Trends in prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection among Albanian blood donors, 1999-2009

  • Vjollca Durro1Email author and

    Affiliated with

    • Shpetim Qyra2

      Affiliated with

      Virology Journal20118:96

      DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-96

      Received: 21 December 2010

      Accepted: 4 March 2011

      Published: 4 March 2011

      Abstract

      Background

      Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was among the first virus known to be transmitted by blood and blood productions. The objective of this study is to determine the trend of hepatitis B virus in blood donors.

      Materials and methods

      In this study 79274 blood donors were retrospectively evaluated for HBsAg. The donors were selected using personal questionnaire, physical examination and testing blood before donation. Blood banks records are used as source of information. The blood donors samples were analyzed for the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) by commercial available kits ELISA method, third generation (from Abbott laboratory, Germany). A sample was considered as HBsAg positive when found twice repeatedly reactive. Reactive samples were not confirmed with addition tests.

      Results

      In the evaluation data, we found out that from 79274 of the total healthy blood donors, 15983 were voluntary donors, 52876 were family replacement donors and 10424 commercial blood donors. The prevalence of HBsAg in blood donors was 7.9%. It was increased steadily from 5.9% in 1999 to 9.1% in 2006 and decreased in 7.9% in 2009. According to blood donors status the HBsAg prevalence was 10.5% in commercial blood donors, 8.1% in voluntary donors and 8.6% in family replacement donors. The prevalence of anti-HBc in blood donors was 59.1%.

      Conclusion

      The prevalence of HBsAg was lower in voluntary non remunerate blood donors than commercial donors and family replacement blood donors. In FDs the prevalence was higher than VDs but lower than CDs. So, it is important to encourage the voluntary blood donors to become regularly blood donors.

      Background

      Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was among the first virus known to be transmitted by blood and blood products. HBV infection from transfusions became rare after the introduction of the HBsAg test in early 1970, but remains one of the most common serious complications of transfusion particularly in countries with high and intermediate prevalence of HBV [14]. The residual transmission risk of HBV through transfusion is higher [58]. This is attributed to the interval between initial HBV infection and the detection of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), resulting in a long window phase during which the virus is transmissible [9, 10]. After the implementation of HBsAg screening in the 1975s, there have been no further measures in Albania to decrease the residual risk of HBV transmission, other than improving the sensitivity of the HBsAg assay. Development of sensitive assays to detect HBV-DNA showed that healthy HBsAg-negative donors who are anti-HBc positive, may harbour an occult HBV infection and maintain HBV-DNA sequences in their liver and blood, thus representing potential sources of HBV transmission [11, 12]. Evaluation of data on the prevalence of HBV, among blood donors permits an assessment of the occurrence of infection in the blood donor population and consequently the safety of the collected donations. This study was performed to assess prevalence and trends of the viral hepatitis B during last decade (2000-2009 years), among blood donors in Tirana. Moreover, in a pilot study, we also explored the prevalence of anti-HBC among randomly selected HBsAg negative blood donor samples.

      Materials and methods

      In this study 79274 blood donors were retrospectively evaluated for HBsAg. The donors were selected using personal questionnaire, physical examination and testing blood before donation (as Hb level, blood pressure, body weight, temperature). Blood banks records are used (personal donor sheet, donation's records) as source of information. A first time blood donors is a donors who has donated blood for first time and only once. A regular blood donors is donors who has donated blood more than two time during one year.

      In this study family replacement donors and voluntary non remunerate blood donors are first time blood donors. We haven't regular blood donors from these groups. Family replacement donors are donors who have donated the same number of units of blood as of patient's requirements, despite the blood group. A friend or family member of the recipient donates blood to replace the stored blood used in a transfusion, ensuring a consistent supply.

      To define the prevalence of HBV infection the number of positive donors for each years is divided by the total number of donors for each years.

      Laboratory testing

      Tests for HBsAg

      The blood donors samples were analyzed for the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) by commercial available kits (as was presented in table 1). A sample was considered as HBsAg positive when found twice repeatedly reactive. Reactive samples were not confirmed with addition tests. All reactive donors were rejected from further blood donations.
      Table 1

      The HBsAg screening kits used 1999-2009.

      Years

      Screening kit

      Manufacture

      Sensitivity

      Method

      1999

      Auszyme Monoclonal HBsAg

      Quantum II ABBOT

      Ad 04 ng/ml, ay 0.7 ng/ml

      Manual

      2000

      Auszyme Monoclonal HBsAg

      Quantum II ABBOT

      Ad 04 ng/ml, ay 0.7 ng/ml

      Manual

      2001

      Auszyme Monoclonal HBsAg

      Quantum II ABBOT

      Ad 04 ng/ml, ay 0.7 ng/ml

      Manual

      2002

      Auszyme Monoclonal HBsAg

      Quantum II ABBOT

      Ad 04 ng/ml, ay 0.7 ng/ml

      Manual

      2003

      IMx

      ABBOT

      Ad 0.22 ng/ml Ay 0.17 ng/ml

      Semi automatic

      2004

      IMx

      ABBOT

      Ad 0.22 ng/ml Ay 0.17 ng/ml

      Semi automatic

      2005

      IMx

      ABBOT

      Ad 0.22 ng/ml Ay 0.17 ng/ml

      Semi automatic

      2006

      AxSYM HBsAg (MEIA)

      ABBOT

      Ad 0.15 ng/mL

      Ay 0.12 ng/mL

      ≤0.5 ng/mL

      automated

      2007

      AXSYM CMIA

      ABBOT

      100%

      automated

      2008

      Architect

      ABBOT

      100%

      fully automate

      2009

      Architect

      ABBOT

      100%

      fully automate

      Tests for anti-HBc

      The blood donor samples were analyzed for the presence of anti-HBc using third generation monoelisa kit anti HBC plus (Bio - Rad) with sensitivity 0.5 U PEI/ml for IgG dhe 8 U PEI/ml for IgM and specificity 99.91%

      Results

      A total of 79274 blood donors have donated blood during 10 years. In the evaluation data, we found out that from the total 79274 healthy blood donors, 15983 were voluntary donors, 52876 were replacement donors and 10424 commercial blood donors. Table 2 shows the number of blood donors who have donated blood during 1999-2009 years. The number of blood donors was progressively increased during the years from 5233 in 1999 to 14352 in 2009. The number of commercial blood donors was decreased from 1714 in 1999 to 284 in 2009. The number of voluntary non remunerate blood donors was increased from 1200 in 1999 to 3639 in 2009 donors and family replacement blood donors from 2319 in 1999 to 10429 in 2009.
      Table 2

      Blood donors during 1999-2009

      Blood donors

      Years

       

      1999

      2000

      2001

      2002

      2003

      2004

      2005

      2006

      2007

      2008

      2009

      Total number

      Voluntary donors No.

      1200

      1110

      210

      509

      506

      605

      1369

      2027

      2330

      2478

      3639

      15983

      %

      22.9

      25.9

      6

      12.9

      11.6

      11.7

      19.1

      23.9

      20.8

      21.3

      25.3

       

      Family replacement donors No.

      2319

      1810

      1965

      2224

      2774

      3464

      4877

      5840

      8403

      8771

      10429

      52876

      %

      44.3

      42.2

      56

      56.7

      63.5

      67.1

      68.4

      69.2

      74.9

      75.4

      72.6

       

      Commercial donors No.

      1714

      1365

      1333

      1199

      1088

      1091

      891

      584

      493

      382

      284

      10424

      %

      32.8

      31.9

      38

      30.6

      24.9

      21.2

      12.5

      6.9

      4.3

      3.3

      1.9

       

      Total

      5233

      4285

      3508

      3923

      4368

      5160

      7137

      8451

      11226

      11631

      14352

      79274

      Table 3 shows the prevalence of HBsAg in blood donors between 1999-2009 years. The HBsAg was detected in 5933 blood donors out of 79274 blood donors screened. The prevalence of HBsAg in blood donors was 7.9%. It was increased steadily from 5.9% in 1999 to 9.1% in 2006 and decreased in 7.9% in 2009.
      Table 3

      HBsAg distribution in blood donors during 1999-2009

      Years

      Total number of blood donors tested

      Positive blood donors

        

      No

      %

      1999

      5233

      307

      5.9

      2000

      4285

      235

      6.5

      2001

      3508

      178

      5.1

      2002

      3923

      272

      6.9

      2003

      4368

      275

      6.3

      2004

      5160

      376

      7.3

      2005

      7137

      568

      7.95

      2006

      8451

      769

      9.1

      2007

      11226

      898

      8

      2008

      11631

      920

      7.9

      2009

      14352

      1135

      7.9

      Total

      79274

      5933

      7.5

      Table 4 shows the prevalence of HBsAg based on donor's status. HBsAg was detected in 60 first time commercial blood donors out of 561 firs time commercial blood donors tested (prevalence 10.5%); in 1298 first time voluntary non remunerate blood donors out of 15983 first time voluntary non remunerate blood donors voluntary tested (prevalence 8.1%); in 4543 family replacement blood donors out of 52876 family replacement blood donors tested (prevalence 8.6%).
      Table 4

      Distribution of HBsAg based on donor status.

      Donor status

      Screened

      HBsAg

       

      No

      No

      %

      First time commercial donors

      561

      60

      10.5

      First time Voluntary blood donors

      15983

      1298

      8.1

      Family replacement blood donors

      52876

      4543

      8,6

      Table 5 shows the prevalence of anti-HBc in blood donors. Anti-HBc was detected in 133 blood donors out of 225 blood donors tested (prevalence 59.1%). According to blood donors groups anti-HBc was detected in 73 first time blood donors out of 103 blood donors tested (prevalence 70.8%); in 60 regular blood donors out of 122 blood donors tested (prevalence 49.1%).
      Table 5

      Anti-HBc prevalence in blood donors

      Donor status

      Screened

      Anti-HBc

       

      No

      No

      %

      Regular blood donors

      122

      60

      49.1

      First time blood donors

      103

      73

      70.8

      Total

      225

      133

      59.1

      Discussed

      Viral Hepatitis, especially hepatitis B in Albania continues to be a public health problem because of Albania is the highly endemic area for hepatitis B. In Albania the prevalence of HBsAg is 19% and anti-HBc 62% [13]. The endemicity of hepatitis B is described by the prevalence of HBsAg in the general population of a defined geographical area, and it varies considerably globally: HBsAg prevalence's of >8% are typical of highly endemic areas [1417]. One of the primary concerns of Health Department is the need to suppress the spread of this highly contagious. The national blood transfusion service in Albania is only responsible body for collection, processing, testing and distribution of blood and blood products under supervision of Ministry of Health. HBsAg screening of all blood donations was mandatory in national level, since 1975. In present study we analyzed the profile of blood donors and estimated the prevalence of HBsAg. Traditionally paid donors (commercial donors) were the main source of blood in Albania. The first efforts for the voluntary blood donation began in 1994 with a cooperation between National Blood Service and Red Cross. One of the most important problems of blood transfusion service in Albania has always been reliance on professional blood donors (paid blood donors) that still exist even if has been reduce significantly. According to the data used in this study, in 1999 commercial blood donors composed 32.8% of blood donors versus 1.9% in 2009. During last years blood donors profile has changed as result implementation of national strategy for blood safety, launched in 2005. Exclusion of paid donors was achieved by rejecting the paid donor for the first time. First time commercial blood donors were prohibited since 2008. This change resulted in a very high percentage of first time blood donors from voluntary blood donors and family replacement blood donors groups. During these years family replacement blood donors constitute the largest group of blood donors in Albania. Our data in this study showed that 72.6% of blood donors were family replacement blood donors(in 2009).

      The first lines of defence protection to assure the safety of blood for transfusion are rejected from donation the candidate of blood donors who are undergoing acute infection. Careful history taking is very important because the vast majority of infectious virus transmitted by transfusion are those causing in apparent or sub clinical infections in blood donors [18, 19]. The prevalence of HBsAg in blood donors population depends on some factor as the prevalence of this virus in general population, diagnose of hepatitis B infection and sensitivity of screening test.

      Our data (table 3/figure 1) showed the higher prevalence of HBsAg in blood donors, 7.9% (it ranging from 5.9% in 1999 to 7.9% in 2009) comparing with neighbor countries. So, the prevalence of HBsAg in blood donors population is 4,1% in Turkey, 0.4% in Greece, 4.2% in Kosovo, 1.32% in Macedonia, 0.4% in Italy [2025].
      http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-8-96/MediaObjects/12985_2010_1211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
      Figure 1

      HBsAg prevalence in blood donors during 1999-2009 years

      The higher prevalence of HBsAg in blood donors reflects epidemiological situation of HBV in our country. According to previous studies in different group of Albanian population the prevalence of HBsAg were respectively in military recruitment 13,2%, in students 8-15.3% and pediatric aged 1.4 - 3.9% [26]. These data show that in blood donors the HBsAg prevalence is lower than general population because of pre-donation selection of blood donors who are interviewed with screening questionnaire.

      As it is shown in the figure 1 there is an increase in prevalence of HBsAg in our donor population during years. This could be the result of the improved testing method from manual to fully automated and sensitivity of screening test(table 1) and with the constant increase of first time blood donors mainly family blood donors.

      According to donors status, the prevalence of HBsAg was lower in voluntary non remunerate blood donors than commercial donors and family replacement blood donors. In family replacement blood donors, the prevalence was higher than voluntary blood donors but lower than paid donors (figures 2). So, it is important to encourage the voluntary blood donors to become regularly blood donors. Screening the blood donors for anti-HBc or HBV DNA has reduced the risk of transmition of HVB infection by transfusion of blood and his products [27]. It is generally accepted that the diagnosis of infection by HBV is based on the presence of the HBsAg in the bloodstream [28]. However, screening of blood donors for HBsAg does not totally eliminate the risk of HBV infection through blood transfusion [29] since the absence of this marker in the serum does not exclude the presence of HBV DNA [3033]. It is possible that, donors with occult HBV infection, who lacked detectable HBsAg but whose exposure to HBV infection was indicated by a positive anti-HBc and HBV DNA, are a potential source of HBV infection [3436].
      http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1743-422X-8-96/MediaObjects/12985_2010_1211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
      Figure 2

      HBsAg prevalence based on blood donor status

      Our pilot study revealed that 133 of 225 (59.1%) HBsAg negative blood donors were anti-HBc positive and thus were exposed to HBV infection. The isolated finding of anti-HBc antibody in HBsAg-negative subjects was considered a marker of past exposure to HBV and of resolved infection. Results obtain from deferent studies in blood donors has shown that HBV DNA was detected in 1.6% to 38% of HBsAg negative/anti HBc positive blood donors [34, 27, 37]. Thus these donors my be the potential to transmit HBV through transfusion.

      The absence of HBsAg in the blood of apparently healthy individuals may not be sufficient to ensure lack of circulating HBV. Blood containing anti-HBc with or without detectable presence of HBsAg might be infectious, therefore routine blood donor screening for anti-HBc has been implemented in some countries resulting in a decrease in the risk of post-transfusion HBV infection [38].

      While anti-HBc-positive blood donor may be a potential source of HBV transmission, routine application of anti-HBc screening is not feasible in Albania. Our findings in random screening HBsAg negative blood donors for anti-HBc are the same with anti-HBc prevalence rates among HBsAg-negative blood donors in endemic area when the prevalence of anti-HBc is over 57% [39].

      In country with intermittent and low prevalence of HBsAg, anti-HBc prevalence vary from, 0.56% in the United Kingdom, 0.84% in United States, 1.4% in Germany, 15.03% in Greece [10, 3438]. In our study the HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive donor population is carry out in two blood donors groups, regular blood donors and first time blood donors. The prevalence rate of anti-HBc was higher in first time blood donors than regularly donors. So, the establishment of a panel of regular blood donors is very important in providing safe blood and blood products. Anti-HBc screening of blood donations is controversial and variably performed in different countries. Currently it is limited to areas where the seroprevalence of HBV is low (generally <2%), while it is not performed in areas with a high HBV seroprevalence because the impact of the deferral of anti-HBc-positive donors is considered not sustainable. However, the prevalence of occult HBV infection is higher in areas in which HBV infection itself is more frequent. The safety of this measure is currently being debated [4042]. Our study underscores the increasing the HBsAg prevalence in our donor population. This trend, suggest that routine anti-HBc screening of blood donors could possibly prevent some transfusion-transmitted HBV infections from blood donors. However, usefulness of screening for anti-HBc in addition to HBsAg detection and introduction of PCR based screenings like NAT to improve the safety of the blood supply in Albania deserves further analysis.

      Declarations

      Authors’ Affiliations

      (1)
      Hospital Planning Directory, Ministry of Health
      (2)
      Department of Chronic Diseases Epidemiology and policies, Public Health Institute

      References

      1. Glynn SA, Kleinman SH, Schreiber GB, Busch MP, Wright DJ, Smith JW, Nass CC, Williams AE: Trends in incidence and prevalence of major transfusion transmissible viral infection in the United States blood donors, 1991 to 1996. JAMA 2000, 284: 229–235.PubMedView Article
      2. Schreiber GB, Busch PM, Kleinman SH, Korelitz JJ: The risk of transfusion transmitted viral infection. N Engl J Med 1996, 334: 1685–1690.PubMedView Article
      3. Michael BuschP, HIV, HBV and HCV: New development related to transfusion safety. Vox Sang 2000, 78: 253–256.View Article
      4. Selim Badur: Transfusion transmitted virus. Plenary et state of the art book. ISBT 2003, 119–121.
      5. Soldan K, Davison K, Dow B: Estimates of the frequency of HBV, HCV and HIV infectious donations entering the blood supply in the United Kingdom, 1996 to 2003. Eurosurveillance 2005, 10: 9–10.
      6. Dodd RY, Notari EP, Stramer SL: Current prevalence and incidence of infectious disease markers and estimated window-period risk in the American Red Cross blood donor population. Transfusion 2002, 42: 975–979.PubMedView Article
      7. Comanor L, Holland P: Hepatitis B virus blood screening: unfinished agendas. Vox Sanguinis 2006, 91: 1–12.PubMedView Article
      8. Pillonel J, Laperche S, l'Eta-blissement Francais du Sang: Trends in risk of transfusion transmitted viral infections (HIV, HCV, HBV) in France between 1992 and 2003 and impact of nucleic acid testing (NAT). Eurosurveillance 2005, 10: 5–6.PubMed
      9. Stroffolini T, Mele A, Tosti ME, Gallo G, Balocchino E, Ragni P, Santonastasi F, Marzolini A, Ciccozzi M, Moiraghi A: The impact of the hepatitis B mass immu-nisation campaign on the incidence and risk factors of acute hepatitis B in Italy. J Hepatol 2000, 33: 980–5.PubMedView Article
      10. Manzini Paola, Girotto Mauro, Borsotti Raffaele, Giachino Osvaldo, Guaschino Roberto, Lanteri Maurizio, Testa Domenico, Ghiazza Paola, Vacchini Maria, Danielle Franca, Pizzi Alessandra, Valpreda Chiara, Castagno Franco, Curti Franco, Magistroni Paola, Maria Lorena Abate, Smedile Antonina, Mario Rizzetto: Italian blood donors with anti-HBc and occult hepatitis B virus infection. Haematologica 2007, 92 (12) : 1664–1670.PubMedView Article
      11. Raimondo G, Pollicino T, Cacciola I, Squadrito G: Occult hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 2007, 46: 160–70.PubMedView Article
      12. Matsumoto C, Tadokoro K, Fujimura K, Hirakawa S, Mitsunaga S, Juji T: Analysis of HBV infection after blood transfusion in Japan through investigation of a comprehensive donor specimen repository. Transfusion 2001, 41: 878–84.PubMedView Article
      13. Nelaj Erida, Bino Silva, Kadare Ilirjana, Eduard Kakarriqi: Evaluate of immunization program with hepatitis B vaccine. Volume 2. Institute of Public Health Bulletin; 2007:3–23.
      14. World Health Organization: Weekly epidemiological record No.40. 2009, 84: 405–420.
      15. Mahoney Fj, Kane M: Hepatitis B vaccine. In Vaccines. 3rd edition. Edited by: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA. Philadelphia, WB. Saunders Company; 1999:158–182.
      16. WHO: Viral hepatitis prevention board. Universal HB immunization by 1997: where are now? [http://​hgins.​uia.​ac.​be/​esoc/​VHPB/​vhfs2.​htlm] 1998.
      17. World Health Organization: Introduction of Hepatitis B Vaccine into Childhood Immunization Services. WHO, Geneva; 2001.
      18. Alter MJ, Kruszon-Moran D, Nainan OV, Mc Quillan GM, Gao F, Moyer LA, Kaslow RA, Margolis HS: The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1988 through 1994. The New England Journal of Medicine 1999, 341 (8) : 556–562. 1999PubMedView Article
      19. Soldan K, Barbara JAJ, Dow BC: Transfusion transmitted hepatitis B virus infection in the UK: a small and moving target. Vox Sanguinis 2002, 83: 305–308. of Medicine, 341, 556–562PubMedView Article
      20. Gurol Emekdas, Saban Cavuslu, Oral Oncul, Cigdem Artuk, Aksoy Armagan: Trends of hepatitis B and C virus among blood donors over 16 years in Turkey. Europian Journal of Epidemiology 2006, 21: 299–305.View Article
      21. Foudoulaki L, Kyriakis KP, Fakitsa V, Giagiozis A, Kourenti K, Sofroniadou K: Long term surveillance of viral diseases marker in large blood transfusion centre in Greece. ISBT 2004. Vox Sanguinis 2004, 87 (suppl 3) : S93-S125.
      22. Fejza Hajrullah, Skender Telaku: Prevalence of HBV and HCV among blood donors in Kosovo. Virology Journal 2009, 6: 21.PubMedView Article
      23. Blood services in south-eastern Europe: Current status and challenges. WHO regional office for Europe; 2007:71–121.
      24. Ortakovska S, Balamovski M, Timova T: Viral markers in voluntary blood donors in Macedonia. ISBT 2004, Vox Sanguinis 2004, 87 (suppl 3) : S93-s125.
      25. Giusti G, Gaeta GB, Russo M, Bedarida G: HBsAg carries among blood donors in Italy-A multicenter study in 107 blood bank. Infection 1989, 17 (4) : 237–43.PubMedView Article
      26. Basho Mimoza: The seroprevalence of viral hepatitis in Albanian people. International Conference of Hyppocraty in Tirana. 20–22 November 2003. Abstract book 2003, 54.
      27. Jongerius JM, Wester M, Cuypers HT, Van Oostendorp WR, Lelie PN, Van Der Poel CL, Van Leeuwen EF: New hepatitis B virus mutant form in a blood donor that is undetectable in several hepatitis B surface Antigen screening assays. Transfusion 1998, 38: 56–9.PubMedView Article
      28. Henning H, Puchta I, Luhm J, et al.: Frequency and load of hepatitis B virus DNA in first-time blood donors with antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen. Blood 2002, 100 (7) : 2637–41.View Article
      29. Badur S, Akgun A: Diagnosis of hepatitis B infections and monitoring of treatment. J Clin Virol 2001, 21: 229–237.PubMedView Article
      30. Allain JP: Occult hepatitis B virus infection. Transfus Clin Biol 2004, 11: 18–25.PubMedView Article
      31. Mahoney FrancisJ: Update on Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Infection Clinical Microbiology Review. 1999, 12 (2) : 351–366.
      32. Brechot C, Thiers V, Kremsdorf D, Nalpas B, Pol S, Paterlini-Brechot P: Persistent hepatitis B virus infection in subjects without hepatitis B surface antigen: clinically significant orpurely "occult"? Hepatology 2001, 34: 194–203.PubMedView Article
      33. Wang JT, Lee CZ, Chen PJ, Wang TH, Chen DS: Transfusion transmitted HBV infection in an endemic area: the necessity of more sensitive screening for HBV carriers. Transfusion 2002, 42: 1592–7.PubMedView Article
      34. Yotsuyanagi H, Yasuda K, Moriya K, Shintani Y, Fujie H, Tsutsumi T, Nojiri N, Juji T, Hoshino H, Shimoda K, Hino K, Kimura S, Iino S, Koike K: Frequent presence of HBV in the sera of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive blood donors. Transfusion 2001, 41: 1093–1099.PubMedView Article
      35. Allain JP, Hewitt PE, Tedder RS, Williamson LM: Evidence that anti-HBc but not HBV DNA testing may prevent some HBV transmission by transfusion. British Journal of Haematology 1999, 107: 186–195.PubMedView Article
      36. Zervou EK, Dalekos GN, Boumba DS, Tsianos EV: Value of anti-HBc screening of blood donors for prevention of HBV infection: results of a 3-year prospective study in Northwestern Greece. Transfusion 2001, 41: 652.PubMedView Article
      37. Dreier J, Kroger M, Diekmann C, Gotting C, Kleesiek K: Low-level viremia of hepatitis B virus in an anti-HBc- and anti-HBs-positive blood donor. Transfusion Medicine 2004, 14: 97–103.PubMedView Article
      38. Kleinman SH, Kuhns MC, Todd DS, Glynn SA, McNamara A, DiMarco A, Busch MP: Frequency of HBV DNA detection in US blood donors testing positive for the presence of anti-HBc: Implications for transfusion transmission and donor screening. Transfusion 2003, 43: 696–704.PubMedView Article
      39. Nilton R, Donaida M, Aricio T: Seroprevalence of HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HCV in Sourthen Brazil 1999–2001. Brazil Journal of Infection Diseases 2003, 7 (4) : 262–7.
      40. Rosini N, Mousse D, Spada C, Treitinger A: Seroprevalence of HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HCV in southern Brazil, 1999–2001. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases 2003, 7: 262–267.PubMedView Article
      41. Turchi Martelli Celina maria, Turchi Marilia Dalva, Francisco Jose dutra Souto, Amadeo Saez-Alqezar, Andrade Ana LuciaSS, Fabio Zicker: Anti-Hbc testing for blood donations in area with intermediate hepatitis B endemicity. Rev Panam Salud Publica/Pan Am J Public Health 1999, 6 (1) : 69–73.View Article
      42. Busch MP: Prevention of transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C and Human Immunodeficiency Virus infections through blood transfusion by anti-HBc testing. Vox Sang 1998, 74 (Suppl 2) : 147–154.PubMed

      Copyright

      © Durro and Qyra; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

      This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

      Advertisement