Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of study design of the six trials

From: Comparison of the efficacy of tenofovir and adefovir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: A Systematic Review

Study

Marcellin Study 102 [14]

Marcellin Study 103 [14]

Lacombe [16]

Hann [17]

Peters [18]

van Bommel [19]

Study location

Worldwide

Worldwide

French multi-centre

Asian-Americans

Worldwide

N/A

Study design

randomized,double-blind

randomized,double-blind

non-randomized, open label

quasi-randomized, open-label

prospective randomized, double-blind

Nonrandmoized,open-label

Grade

5

5

2

3

5

2

Treatment options

Tenofovir 300 mg/d vs Adefovir 10 mg/d

Tenofovir 300 mg/d vs Adefovir 10 mg/d

Tenofovir 300 mg/d vs Adefovir 10 mg/d

Tenofovir 300 mg/d vs Adefovir 10 mg/d

Tenofovir 300 mg/d vs Adefovir 10 mg/d

Tenofovir 300 mg/d vs Adefovir 10 mg/d

Male

193(77%) vs. 97(78%)

119(68%) vs. 64(71%)

54(96.4%) vs. 28(26.6%)

37(85%) vs. 49(76%)

24 (89%) vs. 24 (96%)

32(91.4%) vs. 14(77.8%)

Mean age, years

44 ± 10.6 vs. 43 ± 10

34 ± 11 vs. 34 ± 12

42.3 vs. 41.5

49 vs. 45

40 vs. 47

47 ± 2 vs. 45 ± 3.7

HBeAg-positive (%)

0:0

1:1

50(89.3%) vs. 25(86.2%)

33(75%) vs. 55(84%)

23 (85%) vs. 20 (80%)

31(89%) vs16( 89%)

Treatment (weeks)

48 weeks

48 weeks

48 weeks

48 weeks

48 weeks

72 to 130 weeks vs. 60 to 80 weeks

Follow-up (weeks)

N/A

N/A

N/A

48 weeks

91 weeks vs. 81 weeks

N/A

Status

N/A

N/A

Coinfect HIV

lamivudine-resistant

Coinfect HIV

lamivudine-resistant