Long-Term Nucleos(t)ide Analogues Therapy for Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B reduces the Risk of Long-Term Complications: a meta-analysis
© Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 5 November 2010
Accepted: 15 February 2011
Published: 15 February 2011
The effect of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) on reducing the risk of long-term complications (LTCs) remains unclear so far. To study whether long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy can reduce the risk of long-term complications.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Relative risks (RRs) of long-term complications with or without treatment were studied. Also subgroup analyses including the status of drug-resistance, HBeAg and pre-existing compensated cirrhosis were done using relative risks of long-term complications either with or without treatment or among nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment groups.
Six eligible studies (3644 patients in all) were included. Data showed the incidence of long-term complications in treatment groups was induced by 74%(RR:0.26, 95% CI: 0.15-0.47) compared with no treatment. Whether drug-resistant happened or not during the long-term therapy, the incidence of long-term complications was still significantly induced respectively by 45%(RR: 0.55,95%CI:0.40-0.76) and 78% (RR:0.22, 95%CI: 0.13-0.36). For both different status of HBeAg and pre-existing compensated cirrhosis, there was significant lower incidence of long-term complications in treatment groups compared with no treatment, too. Moreover, among the NA treatment groups, patients with drug-resistance had 2.64 times (RR:2.64, 95%CI: 1.58-4.41) higher chance of developing to long-term complications, and patients with pre-existing compensated cirrhosis also had 3.07 times (RR:3.07, 95%CI: 1.04-9.11) higher chance of developing to long-term complications.
Long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for adults with CHB prevents or delays the development of long-term complications including decompensated cirrhosis, CHB-related death or CHB-related HCC in patients with CHB. The patients who need take antiviral drugs should receive the antiviral therapy as soon as possible.
HBV infection is a common global public health problem which affects over 400 million people worldwide . It not only leads to a wide spectrum of liver disease ranging from acute hepatitis (including fulminant hepatic failure) to chronic hepatitis  but also the main reason of fatal complications including decompensated cirrhosis and CHB-related HCC that cause up to one million HBV carriers dying of HBV associated liver disease annually . According to natural history, around 15-20% of CHB patients develop cirrhosis in 5 years of follow-up [4, 5]. Those with chronic active hepatitis and cirrhosis on liver biopsy have a 5-year survival rate of only 55% . The final goal of treatment for CHB is to induce decompensated cirrhosis, CHB-related HCC or CHB-related death. Two studies more than 3500 CHB patients in Taiwan show the risk of developments of HCC and cirrhosis increases when HBV rapidly replicates, especially after adjustment for sex, age, alcohol consumption, smoking, HBeAg status, serum ALT level and liver cirrhosis [7, 8]. It means that suppress of HBV replication may reduce the risk of long-term complications of CHB infection and improve prognosis. Based on this, all guidelines share a common principle regarding nucleos(t)ide analogues treatment for CHB: long-term viral suppression by the drugs with potent antiviral activity and low rate of drug resistance to achieve ''durable response'' to prevent hepatic decompensation, reduce or prevent progression to cirrhosis and/or HCC, and prolong survival [9–11].
There are two kinds of oral antiviral agents approved to treat hepatitis B. Nucleoside analogues include lamivudine, telbivudine and entecavir, while nucleotide analogues include adefovir and tenofovir. They all suppress the replication of HBV in the liver. Studies have shown that treatment of CHB with nucleos(t)ide analog would not only suppress the viral replication but also reduce fibrosis in the liver [12–18]. These findings have changed the concept that fibrosis is irreversible. Consensus has been reached that treatment must be often administered long-term as the high rate of virological relapse when nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy is discontinued. However, long-term therapy may increase the emergence of resistant viral variants and sometimes may be associated with hepatitis flares, which may compromise the initial clinical benefit of the treatment. So far the effect of treatment on reducing the risk of long-term complications (LTCs) remains unclear. On the other hand, whether drug-resistant mutation is associated with high risk of developing long-term complications remains another open question. The major reasons include relatively small sample size, lack of adequate controls, short time of follow-up, different age groups at enrolment and so on.
Traditionally, meta-analysis is applied and best confined to RCTs. However, there were NRCTs [19, 20] chosen into a meta-analysis before when controlled placebo groups were difficult to perform in the clinical.
According to the available evidence and assessing it by meta-analysis, we made an effort to compare the effect of NA therapy vs. no therapy in the incidence of long-term complications of CHB on the basis of published data. We also attempted to study the effects of HBeAg status, pre-existing compensated cirrhosis, virological response to NA and drug-resistance to NA on the risk of long-term complications.
Confirmed CHB infection including CHB and early cirrhosis whose definition was described clearly in the articles.
Either NA (lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbuvidine, tenofovir) was used for treatment.
In randomized-control trial (RCT) a control group with placebo or no antiviral treatment, and in case-control or cohort study the inclusion of a control group with no antiviral treatment.
The final outcome of studies was the number of incidence of long-term complications such as CHB-related death, CHB-related HCC or decompensated cirrhosis diagnosed during the period of study in both treatment and control groups, and the following-up time was more than 2 years.
Studies with duplicated publications on the same group of patients, including those reported early stages of study findings within complete sample size.
They were children, or pregnant women, or had several causes of hepatitis such as HCV/HDV/HIV/autoimmune hepatitis and so on, unless outcomes for participants meeting our eligibility criteria were reported separately.
They had decompensated liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma at baseline.
They had received chemotherapy any systemic antiviral therapy, immunomodulators, cytotoxic agents, or corticosteroids within 6 months or liver transplantation before.
Studies with less than 50 cases.
We tried to analysis the various factors which effect the main outcomes including pre-existing compensated cirrhosis, drug-resistance to anti-viral agents, HBeAg status and virological response to treatment on long-term complications development. Studies lacking clear definitions of cirrhosis, drug resistance and virological response were not included in subgroup analysis. Pre-existing compensated cirrhosis was referred as Ischaks score of 5-6 and radiological and/or histological diagnosis of cirrhosis without evidence of decompensation of hepatic function and portal hyperion. Drug-resistance was defined as reappearance of HBV DNA after initial negativity. Virological response was defined as disappearance of HBeAg with or without appearance of anti-HBe and undetectable HBV DNA levels.
Denition of long-term complications
Long-term complications of CHB are the end events of clinic including decompensated cirrhosis which included occurrence of ascites, esophageal/gastric variceal bleeding, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or hepatic encephalopathy; HBV-related HCC diagnosed histologically or by diagnostic imaging method(s), given an alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level above 400 ng/mL; or HBV-related death.
For RCT: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blind method, and description of withdrawals and dropouts. The qualities of the first three items were classified into three grades respectively: adequate (2 points), unclear (1 point), and inadequate (0 point). And the fourth item was classified into two grades: described (1 point) and not described (0 point). The scores of modified Jadad quality scale were ranged from 0 to 7, with scores ≥ 4 signifying high-quality studies.
For case-control study: case-matched by patient's characteristics (age, gender, hepatitis function, percentage of pre-existing cirrhosis and HBeAg-positive, and so on).
Definitely listing of inclusion and exclusion criteria for patients.
Clear definitions of treatment response (drug-resistance and virological response) and long-term complications diagnosis.
Meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effect or random-effect methods, depending on absence or presence of significant heterogeneity . Chisquared test was used to test whether statistical heterogeneity existing or not and we considered it to have existed when P < 0.10. Statistical heterogeneity was also assessed with I2, which indicates the percentage of total variation across studies. The random-effect model would be used if there was significant heterogeneity, otherwise the fixed-effect model would be used. We used the relative risk(RR) of the main outcomes as the measure of efficacy. The 95% confidence interval(CI) for the combined RR is also provided. Analyses were performed with review manager version4.2.2 (RevMan, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, England)
Characteristic and quality of studies
1514 abstracts were found, among them eight studies [23–30], of RCTs and NRCTs eligible in this meta-analysis excluding seven reviews. There were three[23, 29, 30]repeated publications at different time points and we selected only one. The final analysis therefore included six studies published from 2004 to 2010[23–28] (Figure 1). The main features of the studies evaluated by meta-analysis are shown in Table 1. All studies on antiviral agent used lamivudine[23–28]and two study added (or switched to) adefovir in case of lamivudine resistance[24, 27].
Characteristics of included clinical trials in meta-analysis
NA regimens (/day)
Sample size (n) (treatment vs. placebo)
Mean age (ys) (treatment vs. placebo)
Male(%) (treatment vs. placebo)
Mean ALT(U/L) (treatment vs. placebo)
Pre-existing cirrhosis(%) (treatment vs. placebo)
HBeAg (+) (%) (treatment vs. placebo)
Mean treatment duration (mon)
Follow up period (ys)
Papatheodoridis et al.
LAM 100 or 150 mg then add or switch to ADV
396 (201 vs. 195)
55.9 (52 ± 11) vs. (49 ± 14)
82.6 (83.1 vs. 82.1)
83.2 (98 vs. 68)
33.3 (31.8 vs. 34.9)
Matsumoto et al.
LAM 100 mg
754 (377 vs. 377)
41.5 (41.5 ± 12.0) vs. (41.4 ± 12.2)
72.8 (73.2 vs. 72.4)
171.6 (191.7 ± 234.8) vs. (151.5 ± 180.5)
17.5 (17.2 vs. 17.8)
54.8 (51.2 vs. 58.4)
Yuen et al.
LAM 100 mg
266 (142 vs. 124)
33.7 (33.9 vs. 33.4)
73.7 (74.7 vs. 72.6)
61 (65 vs. 56.5)
100 (100 vs. 100)
Liaw et al.
LAM 100 mg
651 (436 vs. 215)
43.3 (43 vs. 44)
85 (85 vs. 85)
69.3 (70 vs. 68)
61.3 (60 vs. 65)
58 (58 vs. 58)
Eun et al.
LAM 100 mg then add or switch to ADV
222 (111 vs. 111)
Jong Ryul Eun et al.
1355 (768 vs. 587)
36.8 (39.2 vs. 33.6)
152.7 (161.3 vs. 141.4)
50.9 (67.3 vs. 25.2)
85.2 (80.1 vs. 91.8)
More than 48
There were 3644 patients in all, 2035 of whom received treatment and 1609 didn't. Among the six studies[23–28], there were two randomized controlled trials[23, 27], one case-control studyand there cohort studies[24, 26, 28]. (Table1). One trial was published as an abstractand five published as full publication.
Patients' selection criteria were different among studies. One studiesincluded only patients with HBeAg positive/negative CHB, four studies[23–25, 28]included patients with HBeAg positive/negative CHB or Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, while one studies included only patients with HBV-related cirrhosis. The sample size of each study varied greatly, ranging from 222to 1355 patients. The mean age ranged from 33.7to 52years old for treated patients and from 33.4to 49years old for untreated patients. The percentage of males ranged from 72.8% to 85%. The length of follow up differed among studies, ranging from 2.7 years[23, 25] to 8.2 years. Generally, age, male/female ratio, percentage of pre-existing cirrhosis, and length of follow up were not signicantly different between treated and untreated groups in these studies. But the ALT levels were significantly higher in treated than in untreated groups in four studies[24–26, 28].
Effect of nucleotide/side analogues on development of LTCs
To investigate the various factors of effecting the development of LTCs, we applied subgroup analyses including the aspects of drug-resistance, HBeAg status or pre-existing compensated cirrhosis.
Incidence of LTCs according to the status of drug-resistance
Comparation between NA treatment and no treatment
Comparation between patients with and without drug-resistant among the NA treatment groups
Incidence of LTCs according to HBeAg status
Comparation between NA treatment and no treatment
Incidence of LTCs according to the status of pre-existing compensated cirrhosis
Comparation between patients with and without pre-existing compensated cirrhosis among the NA treatment groups
The researchers of the REVEAL study analyzed the relationships between the development of HCC and high HBV DNA load, according to the natural history of chronic HBV infection, and the findings of this study suggested that effective control of HBV replication can reduce the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the long run theoretically. However, it is still unclear whether the risk of HCC and other long-term complications can be decreased by the recommendation of medical treatments including interferon and nucleotide/side analogues. Interferon has been used in the treatment of CHB for decades. Lots of studies have been reported the long-term prognosis of interferon, and Y.-F. Yang et al has generalized a conclusion that IFN prevents or delays the development of liver cirrhosis and HCC in patients with CHB . Lamivudine was the first nucleoside analogues used as long-term maintenance therapy since the late 1990s, and other nucleotide/side analogues including telbivudine, entecavir, adefovir and tenofovir were approved recent years. The clinical efficacy and particularly on the incidence of long-term complications under long-term antiviral therapy are difficult to monitor because cirrhotic complications and HCC take long time to develop, especially in noncirrhotic patients whose incidence of liver-related complications is even lower. As a result, in most clinical trials, biochemical response, virologic response and histologic response [32–34] have been used as surrogate end points to determine if the treatment of patients with chronic HBV infection has been successful. Whether these surrogate end points can reflect long-term clinical outcomes was still an open question . Vincent Wai-Sun Wong at al. has confirmed that normalization of serum ALT, HBV DNA suppression, HBeAg loss, or HBeAg seroconversion at the end of drug trials were associated but unable to predict long-term clinical outcomes completely . Even histologic response can't exactly reflect the long-term clinical outcomes as regression of compensated cirrhosis can be translated into favorable clinical outcome in those treated with long-term nucleotide/side analogues therapy.
In this meta-analysis, we choose the clinical end points including decompensated cirrhosis, CHB-related death or CHB-related HCC which directly reflect the prognosis of chronic HBV infection to evaluate the efficacy of the long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues therapy.
The most important finding of this meta-analysis is that more than two years NA therapy for adults with CHB reduces the risk of LTCs including decompensated cirrhosis, CHB-related death or CHB-related HCC by pooling data from six studies[23–28].We also analyzed the various factors of effecting the risk of LTCs in some items such as drug-resistance, HBeAg status or pre-existing compensated cirrhosis, and in any item, NA therapy was shown the benefit than placebo of reducing the incidence of LTCs. So for patients with drug-resistance, NA therapy still had a better outcome than the untreated patients with lower risk of LTCs. Among the treated patients, we also investigated whether drug-resistance effected the risk of LTCs. Then it was found that the incidence of LTCs were lower in the non-nucleoside drug resistance groups. At the same time, we compared the prognosis of patients with and without pre-existing compensated cirrhosis among the treatment groups. Then it was found that the incidence of LTCs were lower in patients without pre-existing compensated cirrhosis. It suggested us that the earlier antiviral therapy is been done, the better the prognosis will be. Based on the two conclusions above, the patients who need take antiviral drugs should receive the antiviral therapy as soon as possible. Moreover, and it would be best that drug-resistance genes were detected before patients administrated the antiviral drugs, then proper antiviral therapy could be chosen to reduce the probability of drug-resistance. On the other hand, management of drug-resistance is absolutely important, too. Patients should regularly be followed-up to monitor the drug-resistance. Fortunately, with the available of newer drugs like adefovir dipivoxil without cross resistance to lamivudine , the problem of LAM-resistance will go to remission. Currently, add-on adefovir therapy is the most widely accepted strategy in case of LAM-resistance. Chen et al. confirmed the view that the combination of ADV with LAM was superior in inhibiting HBV replication and preventing drug resistance as compared to ADV alone for LAM-resistant CHB patients by a meta-analysis. Other nucleotide/side analogues were available such as entecavir [39–41], tenofovir  recent years.
There are several limits in our meta-analysis. Firstly we collected the data from not only randomized controlled trials but also case-control, cohort, and historical controls studies because of very few RCTs. When patients are diagnosed CHB or HBV-related cirrhosis especially with the abnormal liver function and the evidence of HBV replication, it is unethical to running randomized controlled trials. Maybe this is the leading reason that so few RCTs were conducted. Secondly, the length of following up differed among studies, ranging from 2.7 years[23, 25]to 8.2 years. As we know, the longer time of following up, the higher incidence of LTCs would be seen. So in our meta-analysis, the incidence of LTCs differed significantly. Maybe this is one reason of statistical heterogeneity. Thirdly, the data we've selected was lacking of testing whether drug-resistance existed or not before therapy because most of the studies didn't show the data about it.
In conclusion, the result of this meta-analysis indicate that long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy for adults with CHB prevents or delays the development of long-term complications including decompensated cirrhosis, CHB-related death or CHB-related HCC in patients with CHB. The patients who need take antiviral drugs should receive the antiviral therapy as soon as possible. During the monotherapy, when LAM-resistance happened, lamivudine should be combined with other antiviral drugs without cross resistance to lamivudine since it still has more benefit than the untreated patients.
Hepatitis B virus
Chronic Hepatitis B
randomized controlled trials
nonrandomized controlled trials
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30972584, 30930082, 30872250, 30771923), National Science and Technology Major Project of China(No.2008ZX10002-006, No.2008ZX10002-004, No. 2008ZX09312-007), Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University(No.IRT 0872), and National Program on Key Basic Research Project (No.2007CB512900).
- Lee WM: HBV infection. N Engl J Med 1997, 337: 1733-1745. 10.1056/NEJM199712113372406View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hollinger FB, Liang TJ: Hepatitis B Virus. In Fields Virology. 4th edition. Edited by: Knipe DM, Howley PM. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:2971-3036.Google Scholar
- Saoleas M, Lygidakis NJ, Manti C: Hepatitis B today. Hepatogastroenterology 2007, 54: 545-548.Google Scholar
- Liaw YF, Tai DI, Chu CM, Chen TJ: The development of cirrhosis in patients with chronic type B hepatitis: a prospective study. Hepatology 1988, 8: 493-6. 10.1002/hep.1840080310View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fattovich G, Brollo L, Giustina G, Noventa F, Pontisso P, Alberti A, Realdi G, Ruol A: Natural history and prognostic factors for chronic hepatitis type B. Gut 1991, 32: 294-8. 10.1136/gut.32.3.294PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weissberg JI, Andres LL, Smith CI, Weick S, Nichols JE, Garcia G, Robinson WS, Merigan TC, Gregory PB: Survival in chronic hepatitis B: an analysis of three hundred seventy-nine patients. Ann Intern Med 1984, 101: 613-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen CJ, Yang HI, Su J, Jen CL, You SL, Lu SN, Huang GT, Iloeje UH, REVEAL-HBV Study Group: Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma across a biological gradient of serum HBV DNA level. JAMA 2006, 295: 65-73. 10.1001/jama.295.1.65View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iloeje UH, Yang HI, Su J, Jen CL, You SL, Chen CJ: Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B viral load. Gastroenterology 2006, 130: 678-686. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lok AS, McMahon BJ: Chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2007,45(2):507-39. 10.1002/hep.21513View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- European Association for the Study of the Liver: EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases. J Hepatol 2009,51(2):237-67. 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liaw YF, Leung N, Guan R, Lau GK, Merican I: Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of Chronic hepatitis B: an update. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003,18(3):239-45. 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.03037.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dienstag JL, Goldin RD, Heathcote EJ, Hann HW, Woessner M, Stephenson SL, Gardner S, Gray DF, Schiff ER: Histological outcome during long-term lamivudine therapy. Gastroenterology 2003, 124: 105-17. 10.1053/gast.2003.50013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hadziyannis SJ, Tassopoulos NC, Heathcote EJ, Chang TT, Kitis G, Rizzetto M, Marcellin P, Lim SG, Goodman Z, Ma J, Brosgart CL, Borroto-Esoda K: Long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B for up to 5 years. Gastroenterology 2006, 131: 1743-51. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.020View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lai CL, Chien RN, Leung NW, Chang TT, Guan R, Tai DI, Ng KY, Wu PC, Dent JC, Barber J, Stephenson SL, Gray DF: A one-year trial of lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B. Asia Hepatitis Lamivudine Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998,339(2):61-8. 10.1056/NEJM199807093390201View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dienstag JL, Schiff ER, Wright TL, Perrillo RP, Hann HW, Goodman Z, Crowther L, Condreay LD, Woessner M, Rubin M, Brown NA: Lamivudine as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis B in the United States. N Engl J Med 1999,341(17):1256-63. 10.1056/NEJM199910213411702View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki Y, Kumada H, Ikeda K, Chayama K, Arase Y, Saitoh S, Tsubota A, Kobayashi M, Koike M, Ogawa N, Tanikawa K: Histological changes in liver biopsies after one year of lamivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection. J Hepatol 1999,30(5):743-8. 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80123-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim SG, Sievert W, Tong M, Arterburn S, Borroto-Esoda K, Frederick D, Rousseau F: Long-term efficacy and safety of adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2008,48(3):750-8. 10.1002/hep.22414View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- William E, Delaney : Progress in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: long-term experience with adefovir dipivoxil. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007,59(5):827-32. 10.1093/jac/dkl551View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozminkowski RJ, Wortman PM, Roloff DW: Inborn/outborn status and neonatal survival: a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Stat Med 1988, 7: 1207-1221. 10.1002/sim.4780071202View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abraham NS, Byrne CM, Young JM, Solomon MJ: Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 2007,77(7):508-16. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04141.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The Cochrane LibraryChichester, UK: JWiley; 2008. [http://www.cochrane.org]
- DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986, 7: 177-188. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liaw YF, Sung JJ, Chow WC, Farrell G, Lee CZ, Yuen H, Tanwandee T, Tao QM, Shue K, Keene ON, Dixon JS, Gray DF, Sabbat J: Lamivudine for patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced liver disease. N Engl J Med 2004,351(15):1521-31. 10.1056/NEJMoa033364View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Papatheodoridis GV, Dimou E, Dimakopoulos K, Manolakopoulos S, Rapti I, Kitis G, Tzourmakliotis D, Manesis E, Hadziyannis SJ: Outcome of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B on long-term nucleos(t)ide analog therapy starting with lamivudine. Hepatology 2005,42(1):121-9. 10.1002/hep.20760View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto A, Tanaka E, Rokuhara A, Kiyosawa K, Kumata H, Omata M, Okita K, Hayashi N, Okanoue T, Lino S, Tanikawa K, The Inuyama Hepatitis Study Group: Efcacy of lamivudine for preventing hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B: a multicenter retrospective study of 2795 patients. Hepatol Res 2005, 32: 173-84. 10.1016/j.hepres.2005.02.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuen MF, Seto WK, Chow DH, Tsui K, Wong DK, Ngai VW, Wong BC, Fung J, Yuen JC, Lai CL: Long-term lamivudine therapy reduces the risk of long-term complications of chronic hepatitis B infection even in patients without advanced disease. Antivir Ther 2007, 12: 1295-303.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eun JR, Lee HJ, Lee SH, Kim TN, Jang BIK, Choi JW, Park YS, Kim KO, Lee KH, Moon HJ, Lee SH: The effect of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil on preventing hepatocellular carcinoma in HBV-related liver cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007, 46: 664A-5A. 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.10.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jong Ryul Eun, Heon Ju Lee, Tae Nyeun Kim, Kyeung Soo Lee: Risk assessment for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma: according to on-treatment viral response during long-term lamivudine therapy in HBV-related liver disease. J Hepatol 2010,53(1):118-25. 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.02.026View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liaw YF, Farrell G, Sung JJY, Chow WC, Shue K, Keene ON, Dixon JS: Disease progression in chronic hepatitis B with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2005,42(Suppl 2):183.Google Scholar
- Liaw YF, Sung JJY, Chow WC, Shue K, Keene O, Farrel G: Effects of lamivudine on disease progression and development of liver cancer in advanced chronic hepatitis B: a prospective double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Hepatology 2003, 38: 262A-3A. 10.1016/S0270-9139(03)80263-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang Y-F, Zhao W, Zhong Y-D, Xia H-M, Shen L, Zhang N: Interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis B reduces progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Journal of Viral Hepatitis 2009, 16: 265-27. 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2009.01070.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lai CL, Chien RN, Leung NW, Chang TT, Guan R, Tai DI, Ng KY, Wu PC, Dent JC, Barber J, Stephenson SL, Gray DF: A one-year trial of lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B: Asia Hepatitis Lamivudine Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998, 339: 61-68. 10.1056/NEJM199807093390201View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marcellin P, Chang TT, Lim SG, Sievert W, Tong M, Arterburn S, Borroto-Esoda K, Frederick D, Rousseau F: Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2003, 348: 808-816. 10.1056/NEJMoa020681View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hadziyannis SJ, Tassopoulos NC, Heathcote EJ, Chang TT, Kitis G, Rizzetto M, Hadziyannis SJ, Marcellin P, Lim SG, Goodman Z, Wulfsohn MS, Xiong S, Fry J: Adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2003,348(9):800-7. 10.1056/NEJMoa021812View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shamliyan TA, MacDonald R, Shaukat A, Taylor BC, Yuan JM, Johnson JR, Tacklind J, Rutks I, Kane RL, Wilt TJ: Antiviral therapy for adults with chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Ann Intern Med 2009, 111-124.Google Scholar
- Wong VW, Wong GL, Chim AM, Choi PC, Chan AW, Tsang SW, Hui AY, Chan HY, Sung JJ, Chan HL: Surrogate end points and long-term outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009,7(10):1113-20. 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.025View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perrillo R, Hann HW, Mutimer D, Willems B, Leung N, Lee WM, Moorat A, Gardner S, Woessner M, Bourne E, Brosgart CL, Schiff E: Adefovir dipivoxil added to ongoing lamivudine in chronic hepatitis B with YMDD mutant HBV. Gastroenterology 2004,126(1):81-90. 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.050View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- En-Qiang Chen, Li-Chun Wang, Jun Lei, Lu Xu, Hong Tang: Meta-analysis: Adefovir dipivoxil in combination with lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV. Virol J 2009, 6: 163. 10.1186/1743-422X-6-163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chang TT, Gish RG, de Man R, Gadano A, Sollano J, Chao YC, Lok AS, Han KH, Goodman Z, Zhu J, Cross A, DeHertogh D, Wilber R, Colonno R: A comparison of entecavir and lamivudine for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2006, 354: 1001-1010. 10.1056/NEJMoa051285View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gish RG, Lok AS, Chang TT, de Man RA, Gadano A, Sollano J, Han KH, Chao YC, Lee SD, Harris M, Yang J, Colonno R, Brett-Smith H: Entecavir therapy for up to 96 weeks in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2007, 133: 1437-1444. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.08.025View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherman M, Yurdaydin C, Simsek H, Silva M, Liaw YF, Rustgi VK, Sette H, Tsai N, Tenney DJ, Vaughan J, Kreter B, Hindes R: Entecavir therapy for lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B: improved virologic, biochemical, and serology outcomes through 96 weeks. Hepatology 2008, 48: 99-108. 10.1002/hep.22323View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Bommel F, Wunsche T, Mauss S, Reinke P, Bergk A, Schurmann D, Wiedenmann B, Berg T: Comparison of adefovir and tenofovir in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant HBV infection. Hepatology 2004, 40: 1421-1425. 10.1002/hep.20464View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.