Skip to main content

Table 1 Pairwise Statistical Comparison2 of Infected Focus Size3

From: "Boom" and "Bust" cycles in virus growth suggest multiple selective forces in influenza a evolution

passage Wt2 (10-5)4
n= 1115
16 (10-5)
n= 68
15 (10-3)
n= 86
14 (10-5)
n= 78
13 (10-5)
n= 67
126
n= 55
11 (10-3)
n= 82
10 (10-4)
n= 21
8 (10-5)
n= 31
4 (10-5)
n= 97
2 (10-5) n = 81 p < 0.001 p < 0.05 p < 0.01 ns ns p < 0.001 p < 0.001 ns p > 0.05 p < 0.001
4 (10-5) ns ns ns p < 0.001 p < 0.01 ns ns ns ns  
8 (10-5) p < 0.05 ns ns ns p > 0.05 ns ns ns   
10 (10-4) ns ns ns ns ns ns ns    
11 (10-3) ns ns ns p < 0.001 p < 0.01 ns     
12 ns ns ns p < 0.001 p < 0.05      
13 (10-5) p < 0.001 ns ns ns       
14 (10-5) p < 0.001 p < 0.01 p < 0.01        
15 (10-3) p < 0.05 ns         
16 (10-5) p < 0.05          
  1. 2 p values were calculated using Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variation (Prism V4.0, GraphPad Software, Inc).
  2. 3 All infections performed in the absence of IgY.
  3. 4 Highest dilution of isolate stock yielding infectious virus in the presence of IgY.
  4. 5 Total number of foci examined.
  5. 6 Combined data from 10-4 and 10-5 dilutions.