Lamivudine plus adefovir is a good option for chronic hepatitis B patients with viral relapse after cessation of lamivudine treatment

  • Zhao Wang1,

    Affiliated with

    • Xiao-Ling Wu1,

      Affiliated with

      • Wei-Zheng Zeng1,

        Affiliated with

        • Hui Xu1,

          Affiliated with

          • Yong Zhang1,

            Affiliated with

            • Jian-Ping Qin1 and

              Affiliated with

              • Ming-De Jiang1Email author

                Affiliated with

                Virology Journal20118:388

                DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-388

                Received: 17 June 2011

                Accepted: 4 August 2011

                Published: 4 August 2011

                Abstract

                Aim

                Currently, there is no consensus on the retreatment recommendation of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with viral rebound after cessation of treatment. In the search of reasonable treatment, we compared the efficacy and safety of adefovir (ADV) plus lamivudine (LAM) and LAM alone for the retreatment of patients with viral relapse but without genotypic resistance after cessation of LAM.

                Methods

                This is a prospective controlled study, and a total of 53 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with viral rebound but without resistance were received either LAM plus ADV or LAM alone treatment.

                Results

                After 1-year treatment, more patients who received LAM plus ADV than those who received LAM alone had ALT normalization (84% versus 53.6%, P = 0.018) or HBV DNA levels below 1000 copies/mL (80% versus 42.9%, P < 0.006). Seven patients receiving LAM plus ADV had HBeAg seroconversion, as compared with 0 in patients receiving ALM alone (28% versus 0%, P = 0.003). During 1-year retreatment, five patients receiving LAM alone had virological breakthrough and all of them had LAM resistance strains (rtM204V/I), while no LAM- or ADV- associated resistance strains were detected in patients receiving LAM plus ADV. All patients receiving LAM plus ADV were well tolerated, and no serious side effects were noted.

                Conclusions

                Patients treated with LAM plus ADV exhibited significantly greater virological, biochemical and serological responses compared with LAM alone. These data suggested that combination of LAM plus ADV would be a good option for the retreatment of CHB patients with viral relapse after cessation of LAM.

                ADV plus LAM LAM alone retreatment chronic hepatitis B

                Background

                Estimated 350~400 million individuals worldwide are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV)[1], and chronic hepatitis B(CHB) can progress to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and death[2]. Antiviral therapy is used in CHB to minimize the liver damage and progression of disease[3], but total eradication of the HBV is seldom achieved by current treatment, especially for patients who infected HBV in early childhood.

                Nucleos(t)ide analogs approved for treatment of CHB include lamivudine (LAM), adefovir (ADV), entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir, and they have been considered to have a good effect in suppressing virus replication with few side effects[4]. In general, HBeAg seroconversion is an important end point for HBeAg-positive patients, which is associated with sustained remission[5, 6]; and international guidelines suggested that early withdrawal of antiviral therapy, without reaching sustainable serological response, would lead to a very high risk of relapse[4]. In fact, a wealth of clinical experience also suggested the problem of viral relapse after drug withdrawal could not be ignored [79]. Some investigators had reported that viral load rebound is common in CHB patients receiving nucleos(t)ide analogs and the relapse rates would be high to 70%[8, 10, 11]. However, nearly 40% of the relapses or virological breakthroughs were not related to antiviral drug resistance. For example, due to the poverty, many CHB patients in Asia cannot afford their long-term medication, and they always terminated their treatment just when reaching virological response irrespective of the occurrence of HBeAg seroconversion. How to therapy those patients with viral relapse has become an urgent problem that we have to face[12]. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on the retreatment of viral relapse with or without resistance after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogs treatment. And it is still unknown whether there is significant difference between original drug monotherapy or combined with other drugs without cross-resistance.

                Current study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of LAM plus ADV with that of LAM alone again in CHB patients with viral relapse after cessation of previous LAM treatment.

                Results

                Characteristics of the study patients

                A total of 53 HBeAg-positive CHB patients were analyzed in the study, which comprised of 25 patients in LAM plus ADV and 28 patients in LAM alone retreatment (Figure 1). The demographic and disease parameters were well matched at baseline of retreatment between two groups, which were described in detail in table 1.
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-8-388/MediaObjects/12985_2011_1487_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                Figure 1

                Flow chart of patients selected in this study.

                Table 1

                Baseline Characteristic of the study population

                Characteristic

                LAM plus ADV

                (N = 25)

                LAM

                (N = 28)

                P value

                Male sex -no. (%)

                20(80%)

                21(75%)

                0.664

                Age - yr*

                35.48

                36.81

                0.176

                ALT - IU/L*

                149.52

                136.25

                0.247

                HBV DNA - log10 copies/ml*

                5.89

                5.96

                0.812

                Previous LAM therapy- yr*

                3.60

                3.88

                0.115

                *Expressed as mean

                Biochemical response

                Serum ALT levels declined in both treatment groups, but ALT level was normalized in a higher proportion of LAM plus ADV than LAM alone retreatment in total. At 6 and 12 months after retreatment, normal ALT was achieved in 76% (19/25) and 84% (21/25) of patients receiving LAM plus ADV, and in 35.7%(10/28) and 53.6% (15/28) of patients receiving LAM alone, respectively (Figure 2). The difference in ALT normalization between two groups was significant at year 1(84% vs 53.6%, p = 0.018).
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-8-388/MediaObjects/12985_2011_1487_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                Figure 2

                Biochemical response rates of patients receiving ADV+LAM or LAM alone during the first year of retreatment.

                Virological response

                The reduction in serum HBV DNA levels from baseline of retreatment during the first year of observation period was greater in LAM plus ADV than in LAM alone retreatment (Figure 3). At 6 months, the proportion of patients with virological response (HBV DNA < 3 log copies/ml) was achieved in 60% (15/25) of patients receiving LAM plus ADV retreatment as compared to 32.1% (9/28) of patients receiving LAM alone. At 12 months, the proportion of patients with virological response was achieved in 80% (20/25) of patients receiving LAM plus ADV as compared to 42.9% (12/28) of patients receiving LAM alone. The difference in virological response between two groups was statistic significant at 6 and12 months, respectively (P = 0.042 for month 6 and P = 0.006 for month 12).
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-8-388/MediaObjects/12985_2011_1487_Fig3_HTML.jpg
                Figure 3

                Virological response rates of patients receiving ADV+LAM or LAM alone during the first year of retreatment.

                HBeAg response

                More patients receiving LAM plus ADV retreatment had HBeAg seroconversion as compared to patients receiving LAM alone retreatment at month 12 (Figure 4), and the difference in HBeAg seroconversion between two groups was significant (7/25 versus 0/28, P = 0.003). Additionally, significant more patients receiving LAM plus ADV obtained HBeAg loss as compared to patients receiving LAM alone at month 12(9/25 versus 1/28, P = 0.004)(Figure 4).
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-8-388/MediaObjects/12985_2011_1487_Fig4_HTML.jpg
                Figure 4

                HBeAg loss and seroconversion rates of patients receiving ADV+LAM or LAM alone during the first year of retreatment.

                Breakthrough and resistance

                Viral breakthrough was found in 5 patients receiving LAM alone retreatment during the 1-year observation period, and the mutations of rtM204V were found in 3 patients and rtM204I were found in 2 patients at year 1 of retreatment. In LAM plus ADV retreatment patients, no viral breakthrough were found and no LAM or ADV associated mutations were detected.

                Safety

                Majority of patients were well tolerated in two retreatment groups. Among patients receiving LAM plus ADV, only1 patient had serum creatinine slightly increasing but there was no discontinuation due to this adverse event. Elevations in ALT were observed less frequently in LAM plus ADV group than LAM alone in group. ALT flares during the first year of treatment were in 5 patients with LAM alone and 1 patient with LAM plus ADV. In LAM plus ADV group, all the ALT flares were associated with toil; while in LAM alone retreatment group, all the ALT flares were associated with HBV DNA flares. Between two groups, none hepatocellular carcinoma was reported.

                Discussion

                Although LAM is not recommended as first line therapy for CHB in the American Association for Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) CHB guidelines[4], and the European Association for Study of Liver (EASL) CHB guidelines[13], which recommend oral nucleosides or nucleotides with high genetic barrier (entecavir and tenofovir) as first line monotherapy, LAM is still widely used in Asia due to cost constraints[14]. Thus, it is necessary for us to concern about the re-treatment issues of patients with viral relapse after discontinuation of LAM monotherapy. Unfortunately, the retreatment options for viral relapse are still in doubt. In clinical practice, a variety of retreatment strategies have been applied, including back to their original drug, switch to another drugs, or two or more drugs in combination.

                Theoretically, if there were no evidence of antiviral resistance of original agent, it seemed reasonable to back to their original drug for retreatment. However, this hypothesis was recently questioned by clinicians. Evidence already had showed that HBV exists in form of quasi-species in patients with chronic hepatitis B[15], and because of the sensitivity and specificity limitation of detection, drug-resistance strains sometimes could not be detected in time, especially when its proportion was less than 20% in the pool of viral quasi-species[16, 17]. Thus, it is not difficult to conclude that before the drug-resistance strains reach a high number, they may not be detected in patients with viral relapse after cessation of antiviral treatment[16]. But it is worth mentioning that those inferior strains would be easily developed to predominant strains with antiviral resistance by positive selection of antiviral agents [18, 19]. Taking into account of the above reasons, when viral relapse occurred after cessation of treatment, switch to agents with high genetic barrier or combination of two or more agents without cross-resistance may be good options for preventing the occurrence of drug resistance[9, 20].

                In this study, we explored and compared retreatment options for chronic hepatitis B patients with viral relapse after cessation of LAM. After 1 year retreatment, the proportion of undetectable HBV DNA was achieved in 80% of patients receiving LAM plus ADV as compared to 42.9% of patients receiving LAM alone. Moreover, higher proportion of ALT normalization and HBeAg seroconversion were also reached in LAM plus ADV retreatment group. Several other studies also had reported that the combination of LAM and ADV could lead to effective viral suppression in most cases after development of viral breakthrough due to LAM monotherapy[21, 22]; and patients receiving LAM plus ADV combination therapy have a lower risk of developing genotypic resistance to ADV[22]. In our study, patients receiving combination therapy of LAM and ADV were well tolerated, and no viral breakthrough was reported and no LAM- or ADV-associated resistant strains were detected. In contrast, among 28 patients receiving LAM alone, five patients experienced a viral breakthrough and LAM-associated resistant strains were detected in all of them. Those findings gave us another hint that the combination of LAM plus ADV was associated with lower antiviral resistance compared with LAM alone. In fact, for some special populations with chronic hepatitis B, the combination of agents without cross-resistance had been clearly put forward by authoritative guidelines[4, 13], and data from many clinical observational trials also suggested combination therapy would bring more benefits to nucleosides or nucleotides-refractory CHB patients.

                At present, majority of clinical studies on LAM plus ADV combination therapy were for HBeAg-negative patients, and few studies on HBeAg-positive patients reported the combination of these agents had no synergistic on HBeAg seroconversion. But in our study, among 25 patients receiving combination therapy of LAM plus ADV, we delighted to found that 9 patients obtained HBeAg loss and 7 patients obtained HBeAg seroconversion, which were significant higher to that of patients receiving LAM alone. However, because of the limited sample size and short observation time, we currently cannot conclude that the combination of ADV plus LAM could increase the rate of HBeAg seroconversion as compared to single nucleoside or nucleotide analogue.

                In conclusion, the current study showed that CHB patients with viral relapse after cessation of LAM retreated by LAM plus ADV exhibited significantly greater virological, biochemical and serological responses compared with LAM alone. These findings indicated that combination of LAM plus ADV would be a good option for the retreatment of CHB patients with viral relapse after cessation of LAM.

                Methods

                Patients

                Outpatients from Chengdu Military General Hospital, with viral relapse after cessation of LAM treatment were screened, of who included in this study should also meet the following criteria: serum hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive; serum HBV DNA load above 1000 copies/ml; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels between 2 and 10 times the upper normal level. And patients who fulfilled one of the following criteria should be excluded: evidence of LAM associated resistance (rtM204V or rtM204I); presence of serum antibodies against hepatitis C virus (HCV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); breast-feeding, pregnancy or inadequate contraceptive measures; other acquired or inherited causes of liver disease; coexisting serious medical disease; advanced liver disease(including decompensated cirrhosis with ascites, severe hepatitis, and hepatic carcinoma).

                Study design

                This is a prospective controlled study, aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of LAM plus ADV with that of LAM alone retreatment in patients with viral relapse after cessation of LAM antiviral therapy. All included patients were administered 100 mg of LAM plus 10 mg of ADV (GlaxoSmithKline) or 100 mg of LAM alone daily according to patients' choice, and they were followed up in outpatient clinic of hospital. Clinical data were collected at baseline, and every 3 months after retreatment. The primary efficacy outcomes were ALT normalization, reduction in HBV DNA, and seroconversion of HBeAg. Second efficacy outcome was antiviral resistance.

                This study was approved by Chengdu Military General Hospital's institutional review board and was conducted in accordance with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

                Serum assay methodology

                HBeAg and serum HBV DNA were measured with the use of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (InTec Technology Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China) and real-time PCR-based quantification assays(DA AN gene Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions, respectively. Serum ALT and Creatinine(Cr) were measured using automatic biochemistry analyzer according to standard laboratory procedures. Antiviral resistance was analyzed using PCR sequencing assay if HBV DNA no less than 1000 copies/mL after 1-year antiviral treatment.

                Definition

                Biochemical response was defined as a decrease in serum ALT to within the normal range. Virological response was defined as a decrease in serum HBV DNA to undetectable levels by PCR assays (<1000 copies/mL). HBeAg response was defined as a loss or seroconversion of HBeAg in patients who were initially HBeAg positive. Virological breakthrough was defined as an increase in serum HBV DNA by 1 log10 (10-fold) above nadir, or to detectable level (≥ 1000 copies/mL) after achieving virological response during retreatment. Viral relapse was defined as an increase in serum HBV DNA to detectable level after achieving virological response.

                Statistical analysis

                Quantitative variables were expressed as mean, and categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages, and HBV DNA levels were presented as log transformation. Comparisons between groups of quantitative and qualitative variables were performed using the student t test and Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test), respectively. A P-value of less than 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered to indicate a significant difference. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software package version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

                Declarations

                Authors’ Affiliations

                (1)
                Department of Digestion, Chengdu Military General Hospital

                References

                1. Lai CL, Ratziu V, Yuen MF, Poynard T: Viral hepatitis B. Lancet 2003, 362:2089–2094.PubMedView Article
                2. Lavanchy D: Hepatitis B virus epidemiology, disease burden, treatment, and current and emerging prevention and control measures. J Viral Hepat 2004, 11:97–107.PubMedView Article
                3. Van Damme P, Zanetti AR, Shouval D, Van Herck K: Strategies for global prevention of hepatitis B virus infection. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010, 659:175–188.PubMedView Article
                4. Lok AS, McMahon BJ: Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatology 2009, 50:661–662.PubMedView Article
                5. Hsu YS, Chien RN, Yeh CT, Sheen IS, Chiou HY, Chu CM, Liaw YF: Long-term outcome after spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2002, 35:1522–1527.PubMedView Article
                6. Fattovich G, Rugge M, Brollo L, Pontisso P, Noventa F, Guido M, Alberti A, Realdi G: Clinical, virologic and histologic outcome following seroconversion from HBeAg to anti-HBe in chronic hepatitis type B. Hepatology 1986, 6:167–172.PubMedView Article
                7. Reijnders JG, Perquin MJ, Zhang N, Hansen BE, Janssen HL: Nucleos(t)ide analogues only induce temporary hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in most patients with chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2010, 139:491–498.PubMedView Article
                8. Song BC, Suh DJ, Lee HC, Chung YH, Lee YS: Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion after lamivudine therapy is not durable in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Korea. Hepatology 2000, 32:803–806.PubMedView Article
                9. Shouval D, Lai CL, Chang TT, Cheinquer H, Martin P, Carosi G, Han S, Kaymakoglu S, Tamez R, Yang J, Tenney D, Brett-Smith H: Relapse of hepatitis B in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who discontinued successful entecavir treatment: the case for continuous antiviral therapy. J Hepatol 2009, 50:289–295.PubMedView Article
                10. Dienstag JL, Cianciara J, Karayalcin S, Kowdley KV, Willems B, Plisek S, Woessner M, Gardner S, Schiff E: Durability of serologic response after lamivudine treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2003, 37:748–755.PubMedView Article
                11. Ito K, Tanaka Y, Orito E, Hirashima N, Ide T, Hino T, Kumashiro R, Kato A, Nukaya H, Sakakibara K, Mukaide M, Ito H, Sata M, Ueda R, Mizokami M: Predicting relapse after cessation of Lamivudine monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2004, 38:490–495.PubMedView Article
                12. Zoulim F: Hepatitis B virus resistance to antiviral drugs: where are we going? Liver Int 2011,31(Suppl 1):111–116.PubMedView Article
                13. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis BJ Hepatol 2009, 50:227–242.
                14. Guideline on prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in China (2005)Chin Med J (Engl) 2007, 120:2159–2173.
                15. Lim SG, Cheng Y, Guindon S, Seet BL, Lee LY, Hu P, Wasser S, Peter FJ, Tan T, Goode M, Rodrigo AG: Viral quasi-species evolution during hepatitis Be antigen seroconversion. Gastroenterology 2007, 133:951–958.PubMedView Article
                16. Lok AS, Zoulim F, Locarnini S, Bartholomeusz A, Ghany MG, Pawlotsky JM, Liaw YF, Mizokami M, Kuiken C: Antiviral drug-resistant HBV: standardization of nomenclature and assays and recommendations for management. Hepatology 2007, 46:254–265.PubMedView Article
                17. Kao JH: Diagnosis of hepatitis B virus infection through serological and virological markers. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 2:553–562.PubMedView Article
                18. Liu Y, Wang C, Zhong Y, Chen L, Li X, Ji D, Wang H, Xin S, Zoulim F, Xu D: Evolution and suppression of HBV strains with multidrug resistance to lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir in a patient with chronic hepatitis B. Antivir Ther 2010, 15:1185–1190.PubMedView Article
                19. Ijaz S, Arnold C, Dervisevic S, Mechurova J, Tatman N, Tedder RS, Naoumov NV: Dynamics of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus during adefovir monotherapy versus lamivudine plus adefovir combination therapy. J Med Virol 2008, 80:1160–1170.PubMedView Article
                20. Sanchez MJ, Buti M, Homs M, Palacios A, Rodriguez-Frias F, Esteban R: Successful use of entecavir for a severe case of reactivation of hepatitis B virus following polychemotherapy containing rituximab. J Hepatol 2009, 51:1091–1096.PubMedView Article
                21. Carey I, Harrison PM: Monotherapy versus combination therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2009, 18:1655–1666.PubMedView Article
                22. Chen EQ, Wang LC, Lei J, Xu L, Tang H: Meta-analysis: adefovir dipivoxil in combination with lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus. Virol J 2009, 6:163.PubMedView Article

                Copyright

                © Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                Advertisement