Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the studies and patients enrolled in this comprehensive analysis

From: Effectiveness of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir, dasabuvir for HCV in HIV/HCV coinfected subjects: a comprehensive analysis

Study

Study design

Study period

Regimen

N

SVR12 (%)

Mean ± SD (Age, year)

Male (%)

Cirrhosis (Yes|No)

TN|TE

GT1|GT4

Rios (2018)

observational study

2014.12–2016.8

OPr ± D ± R

440

420 (95.5)

51.0 ± 1.2

NA

101|339

NA

299|125

Pineda (2018)

cohort

2015.3–2017.1

OPrD±R

182

172 (94.5)

51.0 ± 1.2

151 (82.9)

69|113

101|81

GT1

Massimo (2017)

cohort

NA

OPrD±R

210

203 (96.7)

53.0 ± 7.8

157 (74.8)

23|187

96|114

GT1

Rockstroh (2017)

clinical trial

2015.7–2015.12

OPrD±R

228

221 (96.9)

50.0 ± 7.2

171 (75.0)

23|205

151|76

200|28

Bhattacharya (2017)

observational cohort

2016.4

OPrD±R

89

79 (88.8)

61.4 ± 6.1

89 (100)

14|75

79|10

GT1

Sulkowski (2015)

clinical trial

2013.9–2014.8

OPrD+R

63

58 (92.1)

50.9 ± 7.2

58 (92.0)

NA

42|21

GT1

Montes (2017)

observational study

2015.4–2015.12

OPr ± D ± R

88

87 (98.9)

51.4 ± 1.0

67 (76.1)

NA

NA

NA

Wyles (2017)

clinical trial

2014.12–2015.7

OPrD+R

22

22 (100.0)

NA

17 (77.3)

3|19

19|3

GT1

Steiner (2017)

cohort

2016.4

OPr ± D

14

14 (100.0)

41.9 ± 3.2

9 (66.7)

NA

NA

11|3

Milazzo (2017)

observational study

2014.12–2015.12

OPrD±R

22

20 (90.9)

51.5 ± 3.1

NA

NA

NA

GT1

  1. *OPrD ombitasvir/ paritaprevir/ritonavir plus dasabuvir, OPr ombitasvir/ paritaprevir/ritonavir; D dasabuvir, R RBV, GT genotype, TN treatment-naive, TE treatment-experienced, NA not applicable