Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of HA and NTA method

From: Evaluation of nanoparticle tracking analysis for total virus particle determination

  

HA

 

NTA

 
 

V (ml)

HA (HA/ml)

Total HA (HA)

Recovery (%)

NTA (VP/ml)

Total titer (VP)

Recovery (%)

Load

1,5

128

192,0

 

5,7E+09

8,6E+09

 

1 FT

2,9

<1

  

4,1E+08

1,2E+09

13,8

1 E1

1

128

128,0

66,7

5,8E+09

5,8E+09

68,0

1 E2

1,15

4

4,6

2,4

1,5E+08

1,7E+08

2,0

Total recovery (%)

   

69,1

  

83,0

2 FT

2,4

<1

  

6,0E+08

1,4E+09

16,7

2 E1

0,9

128

115,2

60,0

7,2E+09

6,5E+09

75,4

2 E2

1,1

4

4,4

2,3

3,7E+08

4,1E+08

4,7

Total recovery (%)

   

62,3

  

96,8

  1. Analysis of chromatographic samples collected during influenza virus purification on two different CIM SO3 monolithic columns by HA and NTA method; FT (flow-through fraction) and E (elution fractions).