Human lactoferrin but not lysozyme neutralizes HSV-1 and inhibits HSV-1 replication and cell-to-cell spread
© Välimaa et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 16 December 2008
Accepted: 12 May 2009
Published: 12 May 2009
The frequent oral shedding of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) in the absence of clinical disease suggests that symptomatic HSV-1 recurrences may be inhibited by the mucosal environment. Indeed, saliva has been shown to contain substances with anti-HSV activity. In the current study, we investigated the anti-HSV-1 activity of human lactoferrin (hLf) and lysozyme (hLz), two highly cationic polypeptides of the mucosal innate defence system.
HLf blocked HSV-1 infection at multiple steps of the viral replication cycle, whereas lysozyme displayed no anti-HSV-1 activity. Preincubation of HSV-1 virions and presence of hLf during or after viral absorption period or for the entire HSV-1 infection cycle inhibited HSV-1 infection by reducing both the plaque count and plaque size in a dose- and virus strain-dependent manner. Cell-to-cell spread of wild-type HSV-1 and the strain gC-39, deleted of glycoprotein C, was dramatically reduced, but the cell-to-cell spread of HSV-1 Rid1, harboring a mutated gD and thus unable to react with the cellular HVEM receptor, remained unchanged. This suggests that the inhibition of cell-to-cell spread is mediated by effects on gD or its cellular counterparts.
Our results show that the cationic nature is not a major determinant in the anti-HSV action of mucosal innate cationic polypeptides, since whereas hLf inhibited HSV-1 infection efficiently, hLz had no HSV-1 inhibiting activity. Our results show that in addition to inhibiting the adsorption and post-attachment events of HSV-1 infection, hLf is also able to neutralize HSV-1 and that the inhibition of cell-to-cell spread involves viral gD. These results suggest that Lf may have a significant role in the modulation of HSV-1 infection in the oral cavity as well as in the genital mucosa, the major sites of HSV-1 infection.
Oral mucosa is a common site of primary herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection. After a primary infection in the oral region, HSV-1 establishes latency in the trigeminal ganglion. Subsequent reactivation of HSV-1 typically results in asymptomatic shedding of virus into saliva, but only rarely in detectable intraoral lesions. Instead, extraoral manifestations are frequent and affect 20–40% of the HSV-seropositive population . Thus the intraoral environment may inhibit replication of HSV-1.
Lactoferrin (Lf) and lysozyme (Lz) are highly cationic polypeptides with broad antimicrobial properties, abundant in saliva, tears and cervicovaginal mucosal fluid. The major inhibitory mechanism of Lf on HSV infection has been suggested to occur by competitive binding of Lf to negatively charged cell surface glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) [2–4]. Furthermore, we have observed human Lf (hLf) to inhibit post-attachment events in the HSV-1 replication including entry and cell-to-cell spread . This finding has been confirmed with both bovine and human Lf [6, 7]. Lactoferrin has also been suggested to affect the HSV reactivation phenotype in the oral region .
The most characterized antimicrobial property of Lz is its antibacterial muramidase activity, although some enzyme-independent functions have been reported . Observations on anti-HSV activity of Lz are contradictory [10, 11], but likely involve both enzymatic and cationic properties of this enzyme .
In this study, we compared the anti-HSV activity of human lactoferrin and lysozyme, and the roles of viral glycoproteins gC and gD therein. We infected Vero cell monolayers with HSV-1 in the presence or absence of human milk-derived non-iron-saturated lactoferrin (apoLf; L-0520, Sigma), iron-saturated lactoferrin (satLf; L-3770, Sigma) or lysozyme (hLz; L-6394, Sigma). Virus strains used were the wild-type (wt) HSV-1 strain KOS, and the KOS-derived mutants Rid1 and gC-39. Rid1 has a single amino acid substitution at position 27 of gD, a viral glycoprotein essential for viral entry, that results in the inability of this virus to use HVEM as an entry mediator . gC-39 lacks glycoprotein C, the major viral envelope glycoprotein mediating initial attachment of HSV-1 to cell surface GAGs .
Second, 50 pfu of HSV-1 KOS, Rid1, or gC-39 was adsorbed to Vero cell monolayers in 12-well plates for 2 h at 37°C. The inoculum was removed and fresh MEM added, containing 1% FCS, antibiotics and 0.1% human gammaglobulin supplemented with 0–500 μg/ml of apoLf or satLf, or 0–200 μg/ml of hLz. After five days, plaques formed by viruses were visualized by crystal violet staining. Data were analysed by Student's two-tailed paired t-test, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
We found human lactoferrin (hLf) to interfere with the progression of HSV-1 infection at multiple steps of the viral replication cycle, whereas human lysozyme displayed no anti-HSV-1 activity. The degree of hLf iron-saturation played little role in HSV-1 inhibition.
In the series of inhibition assays, cells were first maintained in hLf containing medium for 24 h before viral inoculation and subsequently through the whole replication cycle (Figure 1). Already at a hLf concentration of 50–100 μg/ml, HSV-1 replication was dramatically inhibited independent of the degree of Lf iron-saturation. Both of the mutant viruses, Rid1 and gC-39, were significantly more resistant to hLf-mediated inhibition, indicating a role for both gC and gD in the inhibition of viral replication.
A series of further experiments was carried out investigating hLf effect on the virion, the absorption and post-absorption events in the replication cycle and cell-to-cell spread. We found hLf to neutralize unbound wt HSV-1 with an IC50 of 100–250 μg/ml of hLf (Figure 2). HSV-1 mutants, gC-39 and Rid1, were significantly more resistant to hLf-mediated neutralization, suggesting that neutralization is mediated by effects of hLf on gC and gD or their cellular counterparts. Moreover, preincubation of gC-39 with apoLf unexpectedly enhanced infectivity in low concentrations. This suggests that hLf binding to virion compensates for gC and facilitates formation of contacts between virion bound hLf and cell surface Lf receptors, as has been earlier also suggested to occur between bovine Lf and gC-39 . Instead, bLf has been found unable to neutralize wt HSV-1 [3, 6], although it has been shown to bind to wt HSV-1 .
Wt HSV-1 and gC-39 were equally sensitive (IC50 250 μg/ml) to hLf pretreatment of cells (Figure 3), suggesting that this inhibition involves interactions participated by both gC and gB, the other major glycoprotein mediating attachment . Cell surface GAGs have been shown to bind Lf  and Lf anti-HSV-1 activity to decrease in the absence of heparan sulphate  or viral gC when Lf was added to cultures simultaneously with the virus . These findings strongly suggest a major role for inhibition of initial attachment of both gB and gC to GAGs in the anti-HSV action of Lf. In our study, pretreatment of cells inhibited also Rid1 in higher hLf concentrations, suggesting that hLf inhibition is not restricted only to HSV attachment to the cell surface, but may also modulate gD-mediated viral entry.
The sensitivity of post-attachment steps to hLf-mediated inhibition was confirmed by the observed anti-HSV-1 activity of hLf added to cultures after viral adsorption (Figure 4). Of the studied viral strains, wt HSV-1 was the most sensitive with IC50 of 250–500 μg/ml of hLf. Iron-saturated form of hLf was slightly more effective. Rid1 infectivity decreased 40–60% at a hLf concentration of 500 μg/ml. Earlier, bLf has been shown not to affect differentially on the entry of wt HSV-1 and Rid1 strains in a β-galactosidase assay . Therefore, the observed gD-associated post-attachment inhibition in our study may yield from Lf interference with intracellular events in the replication cycle or with the synthetized progeny viral components or virions. Previously, both hLf  and bLf  have been shown to reduce HSV-1 plaque number if added immediately after viral adsorption or 1 h after viral entry. This inhibition has been suggested to result from Lf binding to viral components intracellularly . The N-terminal region of Lf has been shown to carry a nuclear localization signal  and to be able to translocate to the nucleus of the cell . The efficiency and mechanisms of Lf binding and intake seem to be cell type-specific and to involve various receptors [3, 7, 17–19]. Therefore certain intracellular antiviral effects of Lf may differ between cell types.
In conclusion, we found hLf to interfere with the progression of HSV-1 infection at multiple steps of the viral replication cycle and with HSV-1 cell-to-cell spread in a dose- and virus strain-dependent manner. Our studies show for the first time that in addition to inhibiting the adsorption and post-attachments steps of HSV-1 infection, hLf is also able to neutralize HSV-1 and that the inhibition of cell-to-cell spread is at least partly dependent on gD or its cellular counterparts. The degree of hLf iron-saturation played little role in the inhibition. HLz displayed no anti-HSV-1 activity, suggesting that cationic property alone has no significant role in the anti-HSV activity of a polypeptide of the mucosal innate defence system.
We are grateful to Prof. Patricia Spear and Dr. William Goins for providing mutant viruses gC-39 and Rid1 as well as the corresponding wild-type viruses for our studies. This study was supported by Emil and Blida Maunula Foundation at University of Turku and Turku Dental Society. Prof. Veijo Hukkanen is the recipient of the grant #118366 of the Academy of Finland.
- Wheeler CE Jr: The herpes simplex problem. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988, 18: 163-168. 10.1016/S0190-9622(88)70019-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marchetti M, Longhi C, Conte MP, Pisani S, Valenti P, Seganti L: Lactoferrin inhibits herpes simplex virus type 1 adsorption to vero cells. Antiviral Res 1996, 29: 221-231. 10.1016/0166-3542(95)00840-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersen JH, Jenssen H, Sandvik K, Gutteberg TJ: Anti-HSV activity of lactoferrin and lactoferricin is dependent on the presence of heparan sulphate at the cell surface. J Med Virol 2004, 74: 262-271. 10.1002/jmv.20171View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marchetti M, Trybala E, Superti F, Johansson M, Bergstrom T: Inhibition of herpes simplex virus infection by lactoferrin is dependent on interference with the virus binding to glycosaminoglycans. Virology 2004, 318: 405-413. 10.1016/j.virol.2003.09.029View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Välimaa H: Innate and adaptive immunity in orolabial herpes simplex virus infection. PhD Thesis University of Turku; 2006, D711. [https://oa.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/36012/D711.pdf?sequence=1]Google Scholar
- Ammendolia MG, Marchetti M, Superti F: Bovine lactoferrin prevents the entry and intercellular spread of herpes simplex virus type 1 in green monkey kidney cells. Antiviral Res 2007, 76: 252-262. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2007.07.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jenssen H, Sandvik K, Andersen JH, Hancock RE, Gutteberg TJ: Inhibition of HSV cell-to-cell spread by lactoferrin and lactoferricin. Antiviral Res 2008, 79: 192-198. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2008.03.004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valimaa H, Waris M, Hukkanen V, Blankenvoorde MF, Nieuw Amerongen AV, Tenovuo J: Salivary defense factors in herpes simplex virus infection. J Dent Res 2002, 81: 416-421. 10.1177/154405910208100612View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laible NJ, Germaine GR: Bactericidal activity of human lysozyme, muramidase-inactive lysozyme, and cationic polypeptides against streptococcus sanguis and streptococcus faecalis: Inhibition by chitin oligosaccharides. Infect Immun 1985, 48: 720-728.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cisani G, Varaldo PE, Pompei R, Valisena S, Satta G: Cell fusion induced by herpes simplex is inhibited by hen egg-white lysozyme. Microbios 1989, 59: 73-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oevermann A, Engels M, Thomas U, Pellegrini A: The antiviral activity of naturally occurring proteins and their peptide fragments after chemical modification. Antiviral Res 2003, 59: 23-33. 10.1016/S0166-3542(03)00010-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dean HJ, Terhune SS, Shieh MT, Susmarski N, Spear PG: Single amino acid substitutions in gD of herpes simplex virus 1 confer resistance to gD-mediated interference and cause cell-type-dependent alterations in infectivity. Virology 1994, 199: 67-80. 10.1006/viro.1994.1098View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holland TC, Homa FL, Marlin SD, Levine M, Glorioso J: Herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoprotein C-negative mutants exhibit multiple phenotypes, including secretion of truncated glycoproteins. J Virol 1984, 52: 566-574.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ziegler T, Waris M, Rautiainen M, Arstila P: Herpes simplex virus detection by macroscopic reading after overnight incubation and immunoperoxidase staining. J Clin Microbiol 1988, 26: 2013-2017.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herold BC, Visalli RJ, Susmarski N, Brandt CR, Spear PG: Glycoprotein C-independent binding of herpes simplex virus to cells requires cell surface heparan sulphate and glycoprotein B. J Gen Virol 1994,75(Pt 6):1211-1222. 10.1099/0022-1317-75-6-1211View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Penco S, Scarfi S, Giovine M, Damonte G, Millo E, Villaggio B, Passalacqua M, Pozzolini M, Garre C, Benatti U: Identification of an import signal for, and the nuclear localization of, human lactoferrin. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2001, 34: 151-159. 10.1042/BA20010038View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Legrand D, Vigie K, Said EA, Elass E, Masson M, Slomianny MC, Carpentier M, Briand JP, Mazurier J, Hovanessian AG: Surface nucleolin participates in both the binding and endocytosis of lactoferrin in target cells. Eur J Biochem 2004, 271: 303-317. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03929.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ji ZS, Mahley RW: Lactoferrin binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans and the LDL receptor-related protein. further evidence supporting the importance of direct binding of remnant lipoproteins to HSPG. Arterioscler Thromb 1994, 14: 2025-2031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki YA, Shin K, Lonnerdal B: Molecular cloning and functional expression of a human intestinal lactoferrin receptor. Biochemistry 2001, 40: 15771-15779. 10.1021/bi0155899View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ligas MW, Johnson DC: A herpes simplex virus mutant in which glycoprotein D sequences are replaced by beta-galactosidase sequences binds to but is unable to penetrate into cells. J Virol 1988, 62: 1486-1494.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huber MT, Wisner TW, Hegde NR, Goldsmith KA, Rauch DA, Roller RJ, Krummenacher C, Eisenberg RJ, Cohen GH, Johnson DC: Herpes simplex virus with highly reduced gD levels can efficiently enter and spread between human keratinocytes. J Virol 2001, 75: 10309-10318. 10.1128/JVI.75.21.10309-10318.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dingwell KS, Brunetti CR, Hendricks RL, Tang Q, Tang M, Rainbow AJ, Johnson DC: Herpes simplex virus glycoproteins E and I facilitate cell-to-cell spread in vivo and across junctions of cultured cells. J Virol 1994, 68: 834-845.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dingwell KS, Johnson DC: The herpes simplex virus gE-gI complex facilitates cell-to-cell spread and binds to components of cell junctions. J Virol 1998, 72: 8933-8942.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laquerre S, Argnani R, Anderson DB, Zucchini S, Manservigi R, Glorioso JC: Heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding by herpes simplex virus type 1 glycoproteins B and C, which differ in their contributions to virus attachment, penetration, and cell-to-cell spread. J Virol 1998, 72: 6119-6130.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.