Open Access

Detection of border disease virus (BDV) in goat herds suffering diarrhea in eastern China

  • Wenliang Li1,
  • Li Mao1,
  • Yongqian Zhao1,
  • Yinhua Sun2,
  • Kongwang He1 and
  • Jieyuan Jiang1Email author
Virology Journal201310:80

https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-10-80

Received: 17 October 2012

Accepted: 4 March 2013

Published: 11 March 2013

Abstract

Background

Border disease virus (BDV) is an important pathogen in sheep and goat production. Neither epidemiological investigation nor any reports of BDV infection was available in China. During Jan to Apr, 2012, several herd goats in Anhui and Jiangsu provinces in eastern China suffered unremitting diarrhea, with morbidity and mortality of about 28-37% and 10-15%, respectively. In the present study, sera and tissue samples from diseased goats of four farms were taken for BDV detection, isolation and identification.

Results

Panpesti generic primers and border disease virus (BDV)-specific primers targeting the 5’-UTR region produced RT-PCR positive bands for sera (24/28) and tissue samples (7/30). Twenty positive sera and tissue samples were inoculated onto Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells for virus isolation. Finally, three different strains of BDV, named AH12-01, AH12-02 and JS12/04, were successfully isolated as identified by RT-PCR using 5’-UTR and Npro gene primers, sequencing and electron microscopy. Sequences of 5’-UTR and Npro genes of them were used for phylogenetic analysis and comparison to other reference sequences available in GenBank. The results indicated AH12-01, AH12-02 and JS12/04 possess high relationship with the BDV 3 group viruses and differed with each other.

Conclusion

This is the first detection of BDV from goats with diarrhea and confirmation of BDV infection in China.

Keywords

Border disease virus Goat Diarrhea Phylogenetic analysis Eastern China

Background

Border disease virus (BDV) causes a congenital viral disease of sheep and goats. It was first reported at the border of Wales and England, and is characterized by reproductive manifestations such as barren ewes, abortion, stillbirth and the birth of small, weak lambs that manifest tremor, abnormal body conformation and hairy fleeces[1]. BDV belongs to the genus Pestivirus of the family Flaviviridae, together with bovine virus diarrhea viruses 1 and 2 (BVDV 1, 2) and classical swine fever virus (CSFV)[2, 3]. In some reported cases, BDV also caused mucosal disease-like lesions in sheep[4, 5].

Border disease is usually transmitted by horizontal and vertical routes, and weak lambs can be persistently infected (PI)[6]. Distribution of BDV is worldwide and the prevalence rate varies between countries and regions. Several studies have confirmed the prevalence of BDV in several countries[611]. However, to date, no epidemiological survey has been done in small ruminants (sheep, goat) and there have been no reports of BDV in China.

In this study, BDV was detected by RT-PCR from the serum and tissue samples of diseased goats suffering diarrhea. Virus isolation was performed and confirmed by RT-PCR and sequencing. Three different strains were isolated and phylogenetic analysis was performed based on 5’-UTR and Npro sequences. This is the first report confirming the occurrence of BDV infection in Chinese goat herds, which might contribute to the clinical disease.

Results

Clinical observations

The clinical signs included serious and repeated diarrhea, rough hair-coat, depression, and slow growth (Figure1A, B). Necropsy of the diseased goats (2–4 months of age) showed gross pathological lesions in the alimentary tract. Obvious hemorrhage was observed in the stomach, small intestine and large intestine (Figure1C, D). 4 out of 5 necropsied goats showed slightly or moderate enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes, while no obvious lesions were observed in other organs including lung, heart, liver, spleen, kidney and brain. Gastrointestinal parasites were not found.
Figure 1

Clinical and pathological observations of diseased goats. A. diseased goat showed depression, rough hair-coat and growth retardation; B. goat with diarrhea. The anus and neighboring fur were covered with loose stool; C and D. hemorrhage and necrosis in small and large intestine (black arrows).

RT-PCR detection and virus isolation

As for RT-PCR detection, nearly all sera samples (24/28) and some of the tissue samples (7/30, spleen and lymph nodes, from 4 goats) gave positive results (Table 1). Virus isolation was performed on MDBK cells and 3 serial passages were performed. No CPE was observed. Cell cultures of the first and third passages were examined by RT-PCR and clear bands could be seen (Figure2A). A total of 16 sera and 4 tissue samples were used for virus isolation. Based on the sequence analysis, three different strains were obtained finally and were named as AH12-01, AH12-02 and JS12/04. AH12-01 was isolated from farm A and C; AH12-02 was isolated from farm A and B; JS12/04 was isolated from farm D (Table 1). The nucleotide sequences of 5'-UTR-Npro regions (949 or 952bp) have been deposited in GenBank (JQ946320, AH12-01; KC537788, AH12-02; KC537789, JS12/04). In addition, numerous viral particles with a size of 50-60nm in diameter were observed by electron microscopy (Figure2B). These results suggested the success isolation of BDV.
Figure 2

RT-PCR (A) and electron microscopy (B) detection of isolated BDV virus(only the result of the third passage of AH12-01 was shown). A. lane 1: DNA molecular weight standard DM 2000; lane 2: 5’-UTR RT-PCR products (225bp); lane 3: Npro RT-PCR products (736bp); B. several 50–60 nm viral particles were observed by electron microscopy (black arrows); each graduate in the scale bar represents 50 nm.

Table 1

Summary of the sampling, RT-PCR detection and virus isolation results

Farm

Location

Size

Sera samples Positive/total

Tissue samples Positive/total

Virus isolation

A

Anhui

160

7/8

3/12

AH12-01 AH12-02

B

Jiangsu

180

5/7

2/12

AH12-02

C

Jiangsu

150

6/6

2/6

AH12-01

D

Jiangsu

200

6/7

0/0

JS12/04

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic analysis of 5’-UTR sequences showed that AH12-01, AH12-02 and JS12/04 were closely grouped with the reference Gifhorn strain of BDV3 (Figure3). These strains possessed nucleotide identity of 87.7%-91.5% with each other and they shared 75.7%-90.6% nucleotide identity with other BDV strains (Table 2). The Npro sequences based phylogenetic analysis showed a similar result, with higher bootstrap values (Figure4). AH12-01, AH12-02 and JS12/04 showed lower nucleotide diversity with each other and other BDV strains (Table 2). These results suggest that these three isolates might belong to BDV 3 group.
Figure 3

Neighbor-joining unrooted trees based on the 5'-UTR sequences. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap percentages obtained after 1,000 replicates. Scale bar indicates genetic distance. Our BDV isolates were marked with ▲. The sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis are as follows: U70263, BD31; AF037405, X818; U65052, 137/4; DQ361072, LE31C2; AB122085, Casimir; AB122086, Rudolph; GQ902940, Gifhorn; EF693991, 90-F-6338; EF693989, 90-F-6227; DQ275622, BU-1CRA22; DQ361070, ZA1-1115; EF693995, 93-F-7289; EF693985, 85-F-488; EF693993, 91-F-7014; EF693994, 92-F-7119; AM418427, BDV/Aydin/04-TR; AM418428, BDV/Burdur/05-TR; AF461997, SN1T; AF461996, SN2T; AF462002, 33S; NC_012812, Th/04_KhonKaen; M31182, NADL; EF101530, KE9; AY775178, Shimen/HVRI; X87939, Alfort/187.

Figure 4

Neighbor-joining unrooted trees based on the N pro gene sequences. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap percentages obtained after 1,000 replicates. Scale bar indicates genetic distance. Our BDV isolates were marked with ▲. The sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis are as follows: U70263, BD31; AF037405, X818; AF144618, reindeer; AJ829444, 712/02; AY163653, Gifhorn; DQ273161, LE-31C2; DQ273155, BU-1CRA22; DQ273164, ZA-1CRA1; EF693963, 85-F-488; EF693973, 93-F-7289; EF693971, 91-F-7014; EF693972, 92-F-7119; EU930014, BDV/Aydin/04-TR; EU930015, BDV/Burdur/05-TR; AF462010, Lot21; AY452484, SN1T; AY452485, 33S; AY735486, D32/00_HoBi; M31182, NADL; U18059, 890; AY775178, Shimen/HVRI; X87939, Alfort/187; AF091661, Brescia.

Table 2

5’-UTR and N pro nucleotide identity of isolated strains with other BDVs (BDV1-7)

5’-UTR

Type

AH12-01

AH12-02

JS12/04

Npro

Type

AH12-01

AH12-02

JS12/04

AH12-01

 

-

91.5

90.2

AH12-01

 

-

81.7

81.5

AH12-02

 

91.5

-

87.7

AH12-02

 

81.7

-

81.5

JS12/04

 

90.2

87.7

-

JS12/04

 

81.5

81.5

-

Gifhorn

BDV3

90.2

86

89.4

Gifhorn

BDV3

79.1

79.9

79.5

90-F-6227

BDV3

89.4

87.2

90.6

X818

BDV1

77.2

74.1

73.9

90-F-6338

BDV3

89.8

88.1

89.8

BD31

BDV1

74.9

71.9

73.5

X818

BDV1

87.2

86.8

85.5

reindeer

BDV2

74.1

75.4

73.3

BD31

BDV1

84.3

84.7

81.7

712/02

BDV2

71.5

69.4

71

137/4

BDV1

89.8

86.4

87.7

ZA-1CRA1

BDV4

75.2

71.7

73.5

Casimir

BDV2

89.4

85.5

86.4

BU-1CRA22

BDV4

73.9

71.7

72.3

Rudolph

BDV2

89.4

85.5

86.4

LE-31C2

BDV4

74.1

74.9

74.5

ZA-1CRA1

BDV4

87.2

85.1

86.8

85-F-488

BDV5

74.5

75.8

74.5

BU-1CRA22

BDV4

88.9

86.8

88.1

93-F-7289

BDV5

74.7

75.6

74.7

LE-31C2

BDV4

86.4

86.4

85.5

91-F-7014

BDV6

76.2

76.8

72.9

85-F-488

BDV5

87.7

85.5

87.2

92-F-7119

BDV6

76

77.4

73.1

93-F-7289

BDV5

88.5

85.1

87.2

Burdur/05-TR

BDV7

65.1

67.1

67.4

91-F-7014

BDV6

87.7

84.3

86.4

Aydin/04-TR

BDV7

65.9

66.4

67.1

92-F-7119

BDV6

87.7

84.3

86.4

     

Burdur/05-TR

BDV7

78.3

79.1

75.7

     

Aydin/04-TR

BDV7

79.1

80.4

77

     

Discussion

Distribution of BDV is worldwide and the prevalence has been confirmed in several countries. Most reports have studied BDV in sheep, cattle or Pyrenean chamois[6], rarely in goat . In addition, no epidemiological survey has been reported in small ruminants in China. In this study, three different BDV strains were detected from goat herds suffering intractable diarrhea.

Both BVDV and BDV infect cattle, sheep, goats, and many other wild ruminants and pigs. But in clinical conditions, BVDV is mostly found in cattle, whereas both BDV and BVDV can be isolated from sheep[12]. In this study, BVDV infection was firstly considered and detected by using RT-PCR with the panpesti generic primers. Sequencing the RT-PCR products resulted in the detection of BDV, as further confirmed with BDV isolation. Infections of pestivirus can vary from subclinical to clinical signs such as fever, diarrhea, hemorrhagic syndrome, death and abortion. No classical symptoms (abortion, stillbirth and the birth of small, weak lambs) were observed in tested goat herds; only diarrhea and alimentary tract lesions were the major clinical and pathologic signs. Barlow et al., Monies et al. and Chalmers et al. have reported that BDV caused mucosal disease-like lesions in sheep, which was characterized by unremitting diarrhea[4, 5, 13]. Few studies have done for BDV infection in goat herds[1416]; and no diarrhea related report was available. In these cases, the development of clinical disease might be multifactoral. Detection of other diarrhea related viruses and bacteriological examinations have not been performed yet. So BDV infection might be one of the pathogenic factors causing the diarrhea of the goats here. In order to determine the pathogenicity of BDV isolates on goats, especially for diarrhea, animal infection experiments should be done.

The genetic diversity of BDV is greater than that reported for other pestivirus species. BDV have been divided into six groups: BDV 1–6[10]. Several isolates from Tunisian[17] and Turkey[1] represented new groups. Based on sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis, the strains isolated in this study showed 75.7%-90.6% and 65.1%-79.9% nucleotide identities with other 5’-UTR and Npro sequences (BDV1-7), indicating the high diversity of different BDV genotypes and the potential variation of Chinese BDV strains.

BDV infection has not yet been reported in China, and no study has been performed on the epidemiology of BDV. In this study, BDV was detected from different farms in different region and the virus infection was confirmed by RT-PCR, virus isolation and electron microscopy. Three strains were isolated from four farms. AH12-01 and AH12-02 were detected in two farms; and farm A was infected with both AH12-01 and AH12-02 strains (Table 1), suggesting the complicated epidemic situation. At present the origin of the virus is unknown. It may have existed in the Chinese goat herd for some time without being noticed or other possibilities of virus introduction. All these results highlight the need for serological assay development to explore the prevalence of BDV in China both in etiologic and serological levels. More samples from different herds in Jiangsu, Anhui provinces as well as more provinces of China are under collection in our lab for epidemiological survey and we hope the results may help us understand the origin and prevalence status of BDV in China.

Conclusions

BDV infection was confirmed in goat herds suffering intractable diarrhea by virus isolation, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. This is the first report of BDV prevalence in Chinese goat herds.

Methods

Cases and sampling

From Jan to Apr 2012, goats of four farms in Anhui and Jiangsu provinces (one in Anhui (farm A), three in Jiangsu (farm B, C, D)) in eastern China suffered severe and unremitting diarrhea, with morbidity and mortality of about 28-37% and 10-15%, respectively. These four goat herds were fattening farms, which purchase weaning goats from several small backyard farms for fatten until slaughter time. Herds size ranged between 150 and 200 animals. Diarrhea was observed for previous batches, but was not such severe and most of the diseased goats recovered after treatment with antibiotics. The goats were vaccinated against goatpox virus, Clostridium septicum, Clostridium welchii and Clostridium novyi. In this present case, several kinds of antibiotics were used, but did not have any positive effect. Twenty eight sera samples from 28 diseased goats (farm A: 8, B: 7, C: 6, D: 7) and 30 tissue samples (brain, liver, lung, spleen, kidney and mesenteric lymph nodes) from 5 necropsied goats (farm A: 2, B: 2, C: 1) were taken and stored at −70°C for RT-PCR and virus isolation (Table 1).

Ethical approval

The collection of sera and tissues samples was performed in strict accordance with the guidelines of Jiangsu Province Animal Regulations (Government Decree No 45).

RT-PCR

Viral RNA was extracted from sera and tissues samples using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Reverse transcription was performed for 1 h at 42°C in a mixture including 8 μl total RNA, 1 μl EasyScript RT/RI Enzyme Mix, (Transgen, Bio, Inc.)1 μl reverse primer and 10 μl 2×ES buffer. PCR amplification (Transgen, Bio, Inc.) was carried out in a 50 μl reaction mixture containing 1× PCR buffer, 0.2 mM of dNTPs, 20 pM of each primer (panpesti generic primers and BDV specific primers PBD1/PBD2 targeting 5’-UTR, with expected product sizes of 290bp and 225bp, respectively)[8, 18], 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Transgen, Bio, Inc.) and 4 μl of cDNA. The reaction was run in a thermocycler (Mjmini, BIO-RAD) with the following program: denaturation at 94°C for 5min, 35 cycles composed of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 54°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 45s, and was terminated with a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. Amplification products were detected by electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose gels.

Virus isolation

Positive tissue samples were homogenized in 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), and then frozen and thawed 3 times. After centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 20 min, the supernatant was filtered through 0.22 μm filter (Millipore) and inoculated onto Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cell monolayers. Positive sera samples were used for inoculation directly after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 20 min. The MDBK cultures were observed for 5 days. Cell cultures were harvested and passaged 2 more times. Each viral stock was stored at −70°C for RT-PCR detection. Virus isolation was confirmed by RT-PCR using primers PBD1/PBD2 and primers targeting the Npro gene (320F/1040R, with RT-PCR product of 736bp)[8, 12].

Electron microscopy

MDBK cells were infected with the 3rd viral passage stock. A total of 200 ml virus stock was harvested. Cell debris was removed by low speed centrifugation (8,000×g for 0.5 h) and the supernatants were ultracentrifuged at 60,000×g for 2 h. The resulting pellet was dissolved in PBS and stained with phosphotungstic acid (PTA), blotted dry, and examined with an electron microscope (H-7650, HITACHI).

Gene clone, sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

The 290bp 5’-UTR and the 736bp Npro gene fragments of the isolates were amplified, purified with a DNA purification kit (Axygen Bio, Inc.), cloned into pMD18-T vector (Takara Bio, Inc.), and transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells. Positive plasmids were confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis and sequencing. Each sequence of the PCR products was determined for both DNA strands by sequencing.

The nucleotide sequences were edited by Editseq (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI) to obtain ≈950bp 5’-UTR-Npro sequences by deleting the overlap region. Multiple sequence alignment was done by using Clustal X 1.83[19] and MegAlign (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI), together with other representative sequences. The 225bp 5’-UTR fragments (PBD1/PBD2 product) and 487bp Npro gene (corresponding to 394-880bp of Gifhorn genome) sequences were used for the analysis, respectively. After determining the percentages of sequence identity among different BDV and other pestivirus strains (CSFV, BVDV-1, BVDV-2, and atypical pestivirus), the phylogenetic tree was generated with the distance-based neighbor-joining (NJ) method by using MEGA 4.0.2 software[20]. The robustness of the phylogenetic tree was determined by bootstrap resampling analysis carried out on 1000 replicates.

Abbreviations

BDV: 

Border Disease Virus

BVDV: 

Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus

CPE: 

Cytopathic Effects

CSFV: 

Classical Swine Fever Virus

MDBK: 

Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney

PCR: 

Polymerase Chain Reaction

PI: 

Persistently Infected

5’-UTR: 

5’-untranslated region.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Special Fund for Independent innovation of Agricultural Science and Technology in Jiangsu province (SCX(12)3143). We thank Dr. Kevin Coombs (Professor, Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Canada) for his proof reading of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences; Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biological Engineering and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture; National Center for Engineering Research of Veterinary Bio-products
(2)
Hai’an animal husbandry and veterinary station

References

  1. Oguzoglu TC, Tan MT, Toplu N, Demir AB, Bilge-Dagalp S, Karaoglu T, Ozkul A, Alkan F, Burgu I, Haas L, Greiser-Wilke I: Border disease virus (BDV) infections of small ruminants in Turkey: a new BDV subgroup? Vet Microbiol 2009, 135: 374-379. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.085PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Peterhans E, Schweizer M: Pestiviruses: how to outmaneuver your hosts. Vet Microbiol 2010, 142: 18-25. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.038PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Becher P, Orlich M, Thiel HJ: Complete genomic sequence of border disease virus, a pestivirus from sheep. J Virol 1998, 72: 5165-5173.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow RM, Gardiner AC, Nettleton PF: The pathology of a spontaneous and experimental mucosal disease-like syndrome in sheep recovered from clinical border disease. J Comp Pathol 1983, 93: 451-461. 10.1016/0021-9975(83)90032-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Monies RJ, Paton DJ, Vilcek S: Mucosal disease-like lesions in sheep infected with Border disease virus. Vet Rec 2004, 155: 765-769.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabezon O, Rosell R, Velarde R, Mentaberre G, Casas-Diaz E, Lavin S, Marco I: Border disease virus shedding and detection in naturally infected Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica). J Vet Diagn Invest 2010, 22: 744-747. 10.1177/104063871002200514PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Giangaspero M, Ibata G, Savini G, Osawa T, Tatami S, Takagi E, Moriya H, Okura N, Kimura A, Harasawa R: Epidemiological survey of Border disease virus among sheep from northern districts of Japan. J Vet Med Sci 2011, 73: 1629-1633. 10.1292/jvms.11-0072PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Albayrak H, Gumusova SO, Ozan E, Yazici Z: Molecular detection of pestiviruses in aborted foetuses from provinces in northern Turkey. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012, 44: 677-680. 10.1007/s11250-011-9955-5PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. McFadden A, Tisdall D, Hill F, Otterson P, Pulford D, Peake J, Finnegan C, La Rocca S, Kok-Mun T, Weir A: The first case of a bull persistently infected with Border disease virus in New Zealand. N Z Vet J 2012, 60: 290-296. 10.1080/00480169.2012.675568PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubois E, Russo P, Prigent M, Thiery R: Genetic characterization of ovine pestiviruses isolated in France, between 1985 and 2006. Vet Microbiol 2008, 130: 69-79. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.01.002PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Vilcek S, Nettleton PF, Paton DJ, Belak S: Molecular characterization of ovine pestiviruses. J Gen Virol 1997, 78: 725-735.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Strong R, La Rocca SA, Ibata G, Sandvik T: Antigenic and genetic characterisation of border disease viruses isolated from UK cattle. Vet Microbiol 2010, 141: 208-215. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.010PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Chalmers GA, Nation PN, Pritchard J: Border disease - a cause of terminal ileitis in lambs? Can Vet J 1990, 31: 611.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Krametter-Froetscher R, Duenser M, Preyler B, Theiner A, Benetka V, Moestl K, Baumgartner W: Pestivirus infection in sheep and goats in West Austria. Vet J 2010, 186: 342-346. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.09.006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Toplu N, Oguzoglu TÇ, Epikmen ET, Aydogan A: Neuropathologic study of border disease virus in naturally infected fetal and neonatal small ruminants and its association with apoptosis. Vet Pathol 2011, 48: 576-583. 10.1177/0300985810371309PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pratelli A, Martella V, Cirone F, Buonavoglia D, Elia G, Tempesta M, Buonavoglia C: Genomic characterization of pestiviruses isolated from lambs and kids in southern Italy. J Virol Methods 2001, 94: 81-85. 10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00277-4PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Thabti F, Letellier C, Hammami S, Pepin M, Ribiere M, Mesplede A, Kerkhofs P, Russo P: Detection of a novel border disease virus subgroup in Tunisian sheep. Arch Virol 2005, 150: 215-229. 10.1007/s00705-004-0427-3PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Vilcek SHA, Herring JA, Nettleton PF, Lowings JP, Paton DJ: Pestiviruses isolated from pigs, cattle and sheep can be allocated into at least three genogroups using polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis. Arch Virol 1994, 136: 309-323. 10.1007/BF01321060PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25: 4876-4882. 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement