Early detection of Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV)-specific T-cells before seroconversion in primary varicella infection: case report
© Baiker et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 29 December 2009
Accepted: 6 March 2010
Published: 6 March 2010
Here we report the case of a 54-year old, immunocompetent German patient with primary varicella whose Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV)-specific T-cell responses could be detected early in infection and before the onset of seroconversion. This case demonstrates that the detection of VZV-specific T-cells may under certain circumstances support the diagnosis of a primary varicella infection, as for example in cases of atypical or subclinical varicella or in the absence of detectable VZV DNA in plasma.
Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV) causes varicella during primary infection and may cause herpes zoster after reactivation from latency. Varicella is typically diagnosed by characteristic clinical signs and usually does not require laboratory testing. Due to the introduction of mass vaccination programmes, however, the incidence of typical varicella has declined. This decline has led to a reduced experience of physicians in diagnosing varicella. Furthermore, an increased incidence of atypical and vaccination breakthrough varicella infections has been described [1–4]. For the early diagnosis of cases with severe or atypical varicella rapid VZV identification techniques are indicated to initiate specific antiviral therapy. Serological markers (i.e. VZV-IgM and/or VZV-IgG) are not appropriate for the laboratory diagnosis of early varicella, because they are detectable in a time-delayed manner . Therefore, the method of choice for the rapid diagnosis of varicella is polymerase chain reaction (PCR) out of specimen collected from lesions . Here we report that the rapid diagnosis of an early varicella infection may also be possible by the detection of VZV-specific CD4+ T-cells from peripheral blood.
The development of novel assays for the detection of virus-specific T-cells will contribute to answer a variety of medically relevant questions that could so far not be addressed sufficiently. Among them (a) the diagnosis of a pathogen involvement if serological parameters are impaired, (b) the differentiation between different stages of viral infections, (c) the monitoring of the immune status of immunosuppressed patients after solid organ or bone marrow transplantation, (d) the examination of vaccine efficiency with respect to cellular immunity, or (e) the determination of immune correlates of protection towards a herpes zoster reactivation as indication for zoster vaccination. Here we report that the detection of VZV-specific T-cells may (f) additionally support the rapid diagnosis of an early varicella infection before seroconversion.
As to our knowledge, no systematic comparison between the onset kinetics of seroconversion and occurrence of VZV-specific T-cells within patients at early stages of varicella infection has been performed until today. Seroconversion has been described to appear one to seven days p.r.o. . In contrast, activation of circulating T lymphocytes has been reported to occur earlier, in some patients already during the incubation period [7, 8].
Within our patient, detectable VZV-specific CD4+/IFNγ+ T-cell titers were highest at day two p.r.o. and before the occurrence of seroconversion. At this time, titers of up to 1% of total CD4+ T-cells were detected. Such elevated CD4+ T-cell titers have been described during acute varicella infections . The percentage of VZV-specific CD4+ T-cells is declining steadily over time, reaching levels of ~0.18% (± 0.01) at day six and ~0.064% (± 0.001) at day 15 p.r.o. (Fig. 1). The latter T-cell titers are slightly above those described for VZV-specific memory (<0.01%) . No significant increase in IgG titers could be observed within our patient between day 6 (2.2 IU/l) and day 15 (2.4 IU/l), which could be explained by the early initiation of antiviral therapy at the day of rash onset.
We conclude that the analysis of VZV-specific CD4+ T-cells might support the rapid diagnosis of primary varicella under certain circumstances, as for example in cases of atypical or subclinical varicella or in the absence of detectable VZV DNA in plasma.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BA 2035/3-1 and SPP1230 priority program "Mechanisms of gene vector entry and persistence") to AB, and the Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung (BMBF BioChancePLUS/FKZ: 0315182) to AB, HN, and K-IP is gratefully acknowledged.
- Breuer J, Schmid S, Gershon A: Use and Limitations of Varicella-Zoster Virus-specific Serological Testing to Evaluate Breakthrough Disease in Vaccinees and to Screen for Susceptibility to Varicella. J Infect Dis 2008, 197: S147-151. 10.1086/529448PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- LaRussa P, Steinberg S, Shapiro E, Vazquez M, Gershon A: Viral strain identification in varicella vaccinees with disseminated rashes. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000, 19: 1037-1039. 10.1097/00006454-200011000-00002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hambleton S, Gershon A: Preventing Varicella-Zoster Disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005, 18: 70-80. 10.1128/CMR.18.1.70-80.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chaves SS, Gargiullo P, Zang JX, Civen R, Guris D, Mascola L, Seward JF: Loss of Vaccine-Induced Immunity to Varicella over Time. N Engl J Med 2007, 356: 1121-1129. 10.1056/NEJMoa064040PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arvin AM, Koropchak CM: Immunoglobulins M and G to varicella-zoster virus measured by solid-phase radioimmunoassay: antibody responses to varicella and herpes zoster infections. J Clin Microbiol 1980, 12: 367-374.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cohen PR: Tests for detecting herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus infections. Dermatol Clin 1994, 12: 51-68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arvin AM, Koropchak CM, Williams BR, Grumet FC, Foung SK: Early immune response in healthy and immunocompromised subjects with primary varicella-zoster virus infection. J Infect Dis 1986, 154: 422-429.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diaz PS, Smith S, Hunter E, Arvin AM: T lymphocyte cytotoxicity with natural varicella-zoster virus infection and after immunization with live attenuated varicella vaccine. J Immunol 1989, 142: 636-641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vossen MTM, Gent M-R, Peters KMC, Wertheim-van Dillen PME, Dolman KM, van Breda A, van Lier RA, Kuijpers TW: Persistent Detection of Varicella-Zoster Virus DNA in a Previously Healthy Child after Severe Chickenpox. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43: 5614-5621. 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5614-5621.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Malavige GN, Jones L, Kamaladasa SD, Wijewickrama A, Seneviratne SL, Black AP, Ogg GS: Viral Load, Clinical Disease Severity and Cellular Immune Responses in Primary Varicella Zoster Virus Infection in Sri Lanka. PLoS ONE 2008, 3: e3789. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003789PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.