Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the 6 studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Potential effects of telbivudine and entecavir on renal function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Region

Study type

Interventions

Sample size

Agea (years)

Gender (F/M)

Follow-up period

Koklu et al. (2015) [16]

Turkey

Case control

LAM/ETV/TDF

LAM: 302

LAM: 49.21 ± 13.17

292/565

2 years

ETV: 282

ETV: 49.86 ± 13.35

TDF: 273

TDF: 47.74 ± 12.45

Lee et al. (2015) [19]

Korea

Cohort

LdT/ETV

LdT: 116

LdT: 53.6 ± 10.9

229/465

1.5 years

ETV: 578

ETV: 54.8 ± 11.3

Jia et al. (2015) [15]

China

Cohort

ADV/ETV

ADV: 165

ADV: 46.2 ± 9.2

95/235

5 years

ETV: 165

ETV: 48.6 ± 8.7

Liang et al. (2014) [20]

Taiwan

Cohort

LdT/ETV

LdT: 34

LdT: 46.68 ± 1.87

10/44

1 year

ETV: 20

ETV: 44.45 ± 1.95

Yan & Han (2012) [21]

China

RCT

LdT/ETV/ADV

LdT: 50

LdT: 37.3 (22-59)

36/79

1 years

ETV: 35

ETV: 43.0 (21-64)

ADV: 30

ADV: 39.4 (25-62)

Gane et al. (2013) [9]

Worldwide

RCT

LdT/LAM

LdT: 680

N/A

N/A

2 years

LAM: 687

  1. aAge expressed as mean ± SD or median (range)
  2. ADV adefovir, ETV entecavir, LAM lamivudine, LdT telbivudine, N/A not applicable, RCT randomized controlled trial, TDF tenofovir