Reemergence of dengue virus type-3 (subtype-III) in India: Implications for increased incidence of DHF & DSS

  • Paban Kumar Dash1,

    Affiliated with

    • Man Mohan Parida1,

      Affiliated with

      • Parag Saxena1,

        Affiliated with

        • Ajay Abhyankar1,

          Affiliated with

          • CP Singh2,

            Affiliated with

            • KN Tewari2,

              Affiliated with

              • Asha Mukul Jana1,

                Affiliated with

                • K Sekhar1 and

                  Affiliated with

                  • Lakshmana PV Rao1Email author

                    Affiliated with

                    Virology Journal20063:55

                    DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-3-55

                    Received: 24 January 2006

                    Accepted: 06 July 2006

                    Published: 06 July 2006

                    Abstract

                    Background

                    Dengue virus infection has recently taken endemic proportion in India implicating all the four known dengue serotypes. There was a major dengue outbreak in northern India including Delhi in October- December, 2003 and again in 2004. We have carried out a detailed investigation of the 2004 outbreak by Serosurveillance, RT-PCR, nested PCR, virus isolation and genotyping. We also report the molecular epidemiological investigation of these outbreaks.

                    Results

                    The serological investigation of 162 suspected serum samples using an in-house dengue dipstick ELISA revealed 11%-IgM, 51%-IgG and 38%-both IgM and IgG antibody positivity. The RT-PCR analysis revealed presence of dengue RNA in 17 samples. Further subtyping and genotyping by nested PCR and nucleotide sequencing of C-prM gene junction revealed the association of subtype III of dengue virus type 3 in the outbreak.

                    Conclusion

                    The sudden shifting and dominance of the dengue virus serotype-3 (subtype III) replacing the earlier circulating serotype-2 (subtype IV) is a point of major concern and may be attributed to increased incidence of DHF and DSS in India.

                    Background

                    Dengue virus infection is now recognized as one of the most important mosquito borne human infections of 21st century. The global incidences of the dengue infection has now increased enormously and an estimated 50–100 million cases of dengue infections are now reported annually from more than 100 tropical and sub tropical countries of the world [1]. Dengue is caused by four antigenically distinct viruses designated as dengue virus type 1–4 (DEN 1–4), belonging to genus Flavivirus of family Flaviviridae. The genome of dengue virus consists of a single stranded, non segmented, positive sense ribonucleic acid (RNA) of approximately 10.7 kb in length [2]. All the four serotypes of dengue viruses are primarily transmitted by Aedes aegypti .Infection with any one of these serotypes generally leads to a mild, self limiting febrile illness (classical dengue fever (DF)). However, in few cases DF also leads to severe life threatening dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). Several hypotheses, like antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) in heterotypic secondary dengue infections, involvement of a virulent viral genotype, and host factors have been suggested to explain the mechanism of pathogenesis of DHF and DSS [3].

                    The number of DHF and DSS cases have increased enormously in the last two decades in India and DEN-2 has been implicated as the causative agent in most of these outbreaks [4, 5]. It is widely reported that DEN-2 is circulating predominantly in most parts of India and involvement of other serotypes in major dengue outbreaks are not reported since 1995. However, surprisingly, a major epidemic struck in many parts of northern India including National Capital Delhi and Gwalior in Madhya Pradesh in 2003, in which DEN-3 virus was implicated as the major serotype [6, 7]. Again dengue cases were reported during September – October, 2004 in Delhi.

                    In the present study, we report the serological, virological and molecular investigation of the 2004 Dengue outbreak. We also report the molecular epidemiological investigation of the 2003 and 2004 Delhi outbreaks based on the nucleotide sequence analysis of C-prM gene junction.

                    Results

                    Outbreak

                    An outbreak of febrile illness was reported in Delhi, India, during September- October 2004. The trend of the epidemic indicated the maximum number of cases was reported from the 1st to 3rd week of October. The clinical history revealed that all the patients had suffered from fever ranging from 38.5° to 40°C. Most of the prominent clinical symptoms include headache (75%), myalgia (66%), rash (48%), vomiting (42%), conjunctival hemorrhage (38%), epistaxis (17%) and melena (5%). The platelet count varies from 18000 – 2.8 lakhs (Mean 62,000). The epidemic affected males and females at a ratio of 2.6:1. Majority (52.5%) of the patients were found belong to the age group more than 25 years. The detail distribution of the disease in terms of the age and sex of the patients is listed in Table 1.
                    Table 1

                    Age and sex distribution of dengue suspected patients in Delhi during September-October, 2004

                    Age (Year)

                    No. of patients

                     

                    Male

                    Female

                    Total

                    0–5

                    4 (3.4%)

                    3(2%)

                    7

                    6–10

                    4(3.4%)

                    -

                    4

                    11–15

                    8(5%)

                    7(4.32%)

                    15

                    16–20

                    15 (9.25%)

                    5(3.08%)

                    20

                    21–25

                    23(14.1%)

                    8(5%)

                    31

                    >25

                    63(39%)

                    22(13.5%)

                    85

                    Serology

                    The serological analysis revealed that a total of 141 samples (87%) are positive for the presence of dengue specific antibodies. Out of these antibody positive cases, 16 (11%) were found positive for IgM, 72 (51%) for IgG and 53 (38%) had both IgM and IgG antibodies.

                    RT-PCR

                    A total of 17 (10%) samples were found positive for the presence of dengue virus specific nucleic acid as demonstrated by the presence of dengue complex specific 511 bp amplicon in 2% agarose gel.

                    Isolation

                    Isolation of virus was attempted from all the RT-PCR positive samples in C6/36 cells. A total of four dengue viruses were isolated from these samples. The isolation was confirmed at each passage level by RT-PCR.

                    Typing of viruses

                    The serotype of the isolated virus, as well as viruses directly from serum samples was determined by nested PCR using serotype specific primers. The result indicated that all the 17 samples were positive for DEN-3 specific RNA.

                    Nucleotide sequence analysis

                    The nucleotide sequence of the C-prM gene junction (454 bp; excluding the primer sequence) of the nine representative dengue viruses and one NIV reference DEN-3 virus (isolated in Philippines in 1957) were determined in the present study. Detailed descriptions of these viruses were given in Table 2. These sequences were compared with eighteen other geographically diverse dengue-3 isolates (Table 3). All these sequences were aligned with the homologous regions (nt 160–613) of prototype DEN-3 isolate (H-87, isolated in 1956 in Philippines; designated as PHIL-56 in this manuscript) (Fig. 1 and 2 ). The alignment did not reveal any base insertion or deletion in this region. This region was found to be AT rich and the AT composition of the nine Indian DEN-3 viruses, sequenced in this study varied from 52.42–53.3 % (avg. 52.92 %). On comparison to PHIL-56 (H-87), majority of mutations were found to be silent. Majority of mutations were found to be of transition type. The ratio of transition to transversion was found to be 15:1. The deduced amino acids were also aligned following the nucleotide alignment pattern (Fig 3). Majority of the amino acid changes are found to be conservative type except a very few like M-I (at position 108) and T-A (at position 112). On comparison of C-prM genomic region, it has been found that all the DEN-3 viruses, sequenced in this study, were very closely related (more than 99%), except the GWL-60, which revealed around 97 % nucleotide sequence identity. However, these Indian DEN-3 viruses revealed an average of 95.3% sequence identity with prototype DEN-3 isolate (H-87). When compared with another Indian DEN-3 virus (isolated in 1984), the nucleotide and amino acid sequence homology was found to be 99.84 and 100 % respectively.
                    Table 2

                    Description of dengue type-3 viruses sequenced in this study

                    Sl. No

                    Virus ID. No

                    Date of collection of sample

                    Clinical Status

                    Age (Year)

                    Sex

                    Passage History

                    GenBank Accession No

                    1

                    DEL-12

                    24-10-2003

                    IUa

                    IUa

                    IUa

                    NIL

                    AY770513

                    2

                    GWL-25

                    03-11-2003

                    DF

                    12

                    F

                    NIL

                    AY770511

                    3

                    GWL-60

                    26-11-2003

                    DHF

                    9

                    M

                    NIL

                    AY770512

                    4

                    DEL-61

                    29-09-2004

                    DHF

                    22

                    F

                    NIL

                    DQ323037

                    5

                    DEL-75

                    24-09-2004

                    DF

                    11

                    F

                    NIL

                    DQ323038

                    6

                    DEL-135

                    16-10-2004

                    DHF

                    24

                    M

                    NIL

                    DQ323039

                    7

                    DEL-139

                    16-10-2004

                    DF

                    22

                    F

                    NIL

                    DQ323040

                    8

                    DEL-170

                    22-10-2004

                    DHF

                    30

                    F

                    NIL

                    DQ323041

                    9

                    DEL-171

                    22-10-2004

                    DF

                    22

                    F

                    NIL

                    DQ323042

                    10

                    PHIL-57b

                    IU

                    IUa

                    IUa

                    IUa

                    SMc (P-58)

                    NSd

                    IUa: Information Unknown, b : NIV Reference Strain

                    SMc : Suckling mouse, NSd: Not submitted

                    Table 3

                    Description of global dengue-3 viruses used for comparison of genome sequence

                    Sl. No

                    Virus ID. No

                    Year of isolation

                    Country of origin

                    Genotype

                    GenBank Accession No

                    1

                    H-87

                    1956

                    Philippines

                    I

                    M93130

                    2

                    A68.AP-2

                    1983

                    Philippines

                    I

                    L11432

                    3

                    85–159

                    1985

                    Indonesia

                    I

                    L11428

                    4

                    29472

                    1992

                    Fiji

                    I

                    L11422

                    5

                    5987

                    1962

                    Thailand

                    II

                    L11440

                    6

                    CH53489

                    1973

                    Thailand

                    II

                    L11626

                    7

                    1416

                    1984

                    India

                    III

                    L11424

                    8

                    BR-74886

                    2002

                    Brazil

                    III

                    AY679147

                    9

                    GUATE97-5

                    1997

                    Guatemala

                    III

                    AB038473

                    10

                    GUATE98-5

                    1998

                    Guatemala

                    III

                    AB038478

                    11

                    H/IMTSSA/1706

                    2000

                    Martinique

                    III

                    AY099339

                    12

                    H/IMTSSA/2012

                    2001

                    Martinique

                    III

                    AY099340

                    13

                    Mozambique85

                    1985

                    Mozambique

                    III

                    AY665402

                    14

                    SOMO79

                    1993

                    Somalia

                    III

                    AF547240

                    15

                    D1440

                    1984

                    Sri Lanka

                    III

                    AF547229

                    16

                    K1

                    1998

                    Sri Lanka

                    III

                    AF547243

                    17

                    65

                    1965

                    Tahiti

                    IV

                    L11439

                    18

                    1340

                    1977

                    Puerto Rico

                    IV

                    L11434

                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-3-55/MediaObjects/12985_2006_Article_162_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 1

                    Multiple sequence alignment of C-prM gene junction [nucleotide 160–399 corresponding to the prototype DEN-3 virus (H-87)]. Dot (.) indicates nucleotide similarities with H-87. Dash (-) indicates sequence not available. Each strain is abbreviated with first four letters of country of origin followed by last two digits of the year of isolation.

                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-3-55/MediaObjects/12985_2006_Article_162_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 2

                    Multiple sequence alignment of C-prM gene junction [nucleotide 400-613 corresponding to the prototype DEN-3 virus (H-87)]. Dot (.) indicates nucleotide similarities with H-87. Dash (-) indicates sequence not available. Each strain is abbreviated with first four letters of country of origin followed by last two digits of the year of isolation.

                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-3-55/MediaObjects/12985_2006_Article_162_Fig3_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 3

                    Multiple sequence alignment of deduced amino acid (aa) corresponding to the aa 23 to 173 of the ORF of prototype DEN-3 virus (H-87). Dot (.) indicates amino acid similarities with H-87. Dash (-) indicates sequence not available. Each strain is abbreviated with first four letters of country of origin followed by last two digits of the year of isolation.

                    Phylogenetic analysis

                    Two different dendrograms were drawn based on the pair-wise comparison of nucleotide sequence of partial prM sequence (nt. position 437–613) (Fig 4) and C-prM gene junction (nt. position from 179 to 613, corresponding to PHIL-56) (Fig 5). The dendrogram based on prM clearly revealed four different subtypes of DEN-3 viruses. All the 2003 Indian isolates were grouped into subtype III, along with another Indian DEN-3 virus, isolated in 1984, and large number of isolates recovered from various parts of world, including Asia, Pacific Islands and South American countries. The prototype H-87 (PHIL-56) was found to belong to subtype I, along with two more isolates from Philippines (1957 & 1983) and one each from Indonesia (1990) and Fiji (1992). Two isolates from Thailand (isolated in 1962 and 1973) were found to belong to subtype II, where as two isolates (TAHI-65 and PUER-77) were found to belong to subtype IV.
                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-3-55/MediaObjects/12985_2006_Article_162_Fig4_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 4

                    Phylogenetic tree among dengue viruses generated by Neighbour - joining method based on the nucleotide sequence of partial prM gene. Each strain is abbreviated with first four letters of country of origin followed by last two digits of the year of isolation. Bootstrap values are indicated at the major branch points.

                    The dendrogram based on the 435 nucleotide sequence of C-prM gene junction also clearly distinguished the two different genotypes (I and III). All the 2003 and 2004 Indian viruses except GWL-60 form a close branch along with SRIL-84; where as, GWL-60 forms a branch with SRIL-98 and GUET-98 (Fig. 5).
                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-3-55/MediaObjects/12985_2006_Article_162_Fig5_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 5

                    Phylogenetic tree among dengue-3 viruses generated by Neighbour - joining method based on the nucleotide sequence of C-prM gene junction. Each strain is abbreviated with first four letters of country of origin followed by last two digits of the year of isolation. Bootstrap values are indicated at the major branch points. .

                    Discussion

                    Dengue is now emerging as the most important arboviral infection in most parts of south east Asia including India. In the past, the larger and severe outbreaks in India were mostly caused by dengue virus type-2. However, the investigation of 2003 dengue outbreak in northern India (carried out by us) revealed the involvement of DEN-3 [6] and was also in agreement with another study [7]. Again during the month of September in 2004, dengue reappeared in Delhi and its adjoining areas. Like previous outbreaks, this also struck following the monsoon season, when the climatic factors (temperature and humidity) remained conducive for Aedes breeding. The post monsoon dengue outbreak is a regular feature of dengue activity in Indian subcontinent [57]. This outbreak was subsided in November upon arrival of winter, when the climatic factors become unfavorable for virus transmission. During this outbreak it has been observed that majority of the patients belonged to age group of > 25 years. However, till date, children and adolescents were recognized as the primary victim of dengue infection [8]. The appearance of dengue primarily among higher age group during this outbreak, suggests the shifting trend towards higher age group. This trend needs to be carefully monitored during ensuing years, as, this can play vital role in planning the control measures.

                    The routine laboratory diagnosis of dengue virus infection is primarily achieved by the isolation of virus, detection of IgM/IgG antibodies by serodiagnosis and/or molecular detection by the demonstration of viral RNA by RT-PCR [9, 10]. In the present study, we screened all the serum samples for the presence of IgM and IgG antibodies by an in house developed Dipstick ELISA assay. This test has been extensively evaluated with field sera collected from different parts of India and can discriminate primary and secondary dengue infection effectively [6, 11]. The results of dipstick ELISA assay also supports the dengue viral etiology of the present outbreak. The presence of only IgG antibodies in the majority (51%) of the patients revealed that they were suffering from secondary dengue infection. This is quite expected, as northern India, particularly Delhi is endemic and has witnessed a number of large dengue epidemics in the past decade [4, 6, 7].

                    RT-PCR is one of the most important confirmatory test, employed to confirm dengue infection. However, it is only positive when sample is collected during the viraemic phase of the patient (preferably within first five days of onset of symptoms). In the present study, the identification of only 17 samples as dengue positive by RT-PCR, may be due to the fact that most of the patients were presented to the hospitals in the post-viremic phase. Further the lower rate of virus isolation may be attributed to the absence of live virus in the sample. This may be due to failure in maintenance of cold chain resulting in inactivation of virus. All the isolation was confirmed and identified by RT-PCR and nested PCR. Isolation and identification of virus from the clinical sample is considered the gold standard and gives a confirmatory diagnosis without any ambiguity [9, 12].

                    Further, we have carried out the molecular epidemiology and genotyping study of the DEN-3 viruses, implicated as the causative agent of this outbreak. We have studied the sequence of these dengue viruses, directly from patient serum sample, as recently advocated by several researchers [13, 14]. Various genomic regions of dengue viruses have been selected for molecular phylogenetic analysis [1417]. However, we have selected the C-prM gene junction as it also harbours epidemiologically important sequence information. In addition, it provides an economic alternative, since a single set of primer pair could be used for amplification and sequencing of any of the four serotype of dengue virus. Based on C-prM sequence we have earlier reported the circulation of genotype IV of DEN -2 in northern India [14].

                    On comparison of the sequence, it was found that all the Indian sequences were very closely related. It was found that the outbreak over fairly large areas of two provinces (Delhi and Madhya Pradesh, more than 300 km apart) were caused by the same type of DEN-3 virus. This indicates that the current virus is easily transmitted in human and mosquitoes and can adapt to a newer area efficiently. We have drawn two different dendrograms to study the evolutionary relationship of Indian DEN-3 isolates, due to absence of sequence of capsid gene of any of the DEN-3 viruses belonging to subtype II and IV. One phylogenetic tree was drawn based on the 177 nucleotide sequence of partial prM gene, classified all the 28 DEN-3 viruses, analysed in this study into respective subtypes, as designated in the classic paper of Lanciotti [16]. All the Indian isolates were found to belong to subtype III along with another Indian strain of 1984 and a large number of geographically diverse strains. The dendrogram based on the 435 nucleotide sequence of C-prM gene junction also clearly distinguished the two different subtypes (I and III). All the 2003 and 2004 Indian viruses, except GWL-60 were found to be very closely related and form a close branch along with SRIL-84; where as, GWL-60 form a close branch with SRIL-98 and GUET-98. In an earlier study, based on BLAST search, the DEN-3 viruses from 2003 Delhi outbreak, revealed close genomic homology with GUET-98 [7]. The critical examination of the branching pattern revealed that though all the Indian DEN-3 viruses are closely related to SRIL-84, however they are following a different evolutionary pattern, away from the SRIL-84. It has earlier been reported that SRIL-84 was isolated prior to emergence of DHF in Sri Lanka, where as SRIL-98 was isolated in post DHF era [18].

                    The dendrogram and sequence analysis clearly revealed that the subtype III of DEN-3 viruses are circulating through out the world, where as other subtypes are localized to a particular small geographical area. This indicates the higher potential of subtype III to spread, adapt and dominate in geographically diverse areas of the world. This subtype has also been implicated in major dengue/DHF epidemic from several parts of Asia, Africa and Americas; and has the potential to cause a trans-national dengue pandemic [18].

                    Though all the four serotypes of dengue viruses were isolated from different parts of India, DEN-2 was considered as the predominant serotype circulating in northern India [47]. DEN-3 associated outbreak was last reported in India in 1994 [19]. However, DEN-3 has been reported as the etiology of the first major DHF outbreak in neighboring Bangladesh in 2001 [20] and also implicated in various outbreaks in Sri Lanka in recent past [18, 21]. The identification of the subtype III of dengue-3 from the present outbreak in northern India in 2003 and its continued dominance again in 2004 indicates the resurgence of dengue-3 in a dominant form. The emergence of a newer dengue serotype after an interval always leads to a major outbreak, which is a matter of great concern from public health prospective [22].

                    Conclusion

                    This study confirms that the major dengue outbreak in northern India in 2003 and 2004 was caused by dengue virus type-3 (subtype III). The reemergence of highly fatal subtype III of DEN-3 in a dominant form, replacing the earlier circulating subtype IV of DEN-2 in India is a matter of great concern. Detailed and continuous epidemiological surveillance is warranted to monitor the incursion and spread of dengue viruses, which will help to undertake effective control and management strategies at the earliest.

                    Methods

                    The outbreak

                    An outbreak of febrile illness was reported in Delhi, India, during September-October, 2004. A total of 162 blood samples from clinically suspected dengue patients were collected from Delhi during this period. In addition, three viraemic blood samples collected from Delhi and Gwalior during October – December, 2003 [6] were also used in this study for genetic analysis. (Informed consent from all the patients and/or their parents (in minors) were obtained, before collection of clinical samples).

                    Serosurveillance

                    All serum samples were tested for the presence of dengue specific IgM and IgG antibodies using the dengue dipstick ELISA kit developed in our laboratory [11]. Briefly, projections of nitrocellulose (NC) comb (Advanced Microdevices, Ambala, India) were coated with sucrose gradient purified cell culture adapted DEN 1–4 cocktail antigen. For the detection of IgM antibodies, IgG antibodies were first removed from patient sera following adsorption with Protein 'A' derived from Staphylococcus aureus Cowan I, where as for detection of IgG antibodies, patient sera were used as such without any pre treatment. Goat anti-human IgM horshradish peroxidase (HRP) and goat anti-human IgG HRP conjugate (Sigma, USA) were used as secondary antibodies for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies, respectively. The reaction was finally developed by dipping the projections in an insoluble substrate solution (phosphate citrate buffer pH 4.5, containing 3, 3'- diamino benzidine (DAB), 4-chloro-1-napthol and hydrogen peroxide). The results were visually recorded as filled brown dots, indicative of the presence of dengue specific antibodies.

                    RT-PCR

                    The identification of the virus isolates obtained from the clinical samples was carried out by RT-PCR followed by nested PCR by demonstrating the presence of virus specific RNA employing dengue group-specific as well as serotype-specific primers targeting C-prM gene junction following the protocol of Lanciotti et al, 1992, with slight modifications [6, 23]. Briefly, viral RNA was extracted from 140 μl of serum samples using QIAamp viral RNA mini kit (Qiagen, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and finally RNA was eluted in 50 μl of nuclease free water. The complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized in a 10 μl reaction volume with RT mix comprising of 5X-RT buffer, dNTPs, RNasin® ribonuclease inhibitor and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (MMLV-RT) (Promega, USA) with dengue virus complex specific antisense primer (D2) (Operon, Germany). The RT mix was incubated for 1 h at 37°C, before heating the reaction for 5 min at 99°C to inactivate the MMLV-RT enzyme. The amplification of cDNA was carried out in a total volume of 50 μl with PCR mix containing 10× PCR buffer, 25 mM MgCl2, NTPs, Taq-DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), using dengue virus complex specific sense primer (D1), (Operon, Germany) in a thermal cycler (BioRad, USA). The thermal profile of the PCR reaction was- initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min., followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 min, annealing at 54°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 2 min and final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were gel purified from 1.2% agarose gel using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Germany).

                    Virus isolation

                    Isolation of viruses from the acute phase viraemic samples was also attempted in the C6/36 cells, following the standard virus adsorption protocol [12]. Briefly, 500 μl of plasma samples (diluted 1:10 in sterile phosphate buffered saline) was inoculated onto confluent monolayers of C6/36 cells in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks. The inoculum was incubated for 2 h before being replenished by 10 ml of fresh maintenance medium (Eagles minimum essential medium (EMEM, Sigma) with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma). Suitable healthy cell controls were also kept along side. The cells were then incubated at 32°C and observed microscopically daily for the appearance of cytopathic effects (CPE), if any. The supernantants of infected cell culture were collected on the 6th – 7th post infection day (PID) and analysed for the presence of virus. Invariably, three subsequent serial blind passages were given in each case.

                    Sequencing reaction

                    Double stranded sequencing of the C-prM gene junction was performed on an ABI 310 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA), employing Big dye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit. Briefly, 2 μl (approximately 25 ng) of purified PCR product was mixed with 3.2 pmol of respective primer and a reaction mixture containing the four dye-labeled dideoxynucleotide terminators. Cycle sequencing was then performed as follows: 25 cycles at 96°C for 30 sec, 50°C for 1 min and 60°C for 4 min. The reaction mixture was purified by ethanol precipitation and the DNA was vacuum dried. The DNA pellet was resuspended in 10 μl of template suppression reagent (TSR) and preheated before loading on to the DNA sequencer.

                    Sequence analysis

                    The nucleotide sequences were edited and analysed by using the EditSeq and MegAlign modules of the Lasergene-5 software package (DNASTAR Inc, USA). Multiple sequence alignments was done employing CLUSTALW version 1.83 [24]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the Neighbour-joining method using MEGA v2.1 programme [25]. The tree topologies were evaluated using 10,000 replicates of the data set.

                    Declarations

                    Acknowledgements

                    The authors are thankful to Defence Research and Development Organization for providing necessary facility and financial grant for this study. The authors are thankful to Dr Shri Prakash, Dr B. D. Parashar, Dr N. Gopalan of Division of Entomology, DRDE for their support in sample collection and Shri N. K. Tripathi, Shri Ambuj and Ms S. Agarwal for their technical support during this study.

                    Authors’ Affiliations

                    (1)
                    Division of Virology, Defence R&D Establishment
                    (2)
                    Municipal Corporation

                    References

                    1. World Health Organization: Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. Fact sheet 2002., 117:
                    2. Henchal EA, Putnak JR: The dengue viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev 1990, 3:376–96.PubMed
                    3. Mc Bride WJH, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H: Dengue viral infections; pathogenesis and epidemiology. Microbes and Infect 2000, 2:1041–50.View Article
                    4. Dar L, Broor S, Sengupta S, Xess I, Seth P: The first major outbreak of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Delhi, India. Emerg Infect Dis 1999, 5:589–90.View ArticlePubMed
                    5. Parida MM, Dash PK, Upadhyay C, Saxena P, Jana AM: Serological and Virological investigation of an outbreak of dengue fever in Gwalior, India. Ind J Med Res 2002, 116:248–54.
                    6. Dash PK, Saxena P, Abhyankar A, Bhargava R, Jana AM: Emergence of dengue virus type-3 in northern India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2005, 36:25–32.
                    7. Kumar M, Pasha ST, Mittal V, Rawat DS, Arya SC, Agarwal N, Bhattacharya D, Lal S, Rai A: Unusual emergence of Guate98-like molecular subtype of DEN-3 during 2003 dengue outbreak in Delhi. Dengue Bull 2004, 28:161–7.
                    8. Monath TP: Dengue: The risk to developed and developing countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1994, 91:2395–400.View ArticlePubMed
                    9. Guzman MG, Kouri G: Advances in dengue diagnosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1996, 3:621–7.PubMed
                    10. Wu SJL, Hanson B, Paxton H, Nisalak A, Vaughn DW, Rossi C, Henchal EA, Porter KR, Watts DM, Hayes CG: Evaluation of a dipstick enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies to dengue virus. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1997, 4:452–7.PubMed
                    11. Parida MM, Upadhyay C, Saxena P, Dash PK, Jana AM, Seth P: Evaluation of a Dipstick ELISA and a rapid Immunochromatographic test for diagnosis of dengue virus infection. Acta Virologica 2000, 45:299–304.
                    12. Yamada K, Takasaki T, Nawa M, Kurane I: Virus isolation as one of the diagnostic methods for dengue virus infection. J Clin Virol 2002, 24:203–9.View ArticlePubMed
                    13. Leitmeyer KC, Vaughn DW, Watts DM, Salas R, Chacon de IV, Ramos C, Rico-Hesse R: Dengue virus structural differences that correlate with pathogenesis. J Virol 1999, 73:4738–4747.PubMed
                    14. Dash PK, Parida MM, Saxena P, Kumar M, Rai A, Pasha ST, Jana AM: Emergence and continued circulation of Dengue-2 (Genotype IV) virus strains in northern India. J Med Virol 2004, 74:314–22.View ArticlePubMed
                    15. Deubel V, Nogueira RM, Drouet MT, Zeller H, Reynes JM, Ha DQ: Direct sequencing of genomic cDNA fragments amplified by the polymerase chain reaction for molecular epidemiology of dengue-2 viruses. Arch Virol 1993, 129:197–210.View ArticlePubMed
                    16. Lanciotti RS, Lewis JG, Gubler DJ, Trent DW: Molecular evolution and epidemiology of dengue-3 viruses. J Gen Virol 1994, 75:65–75.View ArticlePubMed
                    17. Uzcategui NY, Comach G, Camacho D, Cuello de Uzcategui R, Holmes EC, Gould EA: Molecular epidemiology of dengue virus type 3 in Venezuela. J Gen Virol 2003, 84:1569–75.View ArticlePubMed
                    18. Messer WB, Gubler DJ, Harris E, Sivananthan K, de Silva AM: Emergence and global spread of a dengue serotype 3, subtype III virus. Emerg Infect Dis 2003, 9:800–9.PubMed
                    19. Padbidri VS, Mahadev PVM, Thakare JP, Pant U, Ilkal MA, Varghese G, Joshi GD, Mavale MS, Paramasivan R, Athavale SS, Gaikwad DL, Rao TLG: Virological and entomological investigations of an outbreak of dengue fever in Dhule district, Maharashtra. Indian J Med Microbiol 1996, 14:25–32.
                    20. Rahman M, Rahman K, Siddque AK, Shoma S, Kamal AHM, Ali KS, Nisaluk AM, Breiman RF: First outbreak of Dengue hemorrhagic fever, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis 2002, 8:738–40.PubMed
                    21. Messer WB, Vitarana U, Sivananthan K, Elvtigala J, Preethimala LD, Ramesh R, Withana N, Gubler DJ, de Silva AM: Epidemiology of Dengue in Sri Lanka before and after the emergence of epidemic dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2002, 66:765–73.PubMed
                    22. Rico-Hesse R, Harrison LM, Salas RA, Tovar D, Nisalak A, Ramos C, Boshell J, de Mesa MT, Nogueira RMR, da Rosa AT: Origins of dengue type-2 viruses associated with increased pathogenicity in the Americas. Virol 1997, 230:244–51.View Article
                    23. Lanciotti RS, Calisher CH, Gubler DJ, Chang GJ, Vorndam AV: Rapid detection and typing of dengue viruses from clinical samples by using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992, 30:545–51.PubMed
                    24. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: Clustal W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acid Res 1994, 22:4673–80.View ArticlePubMed
                    25. Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M: MEGA2: Molecular evolutionary genetic analysis software. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:1244–5.View ArticlePubMed

                    Copyright

                    © Dash et al. 2006

                    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                    Advertisement