|  | PROLIFERATION | ELISPOT |
---|
VOLUNTEERS | CORE | NS3 | CEF | CORE | NS3 | CEF |
---|
No risk | All | 2/61 (3)4 | 4/62 (6) | 24/62 (39) | 8/65 (12) | 0/59 (0) | 31/58 (53) |
UI
1
| No risk | 1/29 (3) | 1/30 (3) | 10/30 (33) | 4/33 (12) | 0/29 (0) | 13/28 (46) |
 | At risk | 1/32 (3) | 3/32 (9) | 14/32 (44) | 4/32 (13) | 0/30 (0) | 18/30 (60) |
EUI
2
| 0/17 (0) | 0/17 (0) | 5/17 (29) | 6/20 (30) | 1/11 (9) | 6/11 (55) |
CI
3
| 3/17 (18) | 2/16 (12,5) | 9/16 (56) | 8/20 (40) | 2/6 (33) | 3/6 (50) |
- 1: Uninfected individuals (UI); 2: Exposed uninfected partners (EUI) of, 3: chronically HCV-infected (CI) individuals. 4: number positive/total number tested (percent). Control antigen (CEF) : There were no statistical difference in the frequencies of proliferative or elispot responses to CEF when comparing each group 2 by 2. HCV antigens : There were no statistical difference in the frequencies of proliferative response to both Core and NS3 when comparing each group 2 by 2; The frequencies of Elispot response to Core were higher in the CI group compared to UI no risk (p = 0.04) and to UI at risk (p = 0.04). The frequencies of Elispot response to NS3 were higher in the CI group compared to UI no risk (p < 0.03) and to UI at risk (p < 0.03).