Ex vivo promoter analysis of antiviral heat shock cognate 70B gene inAnopheles gambiae

  • Seokyoung Kang1,

    Affiliated with

    • Cheolho Sim2,

      Affiliated with

      • Brian D Byrd1, 3,

        Affiliated with

        • Frank H Collins4 and

          Affiliated with

          • Young S Hong1Email author

            Affiliated with

            Virology Journal20085:136

            DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-5-136

            Received: 14 October 2008

            Accepted: 05 November 2008

            Published: 05 November 2008



            TheAnopheles gambiae heat shock cognate gene (hsc70B) encodes a constitutively expressed protein in thehsp70 family and it functions as a molecular chaperone for protein folding. However, the expression ofhsc70B can be further induced by certain stimuli such as heat shock and infection. We previously demonstrated that theAn. gambiae hsc70B is induced during o'nyong-nyong virus (ONNV) infection and subsequently suppresses ONNV replication in the mosquito. To further characterize the inducibility ofhsc70B by ONNV infection inAn. gambiae, we cloned a 2.6-kb region immediately 5' upstream of the starting codon ofhsc70B into a luciferase reporter vector (pGL3-Basic), and studied its promoter activity in transfected Vero cells during infection with o'nyong-nyong, West Nile and La Crosse viruses.


            Serial deletion analysis of thehsc70B upstream sequence revealed that the putative promoter is likely located in a region 1615–2150 bp upstream of thehsc70B starting codon. Sequence analysis of this region revealed transcriptional regulatory elements for heat shock element-binding protein (HSE-bind), nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), dorsal (Dl) and fushi-tarazu (Ftz). Arbovirus infection, regardless of virus type, significantly increased thehsc70B promoter activity in transfected Vero cells.


            Our results further validate the transcriptional activation ofhsc70B during arbovirus infection and support the role of specific putative regulatory elements. Induction by three taxonomically distinct arboviruses suggests that the HSC70B protein may be expressed to cope with cellular stress imposed during infection.


            TheAnopheles gambiae mosquito is the principle vector of the malaria parasitePlasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan Africa. Current estimates suggest that nearly half of the global population is at risk of malaria and there are annually approximately 250 million cases resulting in a million deaths [1]. In addition,An. gambiae vectors o'nyong-nyong virus (ONNV), a single-stranded (+) RNA virus (Togaviridae; Alphavirus) [24]. Symptoms of ONNV infection in humans include rash, fever and polyarthritis often resulting in high morbidity rates during epidemics [5, 6].

            Although most arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) are vectored by culicine mosquitoes, ONNV is primarily vectored by the anopheline mosquitoesAn. gambiae andAn. funestus [7]. In spite of the unusual vector specificity, ONNV shares a common host cell entry mechanism with many other arboviruses. Endocytosis and subsequent fusion with the host's membrane in the endosome are exploited by ONNV to infect host cells [8]. Alphaviruses, including ONNV, Sindbis virus, and Chikungunya virus have class II fusion proteins such as E glycoproteins that mediate membrane fusion between virus and host cells during virus entry [8, 9]. Class II E glycoproteins mainly consist of beta sheet-folded domains while class I E proteins are α-helices [10, 11]. Since membrane fusion is one of the protein maturation processes mediated by molecular chaperones, such as the HSP70 family, it is possible that HSP70 may enhance or suppress maturation of viral proteins [1214].

            Members of the HSP70 family contain three conserved domains: an ATPase domain at the N-terminus, a peptide binding domain, and a GP-rich region at the C-terminus that contains an EEVD motif [1517]. HSP70, a molecular chaperone, changes its conformation in an ATP dependent manner to mediate proper target protein folding, degradation and translocation [18, 19]. The carboxy-terminal EEVD motif is a unique feature of cytosolic heat shock proteins that is recognized by chaperone cofactors to initiate chaperone activity [2022]. The heat shock cognate protein 70 (HSC70) is a constitutively expressed member of the HSP70 family and functions as a molecular chaperone under normal cellular conditions. However, the expression of the HSC70 gene may be increased in response to environmental and physiological stress [19].

            TheAn. gambiae HSC70B is an ortholog ofDrosophila melanogaster Hsc70-4 [23]. cDNA microarray studies demonstrated that HSC70B is upregulated during ONNV infection in adultAn. gambiae, suggesting an important role during virus infection [24]. The functional importance of HSC70B upregulation in ONNV-infected femaleAn. gambiae was further elucidated by RNAi gene silencing of thehsc70B transcript [23]. Reduction of thehsc70B transcript by RNAi silencing enhanced ONNV replicationin vivo. Likewise, enhanced ONNV replication in HSC70B-knockdown mosquitoes suggests that HSC70 proteins play an important role in arbovirus suppression and maintaining homeostasis during infection [23].

            To further elucidate the transcriptional regulation of thehsc70B locus in response to viral infection, we characterized the 5' upstream region of thehsc70B coding sequenceex vivo using cell culture and luciferase reporter systems. Herein, we report the identification of a regulatory region essential forhsc70B transcription. Furthermore, the kinetic properties ofhsc70B transcription during arbovirus infections were examined with ONNV (Togaviridae; Alphavirus), West Nile virus (Flaviviridae; Flavivirus) and La Crosse virus (Bunyaviridae; Orthobunyavirus). The results showed that thehsc70B promoter region was responsive to all three arboviruses. Induction ofhsc70B transcription by three taxonomically different arboviruses suggests that the HSC70B protein may be expressed to cope with cellular stress imposed during infection. The biological implications of these data are discussed.


            Sequence analysis of the 5' upstream ofhsc70B

            Transcription factor binding elements along the 5'-upstream sequence of thehsc70B gene (2559 bp) were analyzedin silico. The binding sites identified by both the TFSEARCH and AliBaba2.1 programs are shown in Figure 1. In addition to core promoter sequences (e.g., TATA and CAT boxes), putative binding sites for heat shock proteins such as HSE-bind and heat shock transcription factor (HSF) were also identified. Putative binding sites for NF-κB, Dl, c-AMP response element binding protein (CREB), signal transducers and activators of transcription protein (STAT), and fushi-tarazu (Ftz) factors were also identified.
            Figure 1

            Nucleotide sequence of the hsc70B promoter region. Putative binding sites for transcription factors are underlined. The binding sites were evaluatedin silico by both the TFSEARCH and AliBaba2.1 program. Transcription factors predicted by both programs are marked blue. The consensus sequence of HSE (5'-NGAAN-3') is marked red. The position +1 denotes the first base of the putative starting codon ATG.

            Deletion analysis of thehsc70B promoter

            To identify the critical elements required for transcription, various deletions of the 5' upstream region of thehsc70B locus were generated and ligated into the pGL3-Basic vector. The promoter activities of the different deletion constructs were compared to that of the full-length construct (2.6 kb). The full length promoter pGL3-2.6k contains 2599 bp of the 5' upstream region (-2599 to -1); +1 denotes the first base of the starting codon (Figure 2A). Deletions of 449 bp, 975 bp, 1649 bp and 2267 bp from the 5' end of the full length promoter produced pGL3-2.2k, pGL3-1.6k, pGL3-0.9k and pGL3-0.3k, respectively. The promoter activity of these deletion constructs was measured by firefly luciferase expression and normalized by theRenilla luciferase expression. Both pGL3-2.6k and pGL3-2.2k constructs had luciferase expression levels 5-fold higher than that of the pGL3-Basic control. The luciferase expression levels of pGL3-0.3k, pGL3-0.9k and pGL3-1.6k did not differ from that of the control (Figure 2B). These data suggest that elements critical for the transcription ofhsc70B reside in the 526 bp region between 2.2 and 1.6 kb upstream of the starting codon.
            Figure 2

            Deletion Analysis of the hsc70B promoter. (A) The solid black line represents the full length of the promoter where positions -2599 and +1 denote the 5' end of thehsc70B promoter and the putative starting codon ATG, respectively. (B) The bars on the left represent the lengths of the 5' upstream region that were generated by PCR. The bars on the right represent relative firefly luciferase activities (mean ± SD) that were normalized by theRenilla luciferase activity. The relative luciferase activity indicates the promoter activity of the 5' upstream deletion constructs ofhsc70B. The promoter activities of constructs less than 2.2 kb were significantly lower than the 2.6 kb full length construct.

            Effect of ONNV infection on the pGL3-2.6k and pGL3-2.2khsc70B promoter plasmid constructs

            To determine if differences between the promoter activities of the pGL3-2.6k and pGL3-2.2k constructs occurred during arbovirus infection, the constructs were initially evaluated in the context of ONNV infection. Transfected with either the pGL3-2.6k or pGL3-2.2k plasmids, Vero cells were subsequently infected with ONNV (MOI = 0.001). The cells were harvested after cytopathic effects (CPE) were confirmed at 60 hpi. ONNV infection significantly increased thehsc70B promoter activity (Figure 3). The luciferase activity of both pGL3-2.6k and pGL3-2.2k constructs in ONNV-infected Vero cells was ~2-fold higher than uninfected Vero cells.
            Figure 3

            Induction of the hsc70B promoter in transfected Vero cells by ONNV infection. The constructs containing the 2.6 kb and 2.2 kb-long 5' upstream regions were evaluated forhsc70B promoter activity during ONNV infection (MOI = 0.001). The luciferase activity was measured at 60 h post ONNV infection when CPE became apparent. Thehsc70B promoter activity, as measured by relative luciferase activity (mean ± SD), was significantly elevated in both constructs when compared to uninfected controls (2.2 kb uninfected vs. infected: P < 0.01, t = 4.702, df = 6; 2.6 kb uninfected vs. infected: P < 0.01, t = 5.681, df = 6).

            Effect of arbovirus infection on thehsc70B promoter activity

            Based on the previous results, the pGL3-2.2k construct was used to assay the effect of arbovirus infection on thehsc70B promoter. A time course experiment with ONNV (MOI = 0.001) in Vero cells transfected with the pGL3-2.2k construct demonstrated increases inhsc70B promoter activities at 48 and 72 hpi. However, at earlier time points thehsc70B promoter activity was comparable to that of the uninfected control (Figure 4A). This enhancedhsc70B promoter activity in ONNV-infected cells appeared to occur with increasing ONNV titers at 48 and 72 hpi. The titers were 1.5 × 102, 3 × 105, 1.4 × 108, and 1.1 × 108 plaque forming units (pfu)/mL at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hpi, respectively (Figure 4A). Furthermore, CPE in ONNV-infected Vero cells became evident at 48 hpi, corresponding with the elevated viral titers at later time points (Figure 4B). Thehsc70B promoter activity in ONNV infected Vero cells was 1.4 and 1.6-fold higher at 48 hpi and 72 hpi, respectively, than that in uninfected Vero cells (Figure 4A).
            Figure 4

            hsc70B promoter activity (mean ± SD) time course experiments during ONNV infection. (A) Thehsc70B promoter activity, as measured by luciferase activity, was significantly higher at 48 h (P < 0.01, t = 8.53, df = 4) and 72 hpi (P < 0.01, t = 27.34, df = 4) in the ONNV infected samples. ONNV titers were also markedly elevated at 48 and 72 hpi. The induction of the HSC70B promoter corresponds to viral titer. (B) ONNV cytopathic effects in Vero cells; CPE are clearly evident at 48 and 72 hpi.

            To determine if the observed transcriptional activation ofhsc70B was virus specific, two taxonomically distinct arboviruses were chosen for additional time course experiments. Vero cells transfected with pGL3-2.2k constructs were infected with WNV or LACV at MOI = 0.01. The infected cells were harvested at 1, 24, 36 and 48 hpi. Infection with either virus also significantly increased thehsc70B promoter activity as determined by the luciferase assay (Figure 5).
            Figure 5

            Increased hsc70B promoter activities (mean ± SD) in Vero cells during West Nile virus (A) and La Crosse virus (B) infection. Thehsc70B promoter activity, as measured by luciferase activity, is higher in infected cells at 36 and 48 hpi.


            Repression of ONNV replication by the HSC70B protein was previously shown inAn. gambiae [23, 24]. Of particular interest in this result is the transcriptional regulation ofhsc70B expression in response to ONNV infection inAn. gambiae. To map and characterize the promoter activity ofhsc70B, the upstream region up to 2599 bp from the putative starting codon ofhsc70B was subjected to a luciferase reporter assay. Initially, the 2599 bp upstream sequence of thehsc70B showed a promoter activity (Figure 2). Subsequent deletion analysis of this region revealed that the regulatory elements critical forhsc70B transcription reside between 2150 ~ 1615 bp upstream of thehsc70B starting codon (Figure 2). Deletion of this 535 bp region abolished the promoter activity ofhsc70B. This regulatory region contains several binding sites for transcription factors such as HSE-bind, CRE, NF-κB, dorsal, and Ftz (Figure 1). HSE is a binding site for heat shock transcription factors that are activated in response to environmental and physical stresses such as heat shock and microbial infection [25, 26]. Inhsc70B, there is one putative HSE consisting of a block of three repeats of a 5-bp sequence, 5'-nGAAn-3'. Although the number of HSE blocks can vary among different HSPs, the 5-bp HSE repeat is highly conserved in the regulatory region of various heat shock proteins such ashsp70,hsp83, andhsp27 inDrosophila [27]. The second and third repeat in the HSE block ofAn. gambiae hsc70B has a tail-to-tail (5'nTTCnnGAAn3') arrangement with 6-bp gaps between them (Figure 1). InDrosophila HSPs, there are 5 or less gaps, if any, between the 5-bp repeats [27]. It will thus be interesting to learn how the additional gap inAn. gambiae hsc70B regulateshsc70B expression.

            CRE is a response element for phosphorylated CREB (c-AMP response element-binding protein) which regulates transcription of genes. CREB is involved in human hsp90 gene expression which is constitutively expressed [28]. Thus, CRE may be a key element to induce basic transcription ofAn. gambiae hsc70B gene as it is also a constitutively expressed member of HSPs. NF-κB is a transcription factor which responds to stresses including viral infection [29]. Transcription of NF-κB was shown to be increased by downregulation of HSC70B protein in rat pancreatic acinar AR42J cells [30]. Ftz is a transcription factor that was originally isolated inDrosophila. It has many orthologs in various species and is involved infushi tarazu gene expression which functions in embryonic segmentation inDrosophila and sex determination in zebrafish [31, 32]. Further biochemical and molecular characterization using electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and DNase I protection assay should elucidate key elements that transcriptionally regulateAn. gambiae hsc70B expression in response to ONNV infection. These assays will further improve our understanding of transcriptional regulation ofhsc70B, and facilitate the identification of transcriptional factors and co-factors in the signal transduction pathway ofhsc70B expression.

            ONNV was used to infect Vero cells to examine the effects onhsc70B promoter activity. The different lengths, 2150 bp and 2599 bp, of the 5' upstream sequences were tested because these two constructs contain the regulatory sequence for the basic transcription ofhsc70B. Both 2150 bp and 2599 bp upstream genomic fragments responded to ONNV infection and the promoter activities of both constructs increased during ONNV infection (Figure 3). When Vero cells were transfected with either pGL3-2.6k or pGL3-2.2k reporter plasmid, the promoter activity in the reporter plasmids was about 2-fold higher in infected cells than the uninfected control (Figure 3). This suggests that induction ofAn. gambiae hsc70B gene, leading to expression of the HSC70B protein, results from virus infection. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that cellular signals are transduced to the regulatory region of thehsc70B locus inAn. gambiae.

            The 2150-bp 5' upstream sequence was used to further investigate the effects of ONNV infection on thehsc70B promoter activity at different time points after infection. The promoter activity ofhsc70B was significantly higher in infected cells at later time points (48 and 72 hpi) than earlier points (1 and 24 hpi) (Figure 4A). The elevatedhsc70B promoter activity corresponded with increasing viral titers at 48 and 72 hpi because plaque assays of the cell culture media showed higher ONNV titers at these later time points (Figure 4A). These plaque assay data were further evaluated by observing CPE in ONNV-infected Vero cells. CPE became apparent at 48 and 72 hpi in Vero cells while uninfected control cells did not show cell lysis (Figure 4B). The appearance of CPE in ONNV-infected Vero cells corresponded to higher ONNV titers at 48 and 72 hpi. It can be thus inferred that induction ofhsc70B transcription may be triggered in response to cellular stresses burdened by rapidly replicating viruses. In cells at immediate or early infection stages,hsc70B expression may not be activated.

            The inducibility of thehsc70B promoter was also examined using two additional arboviruses, WNV (Flaviviridae) and LACV (Bunyaviridae). Like ONNV, both WNV and LACV were also able to upregulate the transcription activity ofhsc70B during infection (Figure 5). Due to more rapid kinetics of replication, both WNV and LACV caused thehsc70B promoter activity to rise earlier than ONNV. For example, WNV-infected Vero cells started to show transcriptional induction as early as 24 hpi. Transcriptional activation ofhsc70B by three different arboviruses suggests that upregulation ofhsc70B expression indeed results from cellular stresses caused by virus infection in host cells. In addition, activation of thehsc70B promoter by virus infection was recently shown in shrimp (Penaeus monodon) [33]. Using a luciferase reporter in Sf21 cells, Chuanget al. (2007) demonstrated 5.5-fold induction of the shrimphsc70B promoter when the Sf21 cells were infected withAutographa californica multiple nuclear polyhedrosis virus (AcMNPV; MOI = 0.1). Therefore, it appears that induction ofhsc70B expression may be a general cellular response of host cells to virus infection.


            We previously reported that the transcriptional activation ofhsc70B in ONNV-infectedAn. gambiae renders the mosquito an ability to repress ONNV replication [23, 24]. Thesein vivo findings and our currentex vivo characterization of thehsc70B regulatory region unequivocally indicate that the induction of HSC70B may be a mosquito innate immune response against virus infection. To support this hypothesis, mosquito cells (e.g., C6/36 cells fromAe. albopictus) do not show any CPE during arbovirus infection while mammalian cells including Vero cells display prominent CPE and subsequent cell lysis due to overreplication of viruses. Evolutionally, mosquitoes may have acquired the ability to maintain viral titers below a certain threshold, below which mosquitoes may serve as arboviral vectors without pathogenesis from viral infections. Interestingly, a potent antiviral drug, prostaglandin A, showed antiviral effects against Sendai or Sindbis virus through induction of HSP70 proteins in AGMK cells (African green monkey kidney) or Vero cells, respectively [34, 35]. Therefore, comparative studies on HSP expression in response to viral infection between mosquito and mammalian cells will provide a deeper insight into innate immune responses to viral infection between mosquito vectors and mammalian hosts.


            Construction ofAn. gambiae hsc70B promoter-luciferase reporter gene

            The 2599 bp 5' region upstream of the putative starting codon of thehsc70B gene was amplified from BAC clone 132E18 http://​www.​ensembl.​org by a PCR method using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB, MA). The primers used were as follows: AngaHsc_F1, 5'-CCCGAGCTCGATGGTCACAAATGTTTCACAGG-3' and AngaHsc_R, 5'-CCGCTCGAGCTGCGAACACGCAACACAC-3' with aSacI or anXhoI recognition site (underlined) incorporated at the 5' end of the primers, respectively. The PCR conditions were as follows: 98°C for 30 sec, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 98°C for 10 sec, annealing at 68°C for 30 sec and extension at 72°C for 80 sec, a final extension at 72°C was performed for 10 min. The amplified DNA fragment was double-digested withSacI andXhoI and subcloned into the promoterless pGL3-Basic vector (Promega) predigested withSacI andXhoI to construct pGL3-2.6k. Serial deletions of the 5'-flanking region of thehsc70B gene were also prepared from pGL3-2.6k using a PCR method with the primers listed in table 1.
            Table 1

            Primer sequences used to construct pGL3-hsc70B plasmids


            Primer sequence (5' to 3')






            Forward primer to construct pGL3-2.6k




            Forward primer to construct pGL3-2.2k




            Forward primer to construct pGL3-1.6k




            Forward primer to construct pGL3-0.9k




            Forward primer to construct pGL3-0.3k




            Reverse primer to construct all plasmids

            Restriction enzyme recognition sites are underlined.SacI: GAGCTC;XhoI: CTCGAG

            Analysis of 5' upstream sequence ofhsc70B

            Putative binding sites for transcription factors in the 5' upstream region ofhsc70B were predictedin silico using the TFSEARCH [36, 37] and AliBaba2.1 [38] programs.

            Transfection and luciferase activity assay of thehsc70B promoter activity in Vero cells

            Transfection experiments were performed in 24-well plates using the Lipofectamine reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, CA). Briefly, Vero cells (ATCC: CCL-81) were seeded and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) for 24 h prior to transfection at a density of 0.5 × 105 cells/well. When the cells reached ~80% confluency, the culture media was removed and 200 μl of fresh DMEM without antibiotics or fetal bovine serum (FBS) was added. The cells were then co-transfected with 400 ng of pGL3 firefly (Photinus pyralis) luciferase constructs containing varying lengths of thehsc70B upstream region (e.g., pGL3-2.6k, pGL3-2.2k, pGL3-1.6k, pGL3-0.9k, pGL3-0.3k, or pGL3-Basic) and 0.05 ng of a pRL-cmvRenilla reniformis luciferase construct. The pRL-cmv construct was used as an internal control, in which theRenilla luciferase expression is driven by the cytomegalovirus promoter (cmv). Because the pGL3-Basic is a promoterless reporter plasmid containing only the coding sequence of firefly luciferase it served as a background control. At 3 h post transfection, the transfection mixture was replaced with a complete medium including 100 U/mL Penicillin-Streptomycin, and 10% FBS. Cells were harvested at pre-defined time points post transfection. The luciferase activities were measured by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, WI) according to manufacturer's instructions. Quantification of the luminescent signals was performed using a Synergy HT microplate reader (BioTek, USA). In order to account for heterogeneous transfection efficiencies and cell viabilities among different samples, the firefly luminescence values were normalized as a ratio of theRenilla luminescence values. A minimum of three biological replicates were included for the time course experiments with ONNV. For time course experiments with WNV and LACV, the mean values and standard deviations were calculated from four biological replicates out of six replicates. The largest and the smallest values from these replicates were excluded from the analysis.


            The SG650 strain of ONNV has previously been described [23]. The WNV isolate (LA-11-2005) was isolated by BDB from the brain tissue of a blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata) found in New Iberia, LA during 2005. A cloacal swab from the bird tested positive for WNV by the Rapid Analyte Measurement Platform (RAMP, Adapco, Inc.). Subsequent nucleic acid amplification and sequencing of the PreM-Envelope region of the isolate confirmed the RAMP identification (GenBank Accession Number DQ646699). The virus was isolated in Vero cells and had not been further passaged. The LACV (78-V-13193) was obtained from the World Reference Center for Arboviruses at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. The virus had been passed once in suckling mouse brain and twice in Vero cells.

            Virus infection

            To determine the effect of viral infection on the promoter activity ofhsc70B, Vero cells cotransfected with pGL3-2.6k or pGL3-2.2k and pRL-cmv were infected with ONNV, WNV or LACV 12 h post transfection. For ONNV, confluent monolayers of Vero cells were infected at an MOI (multiplicity of infection) of 0.001. The infected cells were harvested at predetermined time points (e.g., 1, 24, 48 and 72 h post-infection) during time course experiments. Otherwise, the cells were harvested at 60 h post infection when CPE were evident. For the WNV and LACV time course experiments, confluent monolayers of Vero cells were infected at an MOI of 0.01 and the infected cells were harvested at 1, 24, 36 and 48 hpi. Viral titers were determined by a standard plaque assay in Vero cells [39].



            The authors are grateful to M. Kern of University of Notre Dame for providing BAC clones containing thehsc70B locus. We appreciate Dr. D. Wesson of Tulane University for providing reagents and cell culture facilities and M. Rider of Tulane University for his critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Louisiana Board of Regents Fund (LEQSF(2005-08)-RD-A-35) and Tulane Research Enhancement Fund to YSH.

            Authors’ Affiliations

            Department of Tropical Medicine, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University
            Department of Entomology, the Ohio State University
            Environmental Health Sciences, Western Carolina University
            The Center for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Notre Dame


            1. WHO:World Malaria Report 2008. Geneva 2008.
            2. Karabatsos N:Antigenic relationships of group A arboviruses by plaque reduction neutralization testing. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1975,24:527–532.PubMed
            3. Levinson RS, Strauss JH, Strauss EG:Complete sequence of the genomic RNA of O'nyong-nyong virus and its use in the construction of alphavirus phylogenetic trees. Virology 1990,175:110–123.View ArticlePubMed
            4. Powers AM, Brault AC, Tesh RB, Weaver SC:Re-emergence of Chikungunya and O'nyong-nyong viruses: evidence for distinct geographical lineages and distant evolutionary relationships. J Gen Virol 2000,81:471–479.PubMed
            5. Sanders EJ, Rwaguma EB, Kawamata J, Kiwanuka N, Lutwama JJ, Ssengooba FP, Lamunu M, Najjemba R, Were WA, Bagambisa G, Campbell GL:O'nyong-nyong fever in south-central Uganda, 1996–1997: description of the epidemic and results of a household-based seroprevalence survey. J Infect Dis 1999,180:1436–1443.View ArticlePubMed
            6. Posey DL, O'Rourke T, Roehrig JT, Lanciotti RS, Weinberg M, Maloney S:O'nyong-nyong fever in West Africa. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2005,73:32.PubMed
            7. Williams MC, Woodall JP, Corbet PS, Gillett JD:O'nyong-nyong fever: an epidemic virus disease in East Africa. 8. Virus isolations from Anopheles mosquitoes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1965,59:300–306.View ArticlePubMed
            8. Strauss JH, Strauss EG:The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution. Microbiol Rev 1994,58:491–562.PubMed
            9. Kielian M:Class II virus membrane fusion proteins. Virology 2006,344:38–47.View ArticlePubMed
            10. Rey FA, Heinz FX, Mandl C, Kunz C, Harrison SC:The envelope glycoprotein from tick-borne encephalitis virus at 2 Å resolution. Nature 1995,375:291–298.View ArticlePubMed
            11. Hrobowski YM, Garry RF, Michael SF:Peptide inhibitors of dengue virus and West Nile virus infectivity. Virol J 2005,2:49.View ArticlePubMed
            12. Mulvey M, Brown DT:Involvement of the molecular chaperone BiP in maturation of Sindbis virus envelope glycoproteins. J Virol 1995,69:1621–1627.PubMed
            13. Ren J, Ding T, Zhang W, Song J, Ma W:Does Japanese encephalitis virus share the same cellular receptor with other mosquito-borne flaviviruses on the C6/36 mosquito cells? Virol J 2007,4:83.View ArticlePubMed
            14. Hirayama E, Hattori M, Kim J:Specific binding of heat shock protein 70 with HN-protein inhibits the HN-protein assembly in Sendai virus-infected Vero cells. Virus Research 2006,120:199–207.View ArticlePubMed
            15. Morimoto RI, Tissières A, Georgopoulos C:The biology of heat shock proteins and molecular chaperones Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1994.
            16. Mosser DD, Caron AW, Bourget L, Meriin AB, Sherman MY, Morimoto RI, Massie B:The chaperone function of hsp70 is required for protection against stress-induced apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 2000,20:7146–7159.View ArticlePubMed
            17. Kiang JG, Tsokos GC:Heat shock protein 70 kDa: molecular biology, biochemistry, and physiology. Pharmacol Ther 1998,80:183–201.View ArticlePubMed
            18. Eisenberg E, Greene LE:Multiple roles of auxilin and Hsc70 in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Traffic 2007,8:640–646.View ArticlePubMed
            19. Hartl FU:Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature 1996,381:571–580.View ArticlePubMed
            20. Demand J, Luders J, Hohfeld J:The carboxy-terminal domain of Hsc70 provides binding sites for a distinct set of chaperone cofactors. Mol Cell Biol 1998,18:2023–2028.PubMed
            21. Carrello A, Allan RK, Morgan SL, Owen BA, Mok D, Ward BK, Minchin RF, Toft DO, Ratajczak T:Interaction of the Hsp90 cochaperone cyclophilin 40 with Hsc70. Cell Stress Chaperones 2004,9:167–181.View ArticlePubMed
            22. Brinker A, Scheufler C, Mulbe F, Fleckenstein B, Herrmann C, Jung G, Moarefi I, Hartl FU:Ligand discrimination by TPR domains. Relevance and selectivity of EEVD-recognition in Hsp70·Hop·Hsp90 complexes. J Biol Chem 2002,277:19265–19275.View ArticlePubMed
            23. Sim C, Hong YS, Tsetsarkin KA, Vanlandingham DL, Higgs S, Collins FH:Anopheles gambiae heat shock protein cognate 70B impedes o'nyong-nyong virus replication. BMC Genomics 2007,8:231.View ArticlePubMed
            24. Sim C, Hong YS, Vanlandingham DL, Harker BW, Christophides GK, Kafatos FC, Higgs S, Collins FH:Modulation of Anopheles gambiae gene expression in response to o'nyong-nyong virus infection. Insect Molecular Biology 2005,14:475–481.View ArticlePubMed
            25. Pirkkala L, Nykanen P, Sistonen LEA:Roles of the heat shock transcription factors in regulation of the heat shock response and beyond. FASEB J 2001,15:1118–1131.View ArticlePubMed
            26. Morimoto RI:Regulation of the heat shock transcriptional response: cross talk between a family of heat shock factors, molecular chaperones, and negative regulators. Genes Dev 1998,12:3788–3796.View ArticlePubMed
            27. Amin J, Ananthan J, Voellmy R:Key features of heat shock regulatory elements. Mol Cell Biol 1988,8:3761–3769.PubMed
            28. Liu B, Wu N, Shen Y:Cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB) participates in the heat-inducible expression of human hsp90β gene. Chinese Science Bulletin 2001,46:1645–1649.View Article
            29. Perkins ND:Integrating cell-signalling pathways with NF-[kappa]B and IKK function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007,8:49–62.View ArticlePubMed
            30. Lim JW, Kim KH, Kim H:NF-[kappa]B p65 regulates nuclear translocation of Ku70 via degradation of heat shock cognate protein 70 in pancreatic acinar AR42J cells. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 2008,40:2065–2077.View Article
            31. Ueda H, Sonoda S, Brown JL, Scott MP, Wu C:A sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that activates fushi tarazu segmentation gene expression. Genes Dev 1990,4:624–635.View ArticlePubMed
            32. von Hofsten J, Olsson PE:Zebrafish sex determination and differentiation: involvement of FTZ-F1 genes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2005,3:63.View ArticlePubMed
            33. Chuang KH, Ho SH, Song YL:Cloning and expression analysis of heat shock cognate 70 gene promoter in tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Gene 2007,405:10–18.View ArticlePubMed
            34. Amici C, Santoro MG:Suppression of virus replication by prostaglandin A is associated with heat shock protein synthesis. Journal of General Virology 1991,72:1877–1885.View ArticlePubMed
            35. Mastromarino P, Conti C, Petruzziello R, De Marco A, Pica F, Santoro MG:Inhibition of Sindbis virus replication by cyclopentenone prostaglandins: A cell-mediated event associated with heat-shock protein synthesis. Antiviral Research 1993,20:209–222.View ArticlePubMed
            36. Matys V, Kel-Margoulis OV, Fricke E, Liebich I, Land S, Barre-Dirrie A, Reuter I, Chekmenev D, Krull M, Hornischer K,et al.:TRANSFAC(R) and its module TRANSCompel(R): transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucl Acids Res 2006,34:D108–110.View ArticlePubMed
            37. Heinemeyer T, Wingender E, Reuter I, Hermjakob H, Kel AE, Kel OV, Ignatieva EV, Ananko EA, Podkolodnaya OA, Kolpakov FA,et al.:Databases on transcriptional regulation: TRANSFAC, TRRD and COMPEL. Nucl Acids Res 1998,26:362–367.View ArticlePubMed
            38. Grabe N:AliBaba2: context specific identification of transcription factor binding sites. In Silico Biol 2002,2:S1–15.PubMed
            39. Myles KM, Pierro DJ, Olson KE:Deletions in the putative cell receptor-binding domain of Sindbis virus strain MRE16 E2 glycoprotein reduce midgut infectivity in Aedes aegypti. J Virol 2003,77:8872–8881.View ArticlePubMed

            This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.