- Open Access
Crystal structure of AFV3-109, a highly conserved protein from crenarchaeal viruses
© Keller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 21 December 2006
- Accepted: 22 January 2007
- Published: 22 January 2007
The extraordinary morphologies of viruses infecting hyperthermophilic archaea clearly distinguish them from bacterial and eukaryotic viruses. Moreover, their genomes code for proteins that to a large extend have no related sequences in the extent databases. However, a small pool of genes is shared by overlapping subsets of these viruses, and the most conserved gene, exemplified by the ORF109 of the Acidianus Filamentous Virus 3, AFV3, is present on genomes of members of three viral familes, the Lipothrixviridae, Rudiviridae, and "Bicaudaviridae", as well as of the unclassified Sulfolobus Turreted Icosahedral Virus, STIV. We present here the crystal structure of the protein (Mr = 13.1 kD, 109 residues) encoded by the AFV3 ORF 109 in two different crystal forms at 1.5 and 1.3 Å resolution. The structure of AFV3-109 is a five stranded β-sheet with loops on one side and three helices on the other. It forms a dimer adopting the shape of a cradle that encompasses the best conserved regions of the sequence. No protein with a related fold could be identified except for the ortholog from STIV1, whose structure was deposited at the Protein Data Bank. We could clearly identify a well bound glycerol inside the cradle, contacting exclusively totally conserved residues. This interaction was confirmed in solution by fluorescence titration. Although the function of AFV3-109 cannot be deduced directly from its structure, structural homology with the STIV1 protein, and the size and charge distribution of the cavity suggested it could interact with nucleic acids. Fluorescence quenching titrations also showed that AFV3-109 interacts with dsDNA. Genomic sequence analysis revealed bacterial homologs of AFV3-109 as a part of a putative previously unidentified prophage sequences in some Firmicutes.
- Bacterial Homolog
- P3121 Space Group
- Icosahedral Virus
- Archaeal Virus
- B116 Dimer
Studies on viral diversity in geothermally heated aquatic environments, at temperatures above 80°C, resulted in isolation of about two dozens of double-stranded DNA viruses infecting members of the third domain of life, the Archaea . The viruses have diverse unusual morphotypes, not encountered among dsDNA viruses of the Bacteria or Eukarya. Moreover, the detailed analysis of their genomes led to the conclusion that hyperthermophilic archaeal viruses are evolutionarily unrelated to other known viruses, and form a singular group in the viral world with a unique origin, or more likely, multiple origins . Based on morphological and genomic characteristics, these viruses have been assigned to seven novel viral families: stiff, rod-shaped Rudiviridae , filamentous Lipothrixviridae [4–7], spindle-shaped Fuselloviridae [8–10], droplet-shaped SNDV , spherical "Globuloviridae" [12, 13], bottle-shaped "Ampullaviridae" , and two-tailed "Bicaudaviridae" . Three more hyperthermophilic archaeal viruses, the icosahedral STIV , spindle-shaped STSV1  and PSV  have still not been classified.
A most prominent feature of the genomes of hyperthermophilic archaeal viruses is an extremely low number of genes coding for proteins homologous to any sequences in the existing sequence databases, be it proteins of other viruses or those of cellular life forms . A few encoded proteins, functions of which have been recognised and confirmed biochemically, include the dUTPase  and the Holliday junction resolvase  of the rudiviruses SIRV1 and SIRV2 and the integrase/recombinase of the fusellovirus SSV1 . The viruses from different families share a very small pool of genes with putative functions, including predicted transcription regulators, glycosylases, ATPase, as well as small proteins of unknown function from an uncharacterized YddF family . The later protein family has three bacterial representatives in Bacillus subtilis, Clostridium beijerincki, and Alkaliphilus metalliredigenes, with all other members found specifically in archaeal viruses: members of the families Rudiviridae, Lipothrixviridae, Bicaudaviridae and the unclassified STIV . A general presence of this protein in the members of the family Lipothrixviridae has been recently confirmed by its identification in the novel member of this family, the virus AFV3 . The strong conservation of this protein in otherwise very different virus families suggests it may play an important function.
The power of structural analysis in establishing evolutionary relation ships among viruses was recently demonstrated by the structure determination of the major capsid protein of the Sulfulobus turreted icosahedral virus  and by the identification of a potential glysolyl transferase in the same virus . This structure identified a common fold with capsid proteins from eukaryotic, bacterial and mammalian viruses. In absence of sequence similarity with proteins of known function, three dimensional structure is often an efficient approach to bring up strong hypothesis about protein function. With these observations in mind we decided to embark upon a systematic structure determination of crenarchaeal viral proteins . In light of the small sequence resemblance with other proteins, we considered that these organisms might be enriched in novel folds. Secondly, in order to better understand the mechanisms of infection and the very peculiar morphologies, the biochemical function of these proteins must be investigated. We present here the 3D structure of an ORF [gid:3174] product from AFV3, named AFV3-109 as a first result of our archaeal virus structural proteomics project. AFV3-109 possesses a unique fold, close to that of the B116 protein, a STIV ortholog of unknown function whose structure was recently deposited at the PDB (code 2BLK). A glycerol molecule bound to a totally conserved surface patch may be a useful observation for further experimentation. We also found experimental evidence that AFV3-109 binds DNA.
Data collection and refinement statistics
a, b, c(Å)
Total number of refl.
Total of unique refl.
Overall completeness (%)
R.m.s.d. bonds (Å)
R.m.s.d. angles (°)
Ramachandran plot (%)
The considerable contact area between some symmetry related molecules in the crystal packing of both crystal forms suggested that AFV3-109 might be a dimer. Strengthening this argument, identical dimers could be formed from symmetry related molecules in both crystal forms. An r.m.s. deviation of 0.51 Å is observed for all Cα atoms of the two dimers. The dimer association creates a dyad-symmetric ten stranded half β-barrel, forming a curved 10 stranded cradle that enrols the two loops connecting strands β1 and β2 (Figure 1b,c). Dimer formation mainly packs the side of the β-sheet that is covered by loops and involves an extended surface area (1432 Å2), corresponding to 22% of the accessible surface area of the monomer. This important fraction of the accessible surface that is buried strongly suggests that this association corresponds to a biologically significant dimer . We confirmed dimer formation in solution both by gel filtration chromatography and by gluteraldehyde cross linking experiments coupled to SDS PAGE analysis (results not shown).
The dimer is stabilised by three types of interactions. First, the main dimer contact is provided by extended anti-parallel β-sheet formation between the β2 strands from both subunits (illustrated in Figure 1b,c). Secondly, the loop connecting β1 and β2 forms a short anti parallel stretch (residues 8 to 10). Third, some hydrogen bonds are formed between well conserved side chains from the loops connecting β3/α2 and β4/α3. Overall, 24 H-bonds and numerous VDW contacts are observed between the monomers.
Dimer cavity and glycerol binding site
The cradle encloses a big cavity at the centre of the dimer, whose floor is made up by the β1β2 loops that are also involved in dimer formation. This cavity, with an estimated volume of 1950 Å3 is covered by parts of loops L3 (residues 43 to 47, between β3 and α2) and the region comprising residues 81 to 93. Many conserved residues line the cavity (see further), which is filled by well identified waters (about 50 were identified in the 1.3Å structure).
Comparison with STIV B116 protein
A search for structural homologues using the msd server at the EBI (Hinxton, UK) identified the B116 protein of the Sulfolobus turreted icosahedral virus (STIV B116, PDB accession number 2BLK). As illustrated in Figure 1d, the monomers of AFV3-109 and B116 superpose with a r.m.s. deviation of 1.93Å for 93 Cα positions. AFV3-109 and B116 share 37% sequence identity and 55% sequence similarity. Interestingly, B116 crystallized with two copies in the asymmetric unit related by a non-crystallographic two fold axis. The resulting dimer arrangement is identical to that observed for the crystallographic AFV3-109 dimer, strengthening the argument that this arrangement corresponds to a genuine dimer in solution. Despite their identical fold, AFV3-109 and B116 present a marked difference within the long connection between β4 and β5 (comprising residues Leu80 to Gly100). While part of this loop closes the cavity in AFV3-109, it has completely swung out from the centre in the B116 dimer (Figure 1d). The different orientations of this connection in AFV3-109 and B116 are essentially caused by different main-chain dihedral angles in the ultimate residue preceding β5 (Gly100 and Lys109, respectively) that provokes a tilt of the α3 helix in B116 compared to AFV3-109. The residues at the tip of this connecting domain in superposed AFV3-109 and B116 are at a distance of 19.4 Å, while they contribute to dimer contacts in AFV3-109. For instance Gly87 Cα positions of the two AFV3-109 monomers are at 4.3 Å, while for B116 the homologous Gly93 Cα positions from the two monomers are at 37.8 Å. The β4-β5 connection forms the vault of the dome in the large central cavity of the AFV3-109 dimer. Due to its different configuration, this connection in B116 no longer seals the central cavity but rather walls a large groove.
B116 has a few insertions compared to AFV3-109. The first one, 4 residues long, is in the connection between β2 and β3 and results in one more turn in helix α2. The second (2 residues) is in the tip of the long connection between β4 and β5 and is juxtaposed to the best conserved sequence region (see further). This large conformational difference in the connection between β4 and β5 with B116 is obeyed for the two crystal forms of AFV3-109 who superpose perfectly in this region. In absence of clear functional data we cannot be certain whether this connection has intrinsic mobility or whether this is an inherent structural difference between the two orthologs. The B-factors within this connection in AFV3-109 are comparable to those of the remaining part of the structure. In B116 the β4-β5 connection of one of the two monomers present in the asymmetric unit is involved in crystal contacts with a neighbouring molecule. However, both monomers adopt the "open" conformation which therefore does not seem to be dictated by crystal packing forces. We suspect that B116 and AFV3-109 may exist in both the open and closed forms, and that the B116 dimer was trapped in the open conformation.
AFV3-109 belongs to the most prominent clusters of apparent orthologs in crenarchaeal viruses. Besides STIV, homologs are clearly identified on genomes of AFV1, SIRV1/2 and ATV, representing 3 different viral families (Rudiviridae, Lipotrixviridae, Bicaudaviridae). Orthologs of unknown function are also present in a few gram positive bacteria: Bacillus subtilis (yddF), Alkaliphilus metalliredigenes and Clostridium beijerincki. AFV3-109 may be the strongest case of horizontal gene transfer among unrelated crenarchaeal virus families and between crenarchaeal viruses and bacteria. Its strong conservation in the crenarchaeal virus families allows us to analyze amino acid sequence conservation against structural data. Figure 2 shows the sequence alignment of the AFV3-109 orthologs with the superposed secondary structure elements as extracted from the AFV3-109 and B116 crystal structures. The best conserved sequence stretch, centred on His45, is contained within the long connection between β3 and β4. This residue is in close contact with Arg64 which also forms a hydrogen bond with carbonyl oxygen of the conserved Gly44. His45 Nδ 1 is hydrogen bonding with the totally conserved Glu86 carboxylate of the opposing monomer. The totally conserved Arg83 makes a dimer contact by hydrogen bonding with the Ala42 carbonyl group. These latter dimer interactions are absent in the much open form of B116.
AFV3-109 as a transcription factor?
The AFV3-109 dimer has an interesting resemblance with the DNA binding modules (DBM) of transcription factors present in eukaryotic viruses (Figure 1e)[25, 26]. The DBMs of the papilloma virus E2 protein and the Epstein-Barr Virus Origin binding protein EBNA1 can be superposed onto AFV3-109 with a r.m.s. of 3.05 and 2.85 Å respectively (on 40 and 44 Cα positions used in the alignment). The topology of AFV3-109 being different from that of the E2 and EBNA1 DBMs, however, a common evolutionary origin should be excluded. E2 and EBNA1 both bind palindromic DNA sequences by virtue of symmetrically disposed helices, although both proteins use very different strategies [25, 26]. DNA binding modules are usually characterized by strong positively charged surface patches that interact with the negatively charged DNA phosphate backbone. As illustrated in Figure 1g, a strong positively charged surface patch is clearly absent in AFV3-109, which is on the contrary marked by a very negatively charged surface patch situated at the opposite of the dome of the cavity. However, a positive patch is observed inside the cavity, not accessible to outside ligands in AFV3-109 due to the closed configuration of the β4β5 connection. Modelling AFV3-109 in an open conformation based on that of its B116 ortholog (Figure 1h) reveals that the positively charged surface patch becomes available for external interactions. In order to test the hypothesis about an eventual role in transcription, we tested whether AFV3-109 could bind DNA in vitro. As shown by fluorescence quenching titrations, dsDNA binds to AFV3-109 with a Kapp of 5 μM (Figure 3b). The biological significance of this interaction remains to be determined.
AFV3-109 is part of a proviral gene cluster present in some Firmicutes
It was previously recognised that the structural analysis of virus coat proteins might prove extremely valuable to establish evolutionary relationships between viruses that infect various hosts. In this paper we present the crystal structure of the best conserved ORF among crenarchaeal viruses, showing that it has a unique architecture, shared by its STIV ortholog B116. The identification of a highly conserved surface patch on the molecular surface will offer the opportunity to test functional hypothesis through site directed mutagenesis.
Cloning, expression, purification
AFV3-109 was amplified by PCR using genomic DNA as a template. An additional sequence coding for a 6 histidine tag was introduced at the 3' end of the gene during amplification. The PCR product was then cloned into a derivative of pET9 vector. Expression was done at 37°C overnight using the transformed E. coli Gold(DE3) strain and 2xYT medium (BIO101 Inc.). When the cell culture reached an OD600nm of 1, protein expression was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG (Sigma) and the cells were grown for a further 4 hours. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended either in 40 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol (C2221 space group) or in 20 mM Na Citrate pH 5.6, 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol (P3121 space group). Then cells were stored overnight at -20°C. Cell lysis was completed by sonication. The His-tagged protein was purified on a Ni-NTA column (Qiagen Inc.), eluted with imidazole and loaded on to a Superdex75 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), equilibrated against either 20 mM Tris-HCl pH7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol (C2221 space group) or 20 mM Na Citrate pH 5.6, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol (P3121 space group). Selenomethionine-substituted AFV3-109 was produced and purified as the native protein (P3121 space group). The homogeneity of the proteins was checked by SDS-PAGE, and the SeMet labelling by mass spectrometry.
AFV3-109 native crystals were grown from a 1:1μl mixture of protein (8 mg/ml, purified at pH 5.6) with 30% PEG4000, 0.2 M NaAc, pH 4, and from a 1:1μl of protein (16 mg/ml, purified at pH 7.5) with 25% PEG 4000, 0.1 M NaAc, 0.1 M tris-HCl pH 8.8, 15% glycerol. SeMet substituted AFV3-109 crystals were grown from a 0.5:0.5μl mixture of protein (14 mg/ml, purified at pH 5.6) with 30% PEG 4000, 0.2 M NaAc, pH 4. Crystals were grown using the hanging drop method at 20°C. For cryoprotection, crystals were soaked in a mixture of precipitant solution with 30% glycerol. Crystals were then flash frozen at 100 K.
X-ray diffraction data from a crystal of the SeMet substituted AFV3-109 were collected on beamline BM30A (ESRF) at the Se K-edge. The crystals diffracted to 2Å and belong to space group P3121 with one molecule per asymmetric unit, corresponding to 49.5% solvent content. Native data of AFV3-109 from crystals grown at pH 4.0 were collected on the ID14-1 beamline (ESRF) to 1.3Å resolution. Crystals grown at pH 8.8 diffracted to 1.5Å and belong to space group C2221 with one molecule per asymmetric unit, corresponding to 45% solvent content. Data processing was carried out with the program MOSFLM  and scaling and merging with SCALA .
The structure of AFV3-109 was determined using SAD X-ray diffraction data, collected from a Se-Met labeled crystal at 2Å resolution. Three Selenium atom sites were found with the program SHELXD in the 50-2 Å resolution range . These sites were used for phasing with the program SOLVE . After solvent flattening with the program RESOLVE, the quality of the electron density map allowed automated construction of ~90% of the model. This partial model was then refined against the 1.3Å data set with the Arp/Warp program  that allowed automated building of the missing residues. The structure was refined with REFMAC  and the model manually corrected using the Turbo molecular graphics program . All the residues (from Met1 to Gln109 and 284 water molecules) are well defined in electron density map and fall within the allowed regions of the Ramachandran plot, as defined by the program PROCHECK .
The structure of AFV3-109 in space group C2221 was solved by molecular replacement with the structure in P3121 space group using the program MOLREP . At the end of the refinement there was some clear residual electron density for a bound glycerol. Some residual density was present at the same site of the protein in the P3121 space group, but did not allow fitting a glycerol moiety into. Statistics for all the data collections and refinement of the different structures are summarized in Table 1.
Fluorescence quenching experiments
Fluorescence quenching of the single tryptophan in AFV3-109 was measured by using a Cary Eclipse (Varian) equipped with a front-face fluorescence accessory at 20°C, by using 5-nm excitation and 10-nm emission bandwidths. The excitation wavelength was 290 nm and the emission spectra were measured between 300 and 410 nm. Titrations were performed in a 1-ml quartz fluorescence cuvette containing 1 μM protein in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, pH 7.5, and by the successive addition of aliquots of glycerol or dsDNA stock solution. Data were analyzed by plotting the relative fluorescence intensities at 336 nm at increasing concentrations of quencher. Dissociation equilibrium constant (KDapp) values were determined from data fitted to a single exponential equation, by using the PRISM 4 nonlinear regression tool (GraphPad, San Diego).
This work was supported by grant NT05-2_41674 from the Agence Nationale de Recherche.
- Prangishvili D, Garrett RA: Viruses of hyperthermophilic Crenarchaea. Trends Microbiol 2005,13(11):535-542. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.08.013PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prangishvili D, Garrett RA, Koonin EV: Evolutionary genomics of archaeal viruses: Unique viral genomes in the third domain of life. Virus Res 2006,117(1):52-67. 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.007PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prangishvili D, Klenk HP, Jakobs G, Schmiechen A, Hanselmann C, Holz I, Zillig W: Biochemical and phylogenetic characterization of the dUTPase from the archaeal virus SIRV. J Biol Chem 1998,273(11):6024-6029. 10.1074/jbc.273.11.6024PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Janekovic D, Wunderl S, Holz I, Zillig W, Gierl A, Neumann H: TTV1, TTV2 and TTV3, a family of viruses of the extremely thermophilic, anaerobic sulfur reducing archaebacterium Thermoproteus tenax. Mol Gen Genet 1983, 192: 39-45. 10.1007/BF00327644View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold HP, Ziese U, Zillig W: SNDV, a novel virus of the extremely thermophilic and acidophilic archaeon Sulfolobus. Virology 2000,272(2):409-416. 10.1006/viro.2000.0375PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bettstetter M, Peng X, Garrett RA, Prangishvili D: AFV1, a novel virus infecting hyperthermophilic archaea of the genus acidianus. Virology 2003,315(1):68-79. 10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00481-1PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haring M, Rachel R, Peng X, Garrett RA, Prangishvili D: Viral diversity in hot springs of Pozzuoli, Italy, and characterization of a unique archaeal virus, Acidianus bottle-shaped virus, from a new family, the Ampullaviridae. J Virol 2005,79(15):9904-9911. 10.1128/JVI.79.15.9904-9911.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schleper C, Kubo K, Zillig W: The particle SSV1 from the extremely thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus is a virus: demonstration of infectivity and of transfection with viral DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992,89(16):7645-7649. 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7645PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stedman KM, She Q, Phan H, Arnold HP, Holz I, Garrett RA, Zillig W: Relationships between fuselloviruses infecting the extremely thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus: SSV1 and SSV2. Res Microbiol 2003,154(4):295-302. 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00074-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wiedenheft B, Stedman K, Roberto F, Willits D, Gleske AK, Zoeller L, Snyder J, Douglas T, Young M: Comparative genomic analysis of hyperthermophilic archaeal Fuselloviridae viruses. J Virol 2004,78(4):1954-1961. 10.1128/JVI.78.4.1954-1961.2004PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arnold HP, Zillig W, Ziese U, Holz I, Crosby M, Utterback T, Weidmann JF, Kristjanson JK, Klenk HP, Nelson KE, Fraser CM: A novel lipothrixvirus, SIFV, of the extremely thermophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus. Virology 2000,267(2):252-266. 10.1006/viro.1999.0105PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haring M, Peng X, Brugger K, Rachel R, Stetter KO, Garrett RA, Prangishvili D: Morphology and genome organization of the virus PSV of the hyperthermophilic archaeal genera Pyrobaculum and Thermoproteus: a novel virus family, the Globuloviridae. Virology 2004,323(2):233-242. 10.1016/j.virol.2004.03.002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ahn DG, Kim SI, Rhee JK, Kim KP, Oh JW: Ttsv1, a novel globuloviridae family virus isolated from the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeote Thermoproteus tenax. GenBank Accession: NC_006556 2004. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?db=nucleotide&val=56692997Google Scholar
- Haring M, Vestergaard G, Brugger K, Rachel R, Garrett RA, Prangishvili D: Structure and genome organization of AFV2, a novel archaeal lipothrixvirus with unusual terminal and core structures. J Bacteriol 2005,187(11):3855-3858. 10.1128/JB.187.11.3855-3858.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haring M, Vestergaard G, Rachel R, Chen L, Garrett RA, Prangishvili D: Virology: independent virus development outside a host. Nature 2005,436(7054):1101-1102. 10.1038/4361101aPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rice G, Tang L, Stedman K, Roberto F, Spuhler J, Gillitzer E, Johnson JE, Douglas T, Young M: The structure of a thermophilic archaeal virus shows a double-stranded DNA viral capsid type that spans all domains of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004,101(20):7716-7720. 10.1073/pnas.0401773101PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xiang X, Chen L, Huang X, Luo Y, She Q, Huang L: Sulfolobus tengchongensis spindle-shaped virus STSV1: virus-host interactions and genomic features. J Virol 2005,79(14):8677-8686. 10.1128/JVI.79.14.8677-8686.2005PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Geslin C, Le Romancer M, Gaillard M, Erauso G, Prieur D: Observation of virus-like particles in high temperature enrichment cultures from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Res Microbiol 2003,154(4):303-307. 10.1016/S0923-2508(03)00075-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Birkenbihl RP, Neef K, Prangishvili D, Kemper B: Holliday junction resolving enzymes of archaeal viruses SIRV1 and SIRV2. J Mol Biol 2001,309(5):1067-1076. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4761PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muskhelishvili G, Palm P, Zillig W: SSV1-encoded site-specific recombination system in Sulfolobus shibatae. Mol Gen Genet 1993,237(3):334-342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khayat R, Tang L, Larson ET, Lawrence CM, Young M, Johnson JE: Structure of an archaeal virus capsid protein reveals a common ancestry to eukaryotic and bacterial viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005,102(52):18944-18949. 10.1073/pnas.0506383102PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larson ET, Reiter D, Young M, Lawrence CM: Structure of A197 from Sulfolobus Turreted Icosahedral Virus: a Crenarchaeal Viral Glycosyltransferase Exhibiting the GT-A Fold. J Virol 2006,80(15):7636-7644. 10.1128/JVI.00567-06PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goulet A, Spinelli S, Campanacci V, Porciero S, Blangy S, Garrett R, Herman van Tilbeurgh H, Leulliot N, Basta T, Prangishvilid D, Cambillau C: Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffractionanalysis of protein 14 from Sulfolobus islandicusfilamentous virus (SIFV). Acta Crystallograph Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2006, 62: 884-6. 10.1107/S1744309106029150View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J: The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Mol Biol 1999,285(5):2177-2198. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2439PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bochkarev A, Barwell JA, Pfuetzner RA, Bochkareva E, Frappier L, Edwards AM: Crystal structure of the DNA-binding domain of the Epstein-Barr virus origin-binding protein, EBNA1, bound to DNA. Cell 1996,84(5):791-800. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81056-9PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hegde RS, Grossman SR, Laimins LA, Sigler PB: Crystal structure at 1.7 A of the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 DNA-binding domain bound to its DNA target. Nature 1992,359(6395):505-512. 10.1038/359505a0PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Forterre P: The two ages of the RNA world, and the transition to the DNA world: a story of viruses and cells. Biochimie 2005,87(9-10):793-803. 10.1016/j.biochi.2005.03.015PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koonin EV, Dolja VV: Evolution of complexity in the viral world: the dawn of a new vision. Virus Res 2006,117(1):1-4. 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.018PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leslie A: . Joint CCP4 and EACMB Newsletter Protein Crystallography, Daresbury Laboratory, Warrington, United Kingdom 1992.Google Scholar
- Evans P: Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2006,62(Pt 1):72-82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schneider TR, Sheldrick GM: Substructure solution with SHELXD. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2002,58(Pt 10 Pt 2):1772-1779. 10.1107/S0907444902011678PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Terwilliger T: SOLVE and RESOLVE: automated structure solution, density modification and model building. J Synchrotron Radiat 2004,11(Pt 1):49-52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Perrakis A, Morris RJ, Lamzin VS: Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nature Struct Biol 1999, 6: 458-463. 10.1038/8263PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murshudov G, Vagin A, Dodson E: Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Cryst D 1997, 53: 240-255. 10.1107/S0907444996012255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roussel A, Cambillau C: TURBO-FRODO, Silicon Graphics Applications Directory. Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, CA 1991.Google Scholar
- Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM: PROCHECK: a program to check stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1993, 26: 283-291. 10.1107/S0021889892009944View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vagin AA, Isupov MN: Spherically averaged phased translation function and its application to the search for molecules and fragments in electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2001,57(Pt 10):1451-1456. 10.1107/S0907444901012409PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI, Metoz F: ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics 1999,15(4):305-308. 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.4.305PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.