Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of RNA quantity and quality among the five groups

From: Improvement in RNA quantity and quality in cervico-vaginal cytology

Group

Concentration (ng/ μL)

Statistics, P

A260/280 (nm)

Statistics, P

A260/230 (nm)

Statistics, P

GAPDH density

Statistics, P

E6 density

Statistics, P

1 a

63.21 ± 56.68d,e

F = 4.430, 0.004

2.23 ± 0.66

F = 0.363, 0.834

1.24 ± 0.93d,e

F = 10.904,< 0.001

58,736.45 ± 21,574.01d,e

F = 17.682,<  0.001

37,511.94 ± 33,672.71c,d,e

F = 4.102, 0.011

2b

52.58 ± 71.42d,e

2.14 ± 0.49

1.35 ± 0.60d,e

58,456.82 ± 14,483.19d,e

17,286.74 ± 18,989.13c,d,e

3c

63.76 ± 57.35d,e

2.56 ± 2.17

1.26 ± 0.70d,e

50,556.82 ± 27,070.25d,e

9593.98 ± 8535.84a,b

4d

2.11 ± 3.38a,b,c

2.73 ± 3.38

0.07 ± 0.10a,b,c

12,229.28 ± 8516.42a,b,c

2273.92 ± 1423.42a,b

5e

4.35 ± 6.01a,b,c

1.85 ± 0.78

0.25 ± 0.37a,b,c

8633.20 ± 20,804.91a,b,c

2157.26 ± 2037.34a,b

  1. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations
  2. The sample letters (a, b, c, d, and e) indicate non-significant differences between groups
  3. P-values were assessed by ANOVA and post hoc Student-Newmann-Keuls test