Genetic diversity and recombination analysis of sweepoviruses from Brazil

  • Leonardo C Albuquerque1, 3,

    Affiliated with

    • Alice K Inoue-Nagata1Email author,

      Affiliated with

      • Bruna Pinheiro1,

        Affiliated with

        • Renato O Resende2,

          Affiliated with

          • Enrique Moriones3 and

            Affiliated with

            • Jesús Navas-Castillo3

              Affiliated with

              Virology Journal20129:241

              DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-9-241

              Received: 31 January 2012

              Accepted: 17 October 2012

              Published: 20 October 2012

              Abstract

              Background

              Monopartite begomoviruses (genus Begomovirus, family Geminiviridae) that infect sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) around the world are known as sweepoviruses. Because sweet potato plants are vegetatively propagated, the accumulation of viruses can become a major constraint for root production. Mixed infections of sweepovirus species and strains can lead to recombination, which may contribute to the generation of new recombinant sweepoviruses.

              Results

              This study reports the full genome sequence of 34 sweepoviruses sampled from a sweet potato germplasm bank and commercial fields in Brazil. These sequences were compared with others from public nucleotide sequence databases to provide a comprehensive overview of the genetic diversity and patterns of genetic exchange in sweepoviruses isolated from Brazil, as well as to review the classification and nomenclature of sweepoviruses in accordance with the current guidelines proposed by the Geminiviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). Co-infections and extensive recombination events were identified in Brazilian sweepoviruses. Analysis of the recombination breakpoints detected within the sweepovirus dataset revealed that most recombination events occurred in the intergenic region (IR) and in the middle of the C1 open reading frame (ORF).

              Conclusions

              The genetic diversity of sweepoviruses was considerably greater than previously described in Brazil. Moreover, recombination analysis revealed that a genomic exchange is responsible for the emergence of sweepovirus species and strains and provided valuable new information for understanding the diversity and evolution of sweepoviruses.

              Keywords

              Geminivirus Begomovirus Sweet potato Ipomoea batatas Convolvulaceae

              Background

              Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas, family Convolvulaceae) is one of the most important subsistence crops in developing countries and the third most important root crop after potato (Solanum tuberosum) and cassava (Manihot esculenta) [1]. More than 30 viruses are known to infect sweet potato and in some cases cause serious diseases in this crop [2]. Many of these viruses are monopartite begomoviruses (genus Begomovirus, family Geminiviridae).

              The first two sweet potato begomoviruses to be characterized at the molecular level were Sweet potato leaf curl virus (SPLCV) and Sweet potato leaf curl Georgia virus (SPLCGoV), isolated in Louisiana, USA, in 1999 [3, 4]. Subsequently, begomovirus infections in sweet potato have been reported from many countries, including Peru [5], Spain [6], China [7, 8], Italy [9], Uganda [10], the United States [11] and Brazil [12, 13], resulting in the description of ten additional novel species [6, 7, 1013]. Phylogenetically, these viruses, for which the name sweepoviruses has been proposed [14], group in a monophyletic cluster that is distinct from the two main begomovirus branches, the Old and New World groups [6, 15]. In addition to sweet potato, sweepoviruses can infect other hosts such as I. nil or I. setosa[16]. The symptoms caused by sweepoviruses depend on the specific host and usually consist of leaf curling and vein yellowing, although the infection can be asymptomatic.

              Begomoviruses are transmitted to dicotyledonous plants by the whitefly Bemisia tabaci and cause important yield losses in many crops worldwide [1719]. They have small, circular, single-strand DNA genomes consisting of one (monopartite) or two (bipartite) components encapsidated in twinned icosahedral particles [20, 21]. The viral DNA-A has one (V1) or two open reading frames (ORFs - V1 and V2, in Old World begomoviruses) in the virion sense and four ORFs (C1, C2, C3 and C4) in the complementary sense, separated by an intergenic region (IR). The DNA-A encodes the viral coat protein (CP or V1) essential for viral transmission by B. tabaci and a V2 protein that may potentially be involved in virus accumulation, symptom development and virus movement [22, 23]. The complementary-sense strand of DNA-A encodes the replication-associated protein (Rep or C1), the transcriptional activator protein (TrAP or C2), which controls viral gene expression, the replication-enhancer protein (REN or C3), required for viral DNA replication, and C4, a suppressor of post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS). The DNA-B of bipartite begomoviruses encodes two proteins, the nuclear shuttle protein (NSP – BV1) and the movement protein (MP – BC1) involved in intra- and inter-cellular movement within the plant [24].

              Because sweet potato plants are vegetatively propagated, accumulation of viruses may occur and results in the co-infection of multiple viral genomes in a single plant. Mixed infections of sweepovirus species and strains have been previously shown to be frequent in sweet potato [6, 11, 13]. This phenomenon is extremely important for virus evolution because it provides opportunities for the occurrence of natural recombination events leading to extensive viral diversity [2527]. The importance of recombination to geminivirus evolution is well known [26, 28, 29], and it is probably the mechanism responsible for the genetic diversification and emergence of the most agriculturally important begomovirus species [3032]. While generating descendants with increased fitness, recombination has also been the cause of the increased genetic diversity within the begomoviruses that consequently complicates the classification of new species.

              In this report, we present a study of the genetic diversity among sweepoviruses in Brazil. Thirty-four new complete sequences were determined. Based on these new sequences and on other sequences available in public sequence databases, the classification and nomenclature of sweepoviruses were revised in accordance with the current guidelines of the Geminiviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). We also provide clear evidence of recombination events that may have led to the emergence of new sweepovirus strains and species.

              Results

              Sequence analysis of full-length sweepovirus genomes

              The complete nucleotide sequence of 34 cloned isolates (GenBank accessions HQ393442 to HQ393472 and HQ393474 to HQ393476) corresponding to putative full-length sweepovirus genomes was determined from the sweet potato Embrapa germplasm bank (SPEGB) and from commercial field samples. All genomes (ranging from 2779 to 2843 nucleotides) had the typical organization of monopartite begomoviruses with two ORFs in the virion sense (V1 and V2) and four ORFs in the complementary sense (C1, C2, C3 and C4). All sequences contained the conserved nonanucleotide sequence 5’-TAATATT↓AC-3’ and four iterative elements (iterons, short repeated sequences important for the replication process; Additional File 1), three direct (I, II and III) and one inverted (IV), with the core consensus sequence GGWGR located around the TATA box [33]. The iteron-related domain (IRD) in the N-terminal region of the replication-associated protein (Rep IRD) was also identified [34]. Sequences were identified that contain three Rep IRDs (MATPKRFRIS, MAPPNRFKIQ and MPRAGRFNLN) that differ from those previously described by Lozano et al.[6] and Zhang and Ling [11] for sweepoviruses (Additional File 1).

              The 34 sequences determined here were compared with the sequences of 67 sweepovirus isolates obtained from sequence databases (Table  1 and Additional File 2). Each isolate was named following the standard nomenclature for begomoviruses (Table  2; see Additional File 2 for complete isolate names). Based on the current guidelines proposed by the ICTV Geminiviridae Study Group [35, 36], two isolates belong to the same species if the overall nucleotide identity is >89%. The isolates described in this study belong to three species, Sweet potato leaf curl virus (SPLCV), Sweet potato golden vein virus (SPGVV) (the term "associated" was eliminated from the previous name, sweet potato golden vein-associated virus, following the standard begomovirus naming recommendation) and Sweet potato leaf curl Spain virus (SPLCESV), with the percentage of nucleotide identity ranging from 92.2-98.4% within each species. Twenty-one of the isolates belong to three novel strains (the demarcation threshold for distinguishing different strains of a species is 89-94% nucleotide identity [36]) of SPLCV and SPGVV named SPLCV-Brazil (SPLCV-BR), SPLCV-Pernambuco (SPLCV-PE) and SPGVV-Rondonia (SPGVV-RO). The other isolates are variants of SPLCV-United States (SPLCV-US), SPGVV-Paraiba (SPGVV-PB) and SPLCESV. The isolates of SPGVV and SPLCESV were found only in the SPEGB, whereas SPLCV isolates were found in both the SPEGB and commercial field samples. The samples from São Paulo state were infected by both SPLCV-US and SPLCV-Sao Paulo (SPLCV-SP) isolates. However, the samples from the States of Pernambuco, Paraíba and Rio Grande do Sul were shown to be infected by SPLCV-PE (Table  2). Interestingly, we identified co-infection in six samples (#171, #184, #325, #337, #346 and #370) from the SPEGB, whereas all of the samples from commercial fields were apparently infected by a single species/strain, as suggested by the uniformity of the clones obtained from these samples (Table  2).
              Table 1

              Sweepoviruses used in this study

              Species-Strain

              Accession no

              Identification according to databases

              Origin

              Reference

              Acronym suggested in this studyb

               

              HQ393450

              SPLCV-US[BR:PA:08] a

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-US[BR:PA:08]

              SPLCV-US

              HQ393451

              SPLCV-US[BR:SE:PV:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-US[BR:SE:PV:08]

              HQ393443

              SPLCV-US[BR:BA:CA1:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-US[BR:BA:CA1:08]

              HQ393446

              SPLCV-US[BR:BA:CA2:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-US[BR:BA:CA2:08]

              FJ969834

              SPLCV-RS2[BR:Est1]

              Brazil

              Paprotka et al., 2010

              SPLCV-US[BR:RS:Est1:07]

              FJ969837

              SPLCV-RS2[BR:Ros1]

              Brazil

              Paprotka et al., 2010

              SPLCV-US[BR:RS:Ros1:07]

              FJ969835

              SPLCV-RS2[BR:Mac1]

              Brazil

              Paprotka et al., 2010

              SPLCV-US[BR:RS:Mac1:07]

              HQ393471

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM1:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM1:09]

              HQ393472

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM2:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM2:09]

              FJ969836

              SPLCV-RS2[BR:Poa1]

              Brazil

              Paprotka et al., 2010

              SPLCV-US[BR:RS:Poa1:07]

              HQ393475

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM4:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM4:09]

              HQ393474

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM3:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM3:09]

              HM754641

              SPLCV-[Haenam1]

              South Korea

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[KR:Hae1:09]

              HM754637

              SPLCV-[Yeojoo 507]

              South Korea

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[KR:Yeo507:09]

              FJ560719

              SPLCKrV-[J-508]

              South Korea

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[KR:Yeo508:08]

              HM754639

              SPLCV-[Haenam532]

              South Korea

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[KR:Hae532:09]

              HM754638

              SPLCV-[Haenam 519–3]

              South Korea

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[KR:Hae519:09]

              HM754635

              SPLCV-[Yeojoo 388]

              South Korea

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[KR:Yeo388:09]

              HM754636

              SPLCV-[Nonsan 445–2]

              South Korea

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[KR:Non445-2:09]

              HM754634

              SPLCV-[Chungju 263]

              South Korea

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[KR:Chu263:09]

              HM754640

              SPLCV-[Haenam 618–2]

              South Korea

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[KR:Hae618:09]

              AF104036

              SPLCV-US[US:Lou:94]

              USA

              Lotrakul & Valverde, 1999

              SPLCV-US[US:Lou:94]

              HQ393453

              SPLCV-US[BR:RO:OPO:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-US[BR:RO:OPO:08]

              FJ176701

              SPLCV-[Eastern China]

              China

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[CN:Jia:08]

              AB433788

              SPLCV-[Japan:Kyoto:1998]

              Japan

              GenBank

              SPLCV-US[JR:Kyo:98]

              HQ333141

              SPLCV-[US:MS:WS1-4]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              SPLCV-US[US:MS:WS1-4:07]

              HQ333142

              SPLCV-[US:MS:WS3-8]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              SPLCV-US[US:MS:WS3-8:07]

              HQ333140

              SPLCV-[US:MS:4B-14]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              SPLCV-US[US:MS:4b-14:07]

              HQ333139

              SPLCV-[US:MS:1B-1A]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              SPLCV-US[US:MS:1b-1a:07]

              SPLCV-CN

              EU267799

              SPLCV-[RL7]

              China

              GenBank

              SPLCV-CN[CN:Yn:RL7:07]

              FN806776

              SPLCV-[Y338]

              China

              GenBank

              SPLCV-CN[CN:Yn338:09]

              EU253456

              SPLCV-[RL31]

              China

              GenBank

              SPLCV-CN[CN:Yn:RL31:07]

              SPLCV-SP

              HQ393473

              SPLCV-SP[BR:AlvM:09]

              Brazil

              Albuquerque et al., 2011

              SPLCV-SP[BR:SP:AlvM:09]

              HQ393476

              SPLCV-SP[BR:SP:PP:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-SP[BR:SP:PP:09]

              SPLCV-JP

              AB433787

              SPLCV-[Japan:Kumamoto:1998]

              Japan

              GenBank

              SPLCV-JP[JR:Kum:98]

              AB433786

              SPLCV-[Japan:Miyazaki:1996]

              Japan

              GenBank

              SPLCV-JP[JR:Miy:96]

              SPLCV-SC

              HQ333138

              SPLCV-[US:SC:646B-11]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              SPLCV-SC[US:SC:646-B11:06]

              HQ333137

              SPLCV-[US:SC:634–7]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              SPLCV-SC[US:SC:634–7:06]

              HQ333135

              SPLCV-[US:SC:377–23]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              SPLCV-SC[US:SC:377–23:06]

              HQ333136

              SPLCV-[US:SC:634–2]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              SPLCV-SC[US:SC:634–2:06]

              SPLCV-BR

              HQ393445

              SPLCV-BR[BR:BA:CA:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-BR[BR:BA:CA:08]

              HQ393460

              SPLCV-BR[BR:RO:Cac:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-BR[BR:RO:Cac:08]

              HQ393455

              SPLCV-BR[BR:RO:OPO:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-BR[BR:RO:OPO:08]

              HQ393449

              SPLCV-BR[BR:SE:Ria:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-BR[BR:SE:Ria:08]

              HQ393442

              SPLCV-BR[BR:BA:Uru:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-BR[BR:BA:Uru:08]

              SPLCV-PR

              DQ644563

              SPLCV-[N4]

              Puerto Rico

              GenBank

              SPLCV-PR[PR:Me-N4:06]

              DQ644562

              SPLCV-[PR80-N2]

              Puerto Rico

              GenBank

              SPLCV-PR[PR:80-N2:06]

              SPLCV-PE

              HQ393456

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RO:PV:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RO:PV:08]

              HQ393464

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP1:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP1:09]

              HQ393465

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP2:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP2:09]

              HQ393467

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP5:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP5:09]

              HQ393462

              SPLCV-PE[BR:PE:CSF:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:PE:CSF:08]

              HQ393463

              SPLCV-PE[BR:PE:CSF:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:PE:CSF:08]

              HQ393461

              SPLCV-PE[BR:PB:PF:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:PB:PF:09]

              HQ393466

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP4:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP4:09]

              HQ393469

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP7:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP7:09]

              HQ393468

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP6:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP6:09]

              HQ393470

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP3:09]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP3:09]

              SPLCV-Fu

              FJ515898

              SPLCV-[Fp-3]

              China

              Yang et al., 2009

              SPLCV-Fu[CN:Fj:Fp3:07]

              FJ515897

              SPLCV-[Fp-2]

              China

              Yang et al., 2009

              SPLCV-Fu[CN:Fj:Fp2:07]

              FJ515896

              SPLCV-[Fp-1]

              China

              Yang et al., 2009

              SPLCV-Fu[CN:Fj:Fp1:07]

              SPLCV-ES

              EU856364

              SPLCV-ES[ES:CI:BG12:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCV-ES[ES:CI:BG12:02]

              EF456744

              SPLCV-ES[ES:CI:BG6:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCV-ES[ES:CI:BG6:02]

              EU856366

              SPLCV-ES[ES:CI:BG13:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCV-ES[ES:CI:BG13:02]

              SPLCV-IT

              AJ586885

              SPLCV-IT[IT:Sic:02]

              Italy

              Briddon et al., 2005

              SPLCV-IT[IT:Sic:02]

              SPLCLaV-BR

              FJ969833

              SPLCV-RS1[BR:Tav1]

              Brazil

              Paprotka et al., 2010

              SPLCLaV-BR[BR:RS:Tav1:07]

              SPLCLaV-ES

              EF456746

              SPLCLaV-[ES:CI:BG27:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCLaV-ES[ES:CI:BG27:02]

              EU839579

              SPLCLaV-[ES:Mal:BG30:06]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCLaV-ES[ES:Mal:BG30:06]

              SPLCBeV

              FN432356

              SPLCBV-[India:West Bengal:2008]

              India

              GenBank

              SPLCBeV-[IN:Ben:08]

              SPLCBRV

              FJ969832

              SPLCV-CE[BR:For1]

              Brazil

              Paprotka et al., 2010

              SPLCBRV-[BR:CE:For1:07]

              SPLCCaV

              EF456742

              SPLCCaV-[ES:CI:BG4:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCCaV-[ES:CI:BG4:02]

              EF456745

              SPLCCaV-[ES:CI:BG7:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCCaV-[ES:CI:BG7:02]

              EU856365

              SPLCCaV-[ES:CI:BG21:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCCaV-[ES:CI:BG21:02]

              FJ529203

              SPLCCaV-[ES:CI:BG25:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCCaV-[ES:CI:BG25:02]

              SPLCShV

              EU309693

              SPLCV

              China

              GenBank

              SPLCShV-[CN:Sha:07]

              SPLCGoV

              AF326775

              SPLCGV-[16]

              USA

              Lotrakul et al., 2003

              SPLCGoV-[US:Geo:16]

              MerLCuV-US

              HQ333143

              SPGVaV-[US:MS:1B-3]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              MerLCuV-US[US:MS:1B-3:07]

              MerLCuV-BR

              FJ969829

              SPGVaV-PA[BR:Bel1]

              Brazil

              Paprotka et al., 2010

              MerLCuV-BR[BR:PA:Bel1:07]

              MerLCuV-PR

              DQ644561

              MeLCV-[PR:N1]

              Puerto Rico

              GenBank

              MeLCuV-PR[PR:N1:06]

              IYVMaV

              EU839576

              IYVV-[ES:Mal:IG1:06]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              IYVMaV-[ES:Mal:IG1:06]

              IYVV

              EU839578

              IYVV-[ES:Mal:IG5:06]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              IYVV-[ES:Mal:IG5:06]

              AJ132548

              IYVV-[ES:98]

              Spain

              Banks et al., 1999

              IYVV-[ES:98]

              EU839577

              IYVV-[ES:Mal:IG3:06]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              IYVV-[ES:Mal:IG3:06]

              SPLCSPV

              HQ393477

              SPLCSPV-[BR:AlvM:09]

              Brazil

              Albuquerque et al., 2011

              SPLCSPV-[BR:SP:AlvM:09]

              SPMV

              FJ969831

              SPMaV-[BR:BSB1]

              Brazil

              Paprotka et al., 2010

              SPMV-[BR:BSB1:07]

              SPLCSCV

              HQ333144

              SPLCSCV-[US:SC:648B-9]

              USA

              Zhang & Ling, 2011

              SPLCSCV-[US:SC:648-B9:06]

              SPLCUV

              FR751068

              SPLCUV-[UG:KAMP:08]

              Uganda

              Wasswa et al., 2011

              SPLCUV-[UG:KAMP:08]

              SPLCESV

              EF456741

              SPLCESV-[ES:CI:BG1:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCESV-[ES:CI:BG1:02]

              EF456743

              SPLCESV-[ES:CI:BG5:02]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCESV-[ES:CI:BG5:02]

              HQ393448

              SPLCESV-[BR:BA:Uti:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCESV-[BR:BA:Uti:08]

              FJ151200

              SPLCESV-[ES:Mal:IG2:06]

              Spain

              Lozano et al., 2009

              SPLCESV-[ES:Mal:IG2:06]

              HQ393458

              SPLCESV-[BR:RO:Cac:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPLCESV-[BR:RO:Cac:08]

              SPGVV-PB

              HQ393444

              SPGVV-PB[BR:BA:CA:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPGVV-PB[BR:BA:CA:08]

              FJ969830

              SPGVaV-PB1[BR:Sou1]

              Brazil

              Paprotka et al., 2010

              SPGVV-PB[BR:PB:Sou1:07]

              SPGVV-RO

              HQ393459

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:Cac:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:Cac:08]

              HQ393457

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:PV2:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:PV2:08]

              HQ393454

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:OPO:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:OPO:08]

              HQ393447

              SPGVV-RO[BR:BA:Uti:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPGVV-RO[BR:BA:Uti:08]

              HQ393452

              SPGVV-RO[BR:SE:PV1:08]

              Brazil

              This study

              SPGVV-RO[BR:SE:PV1:08]

              SPLCCNV

              DQ512731

              SPLCV-[CN]

              China

              Luan et al., 2007

              SPLCCNV-[CN:05]

               

              JF736657

              SPLCV-B3

              China

              GenBank

              SPLCCNV-[CN:Zhe:10]

              aThe isolates present in this study are shown in bold.

              bComplete names of the viruses are shown in the Additional file 2.

              Table 2

              Origins of the 34 sweepovirus isolates used in this study

              Sample Origin

              Sample

              Enzyme

              Species

              Strain[Isolate]

              Acronym

              Accession No

              SPEGBa

              #167

              EcoRV

              SPLCVb

              United States[Brazil:Bahia:Cruz das Almas1:2008]

              SPLCV-US[BR:BA:CA1:08]

              HQ393443

              SPEGB

              #171

              SacI

               

              United States[Brazil:Bahia:Cruz das Almas2:2008]

              SPLCV-US[BR:BA:CA2:08]

              HQ393446

              SPEGB

              #293

              EcoRV

               

              United States[Brazil:Para:2008]

              SPLCV-US[BR:PA:08]

              HQ393450

              SPEGB

              #325

              SacI

               

              United States[Brazil:Rondonia:Porto Velho:2008]

              SPLCV-US[BR:RO:PV:08]

              HQ393451

              SPEGB

              #337

              EcoRV

               

              United States[Brazil:Rondonia:Ouro Preto do Oeste:2008]

              SPLCV-US[BR:RO:OPO:08]

              HQ393453

              Sao Paulo

              #SP12

              BamHI

               

              United States[Brazil:Sao Paulo:Alfredo Marcondes1:2009]

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM1:09]

              HQ393471

              Sao Paulo

              #SP12

              SacI

               

              United States[Brazil:Sao Paulo:Alfredo Marcondes2:2009]

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM2:09]

              HQ393472

              Sao Paulo

              #SP88

              BamHI

               

              United States[Brazil:Sao Paulo:Alfredo Marcondes3:2009]

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM3:09]

              HQ393474

              Sao Paulo

              #SP130

              BamHI

               

              United States[Brazil:Sao Paulo:Alfredo Marcondes4:2009]

              SPLCV-US[BR:SP:AM4:09]

              HQ393475

              Sao Paulo

              #SP140

              BamHI

               

              Sao Paulo[Brazil:Sao Paulo:Presidente Prudente:2009]

              SPLCV-SP[BR:SP:PP:09]

              HQ393476

              SPEGB

              #134

              SpeI

               

              Brazil[Brazil:Bahia:Urucuca:2008]

              SPLCV-BR[BR:BA:Uru:08]

              HQ393442

              SPEGB

              #171

              BamHI

               

              Brazil[Brazil:Bahia:Cruz das Almas:2008]

              SPLCV-BR[BR:BA:CA:08]

              HQ393445

              SPEGB

              #235

              BamHI

               

              Brazil[Brazil:Sergipe:Riachao:2008]

              SPLCV-BR[BR:SE:Ria:08]

              HQ393449

              SPEGB

              #337

              SacI

               

              Brazil[Brazil:Rondonia:Ouro Preto do Oeste:2008]

              SPLCV-BR[BR:RO:OPO:08]

              HQ393455

              SPEGB

              #370

              SacI

               

              Brazil[Brazil:Rondonia:Cacoal:2008]

              SPLCV-BR[BR:RO:Cac:08]

              HQ393460

              SPEGB

              #346

              EcoRV

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Rondonia:Porto Velho:2008]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RO:PV:08]

              HQ393456

              Paraiba

              #PB82

              SacI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Paraiba:Pedras de Fogo:2008]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:PB:PF:08]

              HQ393461

              Pernambuco

              #PE49

              BamHI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Penambuco:Camocin de São Félix1:2008]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:PE:CSF1:08]

              HQ393462

              Pernambuco

              #PE49

              SacI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Pernambuco:Camocin de São Félix2:2008]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:PE:CSF2:08]

              HQ393463

              Rio Grande do Sul

              #RS9

              BamHI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Rio grande do Sul:Mariana Pimentel1:2009]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP1:09]

              HQ393464

              Rio Grande do Sul

              #RS9

              SacI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Rio Grande do Sul:Mariana Pimentel2:2009]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP2:09]

              HQ393465

              Rio Grande do Sul

              #RS24

              SacI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Rio Grande do Sul:Mariana Pimentel4:2009]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP4:09]

              HQ393466

              Rio Grande do Sul

              #RS29

              BamHI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Rio Grande do Sul:Mariana Pimentel5:2009]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP5:09]

              HQ393467

              Rio Grande do Sul

              #RS33

              BamHI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Rio Grande do Sul:Mariana Pimentel6:2009]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP6:09]

              HQ393468

              Rio Grande do Sul

              #RS52

              BamHI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Rio Grande do Sul:Mariana Pimentel7:2009]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP7:09]

              HQ393469

              Rio Grande do Sul

              #RS52

              SacI

               

              Pernambuco[Brazil:Rio Grande do Sul:Mariana Pimentel3:2009]

              SPLCV-PE[BR:RS:MP3:09]

              HQ393470

              SPEGB

              #171

              BamHI

              SPGVVc

              Paraiba[Brazil:Bahia:Cruz das Almas:2008]

              SPGVV-PB[BR:BA:CA:08]

              HQ393444

              SPEGB

              #184

              SacI

               

              Rondonia[Brazil:Bahia:Utinga:2008]

              SPGVV-RO[BR:BA:Uti:08]

              HQ393447

              SPEGB

              #325

              SacI

               

              Rondonia[Brazil:Rondonia:Porto Velho1:2008]

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:PV1:08]

              HQ393452

              SPEGB

              #337

              EcoRV

               

              Rondonia[Brazil:Rondonia:Ouro Preto do Oeste:2008]

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:OPO:08]

              HQ393454

              SPEGB

              #346

              EcoRV

               

              Rondonia[Brazil:Rondonia:Porto Velho2:2008]

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:PV2:08]

              HQ393457

              SPEGB

              #370

              BamHI

               

              Rondonia[Brazil:Rondonia:Cacoal:2008]

              SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:Cac:08]

              HQ393459

              SPEGB

              #184

              SpeI

              SPLCESVd

              [Brazil:Bahia:Utinga:2008]

              SPLCESV-[BR:BA:Uti:08]

              HQ393448

              SPEGB

              #370

              BamHI

               

              [Brazil:Rondonia:Cacoal:2008]

              SPLCESV-[BR:RO:Cac:08]

              HQ393458

              a Sweet potato Embrapa Germplasm Bank.

              b Sweet potato leaf curl virus.

              c Sweet potato golden vein virus.

              d Sweet potato leaf curl Spain virus.

              Taxonomic and phylogenetic analysis of sweepoviruses

              Pairwise comparisons using Clustal V were performed using the sequences determined here and all full-length sweepovirus sequences available in the databases. It is worth noting that a few sweepovirus isolates were likely misclassified according to the taxonomic criteria for geminivirus classification [36] (the proposed new names are shown in Table  1 and Additional File 2). These isolates were SPLCV-Ceara[Brazil:Fortaleza1] (SPLCV-CE[BR:For1], FJ969832), SPLCV-Rio Grande do Sul1[Brazil:Tavares1] (SPLCV-RS1[BR:Tav1], FJ969833) [12], Sweet potato golden vein-associated virus-[United States:Mississipi:1b-3:07] (SPGVaV-[US:MS:1B-3], HQ333143) [11], SPGVaV-Para[Brazil:Belem1] (SPGVaV-PA[BR:Bel1], FJ969829) [12] and Ipomoea yellow vein virus-[Spain:Malaga:IG1:2006] (IYVV-[ES:Mal:IG1:06], EU839576) [6]. The genome of isolate SPLCV-CE[BR:For1] shares <89% nucleotide identity with all other begomovirus sequences (Additional File 2), and in accordance with the cut-off point of 89% identity established for species separation within the genus Begomovirus[35], it most likely belongs to a new species, proposed here as Sweet potato leaf curl Brazil virus (SPLCBRV). The isolate SPLCV-RS1[BR:Tav1] shares >90% identity with SPLCLaV isolates, and we therefore proposed it be classified as Sweet potato leaf curl Lanzarote virus-Brazil[BR:RS:Tav1:07] (SPLCLaV-BR[BR:RS:Tav1:07]). The IYVV-[ES:Mal:IG1:06] sequence shared <89% identity with IYVV-[Spain:1998] and all other begomovirus sequences; it is therefore suggested that it be classified as a new species named Ipomoea yellow vein Malaga virus-[ES:Mal:IG1:06] (IYVMaV-[ES:Mal:IG1:06]). In addition, based on the nucleotide sequence identities found (Additional File 2), we propose that the isolates SPGVaV-[United States:Mississippi:1B-3] (SPGVaV-[US:MS:1B-3], HQ333143), SPGVaV-[Brazil:Belém1] (SPGVaV-PA[BR:Bel1], FJ969829) and Merremia leaf curl virus-[Puerto Rico:N1] (DQ644561) be classified as strains of Merremia leaf curl virus (MerLCuV), specifically MerLCuV-US[US:MS:1B-3:07], MerLCuV-BR[BR:PA:Bel1:07] and MerLCuV-PR[PR:N1:06], respectively.

              In the UPGMA phylogenetic tree (Figure  1), the sweepovirus sequences were consistently grouped in accordance with the proposed species/strain classification and were separated from both the Old and New World begomoviruses as was expected from the pairwise nucleotide identity analysis (Additional File 2).
              http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-9-241/MediaObjects/12985_2012_1827_Fig1_HTML.jpg
              Figure 1

              UPGMA phylogenetic tree based on a multiple alignment of the complete sequences of the sweepoviruses described in this work (in bold) and those available in public sequence databases. Branches were bootstrapped with 1,000 replications. Acronyms are described in Table  1. Representative sequences are included for New World (L14460, Tomato mottle virus: ToMoV-[US:Flo:89]; U51137, Abutilon mosaic virus: AbMV-[US:Haw]; AF173555, Bean golden yellow mosaic virus: BGYMV-[MX:Chi]; and EF417915, Tomato yellow vein streak virus: ToYVSV-[BR:Ba3]) and Old World begomoviruses (AF112352, African cassava mosaic virus: ACMV-[CM:98]; AY705380, Cotton leaf curl Burewala virus: CLCuBuV-[IN:Ban:04]; X74516, AYVV-SG[SG:92]; and AF071228, Tomato yellow leaf curl virus: TYLCV-Mdl[ES:72:97]). The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. Bootstrap values >50% are indicated.

              Recombination analysis

              We searched for evidence of recombination in an alignment of all 101 complete sweepovirus sequences. Different methods were used for recombination breakpoint prediction and provided strong evidence for at least 13 recombination events spread across 19 of 101 analyzed genomes (Figure  2). Remarkably, following the adopted criteria (detectable by seven different analytical methods and recombined fragments with ≥97% nucleotide identity with parental sequences), most recombination events were detected among the isolates from the SPEGB. Eight recombination patterns were detected for sequences reported in this work, while five were found in the previously published sweepovirus sequences. The recombination breakpoints were detected between the intergenic region (IR) and V1 (events 1, 2, and 5); V1 and C2/C3 (event 3); C1 and C1 (event 4), V1 and C2 (event 6), V1 and C1 (event 7); V2 and C2/C3 (event 9); C1/C4 and V1/V2 (event 12) and C1 and IR (events 8, 10, 11, and 13) (Figure  2). After analysis with the RDP3 program, the recombination events detected for the sequences reported in this study (events 1–8, Figure  2A, 2B) were tested using the SimPlot program (Figure  3). Every event identified by the RDP3 program was confirmed by Simplot. SPLCV-US[BR:RO:OPO:08] (HQ393453) appeared to be a recombinant (recombination points detected at nucleotide (nt) positions 37 and 1006) of the putative parental-like strains SPLCV-SP[BR:SP:AlvM:09] (HQ393476) and SPLCV-BR[BR:RO:OPO:08] (HQ393455) (Figure  3A). Among the isolates from the SPLCV-BR strain, SPLCV-BR[BR:BA:Uru:08] (HQ393442) contained three recombination events (event 2, breakpoints at nucleotide positions 58–523; event 3, nt positions 955–1325 and event 4, nt positions 1926–2614), three putative parental-like strains: SPGVV-RO[BR:BA:Uti:08] (HQ393447), SPLCV-US[BR:RO:OPO:08] (HQ393453) and an unknown sequence (Figure  3B). For the SPLCV-BR isolates [BR:BA:CA:08] and [BR:RO:Cac:08], two recombinant events were detected (event 2, nt positions 45–541 and event 4, nt positions 1926–2614), whereas SPLCV-BR[BR:RO:OPO:08] contained only event 2 (Figure  2B). The isolate SPLCESV-[BR:RO:Cac:08] (HQ393458) was identified as a recombinant (between nt positions 994–2770) of SPLCV-BR[BR:BA:CA:08] (HQ393445) and SPLCESV-[BR:BA:Uti:08] (HQ393448) (Figure  3C). When SPGVV-PB[BR:BA:CA:08] (HQ393444) was used as a query sequence, a recombinant breakpoint (event 6, nt positions 698–1589) with two putative parental-like viruses, SPLCESV-[BR:RO:Cac:08] and SPLCV-US[BR:PA:08] (HQ393450) (Figure  3D) was identified. In contrast, when SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:Cac:08] (HQ393459) was used as a query sequence, a recombinant breakpoint at nt positions 581–1727 (event 7) was identified with two putative parental-like viruses, SPLCESV-[BR:RO:Cac:08] and an unknown sequence (Figure  3E). The remaining four SPGVV-RO sequences contained the same recombination event observed for SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:Cac:08] (Figure  2B). Finally, when the analysis was performed for SPLCV-SP[BR:SP:PP:09] (HQ393476), two different recombination points (at nt positions 24–2007) and two putative parental strains, SPLCV-US[BR:RS:Ros1:07] (FJ969837) and SPLCSPV-[BR:SP:AlvM:09] (HQ393477), were detected (Figure  3F).
              http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-9-241/MediaObjects/12985_2012_1827_Fig2_HTML.jpg
              Figure 2

              Schematic representation of recombination events (A) and details of the recombination breakpoints (B) detected in sweepoviruses. The genome organization of a typical sweepovirus is shown at the top of the figure. Each genome is represented by an open box, colored according to the isolate. Numbers indicate recombination events described in B. R, G, B, M, C, S and T indicate detection by RDP, GENCONV, BOOTSCAN, MAXCHI, CHIMAERA, SISCAN and 3SEQ methods, respectively, with the presented highest p-value being that determined by the method indicated in bold type.

              http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-9-241/MediaObjects/12985_2012_1827_Fig3_HTML.jpg
              Figure 3

              Evidence of recombination events in Brazilian sweepoviruses (A) SPLCV-US[BR:RO:OPO:08], (B) SPLCV-BR[BR:BA:Uru:08], (C) SPLCESV-[BR:RO:Cac:08], (D) SPGVV-PB[BR:BA:CA:08], (E) SPGVV-RO[BR:RO:Cac:08] and (F) SPLCV-SP[BR:SP:PP:09]. SimPlot analyses were performed with full genome sequence alignments using the Window 200bp, Step 20bp, GapStrip on Kimura (2-parameter) method. Recombination points are shown by vertical lines.

              Discussion

              RCA (rolling circle amplification) has greatly facilitated the cloning of geminivirus genomes. This is especially true for sweet potato samples, as DNA extraction is difficult due to the high polysaccharide content [37]. Because RCA-based methods may start from a low amount of template DNA, sample dilution is sufficient to avoid the harmful effects of contaminating substances. In total, 34 complete sweepovirus genomes were isolated from sweet potato samples collected from a sweet potato germplasm bank (SPEGB) and commercial fields across four Brazilian states. Based on ICTV guidelines [36], the isolates belong to new strains of SPLCV [38] (strains SPLCV-BR and SPLCV-PE), and of SPGVV [12] (strain SPGVV-RO), and 13 other isolates are considered to be variants of SPLCV-US [38], SPLCV-SP [13] and SPLCESV [6].

              A thorough pairwise comparison of all of the sweepovirus sequences available in the databases along with the 34 sequences reported here was performed, and it appeared that four viral isolates were not appropriately classified; hence, their classification was reviewed according to ICTV guidelines. We found that the isolates described as SPLCV-CE [12] and IYVV-[ES:IG1] [6] would be better classified as novel species, suggested here as Sweet potato leaf curl Brazil virus (SPLCBRV) and Ipomoea yellow vein Malaga virus (IYVMaV), respectively. Additionally, the SPLCV-RS1 isolate [12] may be classified as a new strain of SPLCLaV [6], and the name Sweet potato leaf curl Lanzarote virus-Brazil (SPLCLaV-BR) is proposed. Thus, it is suggested that all SPLCLaV isolates from Spain be classified as SPLCLaV-ES. Similarly, the isolates designated as SPGVaV-[US:MS:1B-3], SPGVaV-PA[BR:Bel1] and Merremia leaf curl virus-[PR:N1] (MeLCV-[PR:N1]) would be better renamed Merremia leaf curl virus-[US:MS:1B-3:07] (MerLCuV-US-[US:MS:1B-3:07]), MerLCuV-BR[BR:PA:Bel1:07] and MerLCuV-[PR:N1:06], respectively. Additionally, we suggest eliminating the term “associated” from the virus names, as symptom expression was not studied for any of the species. Finally, it was concluded that 44 of 67 sequences should be designated as strains (Table  1). This result clearly illustrates the complexity of sweepovirus taxonomy and nomenclature. Therefore, a set of modifications is suggested for updating the sweepovirus nomenclature and facilitating the interpretation of sweepovirus phylogenetic analysis (Table  1 and Figure  1).

              The phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that the sweepovirus diversity found in the SPEGB samples is higher than in samples collected from commercial fields. In the SPEGB samples (n=10), three species (SPLCV, SPGVV and SPLCESV), five strains (SPLCV-US, SPLCV-BR, SPLCV-PE, SPGVV-PB and SPGVV-RO) and 11 recombinants were found, while in commercial fields (n=11), only one species (SPLCV) and three different strains (SPLCV-US, SPLCV-SP and SPLCV-PE) were observed. Moreover, co-infections were found solely in the SPEGB samples, although they have been shown to be frequent in field samples from other countries [6, 11]. This could be explained by the vegetative propagation of sweet potato that favors viral accumulation in the roots, the maintenance of many sweet potato entries collected throughout Brazil and abroad in the same confined screenhouse, and the presence of whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci) in the germplasm bank facilities. Of the approximately 1400 entries in the SBEGB, nine are from Argentina, the USA, Paraguay, Japan and Spain, and 173 were received from the International Potato Center (CIP), Peru, as supposedly virus-free in vitro seedlings. The seedlings were maintained in vivo for at least three years, and this might have resulted in the natural spread of the begomoviruses present in some plants, thus enabling recombinations to occur. Virus-free plants or seeds will be produced to reduce the negative effect of virus infection for the breeding program.

              Patterns of inter-species/strain geminivirus recombination and a number of hot- and cold-spots have been described among members of the genus Begomovirus[32, 3941]. We therefore analyzed the recombination breakpoints detected within the sweepovirus dataset and a number of recombination events were identified. In some cases (Figure  3A, C, D and F), the recombinants appeared to be the result of recent recombination events because a low mutation rate was observed in this region (data not shown). Most of the recombination breakpoints occur in the IR (detected between nt positions 2770 and 96) and in the middle of the C1 ORF (between nt positions 2000 and 2250) (Figure  2A). Similarly, three recombination breakpoints (events 1, 3 and 5) were identified next to the end of the V1 ORF (Figure  2A). These results are consistent with those obtained from geminivirus recombination analyses, which show that the Rep, the IR and the interface between ORFs V1 and C3 are recombination hot-spots [29, 40, 42, 43]. Lefeuvre et al.[40] also described the presence of a recombination cold-spot within the V2 ORF and the third quarter of the V1 ORF of begomoviruses; here, however, we detected the occurrence of recombination breakpoints in the first half of the V1 ORF. Some sweepovirus recombination events have been previously described [6, 11], and most were confirmed in our study (events 9–13, Figure  2). The detection of similar recombination patterns agrees with the recent hypothesis that the recombination sites are non-randomly distributed along the geminivirus genome [29, 39, 44]. The observed recombination patterns are most likely due to the existence of regions with higher biochemical and biophysical predisposition and with tolerance for recombination. The experimental generation of recombinants has shown that the IR and V1/C3 interface is a recombination hot-spot [43], and this can be explained by the fact that recombinants derived from recombination breakpoints that occur outside the genes are generally more viable than those occurring within the genes [29]. In addition to sequence homology, secondary structural features might also favor the occurrence of recombination [43]. In our case, we detected a number of recombination breakpoints in the Rep and this was also observed among other geminiviruses [26, 29, 45].

              Conclusions

              Our study shows that the genetic diversity of sweepoviruses both in the SPEGB and commercial crops in Brazil is considerably greater than previously reported by Paprotka et al.[12] and highlights the importance of recombination in the evolution of these viruses. These results indicate that recombination events are apparently responsible for the emergence of sweepovirus strains and species, although alterations in host range, cell tropism, viral symptoms and pathogenicity remain to be elucidated. Recently, the generation of the first infectious clone of a sweepovirus, SPLCLaV, was described [16], which is especially important as it opens the possibility of understanding the various aspects of pathogenicity as well as its potential use in breeding virus-resistant sweet potatoes. Studies on viral diversity in particular regions provide important information enabling recommendations for viral control strategies and are essential for identifying species/strains from which to select isolates for screening tests for resistant germplasm. Finally, studies on viral diversity are necessary for comprehending how sweepovirus diversification results from propagative material exchange within the country. The ‘in vivo’ maintenance of vegetatively propagated plants in a germplasm bank has proven to be a risky strategy because it may enable or accelerate the generation of new species/strains that can spread to nature if isolation conditions are not sufficient to maintain the bank free of insect vectors.

              Methods

              Collection of leaf samples and DNA extraction

              Sweet potato leaf samples showing a variety of symptoms, including vein thickening, chlorosis, curling, mottling and distortion, were collected from the sweet potato germplasm bank of Embrapa Vegetables (Brasilia-DF, Brazil) (SPEGB) and commercial fields across four Brazilian states (Table  2). Total DNA was extracted following the protocol described by Doyle and Doyle [46].

              Cloning strategy

              Circular geminiviral DNA was amplified by rolling-circle amplification (RCA) using φ-29 DNA polymerase (TempliPhi kit, GE Healthcare) as described by Inoue-Nagata et al.[47]. RCA products were digested with a set of restriction enzymes (BamHI, EcoRI, EcoRV, HindIII, KpnI, PstI, SacI, SacII, SpeI and XbaI) to identify unique sites for cloning the full-length genomes (~2.8 kb). The restricted fragments corresponding to putative full-length monomer genomes were cloned into the vector pBluescript SK(+) (Stratagene, California, USA) and fully sequenced at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). One to two enzymes were finally selected for cloning the viral genomes present in each sample (Table  2).

              Genetic diversity

              Pairwise nucleotide identity comparisons were calculated using Clustal V [48] (included in MegAlign DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA). As recommended by the ICTV Geminiviridae Study Group, viruses with nucleotide identity between full-genome sequences of <89% were considered as distinct species, while those with <94% were considered distinct strains of the same species [36].

              Phylogenetic analysis

              Full genome sequences from 34 virus isolates obtained from 21 samples analyzed in this study (Table  2) and the 67 complete sweepovirus sequences available in public sequence databases ( http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​) as of October 2011 (Table  2) were aligned using Muscle [49]. The phylogenetic relationships were inferred using UPGMA with 1,000 bootstrap replicates, and the evolutionary distances were calculated using the p-distances method implemented in MEGA 5 [50].

              Recombination analysis

              All sweepovirus sequences used in this study (Table  1) were aligned using Muscle with default settings [49], and the detection of potential recombinant sequences, the identification of likely parental sequences and the localization of possible recombination breakpoints were performed using RDP [51], GENCONV [26], BOOTSCAN [52], MAXICHI [53], CHIMAERA [54], SiScan [55] and 3SEQ [56] methods implemented in the RDP3 program [57]. Default settings were used throughout. Only those potential recombination events detected using all of the methods described above and involving fragments sharing ≥97% sequence identity with their parental sequences were considered. Putative recombination events were analyzed with the SimPlot program [58] using the putative recombinant sequence as a query.

              Declarations

              Acknowledgements

              The authors wish to thank Dr. João Bosco Carvalho Silva, Dr. Simone da Graça Ribeiro and Dr. Amaríllis Rós Golla for assistance with sample collection and Dr. Arvind Varsani for critically reading the manuscript. In Brazil, this study was funded by CNPq project 304079/2009-0. The work in Spain was partially performed within the frame of the network 111RT0433 from Fundación CYTED. JN-C and EM are members of the Research Group AGR-214, partially funded by the Consejería de Economía, Innovación y Ciencia, Junta de Andalucía, Spain (co-financed by FEDER-FSE). LCA is sponsored by CNPq (561405/2008-5), and Capes, and ROR and AKIN are CNPq fellows.

              Authors’ Affiliations

              (1)
              Embrapa Vegetables
              (2)
              Departamento de Biologia Celular, Universidade de Brasília
              (3)
              Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea “La Mayora” (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Estación Experimental “La Mayora”

              References

              1. FAO Statistical Databaseshttp://​faostat.​fao.​org/​]
              2. Clark CA, Davis JA, Abad JA, Cuellar WJ, Fuentes S, Kreuze JF, Gibson RW, Mukasa SB, Tugume AK, Tairo FD, Valkonen JPT: Sweetpotato Viruses: 15 Years of Progress on Understanding and Managing Complex Diseases. Plant Dis 2012, 96:168–185.View Article
              3. Lotrakul P, Valverde RA: Cloning of a DNA-A-like genomic component of sweet potato leaf curl virus: nucleotide sequence and phylogenetic relationships. Molecular Plant Pathology Online 1999. http://​www.​bspp.​org.​uk/​mppol/​1999/​0422lotrakul/​index.​htm
              4. Lotrakul P, Valverde RA, Clark CA, Fauquet CM: Properties of a begomovirus isolated from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) infected with Sweet potato leaf curl virus . Revista Mexicana de Fitopatologia 2003, 21:128–136.
              5. Fuentes S, Salazar LF: First report of Sweet potato leaf curl virus in Peru. Plant Dis 2003, 87:98–98.View Article
              6. Lozano G, Trenado HP, Valverde RA, Navas-Castillo J: Novel begomovirus species of recombinant nature in sweet potato ( Ipomoea batatas ) and Ipomoea indica : taxonomic and phylogenetic implications. J Gen Virol 2009, 90:2550–2562.PubMedView Article
              7. Luan YS, Zhang J, Liu DM, Li WL: Molecular characterization of sweet potato leaf curl virus isolate from China (SPLCV-CN) and its phylogenetic relationship with other members of the Geminiviridae . Virus Genes 2007, 35:379–385.PubMedView Article
              8. Luan YS, Zhang J, An LJ: First report of Sweet potato leaf curl virus in China. Plant Dis 2006, 90:1111.View Article
              9. Briddon RW, Bull SE, Bedford ID: Occurrence of Sweet potato leaf curl virus in Sicily. Plant Pathology 2006, 55:286–286.View Article
              10. Wasswa P, Otto B, Maruthi MN, Mukasa SB, Monger W, Gibson RW: First identification of a sweet potato begomovirus (sweepovirus) in Uganda: characterization, detection and distribution. Plant Pathology 2011, 60:1030–1039.View Article
              11. Zhang SC, Ling KS: Genetic diversity of sweet potato begomoviruses in the United States and identification of a natural recombinant between Sweet potato leaf curl virus and Sweet potato leaf curl Georgia virus . Arch Virol 2011, 156:955–968.PubMedView Article
              12. Paprotka T, Boiteux LS, Fonseca MEN, Resende RO, Jeske H, Faria JC, Ribeiro SG: Genomic diversity of sweet potato geminiviruses in a Brazilian germplasm bank. Virus Res 2010, 149:224–233.PubMedView Article
              13. Albuquerque LC, Inoue-Nagata AK, Pinheiro B, Ribeiro Sda G, Resende RO, Moriones E, Navas-Castillo J: A novel monopartite begomovirus infecting sweet potato in Brazil. Arch Virol 2011, 156:1291–1294.PubMedView Article
              14. Fauquet CM, Stanley J: Geminivirus classification and nomenclature: progress and problems. Ann Appl Biol 2003, 142:165–189.View Article
              15. Briddon R, Patil B, Bagewadi B, Nawaz-ul-Rehman M, Fauquet C: Distinct evolutionary histories of the DNA-A and DNA-B components of bipartite begomoviruses. BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:97.PubMedView Article
              16. Trenado HP, Orílio AF, Márquez-Martín B, Moriones E, Navas-Castillo J: Sweepoviruses cause disease in sweet potato and related Ipomoea spp.: fulfilling Koch’s postulates for a divergent group in the genus Begomovirus. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e27329.PubMedView Article
              17. Banks GK, Bedford ID, Beitia FJ, Rodriquez-Cerezo E, Markham PG: A novel geminivirus of Ipomoea indica ( Convolvulacae ) from southern Spain. Plant Dis 1999, 83:486.View Article
              18. Clark CA, Hoy MW: Effects of common viruses on yield and quality of beauregard sweet potato in Louisiana. Plant Dis 2006, 90:83–88.View Article
              19. Valverde RA, Clark CA, Valkonen JPT: Viruses and virus disease complexes of sweetpotato. Plant Viruses 2007, 1:116–126.
              20. Rojas MR, Hagen C, Lucas WJ, Gilbertson RL: Exploiting chinks in the plant's armor: Evolution and emergence of geminiviruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2005, 43:361–394.PubMedView Article
              21. Stanley J, Bisaro DM, Briddon RW, Brown JK, Fauquet CM, Harrison BD, Rybicki EP, Stenger DC: Family Geminiviridae . In Virus Taxonomy Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses Eighth Report of the International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses. Edited by: Fauquet CM, Mayo MA, Maniloff J, Desselberger U, Ball LA. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005:301–326.
              22. Harrison BD: Advances in geminivirus research. Annu Rev Phytopathol 1985, 23:55–82.View Article
              23. Padidam M, Beachy RN, Fauquet CM: The role of AV2 ("Precoat") and coat protein in viral replication and movement in tomato leaf curl geminivirus. Virology 1996, 224:390–404.PubMedView Article
              24. Noueiry AO, Lucas WJ, Gilbertson RL: Two proteins of a plant DNA virus coordinate nuclear and plasmodesmal transport. Cell 1994, 76:925–932.PubMedView Article
              25. Briddon RW, Bedford ID, Tsai JH, Markham PG: Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the treehopper-transmitted geminivirus, Tomato pseudo-curly top virus , suggests a recombinant origin. Virology 1996, 219:387–394.PubMedView Article
              26. Padidam M, Sawyer S, Fauquet CM: Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology 1999, 265:218–225.PubMedView Article
              27. Sanz AI, Fraile A, Garcia-Arenal F, Zhou X, Robinson DJ, Khalid S, Butt T, Harrison BD: Multiple infection, recombination and genome relationships among begomovirus isolates found in cotton and other plants in Pakistan. J Gen Virol 2000, 81:1839–1849.PubMed
              28. Umaharan P, Padidam M, Phelps RH, Beachy RN, Fauquet CM: Distribution and diversity of geminiviruses in Trinidad and Tobago. Phytopathology 1998, 88:1262–1268.PubMedView Article
              29. Lefeuvre P, Martin DP, Hoareau M, Naze F, Delatte H, Thierry M, Varsani A, Becker N, Reynaud B, Lett JM: Begomovirus 'melting pot' in the south-west Indian Ocean islands: molecular diversity and evolution through recombination. J Gen Virol 2007, 88:3458–3468.PubMedView Article
              30. Monci F, Sanchez-Campos S, Navas-Castillo J, Moriones E: A natural recombinant between the geminiviruses Tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus and Tomato yellow leaf curl virus exhibits a novel pathogenic phenotype and is becoming prevalent in Spanish populations. Virology 2002, 303:317–326.PubMedView Article
              31. Garcia-Andres S, Monci F, Navas-Castillo J, Moriones E: Begomovirus genetic diversity in the native plant reservoir Solanum nigrum : Evidence for the presence of a new virus species of recombinant nature. Virology 2006, 350:433–442.PubMedView Article
              32. Owor BE, Martin DP, Shepherd DN, Edema R, Monjane AL, Rybicki EP, Thomson JA, Varsani A: Genetic analysis of maize streak virus isolates from Uganda reveals widespread distribution of a recombinant variant. J Gen Virol 2007, 88:3154–3165.PubMedView Article
              33. Arguello-Astorga GR, Guevara-Gonzalez RG, Herrera-Estrella LR, Rivera-Bustamante RF: Geminivirus replication origins have a group-specific organization of iterative elements: A model for replication. Virology 1994, 203:90–100.PubMedView Article
              34. Argüello-Astorga GR, Ruiz-Medrano R: An iteron-related domain is associated to Motif 1 in the replication proteins of geminiviruses: identification of potential interacting amino acid–base pairs by a comparative approach. Arch Virol 2001, 146:1465–1485.PubMedView Article
              35. Fauquet CM, Bisaro DM, Briddon RW, Brown JK, Harrison BD, Rybicki EP, Stenger DC, Stanley J: Revision of taxonomic criteria for species demarcation in the family Geminiviridae , and an updated list of begomovirus species. Arch Virol 2003, 148:405–421.PubMedView Article
              36. Fauquet CM, Briddon RW, Brown JK, Moriones E, Stanley J, Zerbini M, Zhou X: Geminivirus strain demarcation and nomenclature. Arch Virol 2008, 153:783–821.PubMedView Article
              37. Varadarajan G, Prakash C: A rapid and efficient method for the extraction of total DNA from the sweet potato and its related species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 1991, 9:6–12.View Article
              38. Lotrakul P, Valverde RA, Clark CA, Sim J, De La Torre R: Detection of a geminivirus infecting sweet potato in the United States. Plant Dis 1998, 82:1253–1257.View Article
              39. Prasanna HC, Rai M: Detection and frequency of recombination in tomato-infecting begomoviruses of South and Southeast Asia. Virology Journal 2007, 4:111.PubMedView Article
              40. Lefeuvre P, Lett JM, Reynaud B, Martin DP: Avoidance of protein fold disruption in natural virus recombinants. PLoS Pathogens 2007, 3:e181.PubMedView Article
              41. Patil BL, Fauquet CM: Cassava mosaic geminiviruses: actual knowledge and perspectives. Mol Plant Pathol 2009, 10:685–701.PubMedView Article
              42. Lefeuvre P, Lett JM, Varsani A, Martin DP: Widely conserved recombination patterns among single-stranded DNA viruses. J Virol 2009, 83:2697–2707.PubMedView Article
              43. Garcia-Andres S, Tomas DM, Sanchez-Campos S, Navas-Castillo J, Moriones E: Frequent occurrence of recombinants in mixed infections of tomato yellow leaf curl disease-associated begomoviruses. Virology 2007, 365:210–219.PubMedView Article
              44. Jeske H, Luetgemeier M, Preiss W: DNA forms indicate rolling circle and recombination-dependent replication of Abutilon mosaic virus . EMBO Journal 2001, 20:6158–6167.PubMedView Article
              45. Varsani A, Shepherd DN, Monjane AL, Owor BE, Erdmann JB, Rybicki EP, Peterschmitt M, Briddon RW, Markham PG, Oluwafemi S, et al.: Recombination, decreased host specificity and increased mobility may have driven the emergence of Maize streak virus as an agricultural pathogen. J Gen Virol 2008, 89:2063–2074.PubMedView Article
              46. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL: A rapid isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 1987, 19:11–15.
              47. Inoue-Nagata AK, Albuquerque LC, Rocha WB, Nagata T: A simple method for cloning the complete begomovirus genome using the bacteriophage phi29 DNA polymerase. J Virol Methods 2004, 116:209–211.PubMedView Article
              48. Higgins DG, Bleasby AJ, Fuchs R: Clustal V - improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 1992, 8:189–191.PubMed
              49. Edgar RC: MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:1792–1797.PubMedView Article
              50. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28:2731–2739.PubMedView Article
              51. Martin DP, Rybicki EP: RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics 2000, 15:562–563.View Article
              52. Martin DP, Posada D, Crandall KA, Williamson CA: A modified bootscan algorithm for automated identification of recombinant sequence and recombination breakpoints. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir 2005, 21:98–102.PubMedView Article
              53. Smith JM: Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol 1992, 34:126–129.PubMed
              54. Posada D, Crandall KA: The effect of recombination on the accuracy of phylogeny estimation. J Mol Evol 2002, 54:396–402.PubMed
              55. Gibbs MJ, Armstrong JS, Gibbs AJ: Sister-Scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics 2000, 16:573–582.PubMedView Article
              56. Boni MF, Posada D, Feldman MW: An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics 2007, 176:1035–1047.PubMedView Article
              57. Martin DP, Lemey P, Lott M, Moulton V, Posada D, Lefeuvre P: RDP3: a flexible and fast computer program for analyzing recombination. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:2462–2463.PubMedView Article
              58. Lole KS, Bollinger RC, Paranjape RS, Gadkari D, Kulkarni SS, Novak NG, Ingersoll R, Sheppard HW, Ray SC: Full-length Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes from subtype C-infected seroconverters in India, with evidence of intersubtype recombination. J Virol 1999, 73:152–160.PubMed

              Copyright

              © Albuquerque et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

              This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

              Advertisement