Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of qRRT-PCR testing for pH1N1 virus in oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs of experimental turkey hens inoculated intranasally, intracloacally, or intrauterine with A/Chile/3536/2009 (H1N1) virus.

From: Susceptibility of turkeys to pandemic-H1N1 virus by reproductive tract insemination

Groups

Sampling day (days post inoculation) for swabs

 

2

4

7

10

14

 

OPa

Cb

OP

C

OP

C

OP

C

OP

C

INc

0/8d

0/8

0/7

0/7

0/7

0/7

0/6

0/6

0/6

0/6

ICe

0/4

1/4(104.7)

0/4

0/4

0/3

0/3

0/2

0/2

0/2

0/2

IUf

1/4 (104.7)g

1/4(106.7)

3/3(104.7)

3/3(105.8)

0/3

3/3(105.7)

0/2

1/2(105.1)

1/2(104.8)

0/2

  1. a OP, oropharyngeal. b C, cloacal. c IN, intranasal. d number of virus positive/total sampled. e IC, intracloacal. f IU, intrauterine. g average titer of RNA positive samples. Previous studies have shown correlation between qRRT-PCR results and infectious titer of influenza A virus for oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs [15]. We report our qRRT-PCR data in relative equivalent units (REU) based on a standard curve for A/Chile/3536/2009 (H1N1) in mean chicken embryo infectious doses (EID50)