From: Comparison of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification for orf virus withquantitative real-time PCR
The route of infection | Samples | Days after infection | Assay | Â |
---|---|---|---|---|
 | LAMP | real-time PCR | ||
Intracutaneous | Goat 1 | 10 | + | + |
11 | + | + | ||
12 | + | + | ||
13 | + | + | ||
14 | + | + | ||
15 | + | + | ||
16 | + | + | ||
17 | + | + | ||
18 | + | + | ||
20 | + | + | ||
22 | + | + | ||
25 | - | - | ||
28 | + | + | ||
Goat 2 | 12 | + | + | |
13 | + | + | ||
14 | + | + | ||
15 | + | + | ||
16 | + | + | ||
17 | + | + | ||
18 | + | + | ||
19 | + | + | ||
20 | + | + | ||
23 | + | + | ||
25 | + | + | ||
27 | + | + | ||
30 | - | + | ||
Cohabitation | Goat 3 | 18 | + | + |
21 | + | + | ||
22 | + | + | ||
23 | + | + | ||
24 | + | + | ||
25 | + | + | ||
26 | + | + | ||
27 | - | - | ||
29 | + | + | ||
Goat 4 | 17 | + | + | |
19 | + | + | ||
20 | + | + | ||
21 | + | + | ||
22 | + | + | ||
23 | + | + | ||
24 | + | + | ||
25 | + | + | ||
27 | + | + | ||
29 | - | - | ||
 |  | 32 | - | - |