Involvement of PKR and RNase L in translational control and induction of apoptosis after Hepatitis C polyprotein expression from a Vaccinia virus recombinant
© Gómez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 28 July 2005
Accepted: 12 September 2005
Published: 12 September 2005
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is of growing concern in public health with around 350 million chronically infected individuals worldwide. Although the IFN-α/rivabirin is the only approved therapy with 10–30% clinical efficacy, the protective molecular mechanism involved during the treatment is still unknown. To analyze the effect of HCV polyprotein expression on the antiviral response of the host, we developed a novel vaccinia virus (VV)-based delivery system (VT7-HCV7.9) where structural and nonstructural (except part of NS5B) proteins of HCV ORF from genotype 1b are efficiently expressed and produced, and timely regulated in mammalian cell lines.
Regulated transcript production and viral polypeptide processing was demonstrated in various cell lines infected with the recombinant VT7-HCV7.9, indicating that the cellular and viral proteolytic machineries are functional within these cells. The inducible expression of the HCV polyprotein by VV inhibits the synthesis of both host and viral proteins over the time and also induces apoptosis in HeLa and HepG2-infected cells. These effects occur accompanying with the phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF-2α. In cells co-infected with VT7-HCV7.9 and a recombinant VV expressing the dominant negative eIF-2α-S51A mutant in the presence of the inductor isopropyl-thiogalactoside (IPTG), protein synthesis is rescued. The IFN-inducible protein kinase PKR is responsible for the translational block, as demonstrated with PKR-/- and PKR+/+ cell lines. However, apoptosis induced by VT7-HCV7.9 is mediated by the RNase L pathway, in a PKR-independent manner.
These findings demonstrate the antiviral relevance of the proteins induced by interferon, PKR and RNase L during expression from a VV recombinant of the HCV polyprotein in human cell lines. HCV polyprotein expression caused a severe cytopathological effect in human cells as a result of inhibition of protein synthesis and apoptosis induction, triggered by the activation of the IFN-induced enzymes PKR and RNase L systems. Thus, the virus-cell system described here highlights the relevance of the IFN system as a protective mechanism against HCV infection.
The Hepatitis C virus (HCV) was identified as the causative agent for the majority of posttransfusion and sporadic non-A, and non-B hepatitis cases [1, 2]. The World health organization (WHO) estimates that more than 3% of the world's population is infected with the virus. HCV belongs to the genus of Hepacivirus and is a member of the Flaviviridae family, along with Pestivirus and Flavivirus . The HCV genome is a positively charged single stranded RNA molecule that includes two untranslated regions at the 5' and 3' ends, and a large open reading frame (ORF) encoding a 3010–3030 amino acid polyprotein that is co- and posttranslationally cleaved by cellular and viral proteases to produce mature structural (Core, E1, E2 and p7) and nonstructural (NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A and NS5B) proteins [4, 5]. One striking characteristic of HCV is its strong propensity to persist in the infected host, which often leads to severe liver damage, ranging from chronic hepatitis to liver cirrhosis and even hepatocellular carcinoma .
The IFN-α monotherapy became the mainstay for treatment of HCV infection until recently, when IFN-α/ribavirin, and pegylated IFN-α/ribavirin combination therapies became available . The IFN-based regimens are still the only approved therapies for HCV . Although the beneficial effect has been documented by numerous studies [9–11], only 10–40% of patients respond to treatment. The molecular mechanisms involved in protection during IFN therapy are not fully understood. Due to the clinical relevance of HCV infection and the differential responses of patients to IFN therapy, it is essential to investigate the molecular mechanisms involved in the sensitivity and resistance patterns of HCV infection in an appropriate model system.
In order to establish a robust in vitro infection model system for HCV, a variety of different approaches, mainly those based on infection with human patient sera of primary human liver cells or diverse cell lines of hepatic or lymphoid origin, have been explored [12, 13]. Nonetheless, so far the success of these attempts has been limited due to the extremely low HCV replication levels that prevent detailed studies. The development of subgenomic HCV replicons that generates high-level replication of HCV RNAs in cell culture, has overcome this hurdle [14, 15]. In spite of an efficient expression of the structural proteins and high levels of replication, it has not been possible to generate viral particles in cell cultures. Moreover, important information on the potential effect of the structural proteins on the host cell could not be obtained. An alternative approach has been viral delivery systems. In such systems, cells are transfected with a plasmid containing a cDNA clone under the control of a T7 promoter, and then infected with a virus that expresses T7 RNA polymerase. Although this approach has been met with some degree of success [16–18], it is limited by the efficiency with which the plasmid can be transfected into hosts cells. In the case of hepatocyte derived cell lines, the transfection efficiency is often rather low. This inefficiency could be overcome in certain cases, by using recombinant fowlpox viruses to deliver HCV minigenomes under the control of a T7 promoter into cells co-infected with an adenovirus expressing T7 RNA polymerase . Although this system improved the efficiency of delivery, it was not possible to control HCV gene expression. Recently, a virus production system has been developed which is based on the transfection of the human hepatoma cell line Huh-7 with a genomic HCV RNA replicon derived from an individual with fulminant hepatitis . The limited virus yields and virus spread of this cell culture system has been improved using a particular permissive cell line derived from Huh-7 designated Huh-7.5.1 . This provides a significant advance in order to understand the biology of HCV infection in culture systems.
To characterize the antiviral response of the host during expression of the HCV polyprotein, we developed a novel poxvirus-based delivery system (VT7-HCV7.9), that is inducible and able to express structural and nonstructural (except part of NS5B) proteins of HCV ORF from genotype 1b in hepatic and non-hepatic mammalian cell lines. In this virus-cell system, we observed that HCV polyprotein expression controls cellular translation through eIF-2α-S51 phosphorylation, with involvement of the IFN-inducible double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. Moreover, in VT7-HCV7.9 infected cells, we found that HCV polyprotein expression brings about an apoptotic response through the activation of the RNase L pathway.
Generation of a vaccinia virus recombinant expressing the near full-length HCV genome under regulation (VT7-HCV7.9)
The results of Figures 1, 2 reveal that the HCV ORF included in the recombinant VT7-HCV7.9 is efficiently transcribed during infection in the presence of IPTG, generating a viral polyprotein that is processed into mature structural and nonstructural HCV proteins, triggering disruption of the golgi apparatus.
Expression of HCV polyprotein from VV inhibits the production of vaccinia virus
Expression of HCV polyprotein from VV inhibits cellular and viral protein synthesis through eIF-2α phosphorylation
Phosphorylation of the α subunit of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF-2) on serine 51 leads to the downregulation of translation initiation through a well-characterized mechanism involving inhibition of eIF-2B activity . As such, we determined whether HCV polyprotein expression altered this initiation step. Thus, the levels of phospho-eIF-2α-S51 in VT7-HCV7.9 infected cells, in the presence or absence of IPTG, were determined by immunoblot analysis. The results obtained showed that expression of HCV is related to levels of eIF-2α-S51 phosphorylation over time, relative to non-induced VT7-HCV7.9 infected cells (Figure 4C). Similar levels of phosphorylation have been shown to cause growth inhibitory effects in yeast, as well as in mammalian cells . The levels of phospho-eIF-2α-S51 in VT7-VP3 infected cells in the presence of IPTG at the assayed times, were similar to the levels obtained in uninduced VT7-HCV7.9 infected cultures (Figure 4C), and represent the values usually found in VV-infected cells. A shorter time-course analysis of the extent of inhibition of protein synthesis and of eIF-2α-S51 phosphorylation indicates that such effects are clearly observed by 6 h.p.i in VT7-HCV7.9 infected cultures in the presence of IPTG (not shown).
The above findings demonstrate that the translational block induced after HCV polyprotein expression from VV involves eIF-2α phosphorylation.
HCV polyprotein expression from VV in the hepatic cell line HepG2 inhibits cellular and viral protein synthesis
Phosphorylation of eIF-2α and translational inhibition induced by HCV polyprotein expression from VV is mediated by PKR
Inhibition of translation through phosphorylation of eIF-2α, is a major stress-responsive checkpoint employed by at least four cellular kinases: PKR, PERK, GCN2, and HRI [24–27]. In particular of these four kinases, PKR has been shown to be the key regulator of cell defence against viral infections, and mediates the antiviral and antiproliferative effects of interferon (IFN) . Activated PKR phosphorylates the α subunit of eIF-2 on serine 51, thus halting initiation of translation of both cellular and viral proteins that eventually leads to inhibition of viral replication .
These findings reveal that PKR is the kinase responsible for eIF-2α phosphorylation as well as for the translational block following HCV polyprotein expression from VV in infected cells.
HCV polyprotein expression from VV induces apoptosis in HeLa and HepG2 cells, an effect that is caspase-dependent
Apoptosis induced by HCV polyprotein expression from VV is mediated by RNase L in a PKR-independent manner
In addition to PKR, the antiviral effects of IFN are executed through the functions of various proteins, including 2'5 oligoadenylate synthetase (2'-5AS), RNase L and Mx [31–34]. The 2'-5AS/RNase L and PKR pathways respond to dsRNA produced during the course of viral infections, to trigger an antiviral response in cells through RNA degradation and inhibition of protein synthesis. In contrast, Mx proteins obstruct the replicative cycles of particular negative strand RNA viruses by interfering with the intracellular movement and functions of viral proteins .
One interesting parallel between the PKR and 2-5A system is that both pathways contribute to apoptosis [35, 36]. In order to compare the role of these pathways in the apoptotic response induced by HCV, we used PKR and RNase L knockout cells. PKR+/+ and PKR-/- as well as RL+/+ and RL-/- cells were infected with VT7 or VT7-HCV7.9 recombinants in the presence of IPTG, and the apoptotic levels were determined by ELISA at 24 h.p.i. As seen in Figure 9, expression of HCV by VT7-HCV7.9 induces apoptosis in PKR+/+ (Figure 9B) and RL+/+ cells (Figure 9C). The levels of apoptosis were similar to those obtained after the expression of PKR from VV-PKR, used as positive control. The levels of apoptosis induced by VT7-HCV7.9 after addition of IPTG, were significantly decreased in RL-/- infected cells (Figure 9C), while in PKR-/- cells, such levels remained similar to those in PKR+/+ cells (Figure 9B). These findings indicate that expression of HCV by VT7-HCV7.9 triggers apoptosis through RNase L, in a PKR-independent pathway.
Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which IFN-based therapies decreases HCV viral load, reduces the number of viral quasispecies, improves liver function, and reduces liver fibrosis in 15–30% of patients, is a priority in HCV research. Consequently, both viral and host factors have been implicated during the effective clinical response or resistance phenomenon of patients to IFN treatment . Different in vitro model systems have been developed to study the role of HCV polyprotein on host cell responses [12–21]. The implication of IFN-induced genes and their action in the antiviral response of the host to HCV expression is not yet fully understood.
To further characterize the antiviral response of the host during expression of HCV polyprotein, we developed a novel virus-cell system based on a poxvirus vector, that inducibly expresses the structural and nonstructural (except part of NS5B) proteins of HCV ORF from genotype 1b. The generated recombinant VT7-HCV7.9 virus contains the HCV DNA coding region inserted within the VV HA locus, under the transcriptional control of a T7 promoter, and expresses the T7 RNA polymerase upon induction with IPTG (see Figure 1A). Current systems relying on viral delivery of T7 RNA polymerase are restricted by the efficiency with which HCV cDNAs can be transfected into cells, which in the case of hepatocyte and hepatocyte-derived cell lines, is often low [16–18]. The poxvirus-based system described here permits both the regulated production of the HCV transcripts into cells and the efficient delivery of the HCV genome into a wide variety of primary and continuous cell lines.
In this study, we demonstrate that upon induction with IPTG, HCV proteins are efficiently produced in VT7-HCV7.9 infected cells of various origins. This observation indicates that the DNA fragment of HCV ORF included in the VV genome, is efficiently transcribed and translated into a viral polyprotein precursor that is correctly processed into mature structural and nonstructural HCV proteins, as confirmed with specific antibodies to individual HCV proteins. Significantly, inducible expression of HCV polyprotein in VT7-HCV7.9 infected cells caused a considerable reduction in the production of infectious VV, as well as striking inhibition in total protein synthesis, both viral and cellular. The translational block was observed by 6 h.p.i when all of the HCV proteins were produced. The inhibition of protein synthesis by HCV was highly specific and could not be solely attributed to the induction of HCV RNA transcript since cells infected with VT7-VP3 that expressed the IBDV ORF VP3 mRNA, did not trigger translational inhibition. Furthermore, the HCV ORF included in the VT7-HCV7.9 recombinant virus lacks the 5' UTR, bearing the HCV IRES, and the 3' UTR, both implicated in HCV replication and liver injury . The inhibition of protein synthesis that we have observed in induced VT7-HCV7.9 infected HeLa and HepG2 cells was associated with a significant increase in the phospho-eIF-2α-S51 levels, suggesting that HCV expression might control the cellular translation through eIF-2α-S51 phosphorylation. This translational control was confirmed with a dominant negative non-phosphorylated (NP) mutant Ser51-Ala (eIF-2α-S51A). Expression of the eIF-2α-S51A mutant in cells co-infected with VV-eIF-2α-NP and VT7-HCV7.9 in the presence of IPTG, rescued the translational block induced by HCV (Figure 6). Moreover, we showed that phosphorylation of eIF-2α-S51 was carried out by the cellular kinase PKR, as revealed in knockout PKR-/- cells (Figure 9). The role of PKR and eIF-2α-S51 phosphorylation in HCV infection has been widely studied due to the relevance of this kinase in the cellular antiviral response. As has been previously reported [23, 39–41], PKR mediated phosphorylation of eIF-2α-S51 results in inhibition of translation and a blockade of viral protein synthesis, which in turn, inhibits virus replication. For this reason, viruses employ a variety of strategies to inhibit PKR activation and function. Several groups have described the role of certain HCV proteins in cellular translation. HCV NS4A and NS4B proteins mediate translational inhibition and, perhaps, increased degradation of certain cellular proteins [42, 43]. In contrast, NS5A and E2 proteins are reported to enhance translation by inhibiting PKR functions [44, 45]. Therefore, it seems that during the course of HCV infection, there is a balance between inhibition and enhancement of host cell translation depending on the degree of activation/inhibition of the PKR pathway. Most of these studies have relied on systems that express HCV proteins individually. Nontheless, since all HCV proteins are potentially produced in vivo during virus infection of hepatocytes, it is important to use a full-length genome rather than individual HCV proteins to study the molecular mechanisms involved in virus-host cell interactions and in HCV pathogenesis. In our viral delivery system, the overall expression of structural and nonstructural HCV proteins by recombinant VT7-HCV7.9 virus did not reverse the action of PKR, since host cell translation was inhibited through phosphorylation of eIF-2α-S51 by the kinase. An incapability to prevent PKR activation by HCV polyprotein expression was reported by François and co-workers when they analysed the response to IFN of the human cell line UHCV-11 engineered to inducibly express the entire HCV genotype 1a polyprotein . Although we could not exclude the possibility that a certain level of inhibition of PKR by NS5A or E2 occurs at a much localized level, the resistance to IFN exhibited by some HCV genotypes as a result of viral protein expression, cannot be explained solely by inhibition of the negative control of PKR translation. It is possible that during the course of HCV infection, NS5A plays a role in inhibiting PKR locally at the site of HCV protein synthesis. NS5A may, however, participate in the blockade of IFN's antiviral action through another mechanism, such as the reported interaction with the Ras-associated Grb-2 protein . These results confirm the necessity to re-evaluate all types of interactions between any particular HCV protein and its cellular partner(s) in the context of expression of all of the HCV proteins. Consequently, as shown here by confocal microscopy (Figure 2), the HCV proteins are localized within aggregates in the cell cytoplasm which might influence their interaction with PKR, a protein found surrounding the nucleus, in microsomes and in the nucleolus [24, 48].
Several in vitro studies reveal that synthesis of HCV structural proteins or the full-length genome have a direct cytotoxic effect or activate an apoptotic response in osteosarcoma, hepatoma and B cell lines [29, 30, 49–51]. Furthermore, the alteration of ER membranes  and the activation of signalling pathways characteristic of an ER-stress condition, have been found to be associated with the expression of HCV proteins [53–55]. Although these data suggest that HCV may alter intracellular events with possible consequences on liver pathogenesis, the complex mechanism and the role of the viral proteins implicated are currently unknown. As we have shown in this work, expression of most of the HCV genome from VV induces a cell death phenomenon by apoptosis that should contribute to liver pathogenesis. Apoptosis induced by HCV polyprotein expression was prevented by Bcl-2 and by a general caspase inhibitor (Z-VAD-FMK) indicating a caspase-dependent death process. Even though PKR is the main kinase responsible for eIF-2α phosphorylation and for translation inhibition induced by the expression of HCV in VT7-HCV7.9 infected cells, it does not appear to be involved in apoptosis within this system, as revealed from studies performed in PKR+/+ and PKR-/- knockout cells. The extent of apoptosis induction by HCV expression was the same in PKR+/+ and in PKR-/- cells (Figure 9B), suggesting that other pathways may be involved. PKR induces apoptosis in response to activation by different stimuli, such as the accumulation of dsRNA as a by-product during virus replication , or when PKR is overexpressed in cells . Several authors, however, have reported that PKR can also be activated through the binding of heparin and other polyanions [57, 58], or by the cellular activator protein PACT/RAX [59, 60]. The events that mediate induction of apoptosis by PKR have been widely studied and both PKR-induced translational block by phosphorylation of eIF-2α, and NF-kB activation, have been shown to be activated during apoptosis . Since PKR has a number of potential substrates and signalling targets, it is likely that the phosphorylation of eIF-2α by PKR in response to HCV expression is not sufficient to mediate the pro-apoptotic effects of this kinase.
In this study, we also demonstrate the activation of endogenous RNase L and its role in the apoptosis induced by HCV expression (Figure 9A,C). Although it is widely accepted that the IFN-induced proteins PKR and RNase L require the expression of dsRNA for their activation (either directly in the case of PKR or indirectly via 2'-5'-OAS in the case of RNase L), there are several reports that documented the effect of HCV proteins on PKR and 2'-5'-OAS activation. The NS5A and E2 proteins can suppress the PKR pathway [44, 45], whereas the Core protein can transcriptionally activate the 2'-5'-OAS gene through an IRES present within IFN-inducible gene promoter . Like PKR, the 2-5AS/RNase L system can control virus growth by inducing apoptosis in response to viral infection [35, 36]. Overexpression of RNase L or activation of the endogenous enzyme induces apoptosis by a mitochondrial-caspase dependent pathway that is suppressed by Bcl-2 [63–65]. Similarly, apoptosis induced by HCV polyprotein expression was inhibited by Bcl-2 (Figure 8). Although the apoptotic levels induced by HCV proteins remain invariable in PKR+/+, PKR-/-, and RL+/+ cells, the levels are significantly decreased in RL-/- cells, indicating that inducible expression of HCV proteins by VT7-HCV7.9 triggers apoptosis through RNase L in a PKR-independent pathway. Under physiologic conditions, RNase L activity is tightly regulated by 2'-phosphodiesterase and RNase L inhibitor [66, 67] such that only a limited activation of RNase L occurs. The mechanism of the regulation of RNase L inhibitor is unknown, but the reduction of its expression seems to be advantageous for host defence together with the enhanced 2-5 OAS activity. Yu and co-workers  described that hepatic overexpression of PKR mRNA, and reduced expression of an RNase L inhibitor mRNA, are parameters that seem to contribute to an anti-HCV response. In agreement with our results, it has been reported that the absence of RNase L has an anti-apoptotic effect in multiple cell types treated with a variety of different agents . The effects that have been observed in this study upon HCV polyprotein expression from VV are likely to have biological significance during HCV infection as there is ample evidence that VV recombinants can be used to study the function of multiple genes and that the assigned function mimics the effects described in non-viral systems .
We have developed an efficient viral delivery system expressing the polyprotein of HCV in numerous mammalian cell lines in a faithfully, efficient and time regulated manner, allowing us to analyze the host response to HCV proteins. We demonstrate that two components of the interferon (IFN) system, protein kinase PKR and RNase L, are activated during HCV polyprotein expression and are responsible for translational control and induction of apoptosis. These two pathways are likely to limit the replication capacity of HCV. Thus, the virus-cell system described here highlights the relevance of the IFN system as a protective mechanism against HCV infection.
Cells and viruses
Cells were maintained in a humidified air 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. African green monkey kidney cells (BSC40) and human cells (HeLa) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum (NCS). Human HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells (ATCC HB-8065) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with penicillin (0.6 μg/mL); streptomycin (60 μg/mL); glutamine (2 mM); N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethanosulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer, pH 7.4 (20 mM) and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Mouse 3T3-like fibroblasts derived either from homozygous PKR knockout mice (PKR-/-) or PKR wild type mice (PKR+/+)  were obtained from C. Weissmann (University of Zurich, Switzerland) and grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS. Wild type mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from C57BL6 mice (RL+/+) and fibroblast lacking the RNase L gene (RL-/- MEFs) derived from mice with the RNase L gene disrupted , were propagated in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, and were a gift from R. Silverman (Cleveland Clinic, USA)
The recombinant vaccinia virus (VV) that is inducible and expresses the T7 RNA polymerase (VT7lacOI) was previously described . Virus VT7-VP3 expressing the IBDV mature structural capsid protein VP3  was kindly provided by J.F. Rodríguez (CNB, Spain). VVeIF-2α NP was generated through homologous recombination in TK- 143B cells, as previously reported . The recombinant VV-PKR TK- expressing IPTG-inducible PKR was generated by homologous recombination of their respective pPR35-derived plasmid with the WR strain of VV in BSC40 cells, as previously described . VV recombinant expressing Bcl-2 protein (VV-Bcl2) was generated as previously reported . The recombinant vaccinia viruses VV-RL and VV-2-5AS were obtained after introduction of plasmid pTM-RL and pSC-2-5AS respectively into the TK region of wild-type vaccinia virus (WR) DNA by homologous recombination as described . All VV recombinants were grown in BSC40 cells and purified by banding on sucrose gradients .
Generation of the recombinant vaccinia VT7-HCV7.9 virus
A 7.9 Kb DNA fragment containing the structural (C, E1, E2 and p7) and nonstructural (NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A and the amino terminal region of NS5B) proteins of HCV ORF from genotype 1b was excised with EcoRI from the original full-length HCV genome containing plasmid pcDNA-hcv1b (kindly provided by Ilkka Julkunen from National Public Health Institute, Finland). This DNA fragment was cloned into the VV insertion/expression vector pVOTE.1  previously digested with EcoRI and dephosphorylated by incubation with alkaline phosphatase, Calf Intestinal (CIP) as described in Figure 1A. The resulting plasmid, pVOTE.1-HCV7.9 directs the insertion of HCV genes into the HA locus of the VT7lacOI genome under the transcriptional control of the T7 promoter. BSC40 cells were infected with the recombinant vaccinia virus VT7lacOI at a multiplicity of 0.05 PFU/cell, and then transfected with 10 μg of plasmid DNA pVOTE.1-HCV7.9 using lipofectamine reagent according to manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). The selection and amplification of the recombinant VT7-HCV7.9 virus was carried out as previously described . The purity of the recombinant virus was confirmed by PCR analysis. The plasmid pVOTE.1 as well as the VV recombinant VT7lacOI, were kindly provided by Bernard Moss (NIH, USA).
Metabolic labelling of proteins
Different cell lines grown in 12 well plates were infected at an infection multiplicity of 5 PFU/cell with the viruses indicated, and maintained either in the presence or absence of the inductor isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) (1.5 mM final concentration). For continuous metabolic labelling of proteins, the cells were rinsed three times with Met-Cys-free DMEM at 4 h post-infection (p.i) and incubated with 100 μCi of [35S] Met-Cys Promix (Amersham) per mL in a mixture of Met-Cys-free DMEM and complete DMEM (9:1) for 16–20 h. After three washes with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) cells were resuspended in Laemmli buffer and analysed by sodium-dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by autoradiography. For discontinuous metabolic labelling of proteins, the cells were rinsed three times and incubated with Met-Cys-free DMEM 30 minutes prior to labelling. After incubation, the medium was removed and 50 μCi of [35S] Met-Cys Promix per mL in Met-Cys-free DMEM was added for an additional 30 minutes. The cells were washed with PBS and treated as described above.
The HCV-antibody positive human sera used in this study was kindly provided by Dr Rafael Fernández from the Ramón and Cajal Hospital (Spain). The rabbit polyclonal anti-serum against live vaccinia virus was previously described . The rabbit polyclonal anti eIF2α [PS51] phosphospecific antibody was supplied by BIOSOURCE. The monoclonal antibody against β-actin was supplied by SIGMA. Rabbit polyclonal anti-eIF2α antibody was supplied by Santa Cruz, CA.
For immunoblot analyses, total cell extracts were boiled in Laemmli sample buffer, and proteins were fractionated by 12% SDS-PAGE. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a semi-dry blotting apparatus (Gelman Sciences). Filters were mixed with antisera in PBS containing non-fat dry milk at 5% (BLOTTO), incubated overnight at 4°C, washed three times with PBS, and further incubated with secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase in BLOTTO. After the PBS wash, the immunocomplexes were detected by enhanced chemiluminescense Western blotting reagents (ECL) (Amersham).
Specific antibody for Golgi apparatus (anti-Gigantine) was kindly provided by Manfred Renz from the Institute of Immunology and Genetics Karlsruhe (Germany).
HeLa cells cultured on coverslips were infected at 5 PFU/cell with VT7-HCV7.9 in the presence or absence of IPTG (1.5 mM final concentration). At 16 h.p.i, cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 2% Triton X-100 in PBS (room temperature, 5 min). Cells were incubated with a human antibody recognizing HCV proteins together with anti-Gigantine antibody. Coverslips were then extensively washed with PBS, and incubated in darkness for 1 h at 37°C, with secondary antibody conjugated with green fluorochrome Cy2 (Jackson Immunoresearch) and with the DNA staining reagent ToPro (Molecular Probes). Images were obtained by using Bio-Rad Radiance 2100 confocal laser microscope, were collected by using Lasersharp 2000 software and were processed in LaserPix.
Measurement of the extent of apoptosis
The cell death detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Roche) was used according to manufacturer's instructions. This assay is based on the quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay principle, and uses mouse monoclonal antibodies directed against DNA and histones to estimate the amount of cytoplasmic histone-associated DNA fragments.
Total RNA isolation
Total RNA from uninfected or infected cells was isolated using Ultraspect-II resin purification system (Biotecx). RNA was denatured and analyzed in 1% formaldehyde agarose gels and stained using ethidium bromide as previously described .
This investigation was supported by research grants BIO2000-0340-P4, BMC2002-03246 and Fundación Marcelino Botin from Spain and QLK22002-00954 from the European Union to ME. CEG was supported by a fellowship from Carolina Foundation and MAG from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Spain. We thank the expert technical assistance of Victoria Jiménez. We also thank JF Rodríguez, R. Bablanian and P. Martinez for critically reviewing the manuscript.
- Choo QL, Kuo G, Weiner AJ, Overby LR, Bradley DW, Houghton M: Isolation of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-borne non-A, non-B viral hepatitis genome. Science 1989, 244: 359-362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuo G, Choo QL, Alter HJ, Gitnick GL, Redeker AG, Purcell RH, Miyamura T, Dienstag JL, Alter MJ, Stevens CE, et al.: An assay for circulating antibodies to a major etiologic virus of human non-A, non-B hepatitis. Science 1989, 244: 362-364.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robertson B, Myers G, Howard C, Brettin T, Bukh J, Gaschen B, Gojobori T, Maertens G, Mizokami M, Nainan O, Netesov S, Nishioka K, Shin i T, Simmonds P, Smith D, Stuyver L, Weiner A: Classification, nomenclature, and database development for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and related viruses: proposals for standardization. International Committee on Virus Taxonomy. Arch Virol 1998, 143: 2493-2503. 10.1007/s007050050479View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bartenschlager R: The NS3/4A proteinase of the hepatitis C virus: unravelling structure and function of an unusual enzyme and a prime target for antiviral therapy. J Viral Hepat 1999, 6: 165-181. 10.1046/j.1365-2893.1999.00152.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reed KE, Rice CM: Overview of hepatitis C virus genome structure, polyprotein processing, and protein properties. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2000, 242: 55-84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoofnagle JH: Hepatitis C: the clinical spectrum of disease. Hepatology 1997, 26: 15S-20S. 10.1002/hep.510260703View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fabrizi F, Poordad FF, Martin P: Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease. Hepatology 2002, 36: 3-10. 10.1053/jhep.2002.34613View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoofnagle JH: Management of hepatitis C: current and future perspectives. J Hepatol 1999, 31 Suppl 1: 264-268. 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80414-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas HC, Torok ME, Forton DM, Taylor-Robinson SD: Possible mechanisms of action and reasons for failure of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 1999, 31 Suppl 1: 152-159. 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80393-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poynard T, Moussalli J, Ratziu V, Regimbeau C, Opolon P: Effect of interferon therapy on the natural history of hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Liver Dis 1999, 3: 869-881. 10.1016/S1089-3261(05)70244-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi VK, Shiffman M, Reindollar R, Goodman ZD, Koury K, Ling M, Albrecht JK: Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001, 358: 958-965. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06102-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bartenschlager R, Lohmann V: Replication of hepatitis C virus. J Gen Virol 2000, 81: 1631-1648.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kato N, Shimotohno K: Systems to culture hepatitis C virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2000, 242: 261-278.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lohmann V, Korner F, Koch J, Herian U, Theilmann L, Bartenschlager R: Replication of subgenomic hepatitis C virus RNAs in a hepatoma cell line. Science 1999, 285: 110-113. 10.1126/science.285.5424.110View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikeda M, Yi M, Li K, Lemon SM: Selectable subgenomic and genome-length dicistronic RNAs derived from an infectious molecular clone of the HCV-N strain of hepatitis C virus replicate efficiently in cultured Huh7 cells. J Virol 2002, 76: 2997-3006. 10.1128/JVI.76.6.2997-3006.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chung RT, He W, Saquib A, Contreras AM, Xavier RJ, Chawla A, Wang TC, Schmidt EV: Hepatitis C virus replication is directly inhibited by IFN-alpha in a full-length binary expression system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98: 9847-9852. 10.1073/pnas.171319698PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mizuno M, Yamada G, Tanaka T, Shimotohno K, Takatani M, Tsuji T: Virion-like structures in HeLa G cells transfected with the full-length sequence of the hepatitis C virus genome. Gastroenterology 1995, 109: 1933-1940. 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90761-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Myung J, Khalap N, Kalkeri G, Garry R, Dash S: Inducible model to study negative strand RNA synthesis and assembly of hepatitis C virus from a full-length cDNA clone. J Virol Methods 2001, 94: 55-67. 10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00278-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yap CC, Ishii K, Aizaki H, Tani H, Aoki Y, Ueda Y, Matsuura Y, Miyamura T: Expression of target genes by coinfection with replication-deficient viral vectors. J Gen Virol 1998, 79 ( Pt 8): 1879-1888.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wakita T, Pietschmann T, Kato T, Date T, Miyamoto M, Zhao Z, Murthy K, Habermann A, Krausslich HG, Mizokami M, Bartenschlager R, Liang TJ: Production of infectious hepatitis C virus in tissue culture from a cloned viral genome. Nat Med 2005, 11: 791-796. 10.1038/nm1268PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhong J, Gastaminza P, Cheng G, Kapadia S, Kato T, Burton DR, Wieland SF, Uprichard SL, Wakita T, Chisari FV: Robust hepatitis C virus infection in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102: 9294-9299. 10.1073/pnas.0503596102PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rowlands AG, Panniers R, Henshaw EC: The catalytic mechanism of guanine nucleotide exchange factor action and competitive inhibition by phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2. J Biol Chem 1988, 263: 5526-5533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clemens MJ: Protein kinases that phosphorylate eIF2a and eIF2b and their role in eukaryotic cell translational control. In Translational control. Edited by: Hershey JWMMBSN. New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1996:139-172.Google Scholar
- Kaufman R: The double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase PKR. In Translational control of gene expression. Edited by: Sonenberg NHJWMMB. New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2000:503-527.Google Scholar
- Chen JJ: Heme-regulated eIF2a kinase. In Translational control of gene expression. Edited by: Sonenberg NHJWMMB. New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2000:529-546.Google Scholar
- Hinnebusch AG: Mechanism and regulation of initiator methionyl-tRNA binding to ribosomes. In Translational control of gene expression. Edited by: Sonenberg NHJWMMB. New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2000:185-244.Google Scholar
- Ron DHHP: PERK and translational control by stress in the endoplasmic reticulum. In Translational control of gene expression. Edited by: Sonenberg NHJWMMB. New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2000:547-560.Google Scholar
- Stark GR, Kerr IM, Williams BR, Silverman RH, Schreiber RD: How cells respond to interferons. Annu Rev Biochem 1998, 67: 227-264. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.227View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalkeri G, Khalap N, Akhter S, Garry RF, Fermin CD, Dash S: Hepatitis C viral proteins affect cell viability and membrane permeability. Exp Mol Pathol 2001, 71: 194-208. 10.1006/exmp.2001.2392View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalkeri G, Khalap N, Garry RF, Fermin CD, Dash S: Hepatitis C virus protein expression induces apoptosis in HepG2 cells. Virology 2001, 282: 26-37. 10.1006/viro.2000.0835View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Staeheli P, Pavlovic J: Inhibition of vesicular stomatitis virus mRNA synthesis by human MxA protein. J Virol 1991, 65: 4498-4501.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sen GC, Ransohoff RM: Interferon-induced antiviral actions and their regulation. Adv Virus Res 1993, 42: 57-102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hassel BA, Zhou A, Sotomayor C, Maran A, Silverman RH: A dominant negative mutant of 2-5A-dependent RNase suppresses antiproliferative and antiviral effects of interferon. Embo J 1993, 12: 3297-3304.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li XL, Blackford JA, Hassel BA: RNase L mediates the antiviral effect of interferon through a selective reduction in viral RNA during encephalomyocarditis virus infection. J Virol 1998, 72: 2752-2759.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou A, Paranjape J, Brown TL, Nie H, Naik S, Dong B, Chang A, Trapp B, Fairchild R, Colmenares C, Silverman RH: Interferon action and apoptosis are defective in mice devoid of 2',5'-oligoadenylate-dependent RNase L. Embo J 1997, 16: 6355-6363. 10.1093/emboj/16.21.6355PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Der SD, Yang YL, Weissmann C, Williams BR: A double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase-dependent pathway mediating stress-induced apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94: 3279-3283. 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3279PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu KQ, Vierling JM, Redeker AG: Viral, host and interferon-related factors modulating the effect of interferon therapy for hepatitis C virus infection. J Viral Hepat 2001, 8: 1-18. 10.1046/j.1365-2893.2001.00253.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang M, Marquardt AP, Wood BL, Williams O, Cotler SJ, Taylor SL, Carithers RLJ, Gretch DR: In situ distribution of hepatitis C virus replicative-intermediate RNA in hepatic tissue and its correlation with liver disease. J Virol 2000, 74: 944-955. 10.1128/JVI.74.2.944-955.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hershey JW: Translational control in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Biochem 1991, 60: 717-755. 10.1146/annurev.bi.60.070191.003441View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merrick WCHJW: The pathway and mechanism of eukaryotic protein syntesis. In Translational control. Edited by: Hershey JWMMBSN. New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1996:31-70.Google Scholar
- Korth MJ, Katze MG: Evading the interferon response: hepatitis C virus and the interferon-induced protein kinase, PKR. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2000, 242: 197-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Florese RH, Nagano-Fujii M, Iwanaga Y, Hidajat R, Hotta H: Inhibition of protein synthesis by the nonstructural proteins NS4A and NS4B of hepatitis C virus. Virus Res 2002, 90: 119-131. 10.1016/S0168-1702(02)00146-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kato J, Kato N, Yoshida H, Ono-Nita SK, Shiratori Y, Omata M: Hepatitis C virus NS4A and NS4B proteins suppress translation in vivo. J Med Virol 2002, 66: 187-199. 10.1002/jmv.2129View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gale MJJ, Korth MJ, Tang NM, Tan SL, Hopkins DA, Dever TE, Polyak SJ, Gretch DR, Katze MG: Evidence that hepatitis C virus resistance to interferon is mediated through repression of the PKR protein kinase by the nonstructural 5A protein. Virology 1997, 230: 217-227. 10.1006/viro.1997.8493View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor DR, Shi ST, Romano PR, Barber GN, Lai MM: Inhibition of the interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR by HCV E2 protein. Science 1999, 285: 107-110. 10.1126/science.285.5424.107View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Francois C, Duverlie G, Rebouillat D, Khorsi H, Castelain S, Blum HE, Gatignol A, Wychowski C, Moradpour D, Meurs EF: Expression of hepatitis C virus proteins interferes with the antiviral action of interferon independently of PKR-mediated control of protein synthesis. J Virol 2000, 74: 5587-5596. 10.1128/JVI.74.12.5587-5596.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tan SL, Nakao H, He Y, Vijaysri S, Neddermann P, Jacobs BL, Mayer BJ, Katze MG: NS5A, a nonstructural protein of hepatitis C virus, binds growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 adaptor protein in a Src homology 3 domain/ligand-dependent manner and perturbs mitogenic signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96: 5533-5538. 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5533PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Besse S, Rebouillat D, Marie I, Puvion-Dutilleul F, Hovanessian AG: Ultrastructural localization of interferon-inducible double-stranded RNA-activated enzymes in human cells. Exp Cell Res 1998, 239: 379-392. 10.1006/excr.1997.3908View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moradpour D, Kary P, Rice CM, Blum HE: Continuous human cell lines inducibly expressing hepatitis C virus structural and nonstructural proteins. Hepatology 1998, 28: 192-201. 10.1002/hep.510280125View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moradpour D, Wakita T, Wands JR, Blum HE: Tightly regulated expression of the entire hepatitis C virus structural region in continuous human cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998, 246: 920-924. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8727View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sung VM, Shimodaira S, Doughty AL, Picchio GR, Can H, Yen TS, Lindsay KL, Levine AM, Lai MM: Establishment of B-cell lymphoma cell lines persistently infected with hepatitis C virus in vivo and in vitro: the apoptotic effects of virus infection. J Virol 2003, 77: 2134-2146. 10.1128/JVI.77.3.2134-2146.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Egger D, Wolk B, Gosert R, Bianchi L, Blum HE, Moradpour D, Bienz K: Expression of hepatitis C virus proteins induces distinct membrane alterations including a candidate viral replication complex. J Virol 2002, 76: 5974-5984. 10.1128/JVI.76.12.5974-5984.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tardif KD, Mori K, Siddiqui A: Hepatitis C virus subgenomic replicons induce endoplasmic reticulum stress activating an intracellular signaling pathway. J Virol 2002, 76: 7453-7459. 10.1128/JVI.76.15.7453-7459.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pavio N, Romano PR, Graczyk TM, Feinstone SM, Taylor DR: Protein synthesis and endoplasmic reticulum stress can be modulated by the hepatitis C virus envelope protein E2 through the eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha kinase PERK. J Virol 2003, 77: 3578-3585. 10.1128/JVI.77.6.3578-3585.2003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liberman E, Fong YL, Selby MJ, Choo QL, Cousens L, Houghton M, Yen TS: Activation of the grp78 and grp94 promoters by hepatitis C virus E2 envelope protein. J Virol 1999, 73: 3718-3722.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee SB, Esteban M: The interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase induces apoptosis. Virology 1994, 199: 491-496. 10.1006/viro.1994.1151View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- George CX, Thomis DC, McCormack SJ, Svahn CM, Samuel CE: Characterization of the heparin-mediated activation of PKR, the interferon-inducible RNA-dependent protein kinase. Virology 1996, 221: 180-188. 10.1006/viro.1996.0364View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hovanessian AG, Galabru J: The double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase is also activated by heparin. Eur J Biochem 1987, 167: 467-473. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13360.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ito T, Yang M, May WS: RAX, a cellular activator for double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase during stress signaling. J Biol Chem 1999, 274: 15427-15432. 10.1074/jbc.274.22.15427View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel RC, Sen GC: PACT, a protein activator of the interferon-induced protein kinase, PKR. Embo J 1998, 17: 4379-4390. 10.1093/emboj/17.15.4379PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gil J, Alcami J, Esteban M: Induction of apoptosis by double-stranded-RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) involves the alpha subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 and NF-kappaB. Mol Cell Biol 1999, 19: 4653-4663.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naganuma A, Nozaki A, Tanaka T, Sugiyama K, Takagi H, Mori M, Shimotohno K, Kato N: Activation of the interferon-inducible 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase gene by hepatitis C virus core protein. J Virol 2000, 74: 8744-8750. 10.1128/JVI.74.18.8744-8750.2000PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castelli JC, Hassel BA, Wood KA, Li XL, Amemiya K, Dalakas MC, Torrence PF, Youle RJ: A study of the interferon antiviral mechanism: apoptosis activation by the 2-5A system. J Exp Med 1997, 186: 967-972. 10.1084/jem.186.6.967PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diaz-Guerra M, Rivas C, Esteban M: Activation of the IFN-inducible enzyme RNase L causes apoptosis of animal cells. Virology 1997, 236: 354-363. 10.1006/viro.1997.8719View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rusch L, Zhou A, Silverman RH: Caspase-dependent apoptosis by 2',5'-oligoadenylate activation of RNase L is enhanced by IFN-beta. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2000, 20: 1091-1100. 10.1089/107999000750053762View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benoit De Coignac A, Bisbal C, Lebleu B, Salehzada T: cDNA cloning and expression analysis of the murine ribonuclease L inhibitor. Gene 1998, 209: 149-156. 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00040-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinand C, Salehzada T, Silhol M, Lebleu B, Bisbal C: The RNase L inhibitor (RLI) is induced by double-stranded RNA. J Interferon Cytokine Res 1998, 18: 1031-1038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu SH, Nagayama K, Enomoto N, Izumi N, Marumo F, Sato C: Intrahepatic mRNA expression of interferon-inducible antiviral genes in liver diseases: dsRNA-dependent protein kinase overexpression and RNase L inhibitor suppression in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2000, 32: 1089-1095. 10.1053/jhep.2000.19287View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Houge G, Robaye B, Eikhom TS, Golstein J, Mellgren G, Gjertsen BT, Lanotte M, Doskeland SO: Fine mapping of 28S rRNA sites specifically cleaved in cells undergoing apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 1995, 15: 2051-2062.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gil J, Esteban M: Vaccinia virus recombinants as a model system to analyze interferon-induced pathways. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2004, 24: 637-646.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang YL, Reis LF, Pavlovic J, Aguzzi A, Schafer R, Kumar A, Williams BR, Aguet M, Weissmann C: Deficient signaling in mice devoid of double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase. Embo J 1995, 14: 6095-6106.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ward GA, Stover CK, Moss B, Fuerst TR: Stringent chemical and thermal regulation of recombinant gene expression by vaccinia virus vectors in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92: 6773-6777.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez-Arias A, Martinez S, Rodriguez JF: The major antigenic protein of infectious bursal disease virus, VP2, is an apoptotic inducer. J Virol 1997, 71: 8014-8018.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee SB, Esteban M: The interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated human p68 protein kinase inhibits the replication of vaccinia virus. Virology 1993, 193: 1037-1041. 10.1006/viro.1993.1223View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee SB, Rodriguez D, Rodriguez JR, Esteban M: The apoptosis pathway triggered by the interferon-induced protein kinase PKR requires the third basic domain, initiates upstream of Bcl-2, and involves ICE-like proteases. Virology 1997, 231: 81-88. 10.1006/viro.1997.8494View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diaz-Guerra M, Rivas C, Esteban M: Inducible expression of the 2-5A synthetase/RNase L system results in inhibition of vaccinia virus replication. Virology 1997, 227: 220-228. 10.1006/viro.1996.8294View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esteban M: Defective vaccinia virus particles in interferon-treated infected cells. Virology 1984, 133: 220-227. 10.1016/0042-6822(84)90443-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Earl PLMB: Generation of recombinant vaccinia viruses. In Current protocols in Molecular Biology. Volume 2. Edited by: Ausubel FMBRKREMDSJLSJSK. New York, John Wiley and Sons; 1993:16.17.1-16.18.10.Google Scholar
- Demkowicz WE, Maa JS, Esteban M: Identification and characterization of vaccinia virus genes encoding proteins that are highly antigenic in animals and are immunodominant in vaccinated humans. J Virol 1992, 66: 386-398.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.