Table 1 Prevalence of TTV genogroups in different breeds of pig
From: Molecular detection of Torque teno virus in different breeds of swine
Farm | Breed | Prevalence of swine TTV genogroup | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | TTV1 or TTV2 | TTV1 | TTV2 | TTV1 and TTV2 | ||||
| Â | Â | Positive | Prevalence | Positive | Prevalence | Positive | Prevalence | Positive | Prevalence |
A | Chenghua pig(n = 25) | 23 | 92.0% | 20 | 80.0% | 19 | 76.0% | 18 | 72.0% a, b |
| Â | Rongchang pig(n = 38) | 37 | 97.4% | 26 | 68.4% | 25 | 65.8% | 16 | 42.1% a, |
| Â | Wild boar(n = 20) | 19 | 95.0% | 15 | 75.0% | 16 | 80.0% | 12 | 60.0% a, b |
| Â | Zibet pig(n = 10) | 10 | 100% | 9 | 90.0% | 10 | 100% | 9 | 90.0% b |
Total | n = 93 | 89 | 95.7% | 70 | 75.3% | 70 | 75.3% | 55 | 59.1% |
B | Landrace (n = 25) | 24 | 96.0% | 21 | 84.0% | 23 | 92.0% | 20 | 80.0% a, b |
| Â | Large Yorkshire(n = 16) | 16 | 100% | 13 | 81.5% | 15 | 93.4% | 13 | 81.5% a, b |
| Â | Rongchang pig(n = 42) | 39 | 92.9% | 29 | 69.0% | 31 | 73.8% | 19 | 45.2% a |
| Â | Duroc (n = 32) | 32 | 100% | 29 | 90.6% | 32 | 100% | 29 | 90.6% b |
Total | n = 115 | 111 | 96.5% | 92 | 80.0% | 101 | 87.8% | 81 | 70.4% |