Skip to main content

Table 5 Distribution of HPV infection with a single genotype and multiple genotypes in women (n = 3134)

From: Prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes and precancerous cervical lesions in a screening population in Beijing, China: analysis of results from China’s top 3 hospital, 2009–2019

Types

HSIL

LSIL

Normal

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Total

1745

 

1354

 

35

 

3134

 

Total HPV (+)

1640

93.98%

1195

88.26%

20

57.14%

2803

89.44%

HPV6,11

36

2.20%

64

5.36%

4

20.00%

104

3.71%

HPV16

926

56.46%

289

24.18%

8

40.00%

1223

43.63%

HPV18

120

7.32%

132

11.05%

  

252

8.99%

HPV21

38

2.32%

14

1.17%

  

52

1.86%

HPV31

135

8.23%

56

4.69%

5

25.00%

196

6.99%

HPV33

123

7.50%

45

3.77%

1

5.00%

169

6.03%

HPV35

53

3.23%

57

4.77%

1

5.00%

111

3.96%

HPV39

70

4.27%

128

10.71%

  

198

7.06%

HPV45

36

2.20%

26

2.18%

2

10.00%

64

2.28%

HPV51

126

7.68%

156

13.05%

1

5.00%

283

10.10%

HPV52

266

16.22%

263

22.01%

3

15.00%

532

18.98%

HPV56

102

6.22%

170

14.23%

1

5.00%

273

9.74%

HPV58

302

18.41%

255

21.34%

3

15.00%

560

19.98%

HPV59

71

4.33%

68

5.69%

2

10.00%

141

5.03%

HPV66

40

2.44%

71

5.94%

3

15.00%

114

4.07%

HPV67

22

1.34%

7

0.59%

2

10.00%

  

HPV68

34

2.07%

87

7.28%

1

5.00%

122

4.35%

HPV82

27

1.65%

22

1.84%

  

49

1.75%

  1. The proportion of HPV16 type in HSIL was significantly different from that of other high-risk type HPV, P < 0.05 (HPV58, χ2 = 30.97; HPV52, χ2 = 34.72; HPV31, χ2 = 52.94; HPV51, χ2 = 52.94)
  2. The proportion of HPV58 type in HSIL was significantly different from that of other high-risk type HPV, p < 0.05 (HPV16, χ2 = 30.97; HPV31, χ2 = 4.42; HPV51, χ2 = 4.42) except for HPV52, χ2 = 0.14, p = 0.71 > 0.05
  3. The proportion of HPV52 type in HSIL was significantly different from that of HPV16, χ2 = 34.72, p < 0.05 except for HPV58, χ2 = 0.14, p = 0.71 > 0.05; HPV31, χ2 = 3.03, p = 0.08 > 0.05; HPV51, χ2 = 3.03, p = 0.08 > 0.05
  4. The proportion of HPV16 type in LSIL was significantly different from that of HPV51, χ2 = 4.01, p = 0.045 < 0.05 except for HPV52, χ2 = 0.11, p = 0.72 > 0.05; HPV58, χ2 = 0.26, p = 0.611 > 0.05; HPV56, χ2 = 3.25, p = 0.071 > 0.05
  5. The proportion of HPV52 type in LSIL was not significantly different from that of following HPV type, P > 0.05 (HPV16, χ2 = 0.11, p = 0. 72; HPV58, χ2 = 0.03, p = 0.86; HPV56, χ2 = 2.17, p = 0.14; HPV51, χ2 = 2.91, p = 0.088
  6. The proportion of HPV58 type in LSIL was not significantly different from that of following HPV type, P > 0.05 (HPV58, χ2 = 0.26, p = 0.61; HPV52, χ2 = 0.03, p = 0.86; HPV56, χ2 = 1.70, p = 0.19; HPV51, χ2 = 2.27, p = 0.13
  7. The proportion of HPV16 type in normal cervical lesion was significantly different from that of following HPV type, P < 0.05 (HPV31, χ2 = 5.13, p = 0.024; HPV6,11,52,58,66, Fisher test, p < 0.0001;)
  8. The proportion of HPV31 type in normal cervical lesion was significantly different from HPV16, χ2 = 5.13, p = 0.024 < 0.05; except for HPV6,11,52,58,66 (Fisher test, p = 0.111 > 0.05