Open Access

A novel method for purifying bluetongue virus with high purity by co-immunoprecipitation with agarose protein A

  • Song Zhen1,
  • Dong Changyuan1Email author,
  • Wang Lulu1,
  • Chen Dong-E2,
  • Bi Guoming1,
  • Dai Ming1 and
  • Liu Jun1
Virology Journal20107:126

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-126

Received: 16 February 2010

Accepted: 13 June 2010

Published: 13 June 2010

Abstract

Background

Bluetongue virus (BTV) is an icosahedral non-enveloped virus within the genus Orbivirus of Reoviridae and exists as 24 distinct serotypes. BTV can infect all ruminant species and causes severe sickness in sheep. Recently, it was reported that BTV can infect some human cancer cells selectively. Because of the important oncolysis of this virus, we developed a novel purifying method for large-scale production. The purifying logic is simple, which is picking out all the components unwanted and the left is what we want. The process can be summarized in 4 steps: centrifugation, pulling down cell debrises and soluble proteins by co-immunoprecipitation with agarose Protein A, dialysis and filtration sterilization after concentration.

Results

The result of transmission electron microscope (TEM) observation showed that the sample of purified virus has a very clear background and the virions still kept intact. The result of 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) assay showed that the bioactivity of purified virus is relatively high.

Conclusions

This method can purify BTV-10 with high quality and high biological activity on large-scale production. It also can be used for purifying other BTV serotypes.

Background

Bluetongue virus (BTV) is an icosahedral non-enveloped virus within the genus Orbivirus of Reoviridae[1] and exists as 24 distinct serotypes [2]. BTV can infect ruminant species mainly through the biting Culicoides species [3]. Particularly, it usually causes severe bluetongue diseases (BT) only in sheep and some species of deer. Over the past century, BTV has never shown infectivity on Homosapiens, and no normal human being cells have been successfully infected by BTV [4].

The genome of BTV contains ten linear segments of double-stranded RNA, and each of them codes one of the viral proteins. The virion of BTV has two protein shells with about 850-Å-diameter. The innermost shell is composed of 120 copies of protein VP3 (about 103 KD), which encloses three proteins (VP1, VP4 and VP6) and 10 segments of dsRNA genome, while the outer shell consists of protein VP2 (111 KD) and protein VP5 (about 59 KD). The two shells are linked by 780 copies of protein VP7 (about 38 KD) [5].

Protein VP2, coded by L2 segment, is the major cell adhesion protein [68] and the most variable protein in BTV. It can induce neutralizing antibody in the infected host. On the basis of the antigenicity of protein VP2, all of the 24 serotypes of BTV can be distinguished [9, 10]. Besides, Protein VP5 helps to control the serotype of BTV [11].

Recently, BTV-10 has been reported that it can infect some human cancer cells selectively. The viral dose-dependent cytopathic effect (CPE) can be effectively induced by both virion amplification and virus-induced apoptosis on human liver carcinoma cell line (Hep-3B) and human lung carcinoma cell line (A549), while no visible CPE could be observed or detected in primary human embryo lung fibroblast cell (HEL) even after 5th day post-infection [4]. Another study about an unserotyped BTV, which was isolated from Xiangfan, Hubei province of china in 1990 and named BTV-HbC3, found that it can cause apoptosis on Hep-3B cells and paraptosis on A549 cells [12]. Further more, in the in vivo test this strain can make MA782-induced subcutaneously grown breast adenocarcinoma significantly regressed in mice model [13].

There are many reports about the methods for BTV purification, such as CsCl or saccharose density-gradient centrifugation. But these methods could hardly produce large amount of BTV virions and make BTV somewhat degraded [1416]. We developed an effective method for high-throughput purifying BTV with high bioactivity, which is very helpful for the study of BTV anti-tumor effect since such studies need plenty of BTV with high bioactivity.

Results

Purity and integrity of purified BTV-10 by transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

The photographs from TEM observation showed both unpurified (Fig. 1) and purified (Fig. 2) negatively stained samples. In the photograph of unpurified virus, limited amount of virions can be observed and they were surrounded with a mass of cell debris (Fig. 1A & 1B). On the contrary, the photograph of purified sample revealed the purity and integrity of virus. In fact, the virions can be clearly observed in a clean background; meanwhile, the purified viral particles were still kept intact (Fig. 2A & 2B).
Figure 1

Transmission electron microscopy pictures of the unpurified. The sample was a direct collection of the virus culture on Vero cells. Picture A was photographed by digital camera and the virions were marketed by arrows. Picture B was photographed by film and the virions were marketed by arrows. In picture B, an empty shell was observed. Cell debris was also clearly observed in the two pictures.

Figure 2

Transmission electron microscopy pictures of the purified. Picture A was photographed by digital camera and the virions were marketed by arrows. The two-layer structure of BTV virion was perfectly shown in picture A. Picture B was photographed by film and the virions were marketed by arrows. In picture B, an uncoated BTV virion was observed and was marked by arrow.

Biological activity test by TCID50 assay

The biological infectivity of purified and unpurified BTV was compared by the infectivity curvilinear trend and a TCID50 assay. Fig. 3 showed the process of 50% cells exhibiting CPE as the infected time goes on according to the number of wells, and as the curvilinear trend shown the infectivity of purified virus is similar to the unpurified virus. The TCID50 was calculated at the seventh day when the cells being infected. The TCID50 of unpurified BTV was 106.83 TCID50/ml and purified BTV was 106.42 TCID50/ml under the same conditions.
Figure 3

The activity of purified and unpurified virus. The chart graph shows the process of 50% cells exhibiting CPE as the infected time goes on according to the number of wells. The unpurified virus was used as a criterion to measure whether the purified virus was still active enough. As the infecting days went by, the number of wells appeared 50% CPE was increasing. The curvilinear trend of purified virus is in accordance with unpurified virus, and the wells exhibiting 50% CPE in purified virus per day is slightly less than that of unpurified virus.

Discussion

Nowadays, the research on anti-tumor mediated by virus is a hot field. Several viruses have been reported that they can infect tumor cell lines obviously, such as Reovirus [17] and Newcastle disease virus [18]. Over the past century, BTV has never been reported infectivity on Homosapiens, and no normal human being cells have been infected by this virus. We have studied BTV on anti-tumor for a long time and found that it can infect A549 and Hep-3B cell lines in vitro [4] and MA782 cell line in vivo. However, further study needs a large amount of virions with high biological activities, and current virus purification method can not meet our needs of researching.

This study introduced a novel method for purifying BTV-10 by cell debris co-immunoprecipitation with agarose Protein A. The logic is pulling out all the components unwanted, and then the left is what we want. The whole process can be summarized as three purification steps as well as one condensation and filtration sterilization step. The culture including Vero cells and the nutrient medium, which is used to proliferate BTV, were used as antigen to inoculate experimental rabbits in order to acquire polyclonal antibody. These antibodies containing various components were purified twice and then absorbed by protein A formerly bounded on agarose. At the same time, the culture mixture, containing lysed Vero cells, was centrifuged so as to remove some cell apparatus and big cell fragments. This step is very important and can be regarded as the first step of purification. Then the virus supernatant was mixed with the antibody-protein A-agarose complex. In this second step, molecules and cell pieces, which have antigenicity, have been pulled down mostly, whereas BTV virions still kept in the supernatant. But the second step is still not enough. In the supernatant, there were still a mass of molecules with no immunogenicity and those molecules that having antigenicity but did not induce immune response. So dialysis was needed, as the third step, to remove these ingredients. Thanks to the diameter of BTV particles is 850Å, it is safe enough to use dialysis tubing with 300 KD filtering, which can effectively remove all of the left molecules. After this third step, there were just BTV virions and small amount of microorganisms left. And the final step was the condensation of the virus solution by Polyethylene Glycol (PEG-20000) and sterilization filtration by 0.1 μ membrane filter.

The photographs about TEM observation on purified virus showed clearly that the purified viral particles were intact with a clear and clean background, while the unpurified sample's photographs showed few virions that were surrounded by a large amount of cell debris. This phenomenon means the virions were successfully separated from a mass of castoff.

Biological activity of purified viruses was tested by a TCID50 assay in Vero cells. Compared with unpurified virus, the TCID50/ml of the purified fell slightly. This falling may be caused by filtration sterilization. Considering that mycoplasma, which is a kind of potential pollutant in purification process, can penetrate 0.22 μ filter membrane, and the diameter of filter membrane we used for sterilization is 0.1 μ, which is very close to the diameter of a BTV particle, so as to avoid the purified virus contaminated by mycoplasma as much as possible. Unfortunately, this step may cause virions loss.

The purification process completely focuses on how to remove impurities with no regard to BTV serotypes, which is just like centrifugation method but can avoid physical injury on virions effectively. Thus it can be used for all BTV serotype's purification and we have purified several serotypes of BTV with this method (data not shown).

Conclusions

After the above analysis based on the experiment, a new BTV purification method with high quality and high biological activity was established, and this may significantly push forward the research of BTV on anti-tumor and bluetongue sickness.

Methods

BTV-10 proliferation

BTV-10 and other serotype strains were acquired from China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center. Vero cell line was cultured in MEM (Gibco, USA) with 5% fetal bovine serum at 37°C, 5% CO2. When cells formed monolayer, culture medium was discarded and cells were washed by Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) (50 mM PB, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH7.4) twice. Subsequently, the monolayer of Vero cells were infected with 0.5 ml BTV-10 suspension (105 TCID50/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 2 hours. After that, 6-10 ml MEM with 10% fetal bovine serum was added, and cells were further incubated at 37°C. When 90% cells appeared CPE, the culture mixture was subjected to three rapid freeze/thaw cycles by putting it into liquid nitrogen and 37°C water bath. Then the virus-cell mixture (15 ml) was centrifuged at 5000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C and the supernatant was collected. We took out 5 ml supernatant (virion-cell debris) and preserved it at -20°C as control virus. The left virion-cell debris suspension was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. And then the supernatant was harvested and stored at -20°C. The uninfected cells were cultured in the same conditions as the control, which were used for producing polyclonal antibody either.

Preparation of Antibodies

The Vero cell-culture mixture was subjected to three rapid freeze/thaw cycles by putting it into liquid nitrogen and 37°C water bath. Following ultrasonication for three 1-minute cycles in ice-bath, the cell debris suspension was centrifuged at 5000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Subsequently, the supernatant was used as the antigen injected into experimental rabbits to produce polyclonal antibody.

The first inoculation was performed with 0.2 ml antigen and Freund's incomplete adjuvant (FIA) mixture and BCG vaccine (Bacillus Calmette-Guerin) to final concentration of 10 mg/ml. 2 weeks later, the second inoculation was performed the same dose. Then after 2 weeks, antigen without Freund's adjuvant was inoculated 3 days continuously (once a day) with 0.1 ml, 0.2 ml and 0.3 ml respectively as consolidating immunization. One week later, the blood was collected from experimental rabbits' heart and then the serum was harvested. The first purification of the antibodies was precipitation by saturated (NH4)2SO4. The sediment was resolved in 0.9% NaCl solution and was dialyzed by PBS at 4°C and the dialysis buffer was changed every 6 hours until the (NH4)2SO4 was completely removed. The trace amount of (NH4)2SO4 was checked by BaCl2 solution. Then the polyclonal antibody was further purified by Montage® Antibody Purification K with PROSEP-A media.

Purification of BTV-10 by Reverse Co-immunoprecipitation with Agarose Protein A

2000 μl antibodies (2 mg/ml) were mixed with 3 ml agarose Protein A completely and incubated at 4°C overnight. Then the mixture was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded while the deposit was collected and put into 10 ml unpurified BTV-10 supernatant. The deposit, containing antibodies and agarose Protein A, and BTV-10 suspension was incubated at 4°C overnight. After incubation, the mixture was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C.

Purification of BTV-10 by dialysis

Following the preceding step, the supernatant was transferred into dialysis tubing with 300 KD molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) and was dialyzed by PBS at 4°C for 6 hours, which is one of the cell friendly buffers. Then, the dialyzed solution is concentrated by PEG-20000 and desalted by dialyzing at the same buffer again. This program was repeated 4 times.

Transmission Electron microscopy assay

The purified BTV suspension was sterilized by filtration using 0.1 μ membrane filter firstly. Then both of the purified and unpurified virus suspension were negatively stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid. They were observed by electron microscope to compare the purity and integrity of viruses.

Identification of biological activity of purified viruses

BTV TCID50 assay was used to test biological activity of BTV in Vero cells. Vero cells were cultured in two plates of 96 wells. When Vero cells formed monolayer, in one plate, they were infected with the purified virus suspension formerly sterilized by filtration; in the other plate, the cells were infected with the unpurified virus suspension. Both purified and unpurified virus suspensions were diluted 10 times for six serial dilutions arrange from 10-3-10-8. Each dilution was added to 12 wells with 100 μl/well. Meanwhile 24 wells (F line and G line) of cells of each plate were cultured as the control group. The two plates were placed at 37°C with 5% CO2 and CPE was observed everyday for 7 days. And TCID50 was calculated using Karber formula.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by National Natural Science Fund (No. 30772519).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Lab. of Molecular Virus & Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Virology, Wuhan University School of Basic Medicine, Wuhan University
(2)
Dept. of Epidemiology & Health Statistics, Wuhan University School of Public Hygienics, Wuhan University

References

  1. Pritchard LI, Gould AR: Phylogenetic comparison of the serotype-specific VP2 protein of bluetongue and related orbiviruses. Virus Res 1995, 39: 2-3. 10.1016/0168-1702(95)00094-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Oldfield S, Hirasawa T, Roy P: Sequence conservation of the outer capsid protein, VP5, of bluetongue virus, a contrasting feature to the outer capsid protein VP2. J Gen Virol 1991, 72: 449-51. 10.1099/0022-1317-72-2-449PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Wilson WC, Ma HC, Venter EH, van Djik AA, Seal BS, Mecham JO: Phylogenetic relationships of bluetongue viruses based on gene S7. Virus Res 2000,67(2):141-51. Erratum in: Virus Res. 73 201-2 10.1016/S0168-1702(00)00138-6PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jun H, Dong CY, Li KK, Chen DE, Liang K, Liu J: Selective in vitro cytotoxic effect of human cancer cells by Bluetongue virus-10. Acta Oncol 2008, 47: 124-134. 10.1080/02841860701403038View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Nason EL, Rothagel R, Mukherjee SK, Kar AK, Forzan M, Prasad BV, Roy P: Interactions between the inner and outer capsids of bluetongue virus. J Virol 2004, 78: 8059-8067. 10.1128/JVI.78.15.8059-8067.2004PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Huismans H, Van Der Walt NT, Cloete M, Erasmus BJ: Isolation of a capsid protein of bluetongue virus that induces a protective immune response in sheep. Virology 1987, 61: 3589-3595.Google Scholar
  7. Mertens PPC, Burroughs JN, Anderson J: Purification and properties of virus particles, infectious subviral particles, and cores of bluetongue virus serotype 1 and 4. Virology 1987, 157: 375-386. 10.1016/0042-6822(87)90280-7PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Mertens PPC, Burroughs JN, Walton A, Welby MP, Fu H, O'Hara RS, Brookes SM, Mellor PS: Enhanced infectivities of modified bluetongue virus for two insect cell lines for two Culicoides vector species. Virology 1995, 217: 582-593. 10.1006/viro.1996.0153View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Roy P: Bluetongue virus proteins. J Gen Virol 1989, 73: 3051-3064. 10.1099/0022-1317-73-12-3051View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowley JA, Gorman BM: Cross-neutralisation of genetic reassortants of bluetongue virus serotypes 20 and 21. Vet Microbiol 1989, 19: 37-51. 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90089-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Mertens PPC, Pedley S, Cowley J, Burroughs JN, Corteyn AH, Jeggo MH, Jennings AM, Gorman BM: Analysis of the roles of bluetongue virus outer capsid proteins VP2 and VP5 in determination of virus serotype. Virology 1989, 170: 561-565. 10.1016/0042-6822(89)90447-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen J, Hu J, Dong CY, Liang K, Dai Y, Gao J: Death mode of Hep-3B and A549 tumor cells induced by bluetongue virus strain HbC3. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2007, 29: 505-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Xiang Luo, Changyuan Dong, Shufang Guo: Bluetongue Virus Therapy of MA782 Breast Adenocarcinom a Grown Subcutaneously in Mice. Volume 25. Medical Journal of Wuhan University; 2004:372-379.Google Scholar
  14. Martin SA, Zweerink HJ: Isolation and characterization of two types of bluetongue virus particles. Virology 1972, 50: 495-506. 10.1016/0042-6822(72)90400-XPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Verwoerd DW, Els HJ, De Villiers EM, Huismans H: Structure of the bluetongue virus capsid. J Virol 1972, 10: 783-794.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Huismans H, Els HJ: Characterization of the tubules associated with the replication of three different orbiviruses. Virology 1979, 92: 397-406. 10.1016/0042-6822(79)90144-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Coffey MC, Strong LE, Forsyth PA: Reovirus Therapy of Tumors with Activated Ras Pathway. Science 1998, 282: 1332-1334. 10.1126/science.282.5392.1332PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ahlert T, Schirrmacher V: Isolation of a human melanoma adapted Newcastle disease virus mutant with highly selective replication patterns. Cancer Res 1990, 50: 5962-5968.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement