Open Access

The C-terminal sequence of the large hepatitis delta antigen is variable but retains the ability to bind clathrin

Virology Journal20096:31

DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-6-31

Received: 19 February 2009

Accepted: 16 March 2009

Published: 16 March 2009

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a defected RNA virus and requires its encoded large antigen (LDAg) to interact with helper viral proteins (HBsAgs) during assembly. Recently, a study demonstrated a direct binding of the LDAg C-terminus from genotype I HDV to the clathrin heavy chain (CHC), which suggests that this interaction might facilitate HDV assembly. If LDAg binding to clathrin is essential to HDV life cycle, a clathrin box sequence at the C-terminus of LDAg should be conserved across all HDV. However, the C-terminal sequence of LDAg is variable among 43 HDV isolates.

Results

Based on the presence and location of clathrin box at the C-terminus of LDAg from 43 isolates of HDV, we classified them into three groups. Group 1 (13 isolates) and 2 (26 isolates) contain a clathrin box located at amino acids 199–203 and 206–210, respectively, as found in genotype I and genotype II. Group 3 (4 isolates) contains no clathrin box as found in genotype III. CHC binding by three different LDAg (genotype I to III) was then tested by in vivo and in vitro experiments. Transfection of plasmids which encode fusion proteins of EGFP and full-length of LDAg from three genotypes into HuH-7 cells, a human heptoma cell line, was performed. GFP-pull down assays showed that a full-length of CHC was co-precipitated by EGFP-LDI, -LDII and -LDIII but not by EGFP. Further in vitro studies showed a full-length or fragment (amino acids 1 to 107) of CHC can be pull-down by 13-amino-acid peptides of LDAg from three genotypes of HDV.

Conclusion

Both in vivo and in vitro studies showed that CHC can bind to various sequences of LDAg from the three major genotypes of HDV. We therefore suggest that the clathrin-LDAg interaction is essential to the HDV life-cycle and that sequences binding to clathrin are evolutionarily selected, but nonetheless show the diversity across different HDV genotypes.

Background

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a small defective RNA virus with a negative-stranded genome. It requires for a helper virus, hepatitis B virus (HBV), to supply envelope proteins (HBsAgs) to complete virion assembly and secretion [13]. The HDV genome is about 1,700 nucleotides long and is circular in form; it appears to form an unbranched rod-like structure due to a high degree of intra-molecular complementary base-pairing [4, 5]. The genome sequence of HDV is divided into a viroid-like sequence and a protein-coding sequence [1, 6]. It has been hypothesized that HDV resulted from RNA recombination between a viroid sequence and a cellular mRNA coding a DIPA (delta interacting protein) protein [6, 7]. Analysis of HDV sequences from across world has revealed that those from Africa have the highest diversity, which suggests that the first HDV might have arisen in Africa [8, 9]. After the additional isolation of new HDV sequences from Africa, the classification of HDV has been changed from one including genotypes I to III into one involving clades 1 to 8 [8].

In the past three decades, intensive molecular biology studies have largely revealed the functions and roles of HDV encoded proteins in replication. During HDV replication, the coding sequence is translated into two delta antigens (HDAgs), a small and a large form (SDAg and LDAg), from the same reading frame; these are 195 and 214 amino acids in length, respectively [10, 11]. Production of LDAg is through a process known as RNA editing, which is performed by cellular ADAR [12, 13]; this converts the amber stop codon (UAG) of SDAg into a tryptophan codon (UGG), resulting in an extra 19 or 20 amino acids at the C-terminus of LDAg [14]. SDAg is essential for HDV replication while LDAg antagonizes the function of SDAg and is required to interact with HBsAg during virion assembly and maturation [15, 16]. There is a CaaX-box (211CRPQ214, 211CTPQ214, and 211CTQQ214 in various HDV genotypes, see Fig. 1A) at the C-terminus of LDAg, which acts as a signal of isoprenylation. Mutation of the isoprenylation signal of LDAg leads to a failure of virion assembly and secretion [1719].
Figure 1

The features of LDAg amino acid sequences of HDV and the synthetic oligonucleotides encoding the 13-amino-acid peptide of LDAg. (A) The amino acid (in one-letter symbols) alignment of full-length of LDAg from the three genotypes. Genotype I is from American strain (accession number M28267), genotype II from Taiwan-3 strain (accession number U19598), and genotype III from Peru strain (accession number L22063). The putative clathrin binding domains are shown by rectangle boxes and the last 19 or 20 amino acids of LDAg are highlighted by bold face letters. The consensus amino acids for post-translational modification are indicated as follows: Ac (acetylation) at amino acid 72, Pi (phosphorylation) at positions of 2, 123, and 177 and Py (isoprenylation) at the position 211. The amino acid positions are indicated by numbers. (B) Two complementary oligonucleotides were designed for expression of the corresponding short amino acid sequences (as indicated in one-letter symbols above the oligonucletides) of LDAg. The 5'- and 3'-end of the oligonucleotides were designed to include the restriction sites Eco RI and Sal I, respectively. The restriction site immediately next to Sal I is Eco RV, which was designed specifically to allow quick clone selection.

In addition to the isoprenylation signal sequence, a nuclear exporting signal (NES) has also been identified at the C-terminus of LDAg [20]. Within the common 195-amino-acid sequence of SDAg and LDAg, two putative leucine-zipper motifs, an RNA binding motif, and two nuclear localization signals have been identified [2124]. Both SDAg and LDAg are phosphoprotiens with a different degree of modification [25]. After they have been either phosphorylated by PKC [26], CKII [18, 26], PKR [27] or ERK1/2 [28], they affect HDV replication or are targeted to SC-35 speckles [18, 2628]. Both acetylation of HDAg at lysine-72 and methylation of SDAg at arginine-13 have also been demonstrated to influence HDV replication [2931]. Conservation of these post-translational sites of HDAg among all known HDV genotypes suggests that the cellular enzymes responsible for the post-translational modifications of HDAg are at least partial if not all involved in HDV replication.

Co-infection and super-infection of HDV with HBV usually cause more severe liver disease than an HBV single infection [32]. The various HDV genotypes show different geographical distributions and are associated with different disease patterns [7, 33]. HDV genotype I is distributed world-wide and has been linked to a wide spectrum of diseases, ranging from fulminant hepatitis to asymptomatic chronic liver disease. Genotype II is found mainly in Asia, including Japan, Taiwan and Siberia, and seems to give rise to a less severe disease than genotype I. Genotype III is mainly found in the north part of South America and produces a severe form of fulminant hepatitis [33]. The mechanism of HDV pathogenesis would seem to result from complicated interactions between HDV, HBV, and/or host factors and is not completely understood.

Two recent studies have indicated that LDAg rather than SDAg might play a significant role in HDV pathogenesis [34, 35]. One study demonstrated a direct binding of LDAg to Smad-3, which modulates TGF-β signaling to activate plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression and c-Jun-induced signal cascades; this would seem to lead to liver cirrhosis [35]. The other study demonstrated that the cytoplasmic form of LDAg binds to the clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and further suggested that this LDAg-CHC interaction is required for HDV assembly. Furthermore, the LDAg-CHC interaction would seem to interfere with the clathrin-mediated endocytosis and exocytosis, which might finally lead to the hepatocytes damage [34]. However, the clathrin-box (199LFPAD203) identified in the LDAg of genotype I is not conserved in the same position in genotype II and III (Fig. 1A). This study was carried out with the aim of verifying whether the clathrin-binding activity is conserved across the three major genotypes of LDAgs.

Results

The alignment of LDAg amino acid sequences from the three HDV genotypes indicates two features: 1) the common 195-amino-acid sequence shared by HDAg is conserved because it contains many functional motifs and post-translational modification sites, which are important for viral replication and maturation, and 2) the unique C-terminal sequence of LDAg is highly variable and differs in numbers of amino acids, in which genotype I and II have 19 residues while genotype III has 20 residues (Fig. 1A). Additionally, the presence of consensus sequence of the clathrin box (LϕxϕD/E) [36, 37] and its location are also different at the C-terminus of LDAg (Fig. 1A). There is a clathrin box located at amino acids 199–203 in genotype I and a clathrin box at amino acids 206–210 in genotype II while no clathrin box in genotype III. Further alignment of all known HDV sequences by the C-terminal end of LDAg shows that when 43 isolates across clades 1 to 8 were compared, they could be divided into three different groups. Group 1 contains a clathrin box [LFP(A,S,V)D] located at amino acids 199–203 as found in genotype I. Group 2 contains a clathrin box (LPLLE) located at amino acids 206–210 as found in genotype II. Finally, group 3 contains no clathrin box as found in genotype III (Table 1). Among 43 HDV isolates, 13 sequences belong to group 1, 26 belong to group 2 and 4 are group 3.
Table 1

Three groups of the C-terminus of LDAg from 43 HDV isolates based on the presence and location of clathrin box

Clades

Isolate

Extra a.a. residues

Clathrin Box

HDV-1

Ethiopia

WDILFPSDPPFSPQS-CRPQ

LFP(A,S,V)D

group 1

 

US-1

WDILFPADPPSSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

US-2

WDILFPADPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

Nagasaki-2

WDILFPVDPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

Taiwan

WDLLFPADPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

TW2667

WDILFPADPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

China

WDILFPADPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

Italy

WDILFPADPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

Nauru

WDILFPSDPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

Cagliari

WDLLFPADPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

HDV-Iran

WDILFPSDPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

Lebanon

WDILFPSDPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 
 

Somalia

WDILFPSDPPFSPQS-CRPQ

 

HDV-2

Japan

WVSPSPPQQRLPLLE-CTPQ

LPLLE

group 2

 

Taiwan-3

WVHPSPPQQRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

Miyako-37

WVRPSPPQQRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

TW2476

WVRPSPPQQRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

Yakut-26

WVNPVPPGQRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

Yakut-62

WVNPAPPGQRLPLLE-CTPQ

 

HDV-3

Peru-1

WYGFTPPPPGYYWVPGCTQQ

None

group 3

 

VnzD8624

WYGFTPPPPGYYWVPGCTQQ

 
 

VnzD8375

WYGFTPPPPGYYWVPGCTQQ

 
 

VnzD8349

WYGFTPPPPGYYWVPGCTQQ

 

HDV-4

Miyako

WVDPGRPSPRLPLLE-CTPQ

LPLLE

group 2

 

L215

WVGPGSPSPRFPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

Miyako-36

WVNPQPPPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

Taiwan-Tw-2b

WVSPQPPPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

AF209859

WVSPQPPPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

Tokyo

WVNPQPPPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 

HDV-5

dFr2600

WVNPGPXPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

LPLLE

group 2

 

dFr2005

WVSPGSPSPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

dFr47

WVNPGPRPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

dFr910

WVDPGPRPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

dFr73

WVSPGAPSPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

dFr2703

WVSPXPXPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 

HDV-6

dFr48

WGNTPPRPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

LPLLE

group 2

 

dFr2139

WGNGPPRSPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

dFr2627

WGNTPPRPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 

HDV-7

dFr45

WGNTPPRPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

LPLLE

group 2

 

dFr2158

WGPSPTPPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 

HDV-8

dFr2072

WGQSPPPPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

LPLLE

group 2

 

dFr644

WGQRPPPPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
 

dFr2736

WGQQPPPPPRLPLLE-CTPQ

 
If clathrin-binding by LDAg is important to the HDV life-cycle, this property should be conserved across all genotypes of HDV. To answer this question, we designed in vivo CHC binding experiments to test whether exogenously expressed EGFP-LD can bind to endogenous CHC or not. HuH-7 cells, a human hepatoma cell line, were first transfected with the pEGFP-LD series of plasmids and treated with TNF-α at 24 h post-transfection for 2 h so that the EGFP-LD would behave like authentic LDAg [38] and be translocated from the nucleus to cytoplasm after the TNF-α treatment [39]. The transfected cells were immunoprecipitated by anti-GFP. This was followed by Western blot analysis, which showed that CHC was co-precipitated by all three fusion proteins, EGFP-LDI, EGFP-LDII, and EGFP-LDIII (Fig. 2, lanes 7–9), but not by EGFP (Fig. 2, lane 6). The amount of CHC co-precipitated with EGFP-LDI, -LDII, and LD-III was quantified after normalization and found to have a ratio of 1: 2.6: 2.2, respectively, averaged across three independent experiments. This indicates that LDAg binding to CHC is conserved and that the binding capacity varies across the three genotypes of HDV.
Figure 2

An in vivo binding assay of EGFP-LDs to clathrin. HuH-7 cells were transfected by various plasmids, as indicated above the blot, to allow expression of the EGFP-LDs. The total cell lysate and anti-GFP precipitated proteins were analyzed for CHC (2A), GFP (2B), and actin (2C) by Western blotting. NC (lane 1) represents non-transfection HuH-7 cells as a control. Lanes 2 to 5 are total cell lysates and lanes 6 to 9 are the anti-GFP immunoprecipitated proteins.

To verify the CHC binding by LDAg of genotype II and III is indeed through the C-terminus of LDAg as demonstrated by genotype I [34], we expressed the 13-amino-acid peptide (amino acid positions 198 to 210) of LDAg which is fused to GST, in E. coli (Fig. 3A). Purified GST-LDC(198–210) proteins bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads were then incubated with HuH-7 cell lysate for 16 h. The cell lysate and GST fusion protein mixtures were then spun down and analyzed by Western blotting. The results showed that the full-length CHC from HuH-7 cells was able to bind to the GST fusion proteins containing the peptide from the three LDAg (Fig. 3B, lanes 7–9) but not to GST only (Fig. 3B, lane 6). The normalized amount of CHC binding to the LDAg terminus of genotype I, II and III was in a ratio of 1: 1.6: 1.3, respectively, averaged across three independent experiments. Thus, the binding capacity of genotype II and III was lower than that found by the in vivo experiments as shown in Fig. 2. Nevertheless, this result indicates that the 13-amino-acid peptide of the GST-LDIIIC(198–210)protein, which is without an identifiable clathrin-box, was still able to bind to full-length CHC and that this binding to CHC was stronger than the GST-LDIC(198–210) protein that does contain a clathrin box.
Figure 3

An in vitro binding assay of LDAg peptides to HuH-7 cellular clathrin. (A) Expression and purification of GST and the GST fusion proteins with the 13-amino-acid peptides of LDAg in E. coli. Total E. coli protein profiles are in even number lanes and purified proteins are in odd number lanes. The top gel was stained with Coomassie blue and the bottom gel was analyzed for GST. GST fusion proteins from different LDAg genotypes are indicated above the gel. Protein makers are shown to the left of the gel. (B) Western blot analysis for E. coli expressed LDAg peptide binding to CHC from a HuH-7 cell lysate. The top gel was detected for CHC, middle gel for actin, and bottom gel for GST. The GST and GST fusion proteins used for the binding assay are indicated above the gel. Lanes 1 to 5 are total cell lysate and lanes 6–9 are the GST-pull downs.

Since no consensus sequence of a clathrin box is present in the C-terminus of genotype III LDAg, we further verified whether the CHC fragment (amino acid 1 to 107) is the specific binding site for the peptide (198FTPPPPGYYWVPG210) of genotype III LDAg. A fragment of CHC fused with hexahistidine was expressed in E. coli (Fig. 4A) and then purified by nickel beads. The glutathione-Sepharose beads bound with GST fusion proteins containing the 13-amino-acid peptide of LDAg from the various genotypes was then individually incubated with 6XHis-CHC(1–107) for 16 h. The spun down mixtures were separated by SDS-PADE and stained by silver. The results showed that the fragment of CHC(1–107) was pulled down by beads containing GST fusion protein (Fig. 4B, lanes 3–5) but not by those containing GST only (Fig. 4B, lane 2). The amount of CHC fragment pulled down by GST-LDIC(198–210), GST-LDIIC(198–210), and GST-LDIIIC(198–210) was averaged from three independent experiments and showed the ratio 1: 1.4: 0.7. Taken all these results together, it would seem that the LDAg of genotype II, either as a full-length protein or a 13-amino-acid peptide, had the highest binding capacity to the full-length or 107-amino-acid peptide of CHC as comparing three genotypes. The LDAg of genotype III had the second highest binding capacity to the full-length of CHC (Fig. 2A and Fig. 3B), however, had the lowest binding capacity to the fragment of CHC.
Figure 4

An in vitro binding assay of LDAg peptides to CHC (1–107) fragment produced from E. coli. (A) Expression profile and purification of the fragment of CHC in E. coli. The top gel was stained with Coomassie blue and the bottom gel was detected by anti-His antibody. The protein makers are indicated to the left of the gel. (B) E. coli expressed GST and GST fusion proteins as shown in Fig. 3 were incubated with purified CHC as shown in (A). The GST pull-down products were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and silver stained. The proteins used for the pull-down are indicated above the gel and their migration positions are indicated by a black arrowhead (GST-LD), a gray arrowhead (GST) and a white arrowhead (CHC). Open circle (lane 1) indicates an unknown protein co-purified with CHC from E. coli.

Discussion

In this study, we have demonstrated that binding to CHC by the C-terminus of LDAg is conserved across all three major genotypes of HDV, although their amino acid sequences (198LLFPADPPFSPQS210 in genotype I, 198GPSPPQQRLPLLE210 in genotype II, and 198FTPPPPGYYWVPG210 in genotype III) are highly variable in this region (Fig. 1A). Based on the variable sequences, the 43 HDV isolates analyzed can be classified into three groups (Table 1) and the three genotypes (I to III), described earlier in this study, each are represented by one of these groups.

It is reasonable to speculate that the CHC binding by the 13-amino-acid peptide of genotype II LDAg is through a putative clathrin box (LPLLE) that is located between amino acids 206 to 210. It has the highest binding capability to CHC among the three genotypes and this might be a result of a clathrin box at the most proximal end to the C-terminus. Whether such strong binding to CHC reduces genotype II LDAg's interaction with HBsAg and results in poorer packaging by HBsAg as found by Hsu et al. [40] is not determinable from these results. How the peptide of genotype III LDAg, lacking of a clathrin box, binds to CHC is also unclear. There are two possibilities. Firstly, the proline-rich stretch present in genotype III LDAg, which is similar to that of synaptojanin, might serve as a clathrin binding sequence [41]. Alternatively, cellular factors, such as AP-2, might form a complex with genotype III LDAg, through the 205YYWV208 or 206YWVP209 motif [41], and CHC. The results show a weaker binding affinity to the CHC(1–107) fragment produced from E. coli than to the full-length of CHC from the HuH-7 cell lysate by the peptide of genotype III LDAg (Fig. 4B vs. Fig. 3B). This suggests that firstly, cell factors are possibly involved in the genotype III LDAg binding to CHC and/or secondly, the fragment of CHC might have a different conformation from the full-length CHC. This change conformation might be less favorable to genotype III LDAg peptide binding. Based on the above results, we believe a further investigation to elucidate the hypotheses is warranted.

It has been demonstrated that the LDAg is required for interacting with HBsAgs to form mature virions or empty particles containing LDAg [16, 42]. Questions on where and how HDV virions and empty particles are produced and mature remain unanswered. It is possible that the interaction between clathrin and the C-terminus of LDAg may assist HDV budding into the lumen of various intracellular membranes, such as ER or Golgi apparatus. Thus the LDAg may act as a late (L) domain similar to the situation during budding of many retroviruses [36, 37]. There are three known classes of L domains for retroviruses, namely, PTAP, PPXY, and YXXL. The 202PPGY205 sequence is present in genotype III LDAg, but is not present in genotype I and II, and this fits well into the second class of L domain. Whether this sequence functions as an L domain for genotype III HDV budding remains to be tested.

The fact that clathrin binding by LDAg is conserved across all genotypes must reflect its biological importance to the HDV life-cycle. We therefore postulate that any sequence at the C-terminus of LDAg that is able to bind to clathrin will be selected during evolution and this explains the great diversity across the various genotypes. Whether LDAg binding to clathrin, which may impair the normal functioning of clathrin, is one of causes of HDV pathogenesis as suggested by Huang et al. [34] remains to be elucidated, although many clathrin-associated diseases have been reported [43, 44].

Methods

Plasmids used in this study

The cDNAs coding LDAg from different HDV genotypes, American strain of genotype I (accession number M28267), Taiwan-3 strain of genotype II (accession number U19598), and Peru-1 strain of genotype III (accession number L22063), were used in this study and have been described previously [33, 45, 46]. In this study, plasmids were divided into two groups: one for transfection into human hepatoma cells, HuH-7 [47], and the other for transformation into E. coli for protein expression. For transfection studies, the three genotypes of the LDAg coding sequence were constructed into pEGFP-C3 using Bgl II and Eco RI cloning sites as described previously [38]. The plasmids for protein expression were constructed by the insertion of synthetic oligonucleotides (Fig. 1B) downstream of GST in pGEX-4T1 using Eco RI and Sal I sites; this gave pGST-LDIC(198–210), pGST-LDIIC(198–210), and pGST-LDIIIC(198–210), respectively. These clones were first selected checking for the presence of the Eco RV site and then verified by nucleotide sequencing. The cDNA fragment of human clathrin heavy chain containing amino acid 1 to 107 was amplified by RT-PCR and then inserted downstream of hexahistidine-tag sequence of pET-15b to give p6XHis-CHC(1–107); which was used to express 6XHis-CHC(1–107) protein in E. coli. The plasmid was verified by nucleotide sequencing.

Antibodies and affinity beads

The antibodies used in this study were purchased from different commercial companies. Anti-GFP was obtained from Clontech (California, USA) and Chemicon (California, USA). Anti-GST and anti-6XHis were bought from LTK BioLaboratories (Taoyuan, Taiwan). Anti-clathrin heavy chain was purchased from BD (California, USA). Anti-actin was obtained from Novus Biologicals (Colorado, USA). The secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase was bought from Chemicon. Glutathione beads and nickel beads were purchased from GE (New Jersey, USA) and Qiagen (California, USA), respectively.

Cell culture and plasmid transfection

HuH-7 is a fully-differentiated human hepatoma cell line [47] and was cultured at 37°C under 5% CO2 using Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplement with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), and 1% non-essential amino acid. Cells at 60% confluence in a 10 cm Petri dish were transfected with 10 μg of plasmid by the calcium phosphate/DNA precipitation method or by adding lipofectamin 2000 (Invitrogen; California, USA). The transfection rate of each experiment was determined by the GFP expression under a fluorescence microscope.

Protein expression in E. coli and purification

E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) was used to express GST and GST fusion proteins as well as 6XHis-CHC(1–107). Bacteria were grown in LB medium supplement with 100 μg/ml ampicillin while vigorously shaken at 37°C until an O.D. 600 nm of 0.6 was reached. Production of protein was induced by the addition of 1 mM IPTG to the medium for 1 to 3 h. The resulting fusion proteins were further purified by one step binding to either glutathione affinity beads or nickel beads as appropriate and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

Immunoprecipitation, GST-protein pull down and Westernblotting

At 24 h post-transfection with pEGFP-C3, pEGFP-LDI, pEGFP-LDII or pEGFP-LDIII into HuH-7 cells, the cells were treated with TNF-α (30 ng/ml) for 2 h [39]. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitatd by anti-GFP. The precipitated proteins were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred onto PVDF membranes. The membrane was then incubated with anti-clathrin, anti-GFP, and anti-actin antibodies individually. After incubation with the secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase, the blots were developed by enhanced chemiluminescence using a commercial kit (Pierce; Illinois, USA). The intensity of the protein bands was quantified by the program Image J software (NIH, Maryland, USA). In order to compare the pull-down efficiency of the different genotype LDAgs, the amount of CHC was normalization against actin and the amount pulled down by genotype I EGFP-LD was designated as 1. Three independent results were averaged and compared. Glutathione Sepharose 4B beads containing various GST fusion proteins were incubated with HuH-7 cell lysates or E. coli produced 6XHis-CHC(1–107) for 16 h at 4°C. After three washes with 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS (phosphate buffered saline), the proteins bound to the beads were analyzed and quantified by Western blot and Image J software as described above.

Abbreviations

HBV: 

hepatitis B virus

HBsAg: 

surface antigen of HBV

HDV: 

hepatitis delta virus

HDAg: 

hepatitis delta antigen

LDAg: 

large delta antigen

SDAg: 

small delta antigen

CHC: 

clathrin heavy chain

EGFP: 

enhanced green fluorescence protein

GST: 

glutathione-S-transferase.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Jim-Tong Horng (Chang Gung University) for helpful suggestions on the study and Dr. Ralph Kirby (National Yang Ming University) for English editing of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from NHRI (EX9521BI, EX9621BI, and EX9721BI) to S.J.L.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, Graduate Institute of Biomedical Science, Chang Gung University
(2)
Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, National Yang-Ming University

References

  1. Lai MM: The molecular biology of hepatitis delta virus. Annu Rev Biochem 1995, 64: 259-286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lai MM: RNA replication without RNA-dependent RNA polymerase: surprises from hepatitis delta virus. J Virol 2005, 79: 7951-7958.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Taylor JM: Hepatitis delta virus. Virology 2006, 344: 71-76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wang KS, Choo QL, Weiner AJ, Ou JH, Najarian RC, Thayer RM, Mullenbach GT, Denniston KJ, Gerin JL, Houghton M: Structure, sequence and expression of the hepatitis delta (δ) viral genome. Nature 1986, 323: 508-514.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuo MY, Goldberg J, Coates L, Mason W, Gerin J, Taylor J: Molecular cloning of hepatitis delta virus RNA from an infected woodchuck liver: sequence, structure, and applications. J Virol 1988, 62: 1855-1861.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brazas R, Ganem D: A cellular homolog of hepatitis delta antigen: implications for viral replication and evolution. Science 1996, 274: 90-94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chao M: RNA recombination in hepatitis delta virus: implications regarding the abilities of mammalian RNA polymerases. Virus Res 2007, 127: 208-215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deny P: Hepatitis delta virus genetic variability: from genotypes I, II, III to eight major clades? Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2006, 307: 151-171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Radjef N, Gordien E, Ivaniushina V, Gault E, Anais P, Drugan T, Trinchet JC, Roulot D, Tamby M, Milinkovitch MC, Deny P: Molecular phylogenetic analyses indicate a wide and ancient radiation of African hepatitis delta virus, suggesting a deltavirus genus of at least seven major clades. J Virol 2004, 78: 2537-2544.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zheng H, Fu TB, Lazinski D, Taylor J: Editing on the genomic RNA of human hepatitis delta virus. J Virol 1992, 66: 4693-4697.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Luo GX, Chao M, Hsieh SY, Sureau C, Nishikura K, Taylor J: A specific base transition occurs on replicating hepatitis delta virus RNA. J Virol 1990, 64: 1021-1027.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wong SK, Lazinski DW: Replicating hepatitis delta virus RNA is edited in the nucleus by the small form of ADAR1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99: 15118-15123.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Casey JL, Bergmann KF, Brown TL, Gerin JL: Structural requirements for RNA editing in hepatitis delta virus: evidence for a uridine-to-cytidine editing mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992, 89: 7149-7153.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Casey JL, Gerin JL: Hepatitis D virus RNA editing: specific modification of adenosine in the antigenomic RNA. J Virol 1995, 69: 7593-7600.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chao M, Hsieh SY, Taylor J: Role of two forms of hepatitis delta virus antigen: evidence for a mechanism of self-limiting genome replication. J Virol 1990, 64: 5066-5069.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chang FL, Chen PJ, Tu SJ, Wang CJ, Chen DS: The large form of hepatitis delta antigen is crucial for assembly of hepatitis delta virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88: 8490-8494.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hwang SB, Lai MM: Isoprenylation mediates direct protein-protein interactions between hepatitis large delta antigen and hepatitis B virus surface antigen. J Virol 1993, 67: 7659-7662.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tan KP, Shih KN, Lo SJ: Ser-123 of the large antigen of hepatitis delta virus modulates its cellular localization to the nucleolus, SC-35 speckles or the cytoplasm. J Gen Virol 2004, 85: 1685-1694.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Glenn JS, Watson JA, Havel CM, White JM: Identification of a prenylation site in delta virus large antigen. Science 1992, 256: 1331-1333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee CH, Chang SC, Wu CH, Chang MF: A novel chromosome region maintenance 1-independent nuclear export signal of the large form of hepatitis delta antigen that is required for the viral assembly. J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 8142-8148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chang MF, Baker SC, Soe LH, Kamahora T, Keck JG, Makino S, Govindarajan S, Lai MM: Human hepatitis delta antigen is a nuclear phosphoprotein with RNA-binding activity. J Virol 1988, 62: 2403-2410.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chang MF, Chang SC, Chang CI, Wu K, Kang HY: Nuclear localization signals, but not putative leucine zipper motifs, are essential for nuclear transport of hepatitis delta antigen. J Virol 1992, 66: 6019-6027.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Xia YP, Yeh CT, Ou JH, Lai MM: Characterization of nuclear targeting signal of hepatitis delta antigen: nuclear transport as a protein complex. J Virol 1992, 66: 914-921.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin JH, Chang MF, Baker SC, Govindarajan S, Lai MM: Characterization of hepatitis delta antigen: specific binding to hepatitis delta virus RNA. J Virol 1990, 64: 4051-4058.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mu JJ, Wu HL, Chiang BL, Chang RP, Chen DS, Chen PJ: Characterization of the phosphorylated forms and the phosphorylated residues of hepatitis δ virus delta antigens. J Virol 1999, 73: 10540-10545.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yeh TS, Lo SJ, Chen PJ, Lee YH: Casein kinase II and protein kinase C modulate hepatitis delta virus RNA replication but not empty viral particle assembly. J Virol 1996, 70: 6190-6198.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen CW, Tsay YG, Wu HL, Lee CH, Chen DS, Chen PJ: The double-stranded RNA-activated kinase, PKR, can phosphorylate hepatitis D virus small delta antigen at functional serine and threonine residues. J Biol Chem 2002, 277: 33058-33067.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Chen YS, Huang WH, Hong SY, Tsay YG, Chen PJ: ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation of small hepatitis delta antigen at serine 177 enhances hepatitis delta virus antigenomic RNA replication. J Virol 2008, 82: 9345-9358.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang WH, Mai RT, Lee YH: Transcription factor YY1 and its associated acetyltransferases CBP and p300 interact with hepatitis delta antigens and modulate hepatitis delta virus RNA replication. J Virol 2008, 82: 7313-7324.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mu JJ, Tsay YG, Juan LJ, Fu TF, Huang WH, Chen DS, Chen PJ: The small delta antigen of hepatitis delta virus is an acetylated protein and acetylation of lysine 72 may influence its cellular localization and viral RNA synthesis. Virology 2004, 319: 60-70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Li YJ, Stallcup MR, Lai MM: Hepatitis delta virus antigen is methylated at arginine residues, and methylation regulates subcellular localization and RNA replication. J Virol 2004, 78: 13325-13334.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rizzetto M: The delta agent. Hepatology 1983, 3: 729-737.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Casey JL, Brown TL, Colan EJ, Wignall FS, Gerin JL: A genotype of hepatitis D virus that occurs in northern South America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993, 90: 9016-9020.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Huang C, Chang SC, Yu IC, Tsay YG, Chang MF: Large hepatitis delta antigen is a novel clathrin adaptor-like protein. J Virol 2007, 81: 5985-5994.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Choi SH, Jeong SH, Hwang SB: Large hepatitis delta antigen modulates transforming growth factor-β signaling cascades: implication of hepatitis delta virus-induced liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 2007, 132: 343-357.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirchhausen T: Clathrin. Annu Rev Biochem 2000, 69: 699-727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lafer EM: Clathrin-protein interactions. Traffic 2002, 3: 513-520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shih KN, Lo SJ: The HDV large-delta antigen fused with GFP remains functional and provides for studying its dynamic distribution. Virology 2001, 285: 138-152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang IC, Chien CY, Huang CR, Lo SJ: Induction of hepatitis D virus large antigen translocation to the cytoplasm by hepatitis B virus surface antigens correlates with endoplasmic reticulum stress and NF-κB activation. J Gen Virol 2006, 87: 1715-1723.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hsu SC, Syu WJ, Sheen IJ, Liu HT, Jeng KS, Wu JC: Varied assembly and RNA editing efficiencies between genotypes I and II hepatitis D virus and their implications. Hepatology 2002, 35: 665-672.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Dell'Angelica EC: Clathrin-binding proteins: got a motif? Join the network! Trends Cell Biol 2001, 11: 315-318.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheu SY, Chen KL, Lee YW, Lo SJ: No intermolecular interaction between the large hepatitis delta antigens is required for the secretion with hepatitis B surface antigen: a model of empty HDV particle. Virology 1996, 218: 275-278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Landles C, Bates GP: Huntingtin and the molecular pathogenesis of Huntington's disease. Fourth in molecular medicine review series. EMBO Rep 2004, 5: 958-963.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yao PJ: Synaptic frailty and clathrin-mediated synaptic vesicle trafficking in Alzheimer's disease. Trends Neurosci 2004, 27: 24-29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin FM, Lee CM, Wang TC, Chao M: Initiation of RNA replication of cloned Taiwan-3 isolate of hepatitis delta virus genotype II in cultured cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003, 306: 966-972.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Makino S, Chang MF, Shieh CK, Kamahora T, Vannier DM, Govindarajan S, Lai MM: Molecular cloning and sequencing of a human hepatitis delta (delta) virus RNA. Nature 1987, 329: 343-346.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nakabayashi H, Taketa K, Miyano K, Yamane T, Sato J: Growth of human hepatoma cells lines with differentiated functions in chemically defined medium. Cancer Res 1982, 42: 3858-3863.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement