Clarification of Table 2 Ann Arcand, Coe College 26 April 2010 In Table 2, for the data analyzed from Espirito Santos, 2008 the number of specimens reported is 4, but the positive samples number reported is 5. Is this a typo, or does it imply more than one sample was taken from one of the 4 specimens- and if so, for what purpose? Note if this was a typo, and the cumulative positive sample number should be 60 and not 61, then the Positivity should also be changed to (93.75%) Thanks. Competing interests I have no competing interests. I am an undergraduate student.