Open Access

Human Papillomavirus in Brazilian women with and without cervical lesions

  • Michelle Oliveira-Silva1,
  • Camila X Lordello2, 3,
  • Lucília MG Zardo4,
  • Cibele R Bonvicino1, 3 and
  • Miguel AM Moreira3Email author
Contributed equally
Virology Journal20118:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-4

Received: 10 September 2010

Accepted: 5 January 2011

Published: 5 January 2011

Abstract

Background

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) high-risk (HR) types are the causal factor for cervical cancer and premalignant dysplasia. Data on frequency of HPV types provide a basis to design and evaluate HPV prevention programs. Taking into account the heterogeneity of HPV types across and within populations this study aims to access the HPV frequency in Brazilian women.

Results

We identified 24 different types of HPV, including a Betapapillomavirus and a likely new type, previously reported, from 132 women positive for the virus analysed by Hybrid Capture II assay. These women were infected by a single or multiple HPV types and 142 HPV strains were identified. HR types were found in 75% of women and HPV types 16, 18, 45, 58, and 66 had the highest frequency. Significant differences in frequency of HR HPV types were found for presence of cervical lesions, and for different HPV species and women age.

Conclusions

Compared with previous studies in Brazil, our data indicated differences in frequency and HPV type diversity, a significant association of other HR-types but HPV16 and 18 and cervical lesions, and a trend for distinct distribution of HPV types by age.

Background

Cervical cancer accounts for the third highest mortality amongst cancers in women worldwide, with a higher incidence and frequency in underdeveloped and developing countries [1]. The etiology of cervical cancer, attributed to the high-risk types (HR) of Human Papillomavirus (HPV), has been well established by experimental and epidemiological studies [24]. Due to the discovery of more than 100 HPV types and the association of some types with cancer, pre-cancerous lesions and genital warts [5], a series of assays based on Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification and nucleic acid hybridization were designed for HPV detection. HPV16 and HPV18 are the most types reported, accounting for approximately 70% of all cervical cancers [6] and are also frequent in women lacking cytological abnormalities in different continents [7, 8].

The high frequency of HPV16 and HPV18 in cervical cancer and pre-cancerous lesions lead to development of vaccines against L1 viral capsid proteins of these types [9, 10]. However, the distribution and prevalence of HR-HPV types have been shown to vary among populations worldwide [7, 1113] and also in Brazil [1424], where most of studies were performed in Southeast region, employing different methodologies for HPV detection and typing showing, particularly for HPV18, the largest variation in prevalence [25]. Considering the use of different methodologies for HPV typing, the DNA sequencing is the only procedure capable to recognize all HPV types and variants present in a biological specimen. Despite of direct sequencing is not adequate for the identification of multiple infections, preferentially detecting types over-represented in a sample [26], this method has been used in many studies on HPV prevalence [2730].

Taking in account that the characterization of HPV types will be valuable to implement immunization polices and to monitor the presence of different HPV types, the present study aim to accesses the diversity of HPV types in women from communities of low socioeconomic status of the Metropolitan region of the city of Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

Methods

Study Subjects

We studied women from Duque de Caxias and Nova Iguaçu, two municipalities with low socioeconomic status in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, assisted by the governmental Family Health Program. They had been visited by trained health care professionals and invited to participate in studies for evaluating the efficacy of different methods for detecting cervical lesions [31], and the Hybrid Capture II (HCII) assay for early detection of cervical cancer [32], and also the quality of records on cervical cancer in Brazil [33]. Socio-demographic, cytological data and endocervical samples of these women, collected between December 2001 and July 2002, were used in the present study. Pap tests had not been carried out in any of these women in the last three years before sample collections; they had not been pregnant, had not given birth at least six months before inclusion, have had sexual relation, had not gone through hysterectomy, and were between 25 and 59 years of age. Endocervical samples were obtained using a conical-shaped brush and stored at -20°C in Digene Specimen Transport Medium™ under denaturing conditions. In this present study, only HPV+ women diagnosed previously by HCII assay were analyzed, totalizing 297 women. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Instituto Nacional de Câncer (registration number 19/05).

The conventional cytology results was classified according to the recommendations of Brazilian Ministry of Health and Brazilian Society of Cytology [26], which is based on Bethesda's definition [34].

Extraction, Amplification and HPV DNA Typing

Samples were submitted to pH neutralization step with addition of HCl 1N. DNA isolation was carried out with QIAamp DNA Mini and Blood Kit (QIAGEN, Helden, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions, modified at the elution step that was performed with 30 μL of AE buffer.

HPV DNA amplification was performed by nested-PCR with MY09/11 [35] and GP05/06+ [36] primers, the amplicons were purified with the Illustra GFX PCR and Gel Band Purification Kit (GE Healthcare, UK) before being submitted to direct sequencing, using Big Dye Terminator Kit V3.1 (Applied Biosystems), in a ABI 3730 sequencer at the Genomic DNA Sequencing Platform (PDTIS) of FIOCRUZ [37]. The samples that could not be typed by direct sequencing due to overlap of sequence-peaks were cloned with pMOSBlue Blunt Ended kit (GE Healthcare, UK) and eight clones were sequenced for each patient.

Identification of HPV types was carried out with the Blast software http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi and by phylogenetic analysis within the MEGA 4.0 software [38] applying Neighbor-Joining and Kimura's-2-Parameter (K2P) distance model. Phylogenetic analysis included reference sequences from Alphapapillomavirus. Sequences from Betapapillomavirus and Deltapapillomavirus were used as outgroups. The strength of each node was evaluated by bootstrap test with 1,000 replicates. HPV types were epidemiologically and phylogenetically classified following Muñoz et al [5] and de Villiers et al [39], respectively.

Statistical Analysis

Association between HPV types and cytology results for women with single infection was performed with the χ2 test. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze differences between age at diagnoses and HPV type for all women.

Results

A total of 297 women positive for HCII assay had samples available for DNA isolation and 132 of these had HPV DNA successfully amplified. Despite this, there were no significant differences in respect to the cytological results (ASCUS, AGUS, LSIL and HSIL) and age between women that had HPV DNA successfully amplified and those that not had. The mean age of the 132 women were 39.5 years, ranging from 25 to 59 years of age.

A total of 123 women had the HPV type identified totalizing 142 HPV sequences corresponding to women infected with single, multiple HPV types or by different strains of the same type (GenBank accession numbers HQ834551 - HQ834692). Infections by multiple HPV types or by different strains were found among the 39 women that could not be typed by direct sequencing due to overlap of sequence-peaks and were submitted to molecular cloning and clone sequencing. HPV typing carried out with Blast and confirmed by phylogenetic analysis showed the presence of 24 different HPV types, including HPV17, a Betapapillomavirus often identified in cutaneous lesions [39], and a new likely type previously reported as SW1 [40]. One hundred and twelve women were found to be infected by a single HPV type and 11 showed co-infection, 9 of which by two types and two by three types. Among 132 women that had the HPV type amplified, 63.6% (84/132) had no cervical lesions, 14.4% (19/132) had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS), 9.8% (13/132) had low-grade squamous intraephitelial lesion (LSIL) and 19.7% (26/132) had high-grade squamous intraephitelial lesion (HSIL) (Table 1).
Table 1

HPV type and cytological results of the 132 HPV+ women.

 

Cytological results*

  

HPV type

Normal

ASCUS

AGUS

LSIL

HSIL

No. women

Single Infection

(N = 112)

High-Risk

16

19

3

1

1

6

29

  

18

13

1

1

0

1

15

  

31

3

0

0

1

1

5

  

33

4

0

0

0

0

4

  

35

1

0

0

0

2

3

  

39

1

0

0

1

0

2

  

45

4

0

0

1

4

9

  

53

2

0

0

0

2

4

  

58

5

1

2

2

2

9

  

66

4

2

0

0

2

8

 

Low-Risk

6

5

0

0

1

1

7

  

43

0

1

1

0

1

2

 

Unknown-

17

0

0

0

1

0

1

 

Risk

70

4

1

0

0

1

6

  

74

1

0

0

1

0

1

  

82

1

0

0

0

0

1

  

83

0

1

0

3

1

3

  

89

1

0

0

0

0

1

  

90

1

0

0

0

0

1

  

SW1

1

0

0

0

0

1

Multiple Infection

(N = 11)

Double

16, 66

1

0

0

0

0

1

  

30, 35

0

1

0

0

0

1

  

16, 83

1

1

1

0

0

2

  

18, 83

1

0

0

0

0

1

  

16, 18

1

0

0

0

1

2

  

18, 72

1

0

0

0

0

1

  

16, 45

1

0

0

0

0

1

 

Triple

16, 52, 83

0

0

0

0

1

1

  

6, 16, 56

1

0

0

0

0

1

HPV type not identified

7

1

0

1

0

9

Total

       

132

*ASCUS, Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; AGUS, Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance; LSIL, Low-grade squamous intraephitelial lesion; HSIL, High-grade squamous intraephitelial lesion.

The frequency of HPV HR-types among HPV+ women was 75% (99/132 women), with a highest frequency for HPV16 (28%; 37/132), followed by HPV18 (14.4%; 19/132), HPV45 (7.6%; 10/132), HPV58 (6.8%; 9/132), HPV66 (6.8%; 9/132), HPV31 (3.8%; 5/132) and HPV33 (3.0%; 4/132). Considering only the 84 HPV+ women with normal cytology, we found frequencies of 28.6% (24/84) for HPV16 and 19.0% (16/84) for HPV18.

A significant lower proportion of LSIL and HSIL was found among women infected by HPV16 and/or HPV18 when compared to the ones infected by other HR-types (χ2 test, p = 0.0411). Our data also showed that infection by alpha-7 (including HPV18, 39, 45, 59, 68 and 70) and alpha-9 species (including HPV16, 31, 33, 35, 52, 58 and 67) presented a significant distinct distribution by age at diagnosis respective to women positive for other HPV types (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.0187) (Figure 1). However, separate comparisons among alpha-7 infections, alpha-9 infection, and infections by other HPV types, did not show a significant different distribution by age (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.06).
Figure 1

HPV types and age. Comparison of the distribution of infections by HPV alpha-7 and 9 versus other HPV species and women age. N = Number of HPV strains identified considering single and multiple infections. Bars indicate the mean and standard error of the mean.

Discussion and Conclusions

All cervical samples included in the present study were HPV+ by the HCII assay, which include probes for detection of 18 Alphapapillomavirus types (HR types: HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59 and 68; LR types: HPV6, 11, 42, 43 and 44). However, we identified 12 HPV types (HPV17, 30, 53, 66, 70, 72, 74, 82, 83, 89, 90 and SW1) not included in that set of probes. These findings reinforced previous evidence of cross-hybridizations among probes used in HCII test [4145]. Interestingly, the Betapapillomavirus HPV17 was also identified, a type frequently associated to cutaneous lesions, indicating that probes contained in the HCII test were capable of cross-hybridizing with viruses not belonging to Alphapapillomavirus.

In Brazil, most studies on HPV frequency used as inclusion criteria the suspicion of HPV infection, presence of cervical lesions or cancer. In our study, these criteria were not used, a reason why we compared our findings with studies with similar inclusion criteria [15, 1924]. Three of these studies were performed in Northeast region, two in the same city (Recife), and the HPV frequency reported were discrepant among them and also in comparison with our study. Franco et al [21], carried out a study with 122 HPV+ in João Pessoa city, using dot blot hybridization method for typing and found a lower frequency of HPV45 (3.1%) and higher frequency of HPV33 (13.5%) than here reported (7.6% and 3.0%, respectively). In Recife city, Lorenzato et al [22] analyzing 214 HPV+ women and using PCR/RFLP for HPV typing, found a higher frequency of HPV31 (21.4%) and a lower frequency of HPV18 (2.4%) in comparison with our findings (3.8% and 14.4%, respectively). The third study by Baldez et al [20], also conducted in Recife, analyzed 213 HPV+ women using specific primers for PCR amplification of four HPV types and found a higher frequency of HPV16 (78%) and HPV31 (15.5%), and lower frequency of HPV18 (2.8%) in respect to our data (28.0% of HPV16; 3.8% of HPV31 and 14.4% of HPV18).

In a study performed in Metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro city at the Southeast region of Brazil, Oliveira et al [19] analyzing 82 HPV+ young women (between 14 to 26 years old), using PCR/RFLP for HPV typing, reported a higher frequency of HPV31 (12.2%) than the one found by us (3.8%), and accounting for the second most frequent type after HPV16. In addition, a lower frequency for HPV16 (18.3%) and HPV18 (2.4%) were observed in comparison to our data (28.0% and 14.4%, respectively). In state of São Paulo, also in Southeast region of Brazil, Lippman et al [15], analyzed 135 HPV+ women of 18 to 40 years of age, and employing PCR/RFLP for HPV typing, detected a large diversity of HPV types with lower frequencies for HPV16 (17%), HPV45 (2.2%), HPV58 (4.4%) and HPV66 (2.2%) in comparison to our data (28.0% for HPV16; 7.6% for HPV45; 6.8% for HPV58 and 6.8% for HPV66).

In two studies performed at the South region of Brazil, the first by Krambeck et al [24] in the state of Santa Catarina, using PCR/RFLP for HPV typing, in 29 HPV+ women, and the second by Rosa et al [23] in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, using specific primers for typing HPV16, HPV18, and HPV31, in 179 HPV+ women, reported lower frequencies for HPV16 (17.2% and 18.6%, respectively) than the found here (28.0%). However, the second most frequent types identified in these studies (HPV53 with 10.3% and HPV31 with 15.8%, respectively) were found with higher frequencies than in our study (HPV53 with 3.0% and HPV31 with 3.8%). Furthermore, the HPV18 was not reported in state of Santa Catarina although this type has been found in the state of Rio Grande do Sul with lower frequency (3.3%) than the observed by us (14.4%).

Concerning the 84 HPV+ women with normal cytology, we found a higher frequency of HPV16 (28.6%; 24/84) and HPV18 (19.0%; 16/84) than in a meta-analysis, restricted to women with normal cytology, carried out for South America [7] with 15% and 5%, respectively. In addition, this meta-analysis found a frequency of 7% for HPV58, the second most frequent type, similarly to our sample (6.0%; 5/84) in which this type was the fourth most frequent. These data provide a complementary picture to studies of HPV type distribution in women with cancer or precancerous lesions.

Our results indicated a trend for a higher proportion of lesions in women infected by HR-types other than HPV16 and/or HPV18, indicating that other HR-HPVs must also be considered for further implement appropriate immunization and monitoring policies. Moreover, the considerable difference in frequency of HPV types amongst previous studies (e.g.: ranging from 17.2% to 78.7% for HPV16, and from 0% to 14.4% for HPV18, among HPV+ women), evidences the need to further investigations to improve information of geographical distribution of HPV types in Brazil using standardized methodologies to HPV detection and typing.

Notes

Abbreviations

AGUS: 

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance

ASCUS: 

Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance

HCII: 

Hybrid Capture II assay

HPV: 

Human Papillomavirus

HPV HR: 

Human Papillomavirus of High-Risk for cancer

HPV LR: 

Human Papillomavirus of Low-Risk for cancer

HSIL: 

High-grade squamous intraephitelial lesion

LSIL: 

Low-grade squamous intraephitelial lesion

PCR: 

Polymerase Chain Reaction

RFLP: 

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Ministry of Health (Convênio INCA-FIOCRUZ), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq/Brazil, INCT-573806/2008-0); Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, INCT-E26/170.026/20) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/Brazil). The authors express their gratitude to Vania Reis Girianelli and Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler for concession of samples and Fernanda Pedone Valdez and Hector N. Seuanez for manuscript revision.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
(2)
Universidade Federal do
(3)
Genetics Division, Instituto Nacional de Câncer
(4)
Integrated Service Tecnology in Cytology, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro

References

  1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010, 127: 2893-2917. 10.1002/ijc.25516View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV: The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol 2002, 55: 244-265.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. zur Hausen H: Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nat Rev Cancer 2002, 2: 342-350. 10.1038/nrc798View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Peto J, Meijer CJ, Munoz N: Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999, 189: 12-19. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-FView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Herrero R, Castellsague X, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ: Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003, 348: 518-527.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Smith JS, Lindsay L, Hoots B, Keys J, Franceschi S, Winer R, Clifford GM: Human papillomavirus type distribution in invasive cervical cancer and high-grade cervical lesions: a meta-analysis update. Int J Cancer 2007, 121: 621-632. 10.1002/ijc.22527View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clifford GM, Gallus S, Herrero R, Munoz N, Snijders PJ, Vaccarella S, Anh PT, Ferreccio C, Hieu NT, Matos E, et al.: Worldwide distribution of human papillomavirus types in cytologically normal women in the International Agency for Research on Cancer HPV prevalence surveys: a pooled analysis. Lancet 2005, 366: 991-998. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67069-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Sanjose S, Diaz M, Castellsague X, Clifford G, Bruni L, Munoz N, Bosch FX: Worldwide prevalence and genotype distribution of cervical human papillomavirus DNA in women with normal cytology: a meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2007, 7: 453-459. 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70158-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, Ferris DG, Jenkins D, Schuind A, Zahaf T, Innis B, Naud P, De Carvalho NS, et al.: Efficacy of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004, 364: 1757-1765. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17398-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Villa LL, Costa RL, Petta CA, Andrade RP, Ault KA, Giuliano AR, Wheeler CM, Koutsky LA, Malm C, Lehtinen M, et al.: Prophylactic quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like particle vaccine in young women: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre phase II efficacy trial. Lancet Oncol 2005, 6: 271-278. 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70101-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Castellsague X, Menendez C, Loscertales MP, Kornegay JR, dos Santos F, Gomez-Olive FX, Lloveras B, Abarca N, Vaz N, Barreto A, et al.: Human papillomavirus genotypes in rural Mozambique. Lancet 2001, 358: 1429-1430. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06523-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Naucler P, Da Costa FM, Ljungberg O, Bugalho A, Dillner J: Human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical cancers in Mozambique. J Gen Virol 2004, 85: 2189-2190. 10.1099/vir.0.80001-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bao YP, Li N, Smith JS, Qiao YL: Human papillomavirus type distribution in women from Asia: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008, 18: 71-79. 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00959.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Camara GN, Cerqueira DM, Oliveira AP, Silva EO, Carvalho LG, Martins CR: Prevalence of human papillomavirus types in women with pre-neoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions in the Federal District of Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2003, 98: 879-883. 10.1590/S0074-02762003000700003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lippman SA, Sucupira MC, Jones HE, Luppi CG, Palefsky J, van de Wijgert JH, Oliveira RL, Diaz RS: Prevalence, distribution and correlates of endocervical human papillomavirus types in Brazilian women. Int J STD AIDS 2010, 21: 105-109. 10.1258/ijsa.2009.008436PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernandes JV, Meissner RV, Carvalho MG, Fernandes TA, Azevedo PR, Sobrinho JS, Prado JC, Villa LL: Prevalence of human papillomavirus in archival samples obtained from patients with cervical pre-malignant and malignant lesions from Northeast Brazil. BMC Res Notes 2010, 3: 96. 10.1186/1756-0500-3-96PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Paesi S, Serafini EP, Barea F, Madi SR, Echeverrigaray S: High prevalence of human papillomavirus type 58 in patients with cervical pre-malignant lesions in southern Brazil. J Med Virol 2009, 81: 1270-1275. 10.1002/jmv.21410View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rabelo-Santos SH, Zeferino L, Villa LL, Sobrinho JP, Amaral RG, Magalhaes AV: Human papillomavirus prevalence among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III and invasive cervical cancer from Goiania, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2003, 98: 181-184. 10.1590/S0074-02762003000200003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Oliveira LH, Ferreira MD, Augusto EF, Melgaco FG, Santos LS, Cavalcanti SM, Rosa ML: Human papillomavirus genotypes in asymptomatic young women from public schools in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2010, 43: 4-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Baldez da Silva MF, Chagas BS, Guimaraes V, Katz LM, Felix PM, Miranda PM, Lima AA, Arraes LC, Martins DB, Lima Filho JL, et al.: HPV31 and HPV33 incidence in cervical samples from women in Recife, Brazil. Genet Mol Res 2009, 8: 1437-1443. 10.4238/vol8-4gmr677View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Franco EL, Villa LL, Ruiz A, Costa MC: Transmission of cervical human papillomavirus infection by sexual activity: differences between low and high oncogenic risk types. J Infect Dis 1995, 172: 756-763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lorenzato F, Ho L, Terry G, Singer A, Santos LC, De Lucena Batista R, Lubambo T: The use of human papillomavirus typing in detection of cervical neoplasia in Recife (Brazil). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2000, 10: 143-150. 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2000.00007.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosa MI, Fachel JM, Rosa DD, Medeiros LR, Igansi CN, Bozzetti MC: Persistence and clearance of human papillomavirus infection: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 199: 617 e611-617. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.033Google Scholar
  24. Krambeck WM, Cadide RM, Dalmarco EM, de Cordova CM: HPV detection and genotyping as an earlier approach in cervical cancer screening of the female genital tract. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2008, 35: 175-178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ayres AR, Azevedo e Silva G: Cervical HPV infection in Brazil: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica 2010, 44: 963-974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Vernon SD, Unger ER, Williams D: Comparison of human papillomavirus detection and typing by cycle sequencing, line blotting, and hybrid capture. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38: 651-655.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Asato T, Maehama T, Nagai Y, Kanazawa K, Uezato H, Kariya K: A large case-control study of cervical cancer risk associated with human papillomavirus infection in Japan, by nucleotide sequencing-based genotyping. J Infect Dis 2004, 189: 1829-1832. 10.1086/382896View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee SH, Vigliotti VS, Vigliotti JS, Pappu S: Validation of human papillomavirus genotyping by signature DNA sequence analysis. BMC Clin Pathol 2009, 9: 3. 10.1186/1472-6890-9-3PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore RA, Ogilvie G, Fornika D, Moravan V, Brisson M, Amirabbasi-Beik M, Kollar A, Burgess T, Hsu R, Towers L, et al.: Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in 5,000 British Columbia women--implications for vaccination. Cancer Causes Control 2009, 20: 1387-1396. 10.1007/s10552-009-9365-4PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Zandi K, Eghbali SS, Hamkar R, Ahmadi S, Ramedani E, Deilami I, Nejad HA, Farshadpour F, Rastian Z: Prevalence of various human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes among women who subjected to routine Pap smear test in Bushehr city (south west of Iran) 2008-2009. Virol J 2010, 7: 65. 10.1186/1743-422X-7-65PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Girianelli VR, Santos Thuler LC: Evaluation of agreement between conventional and liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer early detection based on analysis of 2,091 smears: experience at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute. Diagn Cytopathol 2007, 35: 545-549. 10.1002/dc.20699View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Girianelli VR, Thuler LC, Szklo M, Donato A, Zardo LM, Lozana JA, Almeida Neto OF, Carvalho AC, Matos JH, Figueiredo V: Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA tests, liquid-based cytology and conventional cytology for the early detection of cervix uteri cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 2006, 15: 504-510. 10.1097/01.cej.0000220630.08352.7aView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Girianelli VR, Thuler LC, Silva GA: Quality of cervical cancer data system in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Southeastern Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 2009, 43: 580-588. 10.1590/S0034-89102009005000043View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kurman RJ, Solomon D: The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses. New York; 1994.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Manos MMT, Wright DK, Lewis AJ, Broker TR, Wolinsky SM: The use of polymerase chain reaction amplification for the detection of genital human papillomavirus. Cancer Cell Mol Diagnost Hum Cancer 1989, 7: 209-214.Google Scholar
  36. de Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JM, van den Brule AJ, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ: The use of general primers GP5 and GP6 elongated at their 3' ends with adjacent highly conserved sequences improves human papillomavirus detection by PCR. J Gen Virol 1995, 76: 1057-1062. 10.1099/0022-1317-76-4-1057View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Otto TD, Vasconcellos EA, Gomes LH, Moreira AS, Degrave WM, Mendonca-Lima L, Alves-Ferreira M: ChromaPipe: a pipeline for analysis, quality control and management for a DNA sequencing facility. Genet Mol Res 2008, 7: 861-871. 10.4238/vol7-3X-Meeting04View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. de Villiers EM, Fauquet C, Broker TR, Bernard HU, zur Hausen H: Classification of papillomaviruses. Virology 2004, 324: 17-27. 10.1016/j.virol.2004.03.033View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Weissenborn SJ, Hopfl R, Weber F, Smola H, Pfister HJ, Fuchs PG: High prevalence of a variety of epidermodysplasia verruciformis-associated human papillomaviruses in psoriatic skin of patients treated or not treated with PUVA. J Invest Dermatol 1999, 113: 122-126. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00641.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Castle PE, Schiffman M, Burk RD, Wacholder S, Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Bratti MC, Sherman ME, Lorincz A: Restricted cross-reactivity of hybrid capture 2 with nononcogenic human papillomavirus types. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002, 11: 1394-1399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Castle PE, Solomon D, Wheeler CM, Gravitt PE, Wacholder S, Schiffman M: Human papillomavirus genotype specificity of hybrid capture 2. J Clin Microbiol 2008, 46: 2595-2604. 10.1128/JCM.00824-08PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. de Cremoux P, Coste J, Sastre-Garau X, Thioux M, Bouillac C, Labbe S, Cartier I, Ziol M, Dosda A, Le Gales C, et al.: Efficiency of the hybrid capture 2 HPV DNA test in cervical cancer screening. A study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2003, 120: 492-499. 10.1309/XFUCPP6M5XUA94B8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Poljak M, Kocjan BJ, Kovanda A, Lunar MM, Lepej SZ, Planinic A, Seme K, Vince A: Human papillomavirus genotype specificity of hybrid capture 2 low-risk probe cocktail. J Clin Microbiol 2009, 47: 2611-2615. 10.1128/JCM.00278-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Poljak M, Marin IJ, Seme K, Vince A: Hybrid Capture II HPV Test detects at least 15 human papillomavirus genotypes not included in its current high-risk probe cocktail. J Clin Virol 2002, 25: S89-97. 10.1016/S1386-6532(02)00187-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Oliveira-Silva et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.