Skip to main content
Download PDF

Potent and persistent antibody responses against the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein in recovered patients

Virology Journal volume 7, Article number: 299 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV not only mediates receptor-binding but also induces neutralizing antibodies. We previously identified the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S protein as a major target of neutralizing antibodies in animal models and thus proposed a RBD-based vaccine. However, the antigenicity and immunogenicity of RBD in humans need to be characterized.

Results

Two panels of serum samples from recovered SARS patients were included and the antibody responses against the RBD were measured by ELISA and micro-neutralization assays. We found that the RBD of S protein induced potent antibody responses in the recovered SARS patients and RBD-specific antibodies could persist at high titers over three year follow-up. Furthermore, affinity purified anti-RBD antibodies possessed robust neutralizing activity.

Conclusion

The RBD of SARS-CoV is highly immunogenic in humans and mediates protective responses and RBD-based vaccines and diagnostic approaches can be further developed.

Background

The global outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV), resulted in more than 8,000 cases with a fatality rate of about 10%. Impressively, the rapid spread of SARS-CoV made a great impact on public health and social-economic stability. It is thought that SARS-CoV might originate from its natural reservoir bats and transmit to humans through an intermediate such as palm civets and raccoon dogs, and no one can exclude the possibility of its recurrence [1].

SARS-CoV is an enveloped positive-stranded RNA virus and its "crown"-like spike (S) protein has two major biological functions: 1) mediating receptor (angiotensin converting enzyme 2, ACE2) binding and membrane fusion; 2) inducing neutralizing antibody responses [2, 3]. The S protein was considered as an important target for developing diagnostics, vaccines and therapeutics [4–12]. The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S protein was defined as a fragment corresponding to the residues 318 - 510 of the S protein, which mediates viral binding to cell receptor ACE2 [13–15]. Coincidently, we identified the RBD as a major target of neutralizing antibodies [16–19], and proposed it as an ideal vaccine antigen for clinical application [20–22]. The immunogenicity and protective efficacy of RBD-based vaccine candidates have been evaluated in animal models [17, 23–25]. However, the antigenicity and immunogenicity of RBD in humans need to be characterized in detail toward developing the RBD-based vaccines and diagnostics. In this short communication, we found that patients recovered from SARS developed potent and persistent RBD-specific antibody responses, highlighting the potentials of clinical applications of RBD-based vaccines and diagnostics.

Materials and methods

Serum samples from SARS patients

Two panels of serum samples from the recovered SARS patients were used in this study. The first panel of 35 samples were leftover from the previous study [12], which were collected from the convalescent-phase SARS patients 30-60 days after onset of illness during the 2003 outbreak in Beijing. The second panel of sequential samples were collected from 19 SARS patients, who were enrolled in March 2003 for a follow-up study at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing. All patients were diagnosed as SARS according to the criteria released by WHO and verified to be serologically positive by clinical laboratories. Informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Expression of recombinant RBD proteins

The RBD-His (RBD sequence with a His-tag) and RBD-Fc (RBD fused with human IgG-Fc) proteins were respectively expressed and purified as described previously [16, 23]. In brief, the plasmid encoding RBD-His or RBD-Fc was transfected into HEK293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Culture medium was replaced by fresh OPTI-MEM I Reduced-Serum Medium 12 h post-transfection and the supernatants containing expressing RBD proteins were collected 72 h later. RBD-His was purified by Nickel affinity column (Qiagen), while RBD-Fc was purified by protein A-Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ).

ELISA

The reactivity of SARS serum samples or purified anti-RBD antibodies with recombinant RBD protein was determined by ELISA. Briefly, 1 μg/ml purified RBD-His was coated onto wells of 96-well microtiter plates (Corning Costar, Acton, MA) in 0.1 M carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at 4°C overnight. After blocking with 5% non-fat milk for 2 h at 37°C, diluted samples were added and incubated at 37°C for 1 h, followed by three washes with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20. Bound antibodies were detected with HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at 37°C for 1 h, followed by three washes. The reaction was visualized by addition of the substrate 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and stopped by addition of 2N H2SO4. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured by ELISA Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Total serum IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV were measured using commercially available whole virus lysates-based ELISA kits (BJI-GBI Biotechnology, Beijing, China).

Immunoaffinity chromatography

The immunoaffinity resin for the purification of RBD-specific antibodies was prepared as described previously [19]. In brief, the RBD-Fc fusion protein was coupled to cyanogenbromide-activated Sepharose beads (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) according to the manufacturer's instruction. For immunoadsorption, patient serum sample was diluted 10-fold with PBS and incubated with the RBD-Fc resin overnight at 4°C with constant rotation. Resin was then packed into a 5-ml column and the flowthrough was discarded. After the resin was washed with 10× column volumes of PBS, the bound antibodies (anti-RBD) were eluted in 0.2 M glycine-HCl buffer, pH 2.5. The eluates were immediately neutralized with Tris buffer (pH 9.0). Then, the buffer was exchanged with PBS by several cycles of dilution and concentrated by Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter device (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA). The purified anti-RBD antibodies were sterilized with 0.2-μm pore size microspin filters (Millipore) and the concentrations were measured.

Micro-neutralization assays

SARS pseudovirus system was developed in our laboratory as previously described. In brief, HEK293T cells were co-transfected with a plasmid encoding codon-optimized SARS-CoV S protein (Tor2) and a plasmid encoding Env-defective, luciferase expressing HIV-1 genome (pNL4-3.luc.RE) using Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagents (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Supernatants containing pseudovirus bearing the S protein were harvested 48 h post-transfection and used for single-cycle infection of ACE2-expressing 293T cells (293T/ACE2). Briefly, 293T/ACE2 cells were plated (104 cells/well) in 96-well tissue culture plates and grown overnight. The pseudovirus was preincubated with serially diluted purified anti-RBD at 37°C for 1 h before addition to cells. The culture was re-fed with fresh medium 12 h later and incubated for an additional 48 h. Cells were washed with PBS and lysed using lysis reagent included in the luciferase kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Aliquots of cell lysates were transferred to 96-well Costar flat-bottom luminometer plates (Corning Costar, Corning, NY), followed by addition of luciferase substrate (Promega). Relative light units (RLU) were determined immediately on the Modulus™ II Microplate Multimode Reader (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, CA).

Results

Potent RBD-specific antibody responses in SARS-CoV infected patients

Because our previous studies indicated that the RBD of S protein was a major target of neutralizing antibodies and that the RBD-based immunogens could induce potent neutralizing responses and protective immunity in animal models, we intended to know the immunogenicity of RBD in infected patients. A panel of 35 convalescent sera collected from the SARS patients 30 - 60 days after onset of illness were previously used for mapping the antigenic sites of SARS-CoV [12]. The leftover samples were stored in -80°C and expected to maintain their activities to interact with SARS-CoV antigens. Therefore, we used the purified RBD-His protein as a coating antigen in ELISA to detect RBD-specific IgG antibodies in these SARS serum samples. As shown in Figure 1, all 35 convalescent sera at 100-fold dilutions significantly reacted with the RBD-His protein with an average OD450 value of 1.63. As a control, none of the sera from healthy blood donors was reactive to this antigen. The results demonstrated that the S protein RBD is highly immunogenic in the SARS-CoV infected patients.

Figure 1
figure1

Potent RBD-specific antibody responses in the recovered SARS patients. The convalescent sera from 30 SARS patients and normal sera from 25 healthy blood donors were tested at 1/100 dilution by ELISA with RBD-His protein as a coating antigen. The dashed line represents a cutoff value (the mean absorbance at 450 nm of sera from healthy blood donors plus 3 SDs).

Full size image

Persistent RBD-specific antibody responses in SARS-CoV infected patients

To study the antigenicity and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV in humans, we enrolled a cohort during the SARS outbreak in 2003, and 19 patients were followed-up over three years. The sequential blood samples were collected at month 3, 12, 18, 24, and 36, respectively, after the onset of clinical symptom. All serum samples were tested at 100-fold dilutions for RBD-specific IgG antibodies by ELISA with RBD-His as a coating antigen. In a parallel, total serum IgG antibodies specific for SARS-CoV were also detected using the commercial ELISA kit, in which the whole virus lysates were coated as antigen. The serum samples were diluted at 1:10 according to the manufacturer's instruction. The results are presented in Figure 2. The RBD-specific antibodies maintain relatively higher titers through 3 year follow-up. At year 2 and year 3, only one same sample became undetectable and thus gave a positive rate of 94.74%. However, the ELISA results from the kit showed much low reactivity. Compared to the RBD-based results, the OD values for all samples dropped dramatically at year 2 and 3. Specially, the positive percentage of the year 3 samples was only 42.11% (8/19), suggesting the viral lysate-based ELISA kit had much low sensitivity than the RBD-based ELISA.

Figure 2
figure2

Persistent RBD-specific antibody responses in the recovered SARS patients. The sequential samples were collected from 19 recovered SARS patients enrolled for a follow-up study. The sera were tested at 1/100 dilution by ELISA with RBD-His protein as a coating antigen or by the viral lysate-based diagnostic kit.

Full size image

RBD-specific human antibodies possess potent neutralizing activity

We and others previously reported that RBD-specific polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies had potent neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV infection in vitro and in vivo [16, 17, 26, 27]. We have kept asking whether RBD-specific antibodies are responsible for serum-mediated neutralizing activity. To this end, we purified RBD-specific antibodies by immunoaffinity chromatography from four SARS serum samples selected from the convalescent-phase SARS patients 30-60 days after onset of illness during the 2003 Beijing outbreak. The fusion protein RBD-Fc was coupled to cyanogenbromide-activated Sepharose beads and the serum sample was flowed through the bead column to absorb the RBD-specific antibodies. Figure 3A shows that the purified RBD-specific antibodies from SARS patients strongly reacted with RBD-His antigen. Then, we tested their neutralizing activity against SARS pseudoviruses. Consistently, all the four purified human RBD-specific antibodies potently neutralized infection by SARS pseudoviruses, with an average ND50 of 0.05 μg/ml (Figure 3B).

Figure 3
figure3

Neutralization of SARS pseudovirus infection by affinity-purified RBD-specific antibodies from the recovered SARS patients. Infection of 293T/ACE2 cells by SARS pseudovirus was determined in the presence of RBD-specific antibodies at a series of 2-fold dilutions, and percent neutralization was calculated for each sample.

Full size image

Discussion

The sudden emergence of SARS-CoV shocked the world and impacted the public health seriously. The pandemic was contained under high level quarantines, but its disappearance also raised numerous mysteries to the research community. Even today we know little about its severe pathogenesis and have no effective treatment protocols. In preparedness, we also need effective diagnostic approaches and preventive vaccines.

One of our previous major findings is that the RBD of S protein serves as a main antigenic site that mediates neutralizing antibody responses [12, 16–18, 28–33]. We have clearly demonstrated that the RBD contains multiple conformation-dependent neutralizing epitopes [16, 18] and that RBD-based immunogens can induce potent neutralizing antibodies and protective immunity [16, 17, 23–25, 29, 30, 34]. Based on these observations we have proposed RBD-based SARS vaccines [20–22]. However, our previous studies were primarily based on the animal models. Toward developing a safe and effective RBD-based vaccine one fundamental question is that whether the RBD is immunogenic and functional for neutralizing antibodies in humans. In our ongoing preclinical studies, the immunogenicity of RBD immunogens will be evaluated in non-human primates. In the present study, we firstly investigated the RBD-specific antibody responses in subjects recovered from SARS-CoV infection as an alternative way to evaluate RBD vaccine in humans. With a recombinant RBD protein as an ELISA antigen, we showed that the spike RBD could induce potent and persistent antibody responses in the recovered patients (Figure 1 and 2); with a RBD-Fc fusion protein in the immunoaffinity column, the anti-RBD antibodies purified from the positive human serum samples possessed potent neutralizing activity (Figure 3). Therefore, these data verify the functionality of SARS-CoV RBD in infected subjects and highlight RBD-based vaccines for human application.

The antibody detection is critical for serodiagnosis of SARS-CoV infection, but the sensitivity and specificity of current approaches need to be improved. Although a number of antigens, including proteins or peptides, have been proposed for SARS-CoV serodiagnosis, the first and only serological diagnostic kit in China is based on the viral lysates-derived antigen. Our results also demonstrated that the lysate-based ELISA kit showed much lower reactivity with human positive sera while compared to the RBD-based ELISA (Figure 2). We were not surprised by the kit-based results since similar serological data were previously reported [35, 36]. By using the same brand kit in a follow-up study, Wu et al reported that the average OD values dropped to 0.25 by year 3 and gave a positive rate of 55.56% [35], consistent with the present results. Therefore, the clinical application of the viral lysate-based ELISA kit might be limited by its sensitivity and specificity, and development of novel improved approaches for SARS-CoV serodiagnosis remains to be a priority. The S protein RBD-based methods can be further explored as the RBD specifically mediates receptor-binding and is a major antigenic sites in both animals and humans.

References

  1. 1.

    Li W, Shi Z, Yu M, Ren W, Smith C, Epstein JH, Wang H, Crameri G, Hu Z, Zhang H, et al.: Bats are natural reservoirs of SARS-like coronaviruses. Science 2005, 310: 676-679. 10.1126/science.1118391

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rota PA, Oberste MS, Monroe SS, Nix WA, Campagnoli R, Icenogle JP, Penaranda S, Bankamp B, Maher K, Chen MH, et al.: Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 2003, 300: 1394-1399. 10.1126/science.1085952

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Marra MA, Jones SJ, Astell CR, Holt RA, Brooks-Wilson A, Butterfield YS, Khattra J, Asano JK, Barber SA, Chan SY, et al.: The Genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science 2003, 300: 1399-1404. 10.1126/science.1085953

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Liu S, Xiao G, Chen Y, He Y, Niu J, Escalante CR, Xiong H, Farmar J, Debnath AK, Tien P, Jiang S: Interaction between heptad repeat 1 and 2 regions in spike protein of SARS-associated coronavirus: implications for virus fusogenic mechanism and identification of fusion inhibitors. Lancet 2004, 363: 938-947. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15788-7

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bosch BJ, Martina BE, Van Der Zee R, Lepault J, Haijema BJ, Versluis C, Heck AJ, De Groot R, Osterhaus AD, Rottier PJ: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection inhibition using spike protein heptad repeat-derived peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101: 8455-8460. 10.1073/pnas.0400576101

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Simmons G, Reeves JD, Rennekamp AJ, Amberg SM, Piefer AJ, Bates P: Characterization of severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike glycoprotein-mediated viral entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101: 4240-4245. 10.1073/pnas.0306446101

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Buchholz UJ, Bukreyev A, Yang L, Lamirande EW, Murphy BR, Subbarao K, Collins PL: Contributions of the structural proteins of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus to protective immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101: 9804-9809. 10.1073/pnas.0403492101

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Yang ZY, Kong WP, Huang Y, Roberts A, Murphy BR, Subbarao K, Nabel GJ: A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice. Nature 2004, 428: 561-564. 10.1038/nature02463

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bisht H, Roberts A, Vogel L, Bukreyev A, Collins PL, Murphy BR, Subbarao K, Moss B: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein expressed by attenuated vaccinia virus protectively immunizes mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101: 6641-6646. 10.1073/pnas.0401939101

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bukreyev A, Lamirande EW, Buchholz UJ, Vogel LN, Elkins WR, St Claire M, Murphy BR, Subbarao K, Collins PL: Mucosal immunisation of African green monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) with an attenuated parainfluenza virus expressing the SARS coronavirus spike protein for the prevention of SARS. Lancet 2004, 363: 2122-2127. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16501-X

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    ter Meulen J, Bakker AB, van den Brink EN, Weverling GJ, Martina BE, Haagmans BL, Kuiken T, de Kruif J, Preiser W, Spaan W, et al.: Human monoclonal antibody as prophylaxis for SARS coronavirus infection in ferrets. Lancet 2004, 363: 2139-2141. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16506-9

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    He Y, Zhou Y, Wu H, Luo B, Chen J, Li W, Jiang S: Identification of immunodominant sites on the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus: implication for developing SARS diagnostics and vaccines. J Immunol 2004, 173: 4050-4057.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wong SK, Li W, Moore MJ, Choe H, Farzan M: A 193-amino acid fragment of the SARS coronavirus S protein efficiently binds angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 3197-3201. 10.1074/jbc.C300520200

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Babcock GJ, Esshaki DJ, Thomas WD Jr, Ambrosino DM: Amino acids 270 to 510 of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein are required for interaction with receptor. J Virol 2004, 78: 4552-4560. 10.1128/JVI.78.9.4552-4560.2004

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, Somasundaran M, Sullivan JL, Luzuriaga K, Greenough TC, et al.: Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 2003, 426: 450-454. 10.1038/nature02145

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    He Y, Lu H, Siddiqui P, Zhou Y, Jiang S: Receptor-binding domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein contains multiple conformation-dependent epitopes that induce highly potent neutralizing antibodies. J Immunol 2005, 174: 4908-4915.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    He Y, Li J, Li W, Lustigman S, Farzan M, Jiang S: Cross-neutralization of human and palm civet severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses by antibodies targeting the receptor-binding domain of spike protein. J Immunol 2006, 176: 6085-6092.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    He Y, Li J, Heck S, Lustigman S, Jiang S: Antigenic and immunogenic characterization of recombinant baculovirus-expressed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein: implication for vaccine design. J Virol 2006, 80: 5757-5767. 10.1128/JVI.00083-06

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    He Y, Zhu Q, Liu S, Zhou Y, Yang B, Li J, Jiang S: Identification of a critical neutralization determinant of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus: importance for designing SARS vaccines. Virology 2005, 334: 74-82. 10.1016/j.virol.2005.01.034

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Du L, He Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, Zheng BJ, Jiang S: The spike protein of SARS-CoV--a target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009, 7: 226-236. 10.1038/nrmicro2090

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    He Y, Jiang S: Vaccine design for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Viral Immunol 2005, 18: 327-332. 10.1089/vim.2005.18.327

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Jiang S, He Y, Liu S: SARS vaccine development. Emerg Infect Dis 2005, 11: 1016-1020.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Du L, Zhao G, Chan CC, Sun S, Chen M, Liu Z, Guo H, He Y, Zhou Y, Zheng BJ, Jiang S: Recombinant receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein expressed in mammalian, insect and E. coli cells elicits potent neutralizing antibody and protective immunity. Virology 2009, 393: 144-150. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.07.018

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Du L, Zhao G, He Y, Guo Y, Zheng BJ, Jiang S, Zhou Y: Receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein induces long-term protective immunity in an animal model. Vaccine 2007, 25: 2832-2838. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.10.031

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Du L, Zhao G, Lin Y, Sui H, Chan C, Ma S, He Y, Jiang S, Wu C, Yuen KY, et al.: Intranasal vaccination of recombinant adeno-associated virus encoding receptor-binding domain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike protein induces strong mucosal immune responses and provides long-term protection against SARS-CoV infection. J Immunol 2008, 180: 948-956.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhu Z, Chakraborti S, He Y, Roberts A, Sheahan T, Xiao X, Hensley LE, Prabakaran P, Rockx B, Sidorov IA, et al.: Potent cross-reactive neutralization of SARS coronavirus isolates by human monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104: 12123-12128. 10.1073/pnas.0701000104

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sui J, Li W, Murakami A, Tamin A, Matthews LJ, Wong SK, Moore MJ, Tallarico AS, Olurinde M, Choe H, et al.: Potent neutralization of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus by a human mAb to S1 protein that blocks receptor association. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101: 2536-2541. 10.1073/pnas.0307140101

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    He Y, Li J, Du L, Yan X, Hu G, Zhou Y, Jiang S: Identification and characterization of novel neutralizing epitopes in the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein: revealing the critical antigenic determinants in inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine. Vaccine 2006, 24: 5498-5508. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.04.054

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    He Y, Li J, Jiang S: A single amino acid substitution (R441A) in the receptor-binding domain of SARS coronavirus spike protein disrupts the antigenic structure and binding activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006, 344: 106-113. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.03.139

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    He Y, Zhou Y, Liu S, Kou Z, Li W, Farzan M, Jiang S: Receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein induces highly potent neutralizing antibodies: implication for developing subunit vaccine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004, 324: 773-781. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.106

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    He Y, Zhou Y, Siddiqui P, Jiang S: Inactivated SARS-CoV vaccine elicits high titers of spike protein-specific antibodies that block receptor binding and virus entry. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004, 325: 445-452. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.052

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    He Y, Zhou Y, Siddiqui P, Niu J, Jiang S: Identification of immunodominant epitopes on the membrane protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus. J Clin Microbiol 2005, 43: 3718-3726. 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3718-3726.2005

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    He Y, Zhou Y, Wu H, Kou Z, Liu S, Jiang S: Mapping of antigenic sites on the nucleocapsid protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Clin Microbiol 2004, 42: 5309-5314. 10.1128/JCM.42.11.5309-5314.2004

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Du L, Zhao G, Lin Y, Chan C, He Y, Jiang S, Wu C, Jin DY, Yuen KY, Zhou Y, Zheng BJ: Priming with rAAV encoding RBD of SARS-CoV S protein and boosting with RBD-specific peptides for T cell epitopes elevated humoral and cellular immune responses against SARS-CoV infection. Vaccine 2008, 26: 1644-1651. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.025

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wu LP, Wang NC, Chang YH, Tian XY, Na DY, Zhang LY, Zheng L, Lan T, Wang LF, Liang GD: Duration of antibody responses after severe acute respiratory syndrome. Emerg Infect Dis 2007, 13: 1562-1564.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Cao WC, Liu W, Zhang PH, Zhang F, Richardus JH: Disappearance of antibodies to SARS-associated coronavirus after recovery. N Engl J Med 2007, 357: 1162-1163. 10.1056/NEJMc070348

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National 973 program of China (2007CB512804 and 2010CB530100) and an NIH grant (AI068002).

Author information

Author notes

    Affiliations

    1. State Key Laboratory for Molecular Virology and Genetic Engineering, Institute of Pathogen Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

      Zhiliang Cao, Chao Zhang & Yuxian He

    2. Peking Union Medical college Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

      Lifeng Liu & Taisheng Li

    3. Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, 10065, USA

      Lanying Du & Shibo Jiang

    Authors
    1. Zhiliang Cao
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Lifeng Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Lanying Du
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Chao Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Shibo Jiang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Taisheng Li
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Yuxian He
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding authors

    Correspondence to Taisheng Li or Yuxian He.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors' contributions

    ZLC, LFL, LYD and CZ mainly carried out the experiments and data analysis. SBJ, TSL and YXH conceived the studies and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Zhiliang Cao, Lifeng Liu contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

    Authors’ original file for figure 1

    Authors’ original file for figure 2

    Authors’ original file for figure 3

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Cao, Z., Liu, L., Du, L. et al. Potent and persistent antibody responses against the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV spike protein in recovered patients. Virol J 7, 299 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-299

    Download citation

    Keywords

    • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
    • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
    • Neutralize Antibody Response
    • Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Patient
    • Immunoaffinity Chromatography

    Virology Journal

    ISSN: 1743-422X