Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of test results of both LAMP and PCR & Sequencing in clinical sample detection: The PCR & Sequencing method was used as the standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the microfluidic LAMP method used to detect the clinical samples were analyzed

From: Genotyping of 30 kinds of cutaneous human papillomaviruses by a multiplex microfluidic loop-mediated isothermal amplification and visual detection method

LAMP

PCR

Total

Sensitive (%)

Specificity (%)

Kappa

Positive

Negative

95% CI

95% CI

HPV27

 Positive

30

36

66

100 (88.43–100)

34.55 (22.24–48.58)

0.271 (P < 0.001)

 Negative

0

19

19

 Total

30

55

85

HPV2

 Positive

3

45

48

100 (29.24–100)

45.12 (34.1–56.51)

0.055 (P > 0.05)

 Negative

0

37

37

 Total

3

82

85

HPV1

 Positive

13

3

16

100 (75.29–100)

95.83 (88.3–99.13)

0.876 (P < 0.001)

 Negative

0

69

69

 Total

13

72

85

HPV57

 Positive

14

1

15

100 (76.84–100)

98.59 (92.40–99.96)

0.958 (P < 0.001)

 Negative

0

70

70

 Total

14

71

85

HPV3

 Positive

1

2

3

100 (2.5–100)

97.62 (91.66–99.71)

0.491 (P < 0.001)

 Negative

0

82

82

 Total

1

84

85

HPV4

 Positive

0

3

3

–

96.47 (90.03–99.27)

–

 Negative

0

82

82

 Total

0

85

85

HPV7

 Positive

0

1

1

–

98.82 (93.62–99.97)

–

 Negative

0

84

84

 Total

0

85

85

HPV75

 Positive

0

1

1

–

98.82 (93.62–99.97)

–

 Negative

0

84

84

 Total

0

85

85

  1. LAMP represents the new HPV detection system based on LAMP and microfluidic chip. PCR represents DNA sequencing based on PCR method
  2. Abbreviations: HPV human papillomaviruses, LAMP Loop-mediated isothermal amplification, PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction, CI confidence interval