In Table 2, for the data analyzed from Espirito Santos, 2008 the number of specimens reported is 4, but the positive samples number reported is 5. Is this a typo, or does it imply more than one sample was taken from one of the 4 specimens- and if so, for what purpose? Note if this was a typo, and the cumulative positive sample number should be 60 and not 61, then the Positivity should also be changed to (93.75%) Thanks.
Competing interests
I have no competing interests. I am an undergraduate student.
Clarification of Table 2
Jônatas Abrahão, UFMG
3 May 2010
It was a typo. Were analyzed 5 samples from Espiríto Santo State. Thanks for your contribution.
Competing interests
I have no competing interests. I am an author of this paper.
Virology Journal
Clarification of Table 2
26 April 2010
In Table 2, for the data analyzed from Espirito Santos, 2008 the number of specimens reported is 4, but the positive samples number reported is 5. Is this a typo, or does it imply more than one sample was taken from one of the 4 specimens- and if so, for what purpose?
Note if this was a typo, and the cumulative positive sample number should be 60 and not 61, then the Positivity should also be changed to (93.75%)
Thanks.
Competing interests
I have no competing interests. I am an undergraduate student.
Clarification of Table 2
3 May 2010
It was a typo. Were analyzed 5 samples from Espiríto Santo State.
Thanks for your contribution.
Competing interests
I have no competing interests. I am an author of this paper.