Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate models for prediction of SVR (for all patients treated with PI-triple therapy; n = 131)

From: First-generation protease inhibitor-triple therapy: SVR 24, safety, and predictors of response in a large single center cohort

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analyses**

 

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Wald p value

Odds ratio (95% CI)

Wald p value

Viral kinetics

    

eRVR vs. no eRVR

8.875 (3.66, 21.51)

<0.0001

8.875 (3.66, 21.51)

<0.0001

PI-TW 4 < LLOD vs. > LLOD

7.115 (3.04, 16.65)

<0.0001

 

n/a***

PI-TW 4 viral load > LLOQ vs. < LLOQ

0.049 (0.01, 0.24)

<0.0001

 

n/a***

Baseline demographic parameters

    

Fibrosis

    

Liver Cirrhosis (Ishak 5 + 6) vs. no Liver Cirrhosis (Ishak 1–4)

0.528 (0.24, 1.18)

0.118

 

0.858

Sex

    

Male vs. female

0.533 (0.239, 1.187)

0.123

 

0.194

Age

    

Patients < 60 years vs. ≥ 60 years

0.894 (0.358, 2.23)

0.811

 

0.751

Baseline viral load

    

High viral load (>800.000 IU/ml) vs. Low viral load (<800.000 IU/ml)

0.679 (0.29, 1.58)

0.367

 

0.165

Genotype

    

1a vs. 1b

1.565 (0.678, 3.62)

0.294

 

0.308

Baseline platelet count

    

Platelets < 100/nl vs. > 100/nl

0.1 (0.029, 0.341)

<0.0001

0.112 (0.032, 0.394)

0.001

Previous treatment response

    

Non-response vs. other*

0.313 (0.137, 0.715)

0.006

0.357 (0.147, 0.867)

0.023

  1. Significant calculations (p < 0.05) are printed bold. For absolute numbers see Table 2. *Other (includes treatment naïve, relapsers, unknown response, pretreatment with other interferon than pegylated interferon). **Multivariate analysis was performed twice: first, all shown parameters were included, showing significant results for “eRVR vs. no eRVR”, and “Platelets < 100/nl vs. > 100/nl”, secondly multivariate analysis was conducted only with “baseline demographic parameters” (excluding parameters of viral kinetics), showing significant results for “Platelets < 100/nl vs. > 100/nl”, and additionally “Non-response vs. other”. ***“PI-TW4 < LLOD vs. > LLOD” and “PI-TW 4 viral load > LLOQ vs. < LLOQ” both had to be excluded from the multivariate analysis due to strong collinearity with “eRVR vs. no eRVR”. The width of the confidence intervals might be due to the limited number of cases in our sample. Abbreviations: eRVR Extended rapid virological response, LLOD Lower limit of detection, LLOQ Lower limit of quantification, PI Protease inhibitor, SVR Sustained virological response, TW Treatment week, n/a Not applicable.