Connective tissue metabolism in chikungunya patients
© Lokireddy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 16 January 2008
Accepted: 27 February 2008
Published: 27 February 2008
Chikungunya (CHIK) fever is a viral disease transmitted to humans by the bite of Chikungunya virus (CHIK virus) infected Aedes mosquitoes. CHIK virus is a member of the Alphavirus genus of the family Togaviridae. Previous reports have indicated that infection with CHIK virus produces an acute arthritis in human hosts by large area of necrosis and collagenosis or fibrosis.
We carried out the present study to determine the effect of chikungunya on the collagen and connective tissue metabolism in 75 chikungunya-affected people. First, we screened for mucopolysaccharides in urine by Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) test. Appearance of heavy precipitate indicates the presence of higher levels of mucopolysaccharides and later quantified by DMB dye method. The urinary mucopolysaccharide in CHIK patients was 342 ± 45 mg/l compared to healthy controls (45 ± 5.6 mg/l). The collagen building blocks, proline and hydroxyproline were also measured in CHIK patients and observed higher excretion compared to healthy controls. Urinary excretions hydroxyproline was greater than the proline levels.
These results indicate that CHIK virus infection affects and damage the cartilage and connective metabolism and releases the degraded products from the tissue and responsible for increasing the levels of proline, hydroxyproline and mucopolysaccharides in CHIK affected patients.
Chikungunya (CHIK) fever is a viral disease transmitted to humans by the bite of Chikungunya virus (CHIK virus) infected Aedes mosquitoes. CHIK virus is a member of the Alphavirus genus of the family Togaviridae. CHIK virus was first isolated from the serum of a febrile patient during a dengue epidemic that occurred in the Newala District, Tanzania in 1953 . The Alphaviruses are enveloped particles and their genome consists of a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA molecule of approximately 12000 nucleotides. CHIK virus is an important human pathogen that causes a disease syndrome characterized by fever, headache, rash, nausea, vomiting, myalgia and arthralgia [2–8]. Its association with a fatal haemorrhagic condition was reported in India . CHIK virus is geographically distributed from Africa through Southeast Asia, and its transmission to humans is mainly through Aedes species mosquitoes . Since 1953, CHIK viurs has caused numerous well-documented outbreaks and epidemics in both Africa and Southeast Asia, involving hundreds of thousands of people [10–12]. Recent reports have described a massive outbreak of CHIK disease occurring on islands in the Indian Ocean, off the east coast of Africa [5, 8, 13]. Reemergence of CHIK has also been reported from Indonesia  and very recent massive outbreak in India. No treatment or vaccine is available, and relatively little research has been conducted into its pathogenesis, compared with that of other Arboviruses, such as dengue.
Previous reports have indicated that infection with CHIK virus produces an acute arthritis in human hosts [7, 15, 16] by large area of necrosis and collagenosis or fibrosis . Arthritis is the inflammation of a joint and its surrounding tissues, including the cartilage, ligaments, and tendons. Connective tissue is mainly composed of mucopolysaccharides, protein substances – collagen with major amino acids proline, hydroxyproline etc, calcium, sulfur, and collagen. Mucopolysaccharide, proline and hydroxyproline measurements in urine are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various inheritable disorders that affect bone and connective tissues. Their presence in urine is originated from ground substance of collagen, and bone [18–20]. Though many reports state that CHIK virus produces arthritis in humans. The biochemical mechanisms and the changes of mucopolysaccharides, proline and hydroxyproline in this acute joint pain have not been reported in past literature. During last year monsoon outbreak of CHIK fever in Southern parts of India has led us to carryout the experiments on the effect of CHIK virus on the collagen and connective tissue. In this study we collected the blood and urine samples from chronic CHIK fever patients and studied biochemical parameters related to connective tissue, which is responsible for acute joint pains and arthritis.
Biochemical characteristics of normal and Chikungunya patients
F – 6, M – 14
F – 30, M – 45
20 – 50
15 – 60
80 ± 12 mg/dl
90 ± 16 mg/dl
Serum total protein
7.15 ± 0.96 g/dl
6.96 ± 0.6 g/dl
4.04 ± 0.45 g/dl
3.60 ± 0.24 g/dl$
1 – 2
0.96 ± 0.4
36 ± 8 mg/dl
41 ± 10 mg/dl
0.96 ± 0.23 mg/dl
1.22 ± 0.12 mg/dl$
Effect of chikungunya (on average day 3 – 5) on the levels of proline, hydroxyproline and acid mucopolysaccharides
1.4 ± 0.18 mg/l
22 ± 3.2 mg/l$
25 ± 1.8 mg/l
210 ± 34 mg/l$
45 ± 5.8 mg/l
342 ± 45 mg/l$
Changes of urinary proline, hydroxyproline and mucopolysaccharides during week long Chikungunya fever.
32 ± 2.1
263 ± 22
380 ± 45
30 ± 1.6
251 ± 43
372 ± 30
25 ± 2.0
228 ± 38
354 ± 26
20 ± 1.8
210 ± 24
325 ± 28
16 ± 2.0
186 ± 15
300 ± 30
15 ± 1.5
160 ± 13
260 ± 22
10 ± 0.8
138 ± 11
221 ± 18
10 ± 0.5
130 ± 10
210 ± 16
9 ± 0.8
120 ± 14
185 ± 10
7 ± 0.54
100 ± 10
160 ± 12
Proteoglycan, a mucopolysaccharide building block of cartilage within the joint space, is used by chondrocytes (cartilage-building cells) to create more cartilage. Following pathogenic infection, joints typically exhibit a natural inflammatory response that mainly affects the synovium (synovitis). This process is necessary for the innate repair of damaged tissues, allowing the joint to recoup normal function. Inflammatory mediators released into the joint from such sources as nerves, immunocytes, synoviocytes, and vascular endothelium help to orchestrate these healing responses. These same inflammatory mediators also act on joint sensory nerves, leading to either excitation or sensitization . When people suffer from arthritis, they experience a selective destruction of collagen within the cartilage of their joints. Collagen is the most abundant structural protein in cartilage. It helps provide elasticity of joints and works as the "glue" that holds together the various components of cartilage. It also contains the majority of mucopolysaccharides that give cartilage its healing powers. Mucopolysaccharides are large-molecular mass linear carbohydrate polymers composed of glucuronic or iduronic acid and N-acetylglycosamine or N-acetylgalactosamine units. Chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate are derived from proteoglycans in which these glycosaminoglycans (GAG) are covalently linked at the reducing end to the hydroxyl group of serine residues . Proteoglycans containing GAG bound to hyaluronic acid form large aggregates that are enmeshed in a collagen network as the principal structural constituents of cartilage. Loss of proteoglycans is an early feature of matrix resorption. The erosion of the cartilage lining the joints is a hallmark of osteoarthritis. A corresponding increase in GAGs has been reported in synovial fluid, serum, and urine of patients with rheumatic arthritic diseases [23, 24]. Consistent with this, we observed in our studies higher excretion of mucopolysaccharides through urine (Table 2).
Measurement of urinary hydroxyproline excretion is used to estimate collagen catabolism. Degradation of bone collagen releases free 4-hydroxyproline and peptides containing 4-hydroxyproline into the plasma. Urinary hydroxyproline measurement is particularly useful in monitoring treatment and progress in metabolic bone diseases such as osteomalacia and osteoporosis and Paget's disease. Hydroxyprolme appears in urine after degradation of collagen (collagenosis), which may originate from various tissues . Measuring urinary hydroxyproline has predominantly been used to indicate bone collagen turnover in normal and pathological conditions. Collagen, which constitutes >90% of the fat-free organic matrix of bone, is important in its structural integrity and is the central element of connective tissue structure in which the mineral phase crystallizes during bone formation [20, 26]. Urinary hydroxyproline reflects daily collagen turnover and in humans has shown great potential as an index of nutritional status and growth rate [27, 28]. The CHIK patients showed higher excreted levels of hydroxyproline than proline indicates increased collagen turnover (Table 2). On follow-up study in the selected CHIK patients, increased levels of mucopolysacchariedes, proline and hydroxyproline indicates highermetabolic turnover in early days and recedes progressively in later days (Table 3).
In CHIK patients the collagen and connective tissue metabolism was greatly affected and increased metabolism leads to increased excretion of proline, hydroxyproline and mucopolysaccharides in urine compared to healthy controls. It indicates that the CHIK virus infection, connective tissue typically exhibits inflammatory response and leads to the damage of cartilage and connective tissue; increases metabolism and releases degraded products in to blood and ultimately excreted through urine.
Materials and methods
During last year July – October 2006, CHIK out break in Andhra Pradesh, India, a total of 75 (45 males + 30 females) patients were selected based on disease symptoms for this study. We also taken the 20 age-matched healthy persons were chosen from the community and used as control subjects. Blood and urine samples were collected from each subject with their prior written consent for further studies. From all subjects, 5 ml of blood was collected in heparinized tubes and centrifuged at 1500 ×g for 15 min at 4 C. Plasma and pelleted RBC were separated stored in eppendorf tubes and kept at -80 C until analysis. Commercially available kits measured Blood analysis and other general parameters.
The urine samples were collected from the patients and used for estimation of mucopolysaccharides, proline and hydroxyproline. Total urinary hydroxyproline determinations were performed employing the method described by Cleary and Saunders (1974) . Briefly, urine was passed through a column of ion retardation resin to remove acid, salts, and pigments. From the column eluate, urine hydroxyproline determination was performed by oxidized to pyrrole 2-carboxylic acid and then to pyrole. The color produced with dimethyl amino-benzaldehyde is masured at 560 nm . The proline levels in urine sample were measured by the method of Bates et al (1973) . Two ml urine sample mixed with 2 ml acid ninhydrin reagent and kept in boiling water bath for 1 h. The tubes transferred to an ice bath to terminate the reaction. 5 ml toluene was added and mixed and read at 520 nm against the toluene blank. Screening test for mucopolysaccharides in urine was tested by Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) test. Five ml of fresh urine was added to 1 ml of CTAB (cetavilon) solution (50 g/l in citrate buffer (1 M) of pH 6.0). A heavy precipitate indicated the presence of mucopolysaccharides (Varley et al 1990). The DMB assay was performed essentially for measurement of mucopolysaccharides according to the method of Whitley et al. (1989) . Briefly, the DMB (1,9-dimethylmethylene blue) dye solution was prepared by dissolving 16 mg of DMB, 3.04 g of glycine, 2.37 g of sodium chloride, and 0.5 mL of 0.1 mol/l hydrochloric acid in 1 l of distilled water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 3. For each assay, the patient's urine specimen was mixed with 1 ml of the dye solution at room temperature, and measured absorbance at 525 nm without delay after mixing the sample and dye solution. The assay was calibrated verses a standard curve of chondroitin sulfate (5–100 mg/l). The results were expressed as mg/l. All colorimetric estimations of above biochemical parameters in samples were measured by using BIOTEK ELISA Reader.
Statistical analysis was performed by GraphPad InStat software. Subjects with CHIK were compared with healthy controls. Means and standard error of means were calculated and differences between means were student's t-test.
The publication was conducted as part of the programme 'Biotechnology for Dry land Agriculture in Andhra Pradesh' with financial support for the Research and Communication Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the government of Netherlands. Andhra Pradesh Netherlands Biotechnology Programme, IPE, Hyderabad, India.
- Ross RW: The Newala epidemic. III. The virus: isolation, pathogenic properties and relationship to the epidemic. Journal of Hygiene 1956, 54: 177-91.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thaikruea L, Charearnsook O, Reanphumkarnkit S, Dissomboon P, Phonjan R, Ratchbud S, et al.: Chikungunya in Thailand: a reemerging disease? Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1997, 28: 359-64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diallo M, Thonnon J, Traore-Lamizana M, Fontenille D: Vectors of Chikungunya virus in Senegal: current data and transmission cycles. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1999, 60: 281-286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Powers AM, Brault AaronC, Tesh RobertB, Weaver ScottC: Re-emergence of chikungunya and o'nyong-nyong viruses: evidence for distinct geographical lineages and distant evolutionary relationships. Journal of General Virology 2000, 81: 471-479.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schuffenecker I, Iteman I, Michault A, Murri S, Frangeul L, Vaney MC, et al.: Genome microevolution of chikungunya viruses causing the Indian Ocean outbreak. PLoS Med 2006, 6: 263. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030263View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- NICD. National Institute of Communicable Disease, New Delhi: Chikungunya Fever. CD Alert 2006,10(2):6-8.Google Scholar
- Paquet C, Quatresous I, Solet JL, Sissoko D, Renault P, Pierre V, Cordel H, Lasalle C, Thiria J, Zeller H, Schuffnecker I: Chikungunya outbreak in Reunion: Epidemiology and surveillance. Euro Surveill 2006, 11: 2.Google Scholar
- Nelson Lee, Wong ChunK, Lam WaiY, Wong Ann, Lim Wilina, Lam ChristopherWK, Cockram CliveS, Sung JosephJY, Chan PaulKS, Tang JulianW: Chikungunya fever, Hong Kong. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2006, 12: 1790.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sarkar JK, Chatterjee SN, Chakravarty SK: Haemorrhagic fever in Calcutta: some epidemiological observations. Indian J Med Res 1964,52(7):651-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rao TR: Recent epidemics caused by Chikungunya virus in India, 1963 – 1965. Scientifc Culture 1966, 32: 215.Google Scholar
- Halstead SB, Scanlon JE, Umpaivit P, Udomsakdi S: Dengue and Chikungunya virus infection in man in Thailand, 1962 ± 1964. IV. Epidemiologic studies in the Bangkok metropolitan area. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1969, 18: 997-1021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Posey D, O'Rourke Thomas, Roehrig Johnt, Lanciotti Roberts, Weinberg Michelle, Maloney Susan: Short report: o'nyong-nyong fever in West Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005,73(1):32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lahariya C, Pradhan SK: Emergence of chikungunya virus in Indian subcontinent after 32 years: a review. J Vect Borne Dis 2006, 43: 151-160.Google Scholar
- Laras K, Sukri NC, Larasati RP, Bangs MJ, Kosim R, Djauzi WT, et al.: Tracking the re-emergence of epidemic chikungunya virus in Indonesia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2005, 99: 128. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.03.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy Ac, Flemming J, Solomon L: Chikungunya viral arthropathy: a clinical description. J Rheumatol 1980, 7: 231-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fourie ED, Morrison JG: Rheumatoid arthritic syndrome after chikungunya fever. S Afr Med J 1979, 56: 130-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ozden S, Huerre M, Riviere J-P, Coffey LL, Afonso PV, et al.: Human Muscle Satellite Cells as Targets of Chikungunya Virus Infection. PLoS ONE 2007,2(6):527. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000527View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dull TA, Henneman PH: Urinary hydroxyproline as an index of collagen turnover in bone. New Engl J Med 1963, 268: 132.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawata H, Koizumi T, Wada R, Yo-Shida T: Urinary acid mucopolysaccharide excretion in liver damage. Gastroenterology 1959, 40: 507.Google Scholar
- Grant C, Kachniar JF: Amino acids and related metabolites. In Fundamentals of clinical chemistry. In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Edited by: Tietz NW. WB Saunders Co; 1982:377-400.Google Scholar
- Dougall Jason JMc: Arthritis and pain: Neurogenic origin of joint pain. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2006, 8: 220. 10.1186/ar2069View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Margolis RK, Margolis RU: Structure and localization of glycoproteins and glycosaminoglycans. In Neurobiology of glycoconjugates. Edited by: Margolis RU, Margolis RK. New York: Plenum; 1989:85-126.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bensouyad A, Hollander AP, Dularay B, et al.: Concentrations of glycosaminoglycans in synovial fluids and their relation with immunological and inflammatory mediators in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1990, 49: 301-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vladimir Kery, Orlovska Maria, Stanlkova Maria, Risko Martin, Zlna Daniel: Urinary Glycosaminoglycan Excretion in Rheumatic Diseases. Clinical chemistry 1992,38(6):841.Google Scholar
- Dequeker J, Mbuyi-Muamba JM, Holvoet G: Hydroxyproline and bone metastasis. In Bone metastasis: monitoring and treatment. Edited by: Stoll BA, Parbhoo S. New York: Raven Press; 1983:181-99.Google Scholar
- Smith R, Elia M: The significance of urinary hydroxyproline and 3-methylhistidine changes in growth, starvation and injury. In Amino-acid analysis. Edited by: Rattenbury JM. New York: Haistead Press; 1981:225-36.Google Scholar
- Whitehead RC: Hydroxyproline creatinine ratio as an index of nutritional status and rate of growth. Lancet 1965, 567-570. 10.1016/S0140-6736(65)90870-6Google Scholar
- Howells CR, Wharton BA, Mc Cane RA: Value of hydroxyproline indices in malnutrition. Lancet 1967, 1082-1083. 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)92652-9Google Scholar
- Cleary I, Saunders PA: A simplified procedure for the measurement of total hydroxyproline in urine. Clin Chem Acta 1984, 57: 217-223. 10.1016/0009-8981(74)90400-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Raghuramulu N, Madhavan Nair K, Kalyanasundaram S: A manual of laboratory techniques. NIN 2003.Google Scholar
- Bates LS, Waldron RP, Teare EP: Rapid determination of free proline for stress status. Plant and Soil 1973, 39: 205-208. 10.1007/BF00018060View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whitley CB, Rindour MD, Draper KA, Dutton CM, Neglia JP: Diagnostic test for mucopolysaccharidosis. I. Direct method for quantifying excessive urinary glycosaminoglycan excretion. Clin Chem 1989, 35: 374-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.