Open Access

Maternal plasma viral load and neutralizing/enhancing antibodies in vertical transmission of HIV: A non-randomized prospective study

  • Paul Kamara1,
  • Loyda Melendez-Guerrero2,
  • Miguel Arroyo3,
  • Heidi Weiss4 and
  • Pauline Jolly1Email author
Virology Journal20052:15

DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-15

Received: 05 October 2004

Accepted: 24 February 2005

Published: 24 February 2005

Abstract

Background

We examined the association and interaction between maternal viral load and antibodies in vertical transmission of HIV in a non-randomized prospective study of 43 HIV-1 infected pregnant women who attended the San Juan City Hospital, Puerto Rico, and their 45 newborn infants. The women and infants received antiretroviral therapy.

Methods

A nested PCR assay of the HIV-1 envelope V3 region and infant PBMC culture were performed to determine HIV status of the infants. Maternal and infant plasma were tested for HIV neutralization or enhancement in monocyte-derived macrophages.

Results

Twelve (26.7%) infants were positive by the HIV V3 PCR assay and 3 of the 12 were also positive by culture. There was a trend of agreement between high maternal viral load and HIV transmission by multivariate analysis (OR = 2.5, CI = 0.92, p = 0.0681). Both maternal and infant plasma significantly (p = 0.001 for both) reduced HIV replication at 10-1 dilution compared with HIV negative plasma. Infant plasma neutralized HIV (p = 0.001) at 10-2 dilution but maternal plasma lost neutralizing effect at this dilution. At 10-3 dilution both maternal and infant plasma increased virus replication above that obtained with HIV negative plasma but only the increase by maternal plasma was statistically significant (p = 0.005). There were good agreements in enhancing activity in plasma between mother-infant pairs, but there was no significant association between HIV enhancement by maternal plasma and vertical transmission.

Conclusion

Although not statistically significant, the trend of association between maternal viral load and maternal-infant transmission of HIV supports the finding that viral load is a predictor of maternal-infant transmission. Both maternal and infant plasma neutralized HIV at low dilution and enhanced virus replication at high dilution. The antiretroviral treatments that the women received and the small sample size may have contributed to the lack of association between HIV enhancement by maternal plasma and vertical transmission.

Keywords

HIV vertical transmission HIV neutralization maternal viral load HIV enhancement

Background

The rate of HIV-1 infection has been increasing rapidly among women of childbearing age. At the end of 2003 women accounted for 50% of adults living with HIV/AIDS worldwide [1]. Consequently, the number of pediatric AIDS cases due primarily to perinatal (peripartum or intrapartum) transmission is rapidly increasing. Mother-to-child transmission accounts for more than 90% of all HIV infections in infants and children worldwide. In 2003 an estimated 2.1 million children under 15 years were living with HIV/AIDS [1]. Zidovudine (ZDV) given as either an intensive or short course regimen significantly reduces perinatal transmission [2, 3]. However, because of its cost, ZDV is not always available in poorer countries of the world. Successful use of nevirapine therapy in preventing perinatal transmission offers hope for more affordable treatment for poor women worldwide [4, 5]. However, in 2003, only one in ten pregnant women was offered services for preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission [1]. Further, whether treated with ZDV or nevirapine, a portion of HIV-positive women still transmit virus to their offspring vertically and the problem of maternal-infant transmission through breast milk remains unsolved. Therefore, there is need for continued studies of viral and immunological factors associated with maternal-infant transmission of HIV so that other effective and affordable strategies to prevent transmission may be developed.

Although some studies show no association between the presence of HIV neutralizing antibodies in maternal sera and the risk of perinatal transmission [6, 7], other studies report a reduction in the risk of vertical transmission in pregnant women whose sera contain neutralizing antibodies to HIV [8]. A number of studies have indicated lower transmission rates from infected pregnant women with high antibody titer or with high affinity/avidity antibody to conserved portion of HIV-1 glycoprotein 41 [9], to the CD4 binding site [10] or the V3 loop of glycoprotein 120 [11, 12], and to the p24 Gag protein [13]. Other studies have reported that non-transmitting mothers more frequently have such antibodies to their own virus than do transmitting mothers and that transmitting mothers rarely have neutralizing antibody against their own children's isolates [14, 15]. In contrast, a study by St. Louis, et al. [16] found no evidence that anti-V3 loop antibody protected against perinatal transmission. Further, a study by Lallemant, et al. [17] showed that mothers with higher antibody titers to peptides corresponding to the V3 region of gp120 and the immunodominant domain of gp41 had a higher risk of perinatal transmission. The authors hypothesized that women who display the broadest antibody response to V3 may be experiencing the greatest viral turnover [18] which could make them more at risk for transmitting virus to their offspring.

In contrast to neutralizing antibodies, non-neutralizing antibodies may enhance HIV infection by binding to the virus and facilitating its uptake by cell types that carry immunoglobulin (Fc) or complement receptors. Antibodies that enhance HIV replication in vitro by either Fc gamma receptor- or complement receptor-mediated endocytosis (FcγR-ADE or C'-ADE) have been identified in sera from HIV-1-infected individuals [1925] and from many gp120-vaccinated volunteers [19, 20]. An in vitro study of antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) of HIV-1 infection in human term syncytiotrophoblast cell cultures suggested that both FcγR-ADE and C'-ADE may contribute to maternal-infant transmission of HIV-1 [26]. Pancino, et al. [27], reported that mother-infant transmission of HIV was associated with maternal antibodies to the envelope gp160 and to a highly conserved domain of the trans-membrane glycoprotein. Mann, et al. [28], observed that certain combinations of antibody subclasses occurred more frequently in mothers who transmitted HIV-1 to their offspring than in non-transmitters and suggested that ADE may occur in mother-infant transmission of HIV-1. However, C'-ADE was not found to be associated with maternal-infant transmission of HIV [29] and the role of FcγR-ADE in maternal-infant transmission has not been determined.

Maternal plasma virus load has been shown to be strongly associated with perinatal transmission of HIV [27, 30, 31] and it was reported that there is no absolute threshold of maternal viral load below which HIV transmission does not occur [32]. Although transmission did not occur at a threshold below 2,000 copies/ml [18, 33] or below 1000 copies/ml [34], more recent meta-analysis has demonstrated that occasional transmission does occur below a viral load threshold of 1,000 copies/ml [35]. Another study indicated that viral load correlated with vertical transmission in women at the clinical stage A1 (asymptomatic) of infection [36].

However, the association of both viral load and enhancing activity (presumably by FcγR-ADE) in maternal plasma and vertical transmission of HIV has not formerly been examined. Thus, we examined the association of these factors (independently and combined) in vertical transmission using samples from mother-infant pairs from San Juan, Puerto Rico, previously described by Melendez-Guerrero et al [37]. Neutralization/enhancement of a R5 tropic strain of HIV-1 subtype B by maternal plasma was examined in monocyte-derived macrophage cultures.

Results and Discussion

Study sample

A cohort of 43 HIV-1 subtype B infected pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at the San Juan City Hospital, Puerto Rico, was enrolled into a prospective study from their first antenatal visit until delivery [37]. Eleven women were enrolled during their first trimester, 24 during their second trimester, and 8 during their third trimester of pregnancy. Approximately forty-five HIV-1 infected women gave birth at the San Juan City hospital during 1998. All of the women recruited into the study received some form of antiretroviral therapy as detailed and referenced [3, 3844] in Table 1. All of the infants were enrolled into the study shortly after delivery and most (86%) were also enrolled in the antiviral protocols during their first six weeks of life (Table 1). One mother had triplets, therefore, a total of 43 mothers and 45 infants (regarded as 45 mother-infant pairs) were enrolled.
Table 1

Number and percent of HIV positive pregnant women and infants assigned to the different AIDS Clinical Trails Group (ACTG) protocols or to zidovudine (ZDV)

ACTG Protocol #

Number of women (%)

Dose and frequency

185 [38]

16 (37.2)

Mother: ZDV according to 076 protocol [3] plus anti-HIV immune serum globulin (HIVIg) or immune globulin (Ig) (200 mg/kg) every 28 days followed by 1.0 mg/kg/hr continuous infusion during labor and delivery.

Infant: HIVIg (200 mg/kg) or normal Ig within 12 hrs of birth plus oral ZDV syrup (2.0 mg/kg) every 6 hours after birth (beginning within 8–12 h) and continuing for 6 weeks.

249 [39]

4 (9.3)

Mother: Didanosine (ddi) IV (1.6 mg/kg) on day one, during pregnancy, followed by an oral dose (200 mg) one week after the initial dose. Oral ddi is then administered every 12 hrs until labor starts and every 12 hrs after delivery until 6 weeks post-partum. During labor and delivery patients receive a loading dose followed by continuous infusion.

Infant: Oral ZDV syrup (2.0 mg/kg) every 6 hours after birth and continuing to week 6.

250 [40]

5 (11.6)

Mother: ZDV plus Nevirapine (200 mg/kg) single dose during labor.

Infant: Oral ZDV syrup (2.0 mg/kg) every 6 hours after birth and continuing to week 6 plus single dose of Nevirapine (2 mg/kg) after birth.

296 [41]

3 (7.0)

Mother: ZDV as in protocol 185.

Infant: Oral ZDV syrup (2.0 mg/kg) every 6 hours after birth and continuing to week 6.

316 [42]

9 (20.9)

Mother: Nevirapine (200 mg oral dose) or the corresponding placebo during delivery plus ZDV (as in 076).

Infant: ZDV perinatal prophylaxis (2.0 mg/kg) plus single 2.0 mg/kg oral dose of Nevirapine or Nevirapine placebo administered between 48 and 72 hrs of life.

324 [43]

3 (7.0)

Mother: ZDV before and after delivery as is usual but oral administration of ZDV (300 mg) every 3 hrs, 3 doses total during delivery.

Infant: Oral ZDV syrup (2.0 mg/kg) every 6 hours after birth and continuing to week 6.

332 [44]

1 (2.3)

Mother: Stravudine (d4T, 30–40 mg) during pregnancy and 0.05 mg/kg/hr during delivery in combination with 3TC 150 mg followed by 150 mg during delivery.

Infant: Stravudine (d4T, 1 mg/kg) single dose on day 35–42, in combination with 3TC (2.0 mg/kg/dose).

ZDV [3]

2 (4.7)

Mother: ZDV (2.0 mg/kg) every 28 days followed by 1.0 mg/kg/hr continuous infusion during labor.

Infant: Oral ZDV syrup (2.0 mg/kg) every 6 hours after birth and continuing to week 6.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the mothers and vertical transmission

The mean age of the mothers was 24 years (range 14–38 years; Table 2). Majority of the women (88.4%) were infected through heterosexual contact. Based on the 1993 CDC revised classification system for HIV infection and disease progression, only 6 of the mothers (those in the A3 and B3 categories) were classified as AIDS cases [45]. Approximately two-thirds (67.4%) of the mothers had viral load levels below 10,000 RNA copies/ml and were classified as having low viral loads (LVL) based on the categorization by Contopoulos-Ioannidis & Ioannidis [46]. The remaining 32.6% of mothers had viral loads above 10,000 RNA copies/ml and were classified as having high viral loads (HVL). CD4+ T cell counts in the women ranged from 23 to 1165 cells/mm3 of blood with a mean count of 425 cells/mm3. Twenty-six of the 43 women delivered their babies by normal vaginal delivery; the remaining women had cesarean sections (Table 2).
Table 2

Age, source of infection, clinical status and transmission outcome for HIV-positive mothers

Variable

Number (%)

Age of mothers (years)a

 

< 25

14 (32.6)

25–30

12 (27.9)

> 30

16 (37.2)

Missing

1 (2.3)

Source of infection

 

Heterosexual contact

38 (88.4)

IV drug use

3 (7.0)

Unknown

2 (4.6)

Clinical status (CDC classification 45)

 

A1

11 (25.6)

A2

14 (32.6)

A3

1 (2.3)

B1

2 (4.6)

B2

10 (23.3)

B3

5 (11.6)

Viral load (copies/ml)b

 

<10,000 (range 83–9,078)

29 (67.4)

≥ 10,000 (range 10,220–484,703)

14 (32.6)

Mode of delivery

 

Vaginal

26 (60.5)

Cesarean

17 (39.5)

Transmission outcome

 

V3 PCR+ Infants

12 (26.7)

V3 PCR- Infants

33 (73.3)

Culture+ Infants

3c (6.7)

Culture- Infants

42 (93.3)

aMean age 24 years (range 14–28 years)

bMean viral load 28,112 copies/ml (range = 83 – 484,703 copies/ml)

cHIV infection confirmed by PCR and culture

Twelve (26.7%) of 45 infants were HIV V3 positive indicating that HIV transmission had occurred (Table 2). However, only three of these twelve infants were also HIV culture positive. This infection rate of approximately 7.0% observed is similar to the rate of 8.3% observed for ZDV treated mothers and infants in the 076 study [4]. Based on the V3 PCR results an equal number of mothers with low and high viral load (6 in each group) transmitted HIV to their infants. The mean log viral load of transmitting mothers 3.77 + 0.31 (median = 3.77) was higher than of the non-transmitting mothers 3.54 + 0.15 (median = 3.44) but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.474). This is probably due to the small sample size. The mothers of the three infants who were HIV culture positive all had high viral load levels (484,703, 11,642 and 10,220 RNA copies/ml) but the levels in two of the three were close to the 10,000 RNA copies/ml cut-off value used to distinguish LVL from HVL. Since perinatal transmission occurs mostly at or during delivery, the viral load in the genital tract (which may be similar to maternal plasma level) [47] may be an important determinant in maternal-infant transmission.

The mothers of HIV V3 positive infants had a non-significantly higher mean CD4+ T count (526 cells/mm3, median = 508 cells/mm3) compared to non-transmitting mothers (mean CD4+ T count of 413 cells/mm3; median = 336 cells/mm3). Maternal CD4 cell counts have been shown to be a less effective predictor of transmission of HIV than viral load [18]. Further, most of the women in the study (86%) had CD4+T cell counts above the 200 cells/mm3 level which is used to define AIDS. Only one of the three women whose infants were HIV culture positive had AIDS (CD4 = 149 cells/mm3). The other two women had CD4 counts of 510 and 538 cells/mm3.

Neutralization/enhancement of HIV treated with maternal and infant plasma

The effect of plasma (at 10-1 to 10-3 dilutions) from the mothers (transmitters and non-transmitters) and infants (HIV V3+ and HIV V3-) on HIV replication was examined in the neutralization/enhancement assay (Table 3). HIV p24 antigen in culture fluids was determined using the coulter p24 antigen assay kit (Coulter, Miami FL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The mean value of HIV p24 antigen by dilution was calculated from seronegative samples. The percent change (increase or decrease) in p24 antigen of the maternal or infant plasma from the mean of the seronegative samples was calculated. Neutralization was defined as 70% or greater reduction in HIV p24 antigen in cultures treated with HIV positive plasma compared with cultures treated with HIV negative plasma. Enhancement was defined as 100% or greater increase in p24 antigen in cultures treated with HIV positive plasma compared to the p24 level in cultures treated with HIV negative plasma. Traditionally enhancement of HIV in PBMC cultures has been defined as a 1.5 to 2.5-fold or greater increase in virus replication as a result of treatment with immune sera [21, 25, 48]. Table 3 shows that at 10-1 dilution, over 90% of plasma samples from both groups of mothers (transmitters/non-transmitters) and infants (HIV V3+/ HIV V3-) neutralized HIV. At 10-2 dilution the percentages of plasma that neutralized HIV dropped to approximately 75% for both groups of mothers and to 58% and 70% for HIV V3+ and HIV V3- infants respectively. The percentages again dropped at 10-3 dilution to ≤ 67% for mothers and ≤ 33% for infants (Table 3). Chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used to compare the proportion of plasma from transmitter versus non-transmitter mothers and between HIV V3+ and HIV V3- infants that neutralized, enhanced or resulted in no change in HIV replication. No significant differences were found.
Table 3

Neutralization/enhancement of HIV infection by plasma from 12 transmitter and 33 non-transmitter mothers and 12 HIV V3 positive and 33 HIV V3 negative infants

Plasma Dilution and effect

Transmitter mothers Number (%)

Non-transmitter mothers Number (%)

HIV V3+ infants Number (%)

HIV V3- infants Number (%)

10-1

    

   Neutralized

11 (92)

31 (94)

11 (92)

30 (91)

   Enhanced

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

   No change

1 (8)

2 (6)

1 (8)

3 (9)

10-2

    

   Neutralized

9 (75)

25 (76)

7 (58)

23 (70)

   Enhanced

1 (8)

2 (6)

2 (17)

1 (3)

   No change

2 (17)

6 (18)

3 (25)

9 (27)

10-3

    

   Neutralized

8 (67)

19 (58)

4 (33)

9 (27)

   Enhanced

0 (0)

5 (15)

4 (33)

7 (21)

   No change

4 (33)

9 (27)

4 (33)

17 (52)

The mean percent change in p24 antigen and standard errors for mothers and infants were plotted for each group by plasma dilution (Figure 1). The Wilcoxon signed-ranked test was used to determine whether the percent change was significantly different from zero. Both the maternal and infant plasma significantly (p = 0.001 for both groups) reduced HIV replication at low (10-1) dilution when compared with HIV negative sera (Figure 1). At 10-2 dilution the infant plasma still significantly (p = 0.001) reduced virus replication, but the maternal plasma lost neutralizing activity (Figure 1). At 10-3 dilution, the maternal plasma significantly increased virus replication (p = 0.005) above seronegative plasma and the infant plasma showed a non-significant increase (88%) in HIV replication (Figure 1). These findings of neutralization by plasma of HIV positive individuals at low dilutions and enhancement at higher dilutions are similar to data published by Jolly and Weiss [49], which showed that neutralizing and enhancing antibodies can occur simultaneously in sera of HIV-infected individuals. If neutralizing antibody is present, enhancement is seen only at high dilutions, whereas, if only enhancing antibody is present, enhancement is observed without, or at low, plasma/serum dilutions.
Figure 1

Neutralization/enhancement of HIV-1BaL by maternal and infant plasma diluted 10-1 – 10-3. Virus replication (determined by p24 antigen (pg/ml) in culture fluids collected 2–4 days post-infection) is compared to replication of virus treated with plasma from HIV-1 seronegative (sn) women. The data represent the average of all maternal and infant samples. Two independent infections were conducted with each sample in duplicate (4 replicates) for each of 43 maternal and 45 infant plasma. Maternal and infant plasma significantly reduced HIV replication (p = 0.001 for both) at 10-1 dilution compared to HIV negative sera. Infant plasma also significantly reduced HIV replication (p = 0.001) at 10-2 dilution. At 10-3 dilution maternal plasma significantly increased HIV replication (p = 0.005) above HIV negative sera and infant plasma showed a non-significant increase (88%) in HIV replication.

Enhancing activity in plasma from mothers and infants

Sixty-nine percent (31/45) of plasma from mother-infant pairs were also tested in the neutralization/enhancement assay at higher dilutions (10-4 to 10-6). Examination of enhancing activity in plasma of mothers and infants showed that there were good agreements (60% or greater) in enhancement status between mother-infant pairs. For example, at 10-4 dilution, the plasma of 7 infants of 9 mothers (78%) whose plasma enhanced HIV replication also exhibited enhancement, and at 10-6 dilution, the plasma of 8 infants of 10 mothers (80%) whose plasma enhanced HIV replication also exhibited enhancement (data not shown). Comparison of p24 antigen between transmitter and non-transmitter mothers or their infants at 10-4 to 10-6 dilutions showed no significant difference between the two groups of mothers or infants. The lack of association of enhancing activity and HIV transmission in this study is similar to the findings for C'-ADE by Gras, et al. [29]. We examined complement-independent (presumably FcγR-mediated antibody dependent) enhancement in primary human macrophages because we thought that this type of enhancement would be more relevant to HIV clinical disease and transmission. FcγR-mediated enhancement is characteristic of diseases such as dengue and feline infectious peritonitis for which ADE has been best demonstrated to occur [50, 51]. In addition, macrophages are important target cells for infection and replication in vivo by most HIV-1 variants [5254]. However, our results showed no association between enhancing activity in maternal or infant plasma and maternal-infant transmission of HIV. The negative results could in part be due to the various anti-retroviral protocols to which the women were assigned.

Correlation between maternal and infant p24 antigen levels and maternal viral load with maternal and infant p24 antigen

Using Spearman's correlation, we examined the association between maternal viral load and enhancing activity in vertical transmission of HIV by using mothers' characteristics (viral load and p24 antigen value) and the infants' p24 antigen values. A correlation matrix showed a positive association between mothers' p24 antigen values and those of their infants (Table 4). However, low positive or no associations were found between maternal viral load and maternal p24 antigen values at low dilutions (10-1 – 10-3) and low negative associations at higher dilutions (10-4 – 10-6). There were low positive associations between maternal viral load and the p24 antigen values of their infants at low dilutions (10-1 – 10-3) and low negative correlations at higher dilutions except at 10-5 dilution (Table 4). However, none of the values was statistically significant.
Table 4

Correlation (Spearman) of maternal and infant p24 antigen levels and maternal viral load with maternal and infant p24 antigen

Plasma dilution

p24 antigen (M vs I) Correlationa log (p-value)b

MVL and Mp24 Correlationc log (p-value)b

MVL and Ip24 Correlationd log (p-value)b

10-1

0.412 (0.005)

0.12 (0.448)

0.09 (0.562)

10-2

0.59 (0.0001)

0.18 (0.249)

0.11 (0.473)

10-3

0.72 (0.0001)

0.14 (0.355)

0.04 (0.832)

10-4

0.40 (0.028)

-0.15 (0.423)

-0.16 (0.394)

10-5

0.75 (0.0001)

-0.10 (0.581)

0.31 (0.091)

10-6

0.69 (0.0001)

-0.34 (0.064)

-0.31 (0.089)

M = mother; I = infant; MVL = maternal viral load; Mp24 = maternal p24 antigen; Ip24 = infant p24 antigen

aSpearman correlation coefficient between log values of maternal and infant p24 antigen.

bp-value to test for statistically significant correlation.

cSpearman correlation coefficient between log values of maternal viral load and maternal p24 antigen.

dSpearman correlation coefficient between log values of maternal viral load and infant p24 antigen.

Maternal viral load and enhancing antibodies as predictors of vertical transmission of HIV

Univariate analysis of type of treatment, stage of HIV disease, method of delivery and CD4+ T cell count of the mothers indicated no significant association with vertical transmission of HIV (p > 0.05). The combined effect of maternal viral load and enhancing antibodies as potential risk factors for the vertical transmission of HIV-1 was examined in a multivariable model. Log viral load was treated as a continuous variable in the model and enhancement was categorized as enhancement versus neutralization. There was a trend of association between maternal viral load and transmission of HIV-1 so that the higher the viral load, the more likely mothers were to transmit HIV-1 to their infants (OR= 2.5, CI= 0.93 – 6.67, p = 0.0681). This is in agreement with other studies discussed earlier that show viral load as a predictor of maternal-infant transmission [27, 30, 31]. The non-significant result in this study is probably due to the small sample size. Also, twice as many mothers (29) in this study had low plasma HIV RNA levels (<10,000 RNA copies/ml) compared to those with high viral load levels (14 mothers). The preponderance of women with low viral load levels may be the result of the effect of the different antiretroviral protocols that the women were given during pregnancy. Whereas Dickover, et al. [30] showed that women given zidovudine during gestation showed an eight-fold median decrease in plasma HIV RNA levels (p < 0.001), Sperling, et al., [32] have shown that ZDV treatment had only a minimal effect in decreasing maternal HIV RNA levels. In this study all of the women except one (given stravudine) received ZDV treatment and in most cases ZDV was given along with one other anti-retroviral drug or with HIVIg (Table 1). There was no significant association between enhancing activity (based on p24 antigen values) in the plasma of mothers who transmitted HIV-1 to their infants based on the HIV V3+ status of the infants (OR = 0.92, CI = 0.41 – 2.07, p = 0.8492).

Conclusion

In agreement with published data, multivariate analysis showed a trend of association between maternal viral load and maternal-infant transmission of HIV. The non-significant difference in the mean log viral load of transmitting and non-transmitting mothers is probably due to the small sample size. No significant associations were found between HIV antiretroviral treatment protocols, classification of HIV disease, method of infant delivery and CD4+ T cell count of the mothers and vertical transmission of HIV. Both maternal and infant plasma significantly neutralized HIV infection at low (10-1) dilution and enhanced virus replication at higher dilution (10-3). Neutralizing and enhancing antibodies can occur together in the blood of HIV positive individuals and the neutralizing effect can be lost at high plasma dilution.

There were good agreements in the neutralizing or enhancing activity of the plasma from mothers-infant pairs. That is, when plasma of the mothers neutralized or enhanced HIV infection, their infants' plasma showed similar activity. However, there was no significant association between virus enhancement by maternal plasma and vertical transmission of HIV. Thus, enhancing activity in plasma of these HIV-infected mothers was not a dominant factor in vertical transmission of HIV.

Methods

Collection, processing and testing of maternal and infant blood samples for HIV

Blood samples were taken from the mothers during each trimester of pregnancy and during delivery. Blood samples from the infants were collected from the umbilical cord at birth and at 1–2, 3–4 and 5–12 months. Blood was collected in vacutainer tubes containing ACD anticoagulant and centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 15 minutes. The plasma was stored frozen (-20°C) for use in maternal viral load and HIV neutralization/enhancement assays. The remaining blood was diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 and processed by Ficoll-hypaque density gradient for cell isolation. For virus isolation, one million cells from each mother or infant were co-cultured with HIV seronegative donor cells previously stimulated by PHA as described in the ACTG virology manual [55]. The remaining cells (105) were stored frozen at -85°C. The HIV status of the infants was determined using a nested PCR assay of the HIV-1 envelope variable (V3) region as previously described [37, 56]. This V3 PCR assay was conducted in duplicates and repeated on the infant samples at 1–2 months, 3–4 months and 5–11 months. Culture for HIV was repeated on infant samples collected at 3, 6 and 12 months and all except 3 infants were culture negative.

Determination of maternal viral load

HIV RNA copies in maternal plasma was determined by the amplicor HIV monitor test (Roche Diagnostics, Branchwater, NJ, USA) at the Puerto Rico ACTG-certified laboratory [37]. A 142 base-pair sequence in the HIV gag gene was amplified by RT-PCR for viral load determination. The mean log viral load was calculated and compared between transmitting and non-transmitting mothers to determine the effect of maternal viral load on HIV vertical transmission.

Preparation and titration of HIV-1BaL for the neutralization/enhancement assay

HIV-1BaL stock was prepared in primary macrophages as reported previously by Jolly [57]. Briefly, HIV-1BaL supernatant fluid (1 × 104.6 TCID50/ml) obtained from the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program was used to inoculate fresh cultures of macrophages grown on 75 ml tissue culture flasks. The cultures were washed 24 hours later and incubated with fresh media. Supernatant fluids were harvested at 7 and 14 days post-infection, clarified by centrifugation at 1800 rpm for 10 minutes and used as stock virus for these studies. The stock contained 5 × 105 TCID50/ml.

Neutralization/enhancement assay

A neutralization/enhancement assay was conducted using maternal or infant samples and HIV-1BaL. Maternal plasma samples collected during the third trimester of pregnancy were used in these assays since most prenatal HIV infections occur in the third trimester [58]. Briefly, 10-fold dilutions of heat inactivated (56°C for 30 min) plasma samples were mixed 1:1 with 103 TCID50/ml of virus and pre-incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The mixtures were then inoculated into replicate cultures of monocyte-derived macrophages as prepared previously [57] in 8 well chamber slides and incubated at 37°C for 6 hours in a 5% CO2 incubator. The inocula were removed and the cells washed, and incubated with fresh media for up to 8 days. Culture supernatant fluids were then collected on days 2, 4, 6, and 8 and tested for p24 antigen using the Coulter assay (Coulter, Miami, FL, USA). Cultures treated with HIV-negative sera were used as controls. All maternal and infant plasma samples were tested at three 10-fold dilutions; 69% of samples were tested up through six 10-fold dilutions. Two independent assays were conducted for each maternal or infant plasma sample and each sample was run in duplicate on each assay (4 replicates).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics such as mean, median, range were calculated to summarize maternal characteristics such as viral load, CD4+ T cell count and p24 antigen levels. The number of HIV vertical transmission among infants was summarized and the univariate association of maternal characteristics, such as, treatment (type of antiretroviral therapy), stage of disease based on the 1993 CDC classification [45], method of delivery (C-section vs. vaginal), and CD4+ T cell count, with HIV transmission in infants was evaluated using the Fisher's exact test. The simultaneous effect of maternal viral load and p24 levels on infant transmission was evaluated using the logistic regression model. Odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the effect of both factors in the model.

Correlation between maternal versus infant p24 antigen levels and between maternal viral load and maternal or infant p24 antigen levels was evaluated using the Spearman's correlation coefficient. Enhancement, decrease (neutralization), or no change in p24 levels compared to seronegative control was assessed for mother-infant pairs. The distribution of virus p24 antigen was compared between transmitting vs. non-transmitting mothers and between HIV V3+ infants and HIV V3- infants using Fisher's exact test.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the CFAR-RCMI supplement grant P30-AI-2767 from the NIAID/NIH, the "Research Centers in Minority Institutions" award G12RR-03051 from the National Center for Research Resources, NIH, award 3 S06 GM08224 from the National Institutes of General Medical Sciences, NIH, and awards RO1 AI 39194 and 5P30 AI27767 from the NIAID/NIH. We appreciate the contribution of the nurses who followed the mothers and infants in the study and the pediatrician in charge of the ACTG clinic. We thank Gill Nieves for help in developing viral macrocultures and M. Vega and G. Hillyer for help with phenotypic and viral load analyses, respectively. HIV-1BaL from Dr. Suzanne Gartner and Dr. Mikulas Popovic was obtained through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham
(2)
Department of Microbiology and Medical Zoology, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, School of Medicine
(3)
Division of Retrovirology, US Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
(4)
Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza,

References

  1. UNAIDS: Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 2004.Google Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Administration of zidovudine during late pregnancy and delivery to prevent peri-natal HIV transmission – Thailand, 1996–1998. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998, 47: 151-4.Google Scholar
  3. Connor EM, Sperling RS, Gelber R, Kiselev P, Scott G, Sullivan MJ, Van Dyke R, Bey M, Shearer W, Jacobson R, Jimenez E, O'Neill E, Bazin B, Delfraissy JF, Culnane M, Coombs R, Elkins M, Moye J, Stratton P, Balsley J: Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. New Eng J Med 1994, 331: 1173-1180. 10.1056/NEJM199411033311801View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Guay L, Musoke P, Fleming T, Bagenda D, Allen M, Nakabiito C, Sherman J, Bakaki P, Ducar C, Deseyve M, Emel L, Mirochnick M, Fowler MG, Mofenson L, Miotti P, Dransfield K, Bray D, Mmiro F, Jackson JB: Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 Randomised Trial. Lancet 1999, 354: 795-802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. US Department of Health and Human Services: Researchers identify a simple, affordable drug regimen that is highly effective in preventing HIV infection in infants of mothers with the disease. HHS News July 14, 1999
  6. Hengel RL, Kennedy MS, Steketee RW, Thea DM, Abrams EJ, Lambert G, McDougal JS, the New York City Perinatal HIV Transmission Collaborative Study Group: Neutralizing antibody and perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. AIDS Res Human Retrovir 1998, 14: 475-481.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mabondzo A, Rouvier P, Raoul H, Le Naour R, Courpotin C, Herve F, Parnet-Mathieu F, Lasfargues G, Dormont D: Relationship between humoral factors in HIV-1-infected mothers and the occurrence of HIV infection in their infants. Clin Exp Immunol 1995, 102: 476-480.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Scarlatti G, Albert G, Rossi P, Hodara V, Biraghi P, Muggiasca L, Fenyo EM: Mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: Correlation with neutralizing antibodies against primary isolates. J Infect Dis 1993, 168: 207-10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ugen KE, Goedert JJ, Boyer J, Rafaeli Y, Frank I, Williams WV, Willoughby A, Landesman S, Mandez H, Rubinstein A, Kieber-Emmons T, Weiner DB: Vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Reactivity of maternal sera glycoprotein 120 and 41 peptides from HIV Type 1. J Clin Invest 1992, 89: 923-1930.Google Scholar
  10. Khouri YF, MacIntosh K, Cavacini L, Posner M, Pagano M, Tuomala R, Marasco WA: Vertical transmission of HIV-1. correlation with maternal viral load and plasma levels of CD4 binding site anti-gp 120 antobodies. J Clin Invest 1995, 95: 732-737.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Devash Y, Calvelli TA, Wood DG, Reagan KJ, Rubinstein A: Vertical transmission of human Immunodeficiency virus is correlated with the absence of high-affinity/avidity maternal antibodies to the gp120 principal neutralizing domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1990, 87: 3445-3449.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rossi P, Moschese V, Broliden PA, Fundaro C, Plebani A, Giaquinto C, Tovo PA, Ljunggren K, Rosen J, Wigzell H, Jonda M, Wharen B: Presence of maternal antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus 1 envelope glycoprotein gp120 epitopes correlates with the uninfected status of children born to seropositive mothers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989, 86: 8055-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Erb P, Krauchi S, Burgin D, Biederman K, Camli C, Rudin CH, the Swiss HIV and Pregnancy Collaborative Study Group: Quantitative anti-p24 determinations can predict the risk of vertical transmission. J AIDS 1994, 7: 261-4.Google Scholar
  14. Kliks SC, Levy JA: Maternal antibody response and maternal-infant HIV-1 transmission [letter; comment]. Lancet 1994, 343: 1364. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92501-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Scarlatti G, Leitner T, Hodara V, Halapi E, Rossi P, Albert J, Fenyo EM: Neutralizing antibodies and viral characteristics in mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. AIDS 1993,7(suppl 2):S45-S48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. St Louis ME, Pau CP, Msuami M, Ou CY, Matela B, Kashamuka M, Brown C, George JR, Heyward WL: Lack of association between anti-V3 loop antibody and perinatal HIV-1 transmission in Kinshasa, Zaire, despite use of assays based on local HIV-1 strains. J Acq Immun Defic Synd 1994, 7: 63-67.Google Scholar
  17. Lallemant M, Baillou A, Lallemant-LeCoeur S, Nzingoula S, Mampaka M, M'Pele P, Barin F, Essex M: Maternal antibody response at delivery and perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in African women. Lancet 1994, 343: 1001-1005. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90126-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. O'Shea S, Newell ML, Dunn DT, Garcia-Rodriguez MC, Bates I, Mullen J, Rostron T, Corbett K, Aiyer S, Butler K, Smith R, Banatvala JF: Maternal viral load, CD4 cell count and vertical transmission of HIV-1. J Med Virol 1998, 54: 113-117. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199802)54:2<113::AID-JMV8>3.0.CO;2-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dolin R, Graham BS, Greenberg SB, Tacket CO, Belshe RB, Midthun K, Clements ML, Gorse GJ, Horgan BW, Atmar RL, Karzon DT, Bonnez W, Fernie BF, Montefiori DC, Stablein DM, Smith GE, Koff WC, the NIAID AIDS Vaccine Clinical Trials Network: The safety and immunogenicity of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) recombinant gp160 candidate vaccine in humans. Ann Intern Med 1991, 114: 119-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kostrikis LG, Cao Y, Leu J, Qin L, Korber B, Ho DD: Inter- and intraclade neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: genetic clades do not correspond to neutralization serotypes but partially correspond to gp120 antigenic serotypes. J Virol 1996, 70: 427-44.Google Scholar
  21. Homsy J, Meyer M, Levy JA: Serum enhancement of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection correlates with disease in HIV-infected individuals. J Virol 1990, 64: 1437-40.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Homsy J, Tateno M, Levy JA: Antibody-dependent enhancement of HIV infection [letter]. Lancet 1998, 1: 1285-86.Google Scholar
  23. Montefiori DC, Graham BS, Kliks S, Wright PF, the NIAID AIDS Vaccine Clinical Trials Network: Serum antibodies to HIV-1 in recombinant vaccinia virus recipients boosted with purified recombinant gp160. J Clin Immunol 1992, 12: 429-39. 10.1007/BF00918855View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson WE Jr, Montefiori DC, Mitchell WM: Antibody-dependent enhancement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Lancet 1988, 1: 790-4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)91657-1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Takeda A, Tuazon CU, Ennis FA: Antibody-enhanced infection by HIV-1 via Fc receptor-mediated entry. Science 1988, 242: 580-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Toth FD, Mosborg-Ptersen P, Kis J, Aboagye-Mathiesen G, Zdravkovic M, Hager H, Aranyosi J, Lampe L, Ebbesen P: Antibody-dependent enhancement of HIV-1 infection in human term syncytiotrophoblast cells cultured in vitro. Clin Exp Immunol 1994, 96: 389-394.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pancino G, Leste-Lasserre T, Burgard M, Costagliola D, Ivanoff S, Blanche S, Rouzioux C, Sonigo P: Apparent enhancement of perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by high maternal anti-gp160 antibody titer. J Infect Dis 1998, 177: 1737-1741.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mann DL, Hamlin-Green G, Willoughby A, Landesman SH, Goedert JJ: Immunoglobulin class and subclass antibodies to HIV proteins in maternal serum: Association with perinatal transmission. J AIDS 1994, 7: 617-622.Google Scholar
  29. Gras G, Beyssen V, Tranchot-Diallo J, Parnet-Mathieu F, Lasfargues G, Courpotin C, Dormont D: Neutralizing antibodies and complement-mediated, antibody-dependent enhancement (C'-ADE) of human immunodeficiency virus infection in its vertical transmission. AJRI 1998, 39: 381-386.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dickover RE, Garratty EM, Herman SA, Sim M, Plaeger S, Boyer PJ, Keller M, Deveikis A, Stiehm ER, Bryson YJ: Identification of levels of maternal HIV-1 RNA associated with risk of perinatal transmission: Effect of maternal zidovudine treatment on viral load. JAMA 1996, 275: 599-605. 10.1001/jama.275.8.599View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mayaux MJ, Dussaix E, Isopet J, Rekacewicz C, Mandelbrot L, Ciraru-Vigneron N, Allemon MC, Chambrin V, Katlama C, Delfraissy JF, Puel J: Maternal viral load during pregnancy and maternal-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type1: The French perinatal cohort studies. J Infect Dis 1997, 175: 172-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sperling RS, Shapiro DE, Coombs RW, Todd JA, Herman SA, McSherry GD, OSullivan MJ, Van Dyke RB, Jimenez E, Rouzioux C, Flynn PM, Sullivan JL: Maternal viral load, zidovudine treatment, and the risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from mother to infant. New Eng J Med 1996, 336: 1621-1629. 10.1056/NEJM199611283352201View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaffer N, Roongpipong A, Siriwasin W, Chotpltayasunondh T, Chearskul S, Young NL, Parekh B, Mock PA, Bhadrakom P, Kalish ML, Phillips SK, Grenade TC, Subbarao S, Weniger BG, Mastro TD: Maternal virus load and perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype E transmission, Thailand. Bangkok Collaborative Perinatal HIV Transmission Study Group. J Infect Dis 1999, 179: 590-599. 10.1086/314641View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Garcia PM, Kalish LA, Pitt J, Minoff H, Quinn TC, Burchett SK, Kornegay J, Jackson B, Moye J, Hanson C, Zorilla C, Lew JF, for the Women and Infants Transmission Study Group: Maternal levels of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA and the risk of perinatal transmission. New Eng J Med 1999, 341: 394-402. 10.1056/NEJM199908053410602View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ioannidis JPA, Abrams EJ, Ammann A, Bulterys M, Goeder JJ, Gray L, Korber BT, Mayaux MJ, Mofenson LM, Newell ML, Shapiro DE, Teglas JP, Wilfert CM: Perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by pregnant women with RNA virus loads <1000 copies/mL. J Inf Dis 2001, 183: 539-45. 10.1086/318530View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Mazza C, Ravaggi A, Rodella A, Duse M, Padula D, Lomini M, Castell F, Bresciami S, Albertini A, Cariani E: Influence of maternal CD4 levels on the predictive value of virus load over mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1). Study group of vertical transmission. J Med Virol 1999, 58: 59-62. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199905)58:1<59::AID-JMV9>3.0.CO;2-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Melendez-Guerrero LM, Arroyo MA, Vega ME, Jimenez E, Hillyer GV, Cadilla CL: Characterization of HIV isolates from Puerto Rican maternal-infant pairs reveal predominance of non-syncytium inducing (NSI) variants with CCr5 genotype. Cell Mol Biol 2001, 147: OL39-OL47.Google Scholar
  38. NIH: Clinical Trial: A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study of the Use of Anti-HIV Immune Serum Globulin (HIVIG) for the Prevention of Maternal-Fetal HIV Transmission in Pregnant Women and Newborns Receiving Zidovudine (AZT).[http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00000751?order=1]
  39. NIH: Clinical Trial: A Phase I Trial to Evaluate Didanosine (ddI) in HIV-infected Pregnant Women.[http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00000839?order=1]
  40. NIH: Clinical Trial: A Phase I Study of Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Nevirapine in HIV-1 Infected Pregnant Women and Neonates Born to HIV-1 Infected Mothers.[http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00000808?order=1]
  41. NIH: Clinical Trial: Intracellular Pharmacokinetics of Zidovudine Triphosphate in Maternal and Infant Cord Blood Mononuclear Cells.[http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00000830?order=1]
  42. NIH: Clinical Trial: A Study of Nevirapine for the Prevention of HIV Transmission from Mothers to Their Babies.[http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00000869?order=1]
  43. NIH: Clinical Trial: A Study of Zidovudine During Labor and Delivery in HIV-Infected Pregnant Women.[http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00000862?order=1]
  44. NIH: Clinical Trial: A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerance of Stravudine (d4T) in Combination with Lamivudine (3TC) in HIV-Positive Pregnant Women and Their Infants.[http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00000878?order=1]
  45. Centers for Disease Control (CDC): 1993 Revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR 1992, 41: RR-1.Google Scholar
  46. Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Ioannidis JPA: Maternal cell-free viremia in the natural history of perinatal HIV-1 transmission. A meta-analysis. J AIDS Human Retrovirol 1998, 18: 126-35.Google Scholar
  47. O'Shea S, de Ruiter A, Mullen J, Cobett K, Chrystie IL, Newell ML, Banatvala JE: Quantification of HIV-1 RNA in cervico-vaginal secretions: An improved method of sample collection. AIDS 1997, 11: 1056-57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Montefiori DC, Pantaleo G, Fink LM, Zhou JT, Zhou JY, Bilska M, Miralles GD, Fauci AS: Neutralizing and infection-enhancing antibody responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in long-term nonprogressors. J Infect Dis 1996, 173: 60-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jolly PE, Weiss HL: Neutralization and enhancement of HIV-1 infection by sera from HIV-1 infected individuals who progress to disease at different rates. Virology 2000, 273: 52-59. 10.1006/viro.2000.0401View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Halstead SB: Pathogenesis of dengue: challenges to molecular biology. Science 1988, 239: 476-481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Vennema H, de Groot RJ, Harbour DA, Dalderup M, Gruffydd-Jones T, Horzinek MC, Spaan WJ: Early death after feline infectious peritonitis virus challenge due to recombinant vaccinia virus immunization. J Virol 1990, 64: 1407-1409.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Melendez-Guerrero LM, Holmes R, Backe E, Poliotti B, Ibegbu C, Lee F, Panigel M, Schwartz D, Huddleston J, Nahmias A: In vitro infection of Hofbauer cell with a monocytotropic strain of HIV-1. Trophoblast Research 1994, 8: 33-45.Google Scholar
  53. Plaud-Valentin M, Delgado R, Garcia V, Zorilla C, Gandia J, Melendez-Guerrero LM: HIV infection of placental macrophages: effect on the secretion of HIV stimulatory cytokines. Cell Mol Biol 1999, 45: 423-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Valentin A, Albert J, Fenyo EM, Asjo B: Dual Tropism for macrophages and lymphocytes is a common feature of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and 2 isolates. J Virol 1994, 68: 6684-6689.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Department of Health and Human Services: ACTG Virology Manual for HIV Laboratories. Department of Health and Human Services, Division of AIDS, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH Publication No. 94 3828. 1994.Google Scholar
  56. Wolinsky S, Wike C, Korber B, Hutto C, Praks W, Rosemblum L, Kunstman-Furtado KM, Munoz JL: Selective transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 variants from mother to infants. Science 1992, 255: 1134-1137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Jolly PE: Replicative characteristics of primary isolates of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, primary macrophages, and CD4+ transformed T-cell lines. Cell Mol Biol 1997, 43: 1057-65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rouzioux C, Costaglioloa D, Burgard M: Estimated timing of mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) transmission by use of a Markov model. Am J Epidemiol 1996, 142: 1330-1337.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Kamara et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.