The soluble amino-terminal region of HVEM mediates efficient herpes simplex virus type 1 infection of gD receptor-negative cells

  • Hyunjung Baek1, 2,

    Affiliated with

    • Jae Hong Kim2,

      Affiliated with

      • Yoon Tae Noh1 and

        Affiliated with

        • Heechung Kwon1Email author

          Affiliated with

          Virology Journal20129:15

          DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-9-15

          Received: 17 August 2011

          Accepted: 13 January 2012

          Published: 13 January 2012



          Previous studies from our own and other labs reported the surprising finding that the soluble V domain of the herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) entry receptor nectin-1 can both block HSV infection of receptor-bearing cells and mediate infection of receptor-deficient cells. Here we show that this property is not unique to nectin-1. We generated a pair of truncated, soluble forms of the other major HSV-1 entry receptor, herpes virus entry mediator (HVEM or HveA), and examined its effects on HSV-1 infection of receptor-deficient cells.


          In cultures of CHO-K1 cells, sHveA102 comprising the two amino-terminal cysteine-rich pseudorepeats (CRPs) of HVEM enabled infection of greater than 80% of the cells at an MOI of 3, while sHveA162 comprising the complete ectodomain failed to mediate infection. Both sHveA102 and sHveA162 blocked infection of CHO-K1 cells stably expressing HVEM in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that both were capable of binding to viral gD. We found that sHveA102-mediated infection involves pH-independent endocytosis whereas HSV infection of HVEM-expressing CHO-K1 cells is known to be pH-dependent.


          Our results suggest that the C-terminal portion of the soluble HVEM ectodomain inhibits gD activation and that this effect is neutralized in the full-length form of HVEM in normal infection.


          HSV-1 HVEM/HveA gD Soluble entry receptor



          B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator


          Cysteine-rich pseudo repeats


          Fetal bovine serum


          Glycoproteins C


          Glycoprotein D

          HVEM or HveA: 

          Herpes virus entry mediator


          Herpes simplex virus type 1


          Lymphotoxin alpha




          Open reading frame


          Paired immunoglobulin-like type-2 receptor


          Thymidine kinase


          Tumor necrosis factor receptor



          3-OS HS: 

          3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate.


          Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infects a broad range of mammalian cells, including epithelial cells, lymphocytes, and post-mitotic neurons. Initial HSV attachment to host cells is mediated by the binding of viral envelope glycoproteins C (gC) and gB to ubiquitous heparan sulfate moieties on the surface of cells [13]. While not essential [4], these interactions facilitate the binding of glycoprotein D (gD) to one or more of its cognate cell-surface receptors, nectin-1 (HveC), HVEM (HveA), and 3-O-sulfated heparan sulfate (3-OS HS) [57]. Binding to these entry receptors causes conformational changes in the gD ectodomain that signal activation of the downstream effectors of HSV entry, gB and gH/gL, the proximal mediators of membrane fusion and capsid delivery into the cytoplasm [812]. Recent studies have also demonstrated that PILRα (paired immunoglobulin-like type-2 receptor) and non-muscle myosin heavy chain IIA can function as HSV-1 entry co-receptors through interaction with gB [13, 14].

          The absolute dependence of HSV-1 infection on gD binding to a cognate receptor indicates that the tropism of the virus is determined at least in part by the distribution of gD receptors. Nectin-1 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and is expressed on many cell types, including fibroblasts, epithelial cells and neurons [15]. Nectins function as intercellular adhesion molecules localized to cadherin-based adherens junctions [16]. The variable (V) domain of nectin-1 is sufficient for binding to gD and the initiation of fusion between the virus envelope and cell membranes [17]. HVEM is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily and is expressed in hematopoietic cells and lymphoid tissues such as spleen and thymus [18, 19]. HVEM contains four cysteine-rich pseudorepeats (CRPs) characteristic of members of the TNFR family in its ectodomain and functions as a mediator of HSV-1 and HSV-2 entry mainly into human lymphocytes [6, 19]. The natural ligands for HVEM include LIGHT, lymphotoxin alpha (Lt-α), B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), and CD160 [20]. The contribution of the third gD receptor, 3-OS HS, to the broad HSV-1 tropism is not as clearly defined since this glycosaminoglycan modification is not easily detectable by immunological or other methods. However, novel approaches are beginning to reveal the role of this receptor [21].

          X-ray crystallography has shown that HVEM binds to a flexible hairpin at the amino terminus of gD [8]. A variety of mutations in this region, including Q27P originally identified in KOS-rid1 virus [22], abolish HVEM binding [23, 24]. Using a series of truncated forms of HVEM, Whitbeck and colleagues demonstrated that the two N-terminal CRPs of HVEM are required and sufficient for binding to HSV-1 gD [25]. In their study, HveA(120 t), consisting of the first and second CRP, showed full gD binding activity by competition ELISA and blocked HSV entry into CHO cells expressing HVEM.

          We previously reported that the V-domain of nectin-1 as a soluble form can mediate efficient virus entry into HSV-resistant CHO-K1 cells that lack gD receptors [26]. Here, we have investigated whether soluble forms of the HVEM ectodomain have a similar ability. To this end, we constructed soluble recombinant proteins consisting of the first two CRPs (sHA102) or the full ectodomain (sHA162) of HVEM. While both soluble proteins inhibited HSV infection of HVEM-expressing CHO-K1 cells, only sHA102 mediated virus entry into receptor-negative CHO-K1 cells. Infection mediated by sHA102 was highly efficient, involved specific binding of sHA102 to viral gD, required heparin-sensitive virus attachment to the cells, and took place by a pH-independent endocytic mechanism as opposed to the pH-dependent mechanism mediating HSV infection of HVEM-expressing CHO cells [27]. Our results indicate that the C-terminal portion of the HVEM ectodomain contains sequences that inhibit gD activation and suggest a context effect allowing gD activation by full-length HVEM, but not the soluble ectodomain, in the acidic milieu of endosomes.


          Production of soluble gD receptors

          We constructed expression plasmids for two His6-tagged soluble HVEM proteins, sHA102 containing the gD-binding first two CRPs (102 aa), and sHA162 comprising the full ectodomain (162 aa) (Figure 1A). Soluble proteins were produced by transfection of 293 T cells and purified from the culture supernatant, as previously described [26]. The molecular size sHA102 was approximately 15 kDa (Figure 1B, C), somewhat larger than the predicted size of 11 kDa most likely due to N-linked glycosylation in CRP2 [28]. sHA162 migrated predominantly as a 38 kDa species, significantly larger than the predicted 18 kDa for the monomeric form, suggesting incomplete denaturation of the dimeric form that predominates in solution [28].

          Figure 1

          Structure and expression of soluble HVEM proteins. (A) Schematic representations of full-length HVEM (HveA) and the truncated HVEM proteins produced for this study. Lollipops indicate glycosylation sites and numbers indicate amino acid positions relative to position 1 of mature HVEM. CRP, cysteine-rich pseudorepeat; H6, six-histidine tag. (B) Silver-stained SDS-PAGE gels of soluble protein samples. (C) Western blot detection of purified recombinant soluble proteins using anti-His tag antibody. Lane 1, sHA102; lane 2, sHA162; lane 3, sNec1123 used in Figure 2D; lane 4, sgD287 used in Figure 3.

          Soluble HVEM-mediated HSV-1 infection of CHO-K1 cells

          We determined whether sHA102 and sHA162 could mediate HSV-1 entry into CHO-K1 cells that are resistant to infection due to the absence of entry receptors. KOS/tk12, expressing LacZ from the viral thymidine kinase (tk) locus in a wild-type (strain KOS) viral background [29], was preincubated at a multiplicity of 3 pfu/cell with CHO-K1 cells in suspension for 1 h at 4°C. Increasing concentrations (0-1,000 nM) of sHA proteins were then added and the cells were incubated for 1 h at 37°C, plated, and incubated for another 7 h at 37°C prior to measurement of β-galactosidase activity by quantitative ONPG assay. As shown in Figure 2A, dose-dependent infection was observed in the presence of sHA102, whereas sHA162 failed to mediate infection. At an MOI of 9, infection reached a plateau at 500 nM sHA102 (Figure 2B), suggesting that either the amount of virus or the number of cells became limiting at this concentration. A similar level of infection was observed at an MOI of 3 with 1,000 nM sHA102, arguing for the second interpretation. Indeed, titration of X-gal stained cells showed infection of 90-100% of the cells at an MOI of 9 at 500-1,000 nM sHA102 (Figure 2C). These results demonstrated that the known gD binding region of HVEM consisting of CRPs 1 and 2 was sufficient to mediate HSV entry into receptor-deficient cells. As shown in Figure 2D, the efficiency of sHA102-mediated entry was comparable to that mediated by the soluble V domain of nectin-1 (sNec123) described previously [26].

          Figure 2

          Soluble HVEM-mediated KOS/tk12 infection of CHO-K1 cells. Infection was determined by quantitative ONPG assay or X-gal staining. (A) Infection at increasing concentrations of sHA102 and sHA162 at an MOI of 3. (B) MOI effect on sHA102-mediated infection. (C)% infected cells at increasing MOIs determined by X-gal staining of sequential 10-fold dilutions of infected cultures. (D) Comparison of sNec1123- and sHA102-mediated KOS/tk12 entry (MOI = 3). All values are averages of triplicate determinations.

          Soluble HVEM blocks HSV infection of HVEM-expressing CHO cells

          Soluble forms of HVEM and nectin-1 have been shown to inhibit HSV-1 entry through the cognate cellular receptors by competition for gD binding [28]. To determine whether the distinct entry-mediating activities of our sHA102 and sHA162 preparations correlated with their ability to inhibit virus entry via HVEM, we carried out competitive inhibition assays on CHO cells expressing HVEM. Cells were infected with KOS/tk12 in the presence of soluble gD receptors and β-galactosidase expression was measured by ONPG assay. As shown in Figure 4, expression decreased with increasing amounts of sHA102 and sHA162, indicating dose-dependent entry inhibition. While 1,000 nM of sHA102 was required to inhibit KOS/tk12 infection by approximately 50%, sHA162 reached this level of inhibition at 250 nM. The greater blocking efficiency of sHA162 is in sharp contrast to its lack of entry-mediating activity on receptor-deficient cells. One possible explanation is that CRP 3 and 4, when not anchored in the cell membrane, sterically limit the activation of gD involving partial unfolding to expose its effector/pro-fusion domain [10, 12].

          Figure 4

          Inhibition of KOS/tk12 infection of HVEM-expressing CHO cells by soluble HVEM proteins. Increasing amounts of sHA102 (A) or sHA162 (B) were preincubated with the virus for 1 h at 4°C prior to infection of CHO-HVEM-12 cells (MOI = 1) for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were washed and infection was measured 7 h later by ONPG assay. Values are averages of triplicate determinations.

          Specific interaction of sHA102 with viral gD

          We determined whether sHA102-mediated virus entry into CHO-K1 cells requires specific interaction with gD. As illustrated in Figure 3, while sHA102 promoted entry of KOS/tk12 into CHO-K1 cells, little entry was observed by an isogenic mutant virus, KOS-Rid1/tk, that has an amino-acid substitution in gD preventing interaction with HVEM [29]. In addition, we observed that preincubation of sHA102 with soluble gD ectodomain (gD287; Figure. 1C) inhibited virus entry into CHO-K1 cells in a sgD287 dose-dependent manner. When the concentration of sHA102 was augmented up to 100 nM, the viral infection was recovered to 2 fold (Figure 3). Together, these results indicated that sHA102-mediated HSV entry into CHO-K1 cells occurred through specific binding to viral gD.

          Figure 3

          Specificity of sHA 102 -mediated entry. (A) Comparison of sHA102-mediated CHO-K1 infection by KOS/tk12 and a mutant-gD derivative impaired for HVEM binding, KOS-Rid1/tk12, at MOIs of 3. (B) Inhibition of sHA102-mediated infection by soluble gD. sHA102 and sgD287 at the indicated concentrations were incubated with KOS/tk12 virus at 4°C prior to the addition of CHO-K1 cells (MOI = 3) and incubation at 37°C. Infection was determined by ONPG assay. Values are averages of triplicate determinations.

          Requirement of heparan sulfate binding for sHA102-mediated infection

          HSV attachment is mediated by the binding of gB and gC to cell-surface glycosaminoglycans, particularly heparan sulfate [30]. To determine whether heparan sulfate binding was required for sHA102-mediated HSV entry, infections were performed in the presence of 25 μg/ml heparin. As shown in Figure 5, infection was reduced at all MOIs tested, including more than 200-fold at an MOI of 10. These results indicated that virus attachment to cell-surface heparan sulfate is necessary for efficient sHA102-mediated HSV entry, as previously observed for soluble nectin-1-mediated infection [26].

          Figure 5

          Heparin inhibition of sHA 102 -mediated KOS/tk12 entry. Virus and heparin (25 μg/ml) were pre incubated for 30 min at 4°C, CHO-K1 cells were added, and the incubation was continued for another 30 min prior to the addition of sHA102 (500 nM), infection as in previous figures, and ONPG assay. Values are averages of triplicate determinations.

          Pathway of sHA102-mediated HSV entry into CHO-K1 cells

          Previous reports have shown that HSV enters into CHO cells expressing human nectin-1 or HVEM via a low pH-dependent endocytic pathway [27]. To examine whether the same entry pathway is used in sHA102-induced HSV-1 infection of CHO-K1 cells, we treated the cells with hypertonic medium or lysosomotropic agents. Medium containing 0.3 M sucrose reduced sHA102-mediated KOS/tk12 infection approximately 5-fold (Figure 6B), similar to results reported for HSV infection of HVEM-expressing CHO cells (Figure 6A) [27], indicating an important role for active endocytosis in entry mediated by sHA102. To determine whether endosomal acidification was required for infection, CHO-K1 cells were pre-treated with increasing concentrations of NH4Cl or monensin, and incubated with KOS/tk12 and sHA102 in the continued presence of these agents. The results showed no inhibition of sHA102-mediated infection while infection of CHO-HVEM cells was sensitive to these agents (Figure 6C, D). Thus, unlike HSV infection of HVEM-expressing CHO cells, sHA102-mediated CHO-K1 infection appears to take place by a low pH-independent endocytic mechanism.

          Figure 6

          Effect of agents that inhibit endocytic virion uptake or low pH-dependent infection. (A) CHO-A and Vero cells were incubated with KOS/tk12 (MOI = 3) in hypertonic medium containing 0.3 M sucrose for 1 h at 4°C and infections were performed in the continuous presence of sucrose followed by ONPG assay. (B) CHO-K1 cells were incubated with KOS/tk12 (MOI = 3) in hypertonic medium containing 0.3 M sucrose for 1 h at 4°C, sHA102 was added to 500 nM, and infections were performed in the continued presence of sucrose followed by ONPG assay. (C, D) CHO-K1 cells and CHO-HVEM-12 cells (CHO-A) were pretreated with the indicated amounts of NH4Cl (C) or monensin (D) for 30 min at 4°C prior to KOS/tk12 attachment at 4°C (MOI = 3), addition of sHA102 to 500 nM (CHO-K1 cells only), and infection as in previous figures in the continued presence of the respective drugs. Infection was measured by ONPG assay. Values are averages of triplicate determinations.


          In this study, we demonstrate that a soluble gD receptor consisting of the N-terminal 102 amino acids of HVEM is an efficient mediator of HSV-1 infection of receptor-negative, HSV-resistant CHO-K1 cells. In contrast, sHA162, comprising the complete HVEM ectodomain, did not enable viral entry although both sHA102 and sHA162 blocked virus infection of receptor-bearing CHO cells. We suggest that sHA162 binds to viral gD but prevents the folding of gD into an active conformation that can trigger the fusion process. Using inhibitors of receptor- and pH-dependent endocytosis, we obtained evidence that sHA102-mediated infection of CHO-K1 cells occurs by pH-independent endocytosis, unlike the low pH-dependent endocytic mechanism responsible for infection of CHO-HVEM cells [27].

          Previous studies have reported inhibition of HSV infection of CHO-HVEM cells by the soluble ectodomain of HVEM, alone [HVEM (200 t)] or as a fusion with the Fc region of rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) heavy chain [6, 28]. In a later study, Whitbeck and colleagues also reported the ability of HVEM (200 t) to promote HSV entry into receptor-deficient CHO-K1 cells [31]. Although our sHA162 had essentially the same primary sequence as HVEM (200 t), we did not observe an entry-promoting effect of sHA162 on CHO-K1 cells. A potentially significant difference with our study is that Whitbeck et al. [31] used a low speed centrifugation technique referred to as spinoculation to augment HVEM(200 t)-mediated virus infection. Spinoculation has been used with HSV and other enveloped viruses to bring virion and cell membranes closely together [21, 3234], for example to bypass receptor-dependent virus attachment in studies demonstrating soluble receptor-mediated infection by avian sarcoma and leukosis viruses [35, 36]. Since HSV attachment to cells is mediated mainly by viral envelope proteins other than gD, we performed our experiments without spinoculation while showing that heparin-sensitive virus attachment was essential under these conditions. We observed highly efficient sHA102-mediated infection (> 80% infection at an MOI of 3), but entry mediated by the complete soluble ectodomain was essentially undetectable, suggesting that spinoculation in the study by Whitbeck et al. [31] had allowed the detection of HVEM (200 t) activity by concentrating the virus at the cell surface to raise the sensitivity of the assay. Nonetheless, the Whitbeck study reported a maximum HVEM (200 t)-mediated increase in infection of CHO-K1 cells of 15.5-fold [5 μM HVEM (200 t); MOI = 2], substantially less than the increases we observed at lower sHA102 concentrations (Figure 2). Thus, while sHA162/HVEM (200 t) may not be inactive in infection of receptor-deficient cells, sHA102 is clearly more effective.

          The similar inhibition of CHO-HVEM infection by sHA102 and sHA162 indicated that the difference in entry-mediating activity between these two proteins is not due to differences in gD binding, suggesting that the extra sequences in sHA162/HVEM(200 t) compared to sHA102 negatively affect the efficiency of gD activation. The previously reported crystal structure of the gD ectodomain complexed with the HVEM ectodomain has shown that the N-terminal region of gD undergoes a conformational change during HVEM binding [8]. It is conceivable that sHA102 either induces a more global change in the gD conformation or that the C-terminal portion of sHA162/HVEM(200 t) interferes with the efficient receptor-dependent unmasking of the gD effector/pro-fusion domain proposed by Krummenacher et al. [12] and Fusco et al. [10].

          In the absence of gD receptors, HSV is internalized by CHO cells but fails to enter the cytoplasm and is degraded in lysosomes [37]. The presence of gD receptors allows pH-dependent viral capsid escape from endosomes and release into the cytosol [37]. Whitbeck et al. [31] have described evidence that HVEM (200 t) "primes" gD for activation of the membrane fusion machinery, but that a mildly acidic pH is required in CHO cells as a second signal for fusion initiation. Surprisingly, our results using NH4Cl or monensin to neutralize the endosomal pH did not show a reduction in sHA102-mediated infection although virus uptake by endocytosis was indicated by reduced infection in media containing 0.3 M sucrose. Thus it appears that the second signal is not required for sHA102 activation of gD. At the opposite end, it appears that endosome acidification as the second signal is not sufficient for efficient activation of gD by sHA162/HVEM (200 t). Thus our results suggest that both situations differ from normal virus entry via full-length HVEM. It is of interest that several examples have been reported of cell-surface HVEM failing to serve as a functional HSV entry receptor [3840], raising the possibility that these cells lack a mechanism to counteract interference by CRPs 3 and 4 with gD activation by full-length HVEM. Our study suggests that sHA102 may be an efficient tool to enable HSV vector-mediated delivery of therapeutic genes to receptor-deficient cells.


          Here we have demonstrated a soluble gD receptor, containing N-terminal 102 amino acids of HVEM, for efficient HSV infection into HSV receptor-negative, HSV-resistant CHO-K1 cells. This study is consistent with two other soluble form of gD receptors, sNec1123 and soluble 3-OS HS. We can improve the usage of sHA102 by fusing it with ligands or receptors of disease related antigens as a promising molecule for retargeting of natural tropism of HSV-1. This retargeting strategy can be combined to create specific recognition by genetic modifications of the virion envelope for incorporation of targeting moiety.


          Cells and viruses

          African green monkey kidney (Vero) cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD) and maintained in Dulbecco's modification of Eagle minimal medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1, ATCC) were maintained in Ham's F-12 K medium with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 ug/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). CHO-HVEM-12 cells (Montgomery et al., 1996) are CHO-K1 derivatives constitutively expressing full-length human HVEM and were kindly provided by Patricia G. Spear (Northwestern University, IL, USA). Both cell lines were grown in Ham's F-12 K medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 400 μg/ml G418 (Invitrogen).

          Wild-type and mutant gD β-galactosidase reporter viruses KOS/tk12 and KOS-Rid1/tk12 [29] were kindly provided by Patricia G. Spear and were propagated and titered on Vero cells.

          Soluble protein expression constructs

          Sequences encoding sHA102 and sHA162 were amplified by PCR on HVEM plasmid pBEC14 ([6]; a kind gift from Patricia Spear) using the following primers: sHA102/sHA162 sense primer, 5'-CCC AAG CTT GCC ACC ATG GAG CCT CCT GGA GAC TGG GGG CC-3'; sHA102 anti-sense primer, 5'-CCC CTC GAG CTA ATG GTG ATG GTG ATG GTG AGC GCG GCA CGC GGC GCA-3'; sHA162 anti-sense primer, 5'-CCC CTC GAG CTA GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG GGA GCT GCT GGT CCC AGC-3'. Primers were designed to provide a Kozak translational initiation sequence at the start of the open reading frame (ORF) and six histidine residues followed by a TAG stop codon at the end. Underlined sequences indicate recognition sites for the restriction enzymes Hind III and Xho I. Following digestion with Hind III plus Xho I, each PCR product was cloned into pcDNA3.1 (+) (Invitrogen), yielding mammalian expression constructs pHA102 and pHA162.

          Expression plasmids for sNec1123 and sgD287 were as previously described [26].

          Production and purification of His fusion proteins

          Soluble proteins were expressed in 293 T cells and purified using the Probond™ resin purification system (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, DNA transfections were performed with LipofectAmine Plus reagent (Invitrogen) and the cells were then cultured in serum-free media. Culture supernatants were harvested at 72 h post-transfection, mixed with Probond resin, and incubated for 1 hr at 4°C. The resin was washed and bound proteins were eluted.

          SDS-PAGE and Western blotting

          Purified soluble proteins were electrophoresed on a 12% polyacrylamide-sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel and blotted onto Protran nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman GmbH, Dassel, Germany). The membrane was blocked with a solution of 3% skim milk in PBS/0.1% Tween-20, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with anti-His antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) diluted in blocking buffer. The membrane was washed three times and treated with horseradish peroxide-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 1 h at room temperature. Peroxidase activity was detected using an ECL kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ).

          HSV entry assay

          CHO-K1 cells in suspension (6 × 104 cells/well) were preincubated with KOS/tk12 virus in PBS in a total volume of 40 μl for 1 h at 4°C on a rocking device. Increasing concentrations of soluble proteins (0 - 1,000 nM) were added to the virus/cell mixture and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were collected by centrifugation, washed twice with PBS, resuspended in 40 μl of Ham's F-12 K medium, and plated in a single well of a 96 well plate. After continued incubation at 37°C for 7 h, virus entry was detected by staining with X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside) or by colorimetric assay (ONPG, o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside), as previously described [41]. Briefly, infected cell monolayers were fixed with 0.2% glutaldehyde (Sigma) for 15 min at room temperature (RT), washed with PBS, and incubated with 0.2 mg/ml X-gal (Sigma);% infection was determined by staining of sequential 10-fold dilutions of infected cells. For the colorimetric assay, infected monolayers were washed with PBS and lysed in 150 μl of 1% NP-40, 1 mM MgCl2, 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and 4 mg/ml ONPG (Sigma). Lysates were incubated at 37°C until a yellow color developed, and absorbance was measured at 405 nM.

          Infection inhibition by soluble receptors

          Different concentrations of soluble receptors (0-2,000 nM) were preincubated with 6 × 104 pfu of KOS/tk12 in a total volume of 40 μl for 1 h at 4°C. CHO-HVEM-12 cells (6 × 104 cells/well) were added and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were then collected, washed twice with PBS, resuspended in 40 μl of Ham's F-12 K medium, and incubated for 7 h at 37°C. Infection was measured by colorimetric ONPG assay, as described above.

          Infection inhibition by sgD287

          Experiments to determine the sensitivity of sHA102-mediated infection to competition for sHA102 binding with soluble gD were performed essentially as described previously for sNec1123 (Kwon et al., 2006). Briefly, various amounts of sHA102 and sgD287 were incubated with KOS/tk12 in PBS for 1 h at 4°C on rocking device. A total of 5 × 105 CHO-K1 cells (MOI = 3) were added and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were collected, washed, plated with complete medium, and incubated for another 7 h. Infection was measured by ONPG assay.

          Heparin inhibition

          Increasing amounts of KOS/tk12 were preincubated with 25 μl/ml heparin for 30 min at 4°C, CHO-K1 cells were added, and the incubation was continued for another 30 min. sHA102 to a final concentration of 500 nM was then added and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were washed, plated, incubated with complete medium for 7 h at 37°C, and infection was determined by ONPG assay.

          Endocytosis inhibition assays

          KOS/tk12 (MOI = 3) was preincubated with CHO-K1 cells for 30 min at 4°C in the presence of 0.3 M sucrose, sHA102 (500 nM final concentration) was added, and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Alternatively, CHO-K1 cells were incubated with different concentrations of ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) or monensin (Sigma) for 30 min at 4°C, virus was added and the incubation continued for another 30 min at 4°C, and sHA102 was added with incubation for 1 h at 37°C. In each situation, the cells were washed, plated, and incubated for 7 h at 37°C in complete medium containing the respective inhibitory agents. Virus entry was measured by ONPG assay.

          Statistical analysis

          All results were performed in triplicate and the values are expressed as means ± SD. P values were calculated by using Student's t test, and statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05.



          This work was supported by grants National Research Foundation (NFR) (grant code: 20110002169) and National Nuclear R&D Program of the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (MEST) of the Republic of Korea.

          Authors’ Affiliations

          Division of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences
          School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University


          1. Herold BC, Visalli RJ, Susmarski N, Brandt CR, Spear PG: Glycoprotein C-independent binding of herpes simplex virus to cells requires cell surface heparan sulphate and glycoprotein B. J Gen Virol 1994, 75:1211–1222.PubMedView Article
          2. Laquerre S, Argnani R, Anderson DB, Zucchini S, Manservigi R, Glorioso JC: Heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding by herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein B and C, which differ in their contribution to virus attachment, penetration, and cell-to-cell spread. J Virol 1998, 72:6119–6130.PubMed
          3. Lycke E, Johansson M, Svennerholm B, Lindahl U: Binding of herpes simplex virus to cellular heparan sulphate, an initial step in the adsorption process. J Gen Virol 1991, 72:1131–1137.PubMedView Article
          4. Banfield BW, Leduc Y, Esford L, Schubert K, Tufaro F: Sequential isolation of proteoglycan synthesis mutants by using herpes simplex virus as a selective agent: evidence for a proteoglycan-independent virus entry pathway. J Virol 1995, 69:3290–3298.PubMed
          5. Cocchi F, Menotti L, Mirandola P, Lopez M, Campadelli-Fiume G: The ectodomain of a novel member of the immunoglobulin subfamily related to the poliovirus receptor has the attributes of a bona fide receptor for herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in human cells. J Virol 1998, 72:9992–10002.PubMed
          6. Montgomery R, Warner MS, Lum BJ, Spear PG: Herpes simplex virus-1 entry into cells mediated by a novel member of the TNF/NGF receptor family. Cell 1996, 87:427–436.PubMedView Article
          7. Shukla D, Liu J, Blaiklock P, Shworak NW, Bai X, Esko JD, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Rosenberg RD, Spear PG: A novel role for 3- O -sulfated heparan sulfate in herpes simplex virus 1 entry. Cell 1999, 99:13–22.PubMedView Article
          8. Carfi A, Willis SH, Whitbeck JC, Krummenacher C, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Willey DC: Herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D bound to the human receptor HveA. Mol Cell 2001, 8:169–179.PubMedView Article
          9. Campadelli-Fiume G, Amasio M, Avitabile E, Cerretani A, Forghieri C, Gianni T, Menotti L: The multipartite system that mediates entry of herpes simplex virus into the cell. Rev Med Virol 2007, 17:313–326.PubMedView Article
          10. Fusco D, Forghieri C, Campadelli-Fiume G: The pro-fusion domain of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D (gD) interacts with the gD M terminus and is displaced by soluble forms of viral receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 28:9323–9328.View Article
          11. Gianni T, Amasio M, Campadelli-Fiume G: Herpes simplex virus gD forms distinct complexes with fusion executors gB and gH/L in part through the C-terminal profusion domain. J Biol Chem 2009, 284:17370–17382.PubMedView Article
          12. Krummenacher C, Supekar VM, Whitbeck JC, Lazear E, Connolly SA, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH, Wiley DC, Carfi A: Structure of unliganded HSV gD reveals a mechanism for receptor-mediated activation of virus entry. EMBO J 2005, 24:4144–4153.PubMedView Article
          13. Satoh T, Arii J, Suenaga T, Wang J, Kogure A, Uehori J, Arase N, Shiratori I, Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Spear PG, Lanier LL, Arase H: PILRalpha is a herpes simplex virus-1 entry coreceptor that associates with glycoprotein B. Cell 2008, 132:935–944.PubMedView Article
          14. Arii J, Goto H, Suenaga T, Oyama M, Kozuka-Hata H, Imai T, Minowa A, Akashi H, Arase H, Kawaoka Y, Kawaguchi Y: 2010. Non-muscle myosin IIA is a functional entry receptor for herpes simplex virus-1. Nature 2010, 467:859–862.PubMedView Article
          15. Geraghty RJ, Krummenacher C, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ, Spear PG: Entry of alphaherpesviruses mediated by poliovirus receptor-related protein 1 and poliovirus receptor. Science 1998, 280:1618–1620.PubMedView Article
          16. Takai Y, Nakanishi H: Nectin and afadin: novel organizers of intercellular junctions. J Cell Sci 2003, 116:17–27.PubMedView Article
          17. Krummenacher C, Rux AH, Whitbeck JC, Pronce-de-Leon M, Lou H, Baribaud I, Hou W, Zou C, Geraghty RJ, Spear PG, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH: The first immunoglobulin-like domain of HveC is sufficient to bind herpes simplex virus gD with full affinity, while the third domain is involved in oligomerization of HveC. J Virol 1999, 73:8127–8137.PubMed
          18. Spear PG: Herpes simplex virus: receptors and ligands for cell entry. Cell Microbiol 2004, 6:401–410.PubMedView Article
          19. Kwon BS, Tan KB, Ni J, Oh KO, Lee ZH, Kim KK, Kim YJ, Wang S, Gentz R, Yu GL, Harrop J, Lyn SD, Silverman C, Porter TG: A newly identified member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily with a wide tissue distribution and involvement in lymphocyte activation. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:14272–14276.PubMedView Article
          20. Cai G, Freeman GJ: The CD160, BTLA, LIGHT/HVEM pathway: a bidirectional switch regulating T-cell activation. Immunol Rev 2009, 229:244–258.PubMedView Article
          21. O'Doherty U, Swiggard WJ, Malim MH: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 spinoculation enhances infection through virus binding. J virol 2000, 74:10074–10080.PubMedView Article
          22. Dean HJ, Terhune SS, Shieh MT, Susmarski N, Spear PG: Single amino acid substitutions in gD of herpes simplex virus 1 confer resistance to gD-mediated interference and cause cell-type-dependent alterations in infectivity. Virology 1994, 199:67–80.PubMedView Article
          23. Connolly SA, Landsburg DJ, Carfi A, Willey DC, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ: Structure-based mutagenesis of herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D defines three critical regions at the gD-HveA/HVEM binding interface. J Virol 2003, 77:8127–8140.PubMedView Article
          24. Yoon M, Zago A, Shukla D, Spear PG: Mutations in the N termini of herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2 gDs alter functional interactions with the entry/fusion receptors HVEM, nectin-2, and 3- O -sulfated heparan sulfate but not with nectin-1. J Virol 2003, 77:9221–9231.PubMedView Article
          25. Whitbeck JC, Connolly SA, Willis SH, Hou W, Krummenacher C, Ponce de Leon M, Lou H, Baribaud I, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH: Localization of the gD-binding region of the human herpes simplex virus receptor, HveA. J Virol 2001, 75:171–180.PubMedView Article
          26. Kwon H, Bai Q, Baek HJ, Felmet K, Burton EA, Goins WF, Cohen JB, Glorioso JC: Soluble V domain of nectin-1/HveC enables entry of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) into HSV-resistant cells by binding to viral glycoprotein D. J Virol 2006, 80:138–148.PubMedView Article
          27. Nicola AV, McEvoy AM, Straus SE: Roles for endocytosis and low pH in herpes simplex virus entry into HeLa and Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Virol 2003, 77:5324–5332.PubMedView Article
          28. Whitbeck JC, Peng C, Lou H, Xu R, Willis SH, Ponce de Leon M, Peng T, Nicola AV, Montgomery RI, Warner MS, Soulika AM, Spruce LA, Moore WT, Lambris JD, Spear PG, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ: Glycoprotein D of herpes simplex virus (HSV) binds directly to HVEM, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily and a mediator of HSV entry. J Virol 1997, 71:6083–6093.PubMed
          29. Warner MS, Geraghty RJ, Martinez WM, Montgomery RI, Whitbeck JC, Xu R, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH, Spear PG: A cell surface protein with herpesvirus entry activity (HveB) confers susceptibility to infection by mutants of herpes simplex virus type 1, herpes simplex virus type 2, and pseudorabies virus. Virology 1998, 246:179–189.PubMedView Article
          30. O'Donnell CD, Shukla : The importance of heparan sulfate in herpesvirus infection. Virol Sin 2008, 23:383–393.PubMedView Article
          31. Whitbeck JC, Zuo Y, Milne RS, Cohen GH, Eisenberg RJ: Stable association of herpes simplex virus with target membranes is triggered by low pH in the presence of the gD receptor, HVEM. J Virol 2006, 80:3773–3780.PubMedView Article
          32. Hudson JB: Further studies on the mechanism of centrifugal enhancement of cytomegalovirus infectivity. J Virol Methods 1998, 19:97–108.View Article
          33. Scanlan PM, Tiwari V, Bommireddy S, Shukla D: Spinoculation of heparan sulfate deficient cells enhances HSV-1 entry, but does not abolish the need for essential glycoproteins in viral fusion. J Virol Methods 2005, 128:104–112.PubMedView Article
          34. Tenser RB, Dunstan ME: Mechanisms of herpes simplex virus infectivity enhanced by ultracentrifugal inoculation. Infect Immun 1980, 30:193–197.PubMed
          35. Damico R, Bates P: Soluble receptor-induced retroviral infection of receptor-deficient cells. J Virol 2000, 74:6469–6475.PubMedView Article
          36. Knauss DJ, Young JA: A fifteen-amino-acid TVB peptide serves as a minimal soluble receptor for subgroup B avian leukosis and sarcoma viruses. J Virol 2002, 76:5404–5410.PubMedView Article
          37. Nicola AV, Straus SE: Cellular and viral requirements for rapid endocytic entry of herpes simplex virus. J Virol 2004, 78:7508–7517.PubMedView Article
          38. Manoj S, Jogger CR, Myscofski D, Yoon M, Spear PG: Mutations in herpes simplex virus glycoprotein D that prevent cell entry via nectins and alter cell tropism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:12414–12421.PubMedView Article
          39. Uchida H, Shah WA, Ozuer A, Frampton AR Jr, Goins WF, Grandi P, Cohen JB, Glorioso JC: Generation of herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM)-restricted herpes simplex virus type 1 mutant viruses: resistance of HVEM-expressing cells and identification of mutations that rescue nectin-1 recognition. J Virol 2009, 83:2951–2961.PubMedView Article
          40. Tiwari V, Oh MJ, Kovacs M, Shukla SY, Valyl-Nagy T, Shukla D: Role for nectin-1 in herpes simplex virus 1 entry and spread in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. FEBS J 2008, 275:5272–5285.PubMedView Article
          41. Nakano K, Asano R, Tsumoto K, Kwon H, Goins WF, Kumagai I, Cohen JB, Glorioso JC: Herpes simplex virus targeting to the EGF receptor by a gD-specific soluble bridging molecule. Mol Ther 2005, 11:617–626.PubMedView Article

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.