Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of RNA quantity and quality among the five groups

From: Improvement in RNA quantity and quality in cervico-vaginal cytology

GroupConcentration (ng/ μL)Statistics, PA260/280 (nm)Statistics, PA260/230 (nm)Statistics, PGAPDH densityStatistics, PE6 densityStatistics, P
1 a63.21 ± 56.68d,eF = 4.430, 0.0042.23 ± 0.66F = 0.363, 0.8341.24 ± 0.93d,eF = 10.904,< 0.00158,736.45 ± 21,574.01d,eF = 17.682,<  0.00137,511.94 ± 33,672.71c,d,eF = 4.102, 0.011
2b52.58 ± 71.42d,e2.14 ± 0.491.35 ± 0.60d,e58,456.82 ± 14,483.19d,e17,286.74 ± 18,989.13c,d,e
3c63.76 ± 57.35d,e2.56 ± 2.171.26 ± 0.70d,e50,556.82 ± 27,070.25d,e9593.98 ± 8535.84a,b
4d2.11 ± 3.38a,b,c2.73 ± 3.380.07 ± 0.10a,b,c12,229.28 ± 8516.42a,b,c2273.92 ± 1423.42a,b
5e4.35 ± 6.01a,b,c1.85 ± 0.780.25 ± 0.37a,b,c8633.20 ± 20,804.91a,b,c2157.26 ± 2037.34a,b
  1. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations
  2. The sample letters (a, b, c, d, and e) indicate non-significant differences between groups
  3. P-values were assessed by ANOVA and post hoc Student-Newmann-Keuls test