Zp-variant %(n/N) | IM (n = 88) | HLH (n = 46) | CAEBV (n = 32) | Controls (n = 40) |
---|
P | 84.1 (74/88) | 80.4 (37/46) | 56.3 (18/32)△ | 85.0 (34/40) |
V3 | 5.7 (5/88) | 43.5 (20/46)△ | 81.3 (26/32)△ | 2.5 (1/40) |
V4 | 12.5 (11/88) | 6.5 (3/46) | 0 | 15.0 (6/40) |
V1 | 11.4 (10/88) | 0 | 0 | 10.0 (4/40) |
- #The distribution of Zp subtypes involved all co-existence variants-IM included P(n = 61), V3(n = 3), V1(n = 4), V4(n = 6), P+V1(n = 6), P+V3(n = 2), P+V4(n = 5); EBV-HLH included P(n = 23), V3(n = 8), V4(n = 1), P+V3(n = 12), P+V4(n = 2); CAEBV included P(n = 6), V3(n = 14), P+V3(n = 12); controls included P(n = 29), V3 (n = 1), V1(n = 3), V4(n = 4), P+V1(n = 1), P+V4(n = 2)
- △(P ≤ 0.01) vs other groups