Open Access

Phylogenetic analysis of Croatian orf viruses isolated from sheep and goats

  • Ivana Lojkic1Email author,
  • Zeljko Cac1,
  • Ana Beck2,
  • Tomislav Bedekovic1,
  • Zeljko Cvetnic3 and
  • Branko Sostaric4
Virology Journal20107:314

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-314

Received: 8 September 2010

Accepted: 12 November 2010

Published: 12 November 2010

Abstract

Background

The Orf virus (ORFV) is the prototype of the parapoxvirus genus and it primarily causes contagious ecthyma in goats, sheep, and other ruminants worldwide. In this paper, we described the sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the B2L gene of ORFV from two natural outbreaks: i) in autochthonous Croatian Cres-breed sheep and ii) on small family goat farm.

Results

Sequence and phylogenetic analyses of the ORFV B2L gene showed that the Cro-Cres-12446/09 and Cro-Goat-11727/10 were not clustered together. Cro-Cres-12446/09 shared the highest similarity with ORFV NZ2 from New Zealand, and Ena from Japan; Cro-Goat-11727/10 was closest to the HuB from China and Taiping and Hoping from Taiwan.

Conclusion

Distinct ORFV strains are circulating in Croatia. Although ORFV infections are found ubiquitously wherever sheep and goats are farmed in Croatia, this is the first information on genetic relatedness of any Croatian ORFV with other isolates around the world.

Background

Genus Parapoxvirus (PPV) has four members, Orf virus (ORFV), bovine popular stomatitis virus (BPSV), pseudocowpox virus (PCPV), and parapoxvirus of red deer in New Zealand (PVNZ). The ORFV is the prototype of the Parapoxvirus Genus and it primarily causes contagious ecthyma in goats, sheep, and other ruminants worldwide. Spread of infection can be by direct contact or through exposure to contaminated feeding troughs and similar fomites, including wheat stubble and thorny plants. The viruses are sometimes transmissible to humans due to direct contact [1].

Contagious ecthyma, also known as Orf, contagious pustular dermatitis, infectious labial dermatitis, scabby mouth, or sore mouth, is present in any part of the world where sheep and goats are raised [2].

The ORFV is an epitheliotropic virus that generally causes proliferative and self-limiting lesions in the skin of the lips, around the nostrils, oral mucosa and sometimes also affects the gums and tongue, especially in young lambs. Lesions can also be found occasionally on the teats of nursing animals and rarely on other organs [3]. Depending on the location of the lesions, animals may be unwilling to nurse, eat, or walk. Primary lesions usually resolve spontaneously within 3-4 weeks [4].

The disease has an economic impact on sheep farmers due to decreases in production and also has a considerable negative effect on animal welfare. In spite of the high morbidity mortality rates of up to 10% and 93% have been reported in lambs and kids, respectively [5, 6].

Parapoxviruses are antigenically and genetically related and have a similar morphology, genomic organization and virulence mechanism [7]. Parapoxviruses are morphologically distinguished from other poxviruses by their ovoid shape, the crisscross pattern on the particle surface, relatively small size and high G+C content of the genome [8, 9]. The ORFV genome consists of linear double-stranded DNA, it is 138 kbp and contains 132 putative genes [9]. The envelope gene (B2L) of the ORFV encodes for a highly immunogenic major envelope protein of about 42 kDa, which is a homologue of vaccinia virus major envelope antigen p37K [10]. The B2L gene has been used for the detection, molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of ORFV [1113].

ORFV infections are found ubiquitously wherever sheep and goats are farmed in Croatia, since 1949, when it was recorded first time [14]. Although outbreaks of Orf have occurred, there were no reports available of the molecular diagnosis, characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the viruses involved.

In this paper, we described the sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the B2L gene of ORFVs from two natural outbreaks of infection: i) in autochthonous Croatian Cres-breed sheep and ii) on small family goat farm. This is the first information on genetic relatedness of any Croatian ORFV with other isolates around the world.

Results

Affected animals from a Cres-breed free-range sheep flock presented typical ORFV mucosal and skin lesions. Ulcerations were presented at the nasal and oral mucosa accompanied with pustular dermatitis and severe yellowish to brownish crust formations on the lip commissures with spread to the muzzle and nostrils, ear tip skin and occasionally trunk skin. Morbidity among the lambs (3 weeks up to 2 months old) and ewes was 100% and 40%, respectively. Mortality due to starvation was recorded in 80% of affected lambs owing to suckling difficulty. Affected animals from a small family goat farm were suffering from typical ORFV ulcerations at the oral and nasal mucosa, and crust formations on doe teats. Morbidity in does and kids were 50% and 100%, respectively; recovery from disease took 3-4 weeks. No human infections were reported during both outbreaks.

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method using primers to amplify part of the ORFV B2L gene was used to amplify a specific fragment (594 bp) from field specimens of affected animals. Sequence analyses of the nucleotide and deduced amino acid of the ORFV B2L gene showed that the Cro-Cres-12446/09 (HQ215589) shared close relationship with other ORFV isolates from different regions (96,5-99.5% and 96,9-100%) and shared the highest homology with NZ2 from New Zealand, and Ena from Japan (99.5% and 100% at the nucleotide and aminoacid level, respectively). Cro-Goat-11727/10 (HQ215588) shared the highest similarity with NE1 isolate from Brazil, HuB from China and Taiping and Hoping goat isolates from Taiwan. The percent identities and diversities of the nucleotide sequence of the B2L gene among the different strains of ORFV were shown in Table 1. Our viruses differ from each other in 8 nucleotides and only two amino acids, on analysed fragment. The deduced amino acid sequences did not revealed any unique substitution.
Table 1

The percentages of identities and diversities of nucleotide sequences of the B2L gene among analysed ORFV strains.

Virus accession no.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

 

FJ808074

 

97,9

97,5

97,7

97,7

98,9

96,7

97,5

94,7

83,1

97,5

97,7

97,7

97,5

97,3

97,3

97,3

97,7

95,5

97,9

1

FJ665819

2,0

 

98,7

99,3

99,7

98,3

97,1

97,7

94,9

84,3

98,7

98,5

98,9

98,7

99,3

99,3

98,5

98,9

95,7

99,1

2

FJ665818

2,4

1,2

 

98,9

98,9

97,9

96,9

97,7

94,1

83,7

99,5

99,3

99,7

99,5

98,5

98,5

99,3

99,7

94,9

98,7

3

EU935106

2,2

0,6

1,0

 

99,1

98,1

96,9

97,5

94,3

83,9

98,9

98,7

99,1

98,9

99,1

99,1

98,7

99,1

95,1

99,3

4

EU327506

2,2

0,2

1,0

0,8

 

98,1

96,9

97,9

94,7

84,3

98,9

98,7

99,1

98,9

99,1

99,1

98,7

99,1

95,5

98,9

5

DQ263305

1,0

1,6

2,0

1,8

1,8

 

97,1

98,1

95,3

83,5

97,9

98,1

98,1

97,9

97,7

97,7

97,7

98,1

96,1

98,3

6

DQ263303

3,3

2,9

3,1

3,1

3,1

2,9

 

96,1

93,7

82,1

96,7

96,9

96,9

96,7

96,9

97,1

96,5

96,9

94,5

97,1

7

AY958203

2,4

2,2

2,2

2,4

2,0

1,8

3,9

 

94,7

83,1

97,9

98,1

97,9

97,7

97,1

97,1

97,5

97,9

95,5

97,7

8

AY453656

5,4

5,2

6,1

5,8

5,4

4,8

6,5

5,4

 

83,1

94,1

94,3

94,3

94,1

94,3

94,3

93,9

94,3

98,7

94,5

9

AY424973

19,1

17,6

18,3

18,1

17,6

18,6

20,4

19,1

19,1

 

83,9

83,7

83,9

83,7

83,7

83,7

83,7

83,9

83,7

83,7

10

AY386263

2,4

1,2

0,4

1,0

1,0

2,0

3,3

2,0

6,1

18,1

 

99,7

99,7

99,5

98,5

98,5

99,3

99,7

94,9

98,7

11

AY278209

2,2

1,4

0,6

1,2

1,2

1,8

3,1

1,8

5,8

18,3

0,2

 

99,5

99,3

98,3

98,3

99,1

99,5

95,1

98,5

12

AB521175

2,2

1,0

0,2

0,8

0,8

1,8

3,1

2,0

5,8

18,1

0,2

0,4

 

99,7

98,7

98,7

99,5

100

95,1

98,9

13

AB189670

2,4

1,2

0,4

1,0

1,0

2,0

3,3

2,2

6,1

18,3

0,4

0,6

0,2

 

98,5

98,5

99,3

99,7

94,9

98,7

14

GU320351

2,7

0,6

1,4

0,8

0,8

2,2

3,1

2,9

5,8

18,3

1,4

1,6

1,2

1,4

 

99,1

98,3

98,7

95,1

98,9

15

HQ215588

2,7

0,6

1,4

0,8

0,8

2,2

2,9

2,9

5,8

18,3

1,4

1,6

1,2

1,4

0,8

 

98,3

98,7

95,1

98,9

16

HQ215589

2,7

1,4

0,6

1,2

1,2

2,2

3,5

2,4

6,3

18,3

0,6

0,8

0,4

0,6

1,6

1,6

 

99,5

94,7

98,5

17

AY453667

2,2

1,0

0,2

0,8

0,8

1,8

3,1

2,0

5,8

18,1

0,2

0,4

0,0

0,2

1,2

1,2

0,4

 

95,1

98,9

18

AY424972

4,6

4,3

5,2

5,0

4,6

3,9

2,6

4,6

1,2

18,3

5,2

5,0

5,0

5,2

5,0

5,0

5,4

5,0

 

95,3

19

AY453654

2,0

0,8

1,2

0,6

1,0

1,6

2,9

2,2

5,6

18,3

1,2

1,4

1,0

1,2

1,0

1,0

1,5

1,0

4,8

 

20

Phylogenetic analysis of parapox virus nucleotide sequences produced the similar branching patterns by both different methods: the Neighbor-joining (NJ) and the Bayesian inference (Figure 1). Posterior probabilities of MrBayes tree (Figure 1) showed good support for the three main parapox lineages: ORFV, PCPV and BPSV. Croatian viruses clustered only with ORFV. The strains of Orf lineage formed two sub-clusters; Croatian isolate Cro-Cres-12446/09 were clustered together with viruses from New Zealand, Japan and Brazil (AY453667, AB189670, AB521175, FJ665818) and Cro-Goat-11727/10 with HuB isolate from China (GU320351), another Brazilian isolate NE1 (FJ665819) and Taiwanese isolate Taiping (EU327506) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic analysis of different parapoxviruses based on the partial nucleotide sequence of ORFV B2L gene. The phylogenetic relationship was calculated using Bayesian Inference analysis. The Cro-Cres-12446/09 and Cro-Goat-11727/10 has accession numbers HQ215589, and HQ215588, respectively. Posterior probability values are shown for all nodes.

Discussion

The ORFV is common in Croatia, but is not reported in the literature because of its low morbidity and minimal economic consequences. Accordingly, immunisation of sheep and goat is not practised. It is usually diagnosed based on pathologic examinations and clinical signs. Although Croatia has a number of sheep and goat farms, Croatian islands and coast are the most representative breeding regions, with 56% from the total number of registered ewes and rams [15]. Cres-breed sheep with multiple production traits (meat-milk) is characteristic for Croatian islands Cres and Lošinj where almost 60% of territory is covered with rocky pastures, karst and poor vegetation.

In our studies we analyzed the nucleotide sequences of a fragment within the B2L gene of ORFV from two natural outbreaks of the Orf, one among sheep in the island of Cres, and other one in goats from continental part of country. The studies on genetic diversity of ORFV existing in the sheep and/or goat population in Croatia were not carried out before. Recent studies on genetic diversity of ORFV strains and isolates from small ruminants were carried out in China [16, 17], India [11, 18], Brazil [19] and Egypt [20].

Phylogenetic analysis of parapox virus nucleotide sequences produced the similar branching patterns by both different methods: the Neighbor-joining and the Bayesian inference. However MrBayes tree was the most accurate tree out of two calculated trees, so we chose it as a reference tree in study (Figure 1). The grouping pattern in which all the parapoxviruses - ORFV, PCPV and BPSV - formed separate clusters was consistent with report of Tikkanen et al. [13]. In the phylogenetic tree, the viruses under study grouped only with ORFV.

Our study demonstrated that Cro-Cres-12446/09 and Cro-Goat-11727/10 are not in same cluster. Cro-Cres-12446/09 is grouped with isolates from New Zealand, Brazil and Japan. Vaccinal and OV IA82 forms a subgroup within this sub-cluster, which is well supported in Bayesian tree (95%), and by the divergence factor (average 1,4) from other viruses in this cluster. Cro-Goat-11727/10 is grouped with isolates from China, Taiwan and Brazil. The first group is sharing two aminoacid sites differ from the second group. Protein sequences variations between ORFV isolates are already detected [9]. These amino acid substitutions among two groups could also be attributed to their separate geographical or evolutionary origin. Since Cres and continental viruses are not in same sub-cluster, the bigger number of available sequences in the GenBank from the neighbouring countries would be of help in explanation of the genetic relatedness of Orf viruses. For that reason it is hard to explain the origin of ORFV on a goat farm. That farm is the only one in that area, and farmers are regularly buying hay from the neighbouring regions. According to the veterinarian in charge, no contagious echtyma was recorded in that region in last 10 years. Concerning to the origin of ORFV in Cres-breed sheep, it is interesting that in 1995, due to devastation of sheep husbandry during the war, Australia and New Zealand contributed sheep to Croatia. Sheep were transported in Croatian region Lika. Unfortunately, we didn't find the valuable data if some of the sheep were actually brought to this island, which is likely because Lika is only 100 kilometres away and sheep farmers from Cres are regularly buying hay in Lika. It is possible that some of the imported sheep were persistently infected when introduced into new herd. Also, the long-lasting and stressed transportation of sheep from Australia could cause disease afterwards, and release of the virus to environment. It is well documented that viruses from Poxviridae family show a high environmental stability and stay contagious over a period of several months in an ambient environment. Their high resistance to drying is even enhanced by materials in which they are released into the environment (e.g., dermal crusts, serum, blood residues and other excretions [21, 22].

We must emphasize that the Cres-breed sheep flock (which is normally held free-ranged) were held in small enclosure before the lambing onset, due to protection from wild boars attacks on lambs. Agglomeration of the entire flock in restricted area leaded to poor husbandry and close contact between persistently infected ewes and lambs which provided pronounced spread of virus. Persistently infected animals showing no clinical disease have been described [23] and it is possible that such animals contribute to the inter-epidemic survival of the virus. Regarding to the sequence similarity with viruses from New Zealand, Brazil and Japan, we could presume the origin of our virus from that part of the world, but not the exact way of its transmission. For the origin of Cro-Goat-11727/10 we can also suggest one of two described scenarios: contamination of hay or persistent infection. As we mentioned before, the bigger number of available sequences in the GenBank from the Croatia's neighbouring countries would be of help in explanation of the evolutionary or geographical origin and genetic relatedness of our ORFVs.

Conclusion

In the present report, we described a severe outbreaks of contagious ecthyma in Cres-breed sheep flock and on small family goat farm and identify the causative agent as an ORFV that is genetically closely related with other ORFV isolates from distant geographical regions. Although Orf is endemic in Croatia, before this report there was no information on genetic relatedness of any Croatian ORFV with other isolates around the world.

Methods

Tissue samples were taken from four lambs found dead originated from a farm of Cres-breed free-range sheep from Island of Cres (coordinates: 44°51' 52" North, 14°23' 67" East). The flock sized 400 ewes and 300 lambs suffering from contagious ecthyma in lambing season from January to March 2009.

Another material was taken in March 2010 from a doe originated from a small family goat farm in continental part of Croatia (Turopolje region) (coordinates: 45°39' 32" North, 15°57' 48" East). The herd sized 16 does and 4 kids suffering from typical ORFV ulcerations at the oral and nasal mucosa, and crust formations on doe teats.

Scabs, formed over the lesions (approximately 3-5 scabs per animal) were collected and 10% suspension in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2, was prepared. DNA was extracted from suspension using the NucleoSpin Tissue Kit (Machery-nagel, Duren, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A set of primers: PPP-1 (5'-gtc gtc cac gat gag gag ct-3) and PPP-4 (5'-tac gtg gga agc gcc tcg ct-3), which amplify the 594 bp fragment was used in this study. These primers were designed by Inoshima et al. [12] based on the previously published sequence of the B2L gene of ORFV isolate NZ2.

The PCR reaction (total volume of 50 μl) contained 100 ng of extracted DNA, 25 μl JumpStartTM REDTaq®ReadyMix TM (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) and 0.20 μM of each primer. Thermal cycling parameters were: initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, then 35 cycles of: denaturation at 94°C for 35 sec, annealing at 60°C for 35 sec, and extension at 72 °C for 45 sec, followed by the final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The reaction products were analyzed by 1,5% agarose gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium-bromide. The PCR products that showed expected amplicon length were considered positive and purified by Exosap (USB, Staufen, Germany). Sequencing was performed in both directions by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea). The partial sequence of the major envelope gene of our viruses Cro-Cres-12446/09 and Cro-Goat-11727/10 were submitted to GenBank with accession numbers HQ215589, and HQ215588, respectively and compared with 18 different parapoxvirus strains including Bovine papular stomatitis virus (BPSV) and Pseudocowpox virus (PCPV). Detailed information of analysed sequences was shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Detailed information about the ORFV used in the study.

Virus

Species affected

Accession number

Country of isolation

Jilin

Sheep

FJ808074

China

NE1

Goat

FJ665819

Brazil

MT05

Sheep

FJ665818

Brazil

Hoping

Goat

EU935106

Taiwan

Taiping

Goat

EU327506

Taiwan

67/04

Sheep

DQ263305

India

82/04

Goat

DQ263303

India

-

-

AY958203

Iran

F00.120R

Reindeer

AY453656

Finland

Bovine papular stomatitis

Calf

AY424973

-

OV-IA82

Lamb

AY386263

USA

Vaccine strain

Goat

AY278209

USA

Ena

Serow

AB521175

Japan

HIS

Sheep

AB189670

Japan

HuB/2009

-

GU320351

China

Cro-Goat-11727/10

Goat

HQ215588

Croatia

Cro-Cres-12446/09

Sheep

HQ215589

Croatia

NZ2

Sheep

AY453667

New Zealand

Tillquist Pseudocowpox

Cow

AY424972

-

D1701

Reindeer

AY453654

Finland

"-": unknown

Comparisons of the obtained nucleotide sequences with those of parapoxviruses available in the Genbank database were performed using the online BLAST program. Sequence identities of nucleotides, as well as those of amino acids, were analyzed using the ClustalX implemented in Mega4 software [24]. The same tool was used to perform Neighbor-Joining (NJ) analysis, based on p-distance. Reliabilities of phylogenetic relationships were evaluated using nonparametric bootstrap analysis [25] with 1000 replicates for NJ analysis. Estimation of the Mean Evolutionary Diversity among our and vaccinal viruses were calculated as percentage of different nucleotides along a 498 nt of analysed segment using the Jukes-Cantor method in MEGA4 [26]. To confirm the obtained data from NJ analysis, another phylogenetic tree was calculated using MrBayes v3.0b3 [27]. In Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis [28] four incrementally heated Markov Chains were run for 1,000,000 generations (ngen = 1,000,000), sampling every 100 generations (samplefreq = 100), where 2500 samples were discarded (burnin = 2500). A consensus tree was constructed from the tree output files produced in the BI analysis using TreeView http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/rod.html.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants No. 048-0481186-1183, 048-0481153-1127, 048-0481153-1150 and 053-0532264-2260 from the Ministry of Science, Education and Sports, Republic of Croatia.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Virology, Croatian Veterinary Institute
(2)
Department of General Pathology and Pathological Morphology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb
(3)
Department for Bacteriology and Parasitology, Croatian Veterinary Institute
(4)
Department for Pathology, Croatian Veterinary Institute

References

  1. Murphy FA, Gibbs EPJ, Horzinek MC, Studdert MJ: Veterinary Virology. In Poxviridae. 3rd edition. Edited by: Murphy FA, Gibbs EPJ, Horzinek MC, Studdert MJ. New York: Academic Press; 1999:277-291.Google Scholar
  2. De la Concha-Bermejillo A: Health Hazards in Veterinary Practice. In Poxviral diseases. 3rd edition. Edited by: Farris R, Mahlow J, Newman E, Nix B. Schaumburg, IL. American Veterinary Medical Association; 1995:55-56.Google Scholar
  3. Vikoren T, Lillehaug A, Akerstedt J, Bretten T, Haugum M, Tryland M: A severe outbreak of contagious ecthyma (orf) in a free-ranging musk ox (Ovibos moschatus) population in Norway. Vet Microbiol 2008, 127: 10-20. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.07.029PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. McKeever DJ, Jenkinson DM, Hutchison G, Reid HW: Studies of the pathogenesis of orf virus infection in sheep. J Comp Pathol 1988, 99: 317-328. 10.1016/0021-9975(88)90052-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gumbrell RC, McGregor DA: Outbreak of severe fatal orf in lambs. Vet Rec 1997, 141: 150-151. 10.1136/vr.141.6.150PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Mazur C, Machado RD: Detection of contagious pustular dermatitis virus of goats in a severe outbreak. Vet Rec 1989, 125: 419-420. 10.1136/vr.125.16.419PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fleming SB, Blok J, Fraser KM, Mercer AA, Robinson AJ: Conservation of gene structure and arrangement between vaccinia virus and Orf virus. Virology 1993, 195: 175-184. 10.1006/viro.1993.1358PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Delhon G, Tulman ER, Afonso CL, Lu Z, de la Concha-Bermejillo A, Lehmkuhl HD, Piccone ME, Kutish GF, Rock DL: Genomes of the parapoxviruses ORF virus and bovine papular stomatitis virus. J Virol 2004, 78: 168-177. 10.1128/JVI.78.1.168-177.2004PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mercer AA, Uedaa N, Friederichs S, Hofmann K, Fraser KM, Bateman T, Fleming SB: Comparative analysis of genome sequences of three isolates of Orf virus reveals unexpected sequence variation. Virus Research 2006, 116: 146-158.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Sullivan JT, Mercer AA, Fleming SB, Robinson AJ: Identification and characterization of an orf virus homologue of the vaccinia virus gene encoding the major envelope antigen p37K. Virology 1994, 202: 968-973. 10.1006/viro.1994.1420PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hosamani M, Yadav S, Kallesh DJ, Mondal B, Bhanuprakash V, Singh RK: Isolation and Characterization of an Indian Orf Virus from Goats. Zoonoses Public Health 2007, 54: 204-208. 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01046.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Inoshima Y, Morooka A, Sentsui H: Detection and diagnosis of parapoxvirus by the polymerase chain reaction. J Virol Methods 2000, 84: 201-208. 10.1016/S0166-0934(99)00144-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tikkanen MK, McInnes CJ, Mercer AA, Buttner M, Tuimala J, Hirvela-Koski V, Neuvonen E, Huovilainen A: Recent isolates of parapoxvirus of Finnish reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) are closely related to bovine pseudocowpox virus. J Gen Virol 2004, 85: 1413-1418. 10.1099/vir.0.79781-0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cvetnic S: Viral Diseases of Animals. Skolska knjiga, Zagreb; 2005.Google Scholar
  15. CROATIAN AGRICULTURAL AGENCY: Breeding of sheep, goats and small animals-annual report 2009, Križevci, 2010, Croatia.[http://www.hpa.hr]
  16. Zhao K, Song D, He W, Lu H, Zhang B, Li C, Chen K, Gao F: Identification and phylogenetic analysis of an Orf virus isolated from an outbreak in sheep in the Jilin province of China. Vet Microbiol 2010, 142: 408-415. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.10.006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang K, Shang Y, Jin Y, Wang G, Zheng H, He J, Lu Z, Liu X: Diagnosis and phylogenetic analysis of Orf virus from goats in China: a case report. Virology Journal 2010, 7: 121. 10.1186/1743-422X-7-121PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Mondal B, Bera AK, Hosamani M, Tembhurne PA, Bandyopadhyay SK: Detection of orf virus from an outbreak in goats and its genetic relation with other parapoxviruses. Vet Res Commun 2006, 30: 531-539. 10.1007/s11259-006-3270-zPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Abrahao JS, Campos RK, Trindade GS, Guedes MI, Mazur C, Ferreira PC, Bonjardim CA, Kroon EG: Detection and phylogenetic analysis of Orf virus from sheep in Brazil: a case report. Virol J 2009, 6: 47. 10.1186/1743-422X-6-47PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahmoud M, Abdelrahman K, Soliman H: Molecular and virological studies on contagious pustular dermatitis isolates from Egyptian sheep and goats. Res Vet Sci 2010, 89: 290-294. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.019PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Livingston CW, Hardy WT: Longevity of contagious ecthyma virus. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1960, 137: 651.Google Scholar
  22. Rheinbaben F, Gebel J, Exner M, Schmidt A: Environmental resistance, disinfection, and sterilization of poxviruses. In Poxviruses. Edited by: Mercer AA, Schmidt A, Webber O. Birkhauser Verlag Basel/Switzerland; 2008:397-405.Google Scholar
  23. Nettleton PF, Gilray JA, Yirrell DL, Scott GR, Reid HW: Natural transmission of orf virus from clinically normal ewes to orf-naive sheep. Vet Rec 1996, 139: 364-366. 10.1136/vr.139.15.364PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S, MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Felsenstein J: Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39: 783-791. 10.2307/2408678View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Jukes TH, Cantor CR: Evolution of protein molecules. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Edited by: Munro HN. New York: Academic Press; 1969:21-132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Bayes Mr: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 2001, 17: 754-755. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Larget B, Simon DL: Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1999, 16: 750-759.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lojkic et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement