Human Papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr virus co-infection in Cervical Carcinoma in Algerian women
© Khenchouche et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 4 December 2012
Accepted: 18 September 2013
Published: 19 November 2013
Despite the fact that the implication of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the carcinogenesis and prognosis of cervical cancer is well established, the impact of a co-infection with high risk HPV (HR-HPV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is still not fully understood.
Fifty eight randomly selected cases of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the uterine cervix, 14 normal cervices specimens, 21 CIN-2/3 and 16 CIN-1 cases were examined for EBV and HPV infections. Detection of HR-HPV specific sequences was carried out by PCR amplification using consensus primers of Manos and by Digene Hybrid Capture. The presence of EBV was revealed by amplifying a 660 bp specific EBV sequence of BALF1. mRNA expression of LMP-1 in one hand and protein levels of BARF-1, LMP-1 and EBNA-1 in the other hand were assessed by RT-PCR and immunoblotting and/or immunohischemistry respectively.
HR-HPV infection was found in patients with SCC (88%), low-grade (75%) and high grade (95%) lesions compared to only 14% of normal cervix cases. However, 69%, 12.5%, 38.1%, and 14% of SCC, CIN-1, CIN-2/3 and normal cervix tissues, respectively, were EBV infected. The highest co-infection (HR-HPV and EBV) was found in squamous cell carcinoma cases (67%). The latter cases showed 27% and 29% expression of EBV BARF-1 and LMP-1 oncogenes respectively.
The high rate of HR-HPV and EBV co-infection in SCC suggests that EBV infection is incriminated in cervical cancer progression. This could be taken into account as bad prognosis in this type of cancer. However, the mode of action in dual infection in cervical oncogenesis needs further investigation.
KeywordsHuman papillomavirus Epstein-Barr virus Cervical cancer Uterine cervix Confection
Cervical cancer is the second most prevalent cancer among the Algerian women. The association between human papilomavirus (HPV) and cervical neoplasia is well documented . High risk oncogenic HPV types (including HPV 16 and HPV 18) are associated with 99.7% of all low-grade cervical (CIN-1 or mild CIN) and high grade intraepithelial lesions (CIN-2/3) and hence, they play an important role in cervical cancer development. Now, and since 1976, it is well recognized that HPV infections in the cervix are frequently associated with intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) with all their different histological variants (large-cell keratinizing, large-cell non-keratinizing and small-cell carcinoma).
The long period of time (years) it takes for the development of cervical cancer after HPV infection suggests the involvement of other etiologies (such as viruses or cell compounds) in malignancy process. The synergistic effect of carcinogenic factors such as two or more viruses interacting at different stages of tumor development has been reported [2–4]. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), ubiquitous human gamma-herpes virus responsible for mononucleosis , could be one of the ‘helper’ viruses. It can be sexually transmitted  and replicates in cervix cells . EBV infection, widely spread among the population [7, 8], has been associated with an increasing number of lymphocytic and epithelial cancers, mainly Burkitt’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, T cell lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and gastric adenocarcinoma [9, 10].
BARF1 is one of the EBV-encoded proteins secreted in the serum of NPC patients  and expressed in more than 90% of NPC biopsies [12–15] and tumor epithelial cells of EBV-associated gastric carcinoma . It has a malignant transforming activity in rodent fibroblasts  and in EBV-negative human B cells . LMP1, another EBV oncogene candidate essential for B cell immortalization , was present in 30 to 50% of NPC biopsies . This oncogene can activate a number of cellular key genes such as NFκB and EGFR [17, 19]. LMP-1 can inhibit cell differentiation when transfected into epithelial cells .
Tseng et al.  reported a high incidence of EBV in lymphoepithelial like-carcinoma (LELC) patients but did not show any association with HPV. These findings are in contradiction with what has been previously reported [21, 22]. Therefore, the oncogenic relationship between the two viruses remains not fully understood. Added to this, the presence of EBV in the cervix carcinoma remains equally a topic of great debate among virologists, confirmed by certain authors [2, 23, 24] but not by others [25, 26].
As it is well known EBV can transform cells bearing the EBV/C3d receptor making them receptive to other oncogenic stimuli . These receptors are widely detected on ecto- and endo-cervical biopsies of the uterine cervix [28–30]. EBV replicates in cervical epithelium and its possible role in cervical carcinoma development has been raised.
We looked, in this study, for the presence of both EBV and HPV DNA sequences in Algerian patients with SCC and cervical lesions. We examined the presence of EBV infection and the EBV-HPV co-infection. The presence of EBV in cervical cancer tissues suggests its possible involvement in the cervical cancer progression. Initially, PCR amplification was used to identify the co-infection. This was followed by an investigation on EBV oncogenes (BARF-1, LMP-1 and EBNA-1) expression using immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry. This expression would reflect the transformation mechanism of cervical cells.
Since EBV could play an important role in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma and Burkitt’s lymphoma highly frequent in Algeria, Our hypothesis was a possible co-infection by HPV and EBV in Algerian SCC and cervical lesions.
Detection of HR-HPV and EBV in SCC biopsies
PCR detection of HR-HPV and EBV in cervical lesions and in normal patients
Using PCR and HC2, 21 CIN-2/3 and 16 CIN-1 lesions and 14 normal tissue samples were investigated for HPV genome. The two methods showed a good correlation. 95% (20/21) CIN-2/3 cases were infected by HR-HPV compared to 40% (8/21) were co-infected with EBV. Among the 16 CIN-1 cases, HR-HPV was present in 75% (12/16) with 12.5% (2/16) of co-infections. The remaining twenty three EBV free cases (CIN-1 and CIN-2/3) were infected with either high or/and low risk HPV strains. Among the fourteen normal cervix samples, only two were HR-HPV positive and only one was co-infected (Figure 1).
Transcriptional and translational expression of EBV in SCC cases
Relationship between the detection of EBV oncoproteins (LMP-1 and BARF-1) and the presence of either or both HPV and EBV in malignant cervical biopsies
EBV and HPV genomes detection by PCR: 23 SCC
LMP-1 detection by RT-PCR
BARF-1 detected by Western blotting
14/23 HPV + EBV+
8/23 HPV + EBV-
Our findings point out that most patients with either SCC or cervical lesions are HR-HPV infected. To our surprise, EBV-HPV co-infection was detected in the majority (67%) of cervical carcinoma among the Algerian women involved in this study. The presence of EBV was found in 69% of cervical cancer biopsies, suggesting its possible association with the development of cervical cancer. This is in agreement with previous reports [2, 23, 24]. However, other researchers, using in situ hybridization, reported controversial results [31–33]. Furthermore, Sasagawa et al.  demonstrated, by RNA in situ hybridization, the presence of EBV and the expression of EBV genes, EBER-1, LMP-1 and EBNA-1, in cervical biopsies.
Using immunohistochemistry technique, to our knowledge, we are the first to detect EBV antigens in the cervix tissue. The difference in our results between the PCR method and protein detection has three possible explanations; (i) DNA amplification using PCR is a more sensitive technique than the detection of antigens using Immunohistochemistry or immunoblotting, (ii) EBV genome is present but its genes are not abundantly expressed in EBV-infected cells and (iii) a contamination by EBV-positive B lymphocytes infiltrating the connective tissue or EBV-positive normal cervical epithelium adjacent to the lesions. PCR results on their own merely indicate the presence of EBV in the cervix tissue but not necessarily in the epithelial cells.
Our data suggest that co-infection with EBV and HR-HPV may be of cervical significance in the ethiopathogenesis of uterine cervical cancer. However, few cells in cervical tissue were infected by EBV and harbor EBV LMP-1 protein (Figure 5). The expression of LMP-1 and EBNA-1 in SCC may lead to the destruction of cancer cells as they are targets for EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Such process has been reported in gastric  and Burkitt lymphomas . However, the cervix is histologically different from lymphoid tissues which are localized very far from the cervical epithelium by thick myometrial tissue of the cervix. The same situation has been observed in HPV infection where E6-E7 oncogenes are frequently expressed in cervical neoplastic lesions and which are equally targets for cytotoxic T lymphocyte response in patients with cervical neoplasia .
EBV DNA has been shown in the exfoliating cells . The virus could infect cultured ectocervical cells and express its late antigens suggesting an association between EBV replication and epithelial differentiation . Infectious EBV able to transform B lymphocytes has been isolated from cervical washes from women recovering from EBV mononucleosis infection or EBV-seropositive with no acute infection. Several studies showed that EBV infection is sexually transmitted targeting the uterine cervix [5, 36–38].
In this study, EBV latent genes were expressed in some squamous epithelia. The cervix might be a site for chronic EBV shedding in a similar manner to the nasopharynx. It is widely accepted that EBV infects B lymphocytes through CD-21 (EBV/C3d) receptor  which are equally present in cervix cells. The squamocolumnar junction of the cervix is the area where tissue repair and inflammation frequently occur, and where cervical malignancies associated with HPV infection develop. Similarly, chronic cervicitis also may help the EBV infection . The low rate of EBV infection in normal cervixes and in pre-cancer lesions compared with SCC cases of patients used in this study suggests that EBV may play a role in late cervical carcinogenesis. Further investigation is required to clarify whether the presence of EBV is a worse prognosis for the development of cervical cancer. EBV may be acting as a cofactor with another carcinogenic agent(s), possibly human papillomaviruses, in the final invasive cancer progression.
Preliminary presented results of EBV and HR-HPV co-infection in Irish, North American, Thailand and Japanese SCC cases were recently reported [2, 3]. In our hands we showed that most Algerian SCC patients were HPV-EBV co-infected. A lesser degree of co-infection was observed in pre-cancerous lesions of the cervix. A possible joint effect of the two viruses on cervix tumor development should be considered. Such hypothesis is strengthened by EBV oncogene expression. It is clear that the presence of EBV and its relationship with HPV in cervical oncogenesis need to be further investigated.
Materials and methods
DNA extraction and purification
Tissues were cut using sterile blades in a lysis buffer (10 mm Tris, pH 7.4, 50 mm EDTA, 150 mm NaCl, 1% sarcosyl) and treated with RNase A (10 mg/ml) for two hours at 37°C. DNA was obtained after proteinase K digestion, by phenol-chloroform extraction, ethanol precipitation and solubilized in 20 μl TE buffer (10 mm Tris–HCl, pH 8.0; 1 mm EDTA). DNA quantities and purity were assessed by spectroscopy.
Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2)
The HC2, a standardized US FDA-approved test has been employed to detect one or more of 13 carcinogenic HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59 and 68). This enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is based on a sandwich hybridization followed by a non-radioactive alkaline phosphatase reaction following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Polymerase chain reaction for detection of HPV DNA and β-globin
Specimens were subjected to PCR with general HPV primers using conventional L1 consensus primers, MY11 (GCMCAGGGWCATAAYAATGG) and MY09 (CGTCCMARRGGAWACTGATC). The assays were conducted according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Digene SHARP Signal™ System).
EBV-DNA identification by Southern blotting
As previously published by our group , EBV PCR was performed in 25 μl reaction mixture containing Taq polymerase buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.3; 50 mM KCl), 5 mM MgCl2, 200 mM of each deoxyribonucleic triphosphate, and 250 nM of each primer and 1 microgram of DNA sample. The whole BALF1 sequence was amplified from the DNA extracts using two primers: ALF1-S (GGGGATCCAATGAACCTGGCCATTGCTCTG) (upstream) at position 165,517 of EBV genome and ALF1-AS (CGGAATTCTTACAAAGATTTCAGGAAGTC) (downstream) at position 164,858. These primers permitted to amplify a fragment of 660 bp (the entire BALF-1 gene). Ten microliters of the amplified fragment were loaded onto 2% agarose gel, electrophoretically separated and revealed by ethidium bromide and then transferred onto reinforced nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Germany). Amplified fragment was detected by hybridization using 32P-labeled-BamH1-A probe prepared with a random primer DNA-labeling kit (Stratagene) . The hybridization was carried out in a modified solution described by Ausubel et al.  with 10 6 cpm/ml of the labeled BALF1 probe.
RNA was extracted from control and specimens with Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Total RNA was treated with DNase (amplification grade Deoxyribonuclease I, Invitrogen). Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was carried out as previously described . LMP-1 was amplified with primers 5′-CGGGATCCATGGAACGCGACCTTGAGAG and 5′-CGGGATCCCAACAGAAGAGACCTTCTCT.
Western blotting analysis (immunoblotting)
Biopsy tissues were cut using sterile blades in lysis buffer, RIPA (650 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 1% Triton, 0.5% and 0.1% SDS), and treated with antiprotease . The lysates were sonicated and stored at −80°C. Lysates were first adjusted to containing equal amounts of proteins (50 micrograms) measured by a Biorad protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) then diluted with one volume of gel sample buffer (0.2% Bromophenol blue, 4% SDS, 200 mM DTT (dithiothreitol), 20% glycerol, 125 mM Tris–HCl, pH 6.8) and boiled for 5 min. Protein samples were separated on 12% polyacrylamide denaturing gels and electrophoretically blotted onto reinforced nitrocellulose as previously described. After transfer, the filters were subsequently incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-BARF-1 (anti-Pep 2A) . The filters were then washed and incubated for 1–2 hours at room temperature with peroxidase labeled polyclonal anti-rabbit anti-human immunoglobulin as a secondary antibody. The antigen-antibody complexes were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (ECL; Amersham) as instructed by the manufacturer.
Cervix tissues were formalin fixed, dehydrated in alcohol and embedded in paraffin. Immunostaining was performed according to the streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex method, using monoclonal antibodies against HPV, LMP-1 and EBNA-1. Briefly, sections were cut to a thickness of 4 μm, mounted on silane-treated slides (Superfrost), and dried 1 hour at 60°C. All sections were then deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through alcohol, and washed in phosphate-buffered saline. This buffer was used for all subsequent washes. Sections for LMP-1, EBNA-1 and HPV detection were heated in a microwave oven twice for 5 min in citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Mouse monoclonal antibodies (at a dilution of 1:500) anti-LMP-1 (S12, BD Biosciences Pharmingen), and anti-EBNA-1 (sc-29; Santa Cruz; Germany) were used respectively as the primary antibody and incubated overnight at room temperature followed by a conventional streptavidin peroxidase method (DAKO, Denmark). Signals were developed with 3, 30-diaminobenzidine for 5 minutes and counter-stained with hematoxylin. The results were scored for the positive signals in tissue cells. The same samples were sectioned at 4 μm thickness and routine hematoxylin- and eosine-stained for histologic examination.
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
This work was financially supported by a grant from ATRSS (Agence Thématique de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé; grant code : 03/05/01/10/024 for A. Khenchouche), by a grant from “Agence National de la Recherche MIME programme for T. Ooka and by a grant from “Cooperation Inter-universitaire Franco-Algerienne” no. 05 MDU 663 for T. Ooka and A. Bouguermouh. The authors are grateful to Dr. J. Trouillas, Faculty of Medicine Laennec, University of Lyon-1 for the histological and immunohistochemistry technical assistance. We also thank M. Benboubetra of the Setif-1 University for critical reading and English correction of the text.
- Anderson L, O’Rorke M, Jamison J, Wilson R, Gavin A, HPV Working Group members: Prevalence of human papillomavirus in women attending cervical screening in the UK and Ireland: new data from Northern Ireland and a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2013, 85: 295-308. 10.1002/jmv.23459PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nichols W, Sutton K, Nelson N, Clark A, Oddo H, Love N, Hagensee M: Epstein-Barr virus as a Potential Biomarker for Cervical Dysplasia. In (Abstract) 27th International Papillomavirus Conference, Clinical Workshop. Berlin, Germany; 2011:14-15. (Abstract book 2, page 59). http://www.hpv2011.org/index1.asp?siteid=1&pageid=63Google Scholar
- Ekalaksananan T, Aromseree S, Pientong C, Sunthamala N, Swangphon P, Chaiwongkot A, Kongyingyoes B, Patarapadungkit N, Chumworathayee B: (Abstract), Co-infection of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) with High Risk Human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV) is a Significant Risk of Cervical Cancer. In 27th International Papillomavirus Conference and Clinical Workshop. Berlin, Germany; 2011:14-33. (Abstract book 2, page 68). http://www.hpv2011.org/index1.asp?siteid=1&pageid=63Google Scholar
- Silver MI, Paul P, Sowjanya P, Ramakrishna G, Vedantham H, Kalpana B, Shah KV, Gravitt PE: Shedding of Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus from the genital tract of women in a periurban community in Andhra Pradesh, India. J Clin Microbiol 2011, 49: 2435-2439. 10.1128/JCM.02206-10PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Naher H, Gissmann L, Freese UK, Petzoldt D, Helfric S: Subclinical Epstein- Barr virus infection of both the male and female genital tract: Indication for sexual transmission. J Invest Dermatol 1992, 98: 791-793. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12499958PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sixbey JW, Lemon SM, Pagano JS: A second site for Epstein- Barr virus shedding: the uterine cervix. Lancet 1986,2(8516):1122-1124.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ooka T, Sixbey JW: Epstein-Barr Virus Immunopathology. In Springer Seminars in Immunopathology. Vol. 13. Edited by: Ooka T, Sixbey JW. New York: Springer International; 1991:233-247.Google Scholar
- Rickinson AB, Kieff E: Epstein-Barr Virus. In Fields Virology. 4th edition. Edited by: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM, Chanock RM, Melnick JL, Monath TP, Roizman B, Strauss SE. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:2575-2627.Google Scholar
- Decaussin G, Sbih-Lammali F, De Turenne-Tessier M, Bouguermouh AM, Ooka T: Expression of BARF-1 gene encoded by Epstein-Barr Virus in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma biopsies. Cancer Res 2000, 60: 5584-5588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zur Hausen A, Brink AA, Craanen ME, Middeldorp J, Meijer CJ, Van Den Brule AJ: Unique transcription pattern of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in EBV-carrying gastric adenocarcinoma: expression of the transforming BARF-1 gene. Cancer Res 2000, 60: 2745-2748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Houali K, Wang X, Shimizu Y, Diennaoui D, Nicholls J, Nicholls J, Fiorini S, Bougermouh AM, Ooka T: Secreted Epstein-Barr virus-encoded LMP-1 and BARF-1 oncoproteins in serum and saliva of Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients -a new diagnostic marker. Clin Cancer Res 2003, 13: 4993-5000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uozaki H, Fukayama M: Epstein-Barr virus and gastric carcinoma - viral carcinogenesis through epigenetic mechanisms. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2008, 1: 198-216.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wei MX, De Turenne-Tessier M, Decaussin G, Benet G, Ooka T: Establishment of a monkey kidney epithelial cell line with the Epstein-Barr virus BARF-1 gene. Oncogene 1997, 14: 3073-3082. 10.1038/sj.onc.1201128PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sheng W, Decaussin G, Ligou A, Ooka T: Malignant transformation of EBV negative AKATA cells by introduction of BARF-1 gene encoded by Epstein-Barr virus. J Virol 2003, 77: 3859-3865. 10.1128/JVI.77.6.3859-3865.2003PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sbih-Lammali F, Berger F, Busson P, Ooka T: Expression of EBV DNAase in the tumor cells of nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Virology 1996, 222: 64-74. 10.1006/viro.1996.0398PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dolcetti R, Masucci MG: Epstein-Barr virus: induction and control of cell transformation. J Cell Physiol 2003,196(2):207-218. 10.1002/jcp.10263PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Millers WE, Mosialos G, Kieff E, Raab-Traub N: Epstein-Barr virus LMP-1 induction of the epidermal growth factor receptor is mediated through a TRAF signaling pathway distinct from NF-kappa B activation. J Virol 1997, 71: 586-594.Google Scholar
- Dawson CW, Eliopoulos AG, Blake SM, Barker R, Young LS: Identification of functional differences between prototype Epstein-Barr virus-encoded LMP-1 and a nasopharyngeal carcinoma-derived LMP-1 in human epithelial cells. Virology 2000, 272: 204-217. 10.1006/viro.2000.0344PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lavorgna A, Harhaj EW: EBV LMP-1: new and shared pathways to NF-κB activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109: 2188-2189. 10.1073/pnas.1121357109PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tseng CJ, Pao CC, Tseng LH, Chang CT, Lai CH, Soong YK, Hsueh S, Jyu-Jen H: Lymphoepithelial carcinoma like carcinoma of the uterine cervix: association with Epstein-Barr virus and human papillomavirus. Cancer 1997, 80: 91. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970701)80:1<91::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-APubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noel JC, Lespagnard L, Fayt I, Verhest A, Dargent JL: Evidence of human papillomavirus infection but lack of Epstein-Barr virus in lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of uterine cervix: report of two cases and review of the literature. Hum Pathol 2001, 32: 135-138. 10.1053/hupa.2001.20901PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bais AGT, Kooi ST, Teune TM, Patricia C, Ewing PC, Ansink AC: Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of the uterine cervix: absence of Epstein -Barr virus, but presence of a multiple human papillomavirus infection. Gynecol Oncol 2005, 97: 716-718. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.01.016PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Landers RJ, O’Leary JJ, Crowley M, Healy I, Annis P, Burke L, O’Brien D, Hogan J, Kealy WF, Lewis FA, Doyle CT: Epstein-Barr virus in normal, pre-malignant, and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix. J Clin Pathol 1993, 46: 931-935. 10.1136/jcp.46.10.931PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sasagawa T, Shimakage M, Nakamura M, Sakaike J, Ishikawa H, Aki IM: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genes expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer: a comparative study with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Hum Pathol 2000, 31: 318-326. 10.1016/S0046-8177(00)80245-2PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weinberg E, Hoisington S, Eastman AY, Rice DK, Malfetano J, Ross JS: Uterine cervical lymphoepithelial-like carcinoma: absence of Epstein-Barr virus genomes. Am J Clin Pathol 1993, 99: 195-199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Oliveira DE, Monteiro FTA, De Melo AW, Moreira ARM, Alvarenga M, Bacchi CE: Lack of Epstein-Barr virus infection in cervical carcinomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999, 123: 1098-1100.Google Scholar
- Young LS, Dawson CW, Brown KW, Rickinson AB: Identification of a human epithelial cell surface protein sharing an epitope with the C3d/Epstein-Barr virus receptor molecule of B lymphocytes. Int J Cancer 1989, 43: 786-794. 10.1002/ijc.2910430508PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sixbey JW, Davis DS, Young LS, Hutt-Fletcher L, Tedder TF, Rickinson AB: Human epithelial cell expression of an Epstein-Barr virus receptor. J Gen Virol 1987, 68: 805-811. 10.1099/0022-1317-68-3-805PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Se Thoe SY, Wong KK, Pathmanathan R, Sam CK, Cheng HM, Prasad U: Elevated secretory IgA antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and pres ence of EBV DNA and EBV receptors in patients with cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1993, 50: 168-172. 10.1006/gyno.1993.1187PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang W, Jin S, Li J, Liang X, Ming L, Wang X, Shang M, Wu A, Sun J, Wang X, Zhang W, Liu Z: The infection of EBV for cervical epithelium. A new causative agent in the development of cervical carcinoma? Chin J Cancer Res 1992, 4: 23-29. 10.1007/BF02996398View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Taylor Y, Melvin WT, Sewell HF, Flannelly G, Walker F: Prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus in the cervix. J Clin Pathol 1994, 47: 92-93. 10.1136/jcp.47.1.92PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Payne S, Kernohan NM, Walker F: Absence of in situ hybridization evidence for latent- or lytic-phase Epstein-Barr virus infection of preinvasive squamous lesions of the cervix. J Pathol 1995, 176: 221-226. 10.1002/path.1711760303PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Leary JJ, Landers RJ, Crowley M, Healy I, Kealy WF, Hogan J, Cullinane C, Kelehan P, Doyle CT: Genotypic mapping of HPV and assessment of EBV prevalence in endocervical lesions. J Clin Pathol 1997, 50: 904-910. 10.1136/jcp.50.11.904PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Canche JC, López IR, Suárez NG, Acosta GC, Conde-Ferráez L, Cetina TC, Losa MR: High prevalence and low E6 genetic variability of human papillomavirus 58 in women with cervical cancer and precursor lesions in Southeast Mexico. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2010, 105: 144-148. 10.1590/S0074-02762010000200006PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Young LS, Sixbey JW: Epstein-Barr virus and epithelial cells: a possible role for the virus in the development of cervical carcinoma. Cancer Surv 1988, 7: 507-518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Voog E, Ricksten A, Stenglein M, Jonassen F, Ternesten A, Ryd W, Löwhagen GB: Are acetowhite lesions of the cervix correlated to the presence of Epstein-Barr virus DNA? Int J STD AIDS 1997, 8: 432-436. 10.1258/0956462971920488PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leigh R, Nyirjesy P: Genitourinary manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2009, 11: 449-456. 10.1007/s11908-009-0065-8PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ida K, Tokuda H, Kanaoka T, Kanzaki H, Noda Y, Yoshida O, Ito Y, Mori T: Epstein-Barr virus activating principle in husbands’ semen of cervical cancer patients. Am J Reprod Immunol 1991, 26: 89-92. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1991.tb00978.xPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cabras G, Decaussin G, Zeng Y, Djennaoui D, Melouli H, Broully P, Bouguermouh AM, Ooka T: Epstein-Barr virus encoded BALF1 gene is transcribed in Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines and in nasopharyngeal carcinoma’s biopsies. J Clin Virol 2005, 34: 26-34. 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.12.016PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.